A Seminar Report

On

GEO-THERMAL POWER PLANT

Submittedinpartialfulfillmentoftherequirementsforthedegreeof
Bachelor of Technology
In
Branch

SUBMITTED BY

SUVENDU PRASAD NAYAK

regn. No:2221305042
Under the Supervison of
Name of the supervisor
Mr. Jagnyadutta Nayak

KALAM INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

GOVINDAVIHAR, GOVINDAPUR
BERHAMPUR 2021-2025
1

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL
This is to certify that the dissertation work entitled “Geo Thermal Power Plant”,
being submitted by Suvendu Prasad Nayak (Regd. No. 2221305042) for the partial
fulllment of BACHELORE OF TECHNOLOGY in Electrical & Electronics branch
the KALAM INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY embodies the results of the work
carried out by him/her within the prescribed period under my guidance and
supervision during the academic session 2023. The matter presented in this
dissertation has been solely submitted by me and neither I have copied from
anywhere nor submitted by anybody in any other university.

Seminar Supervisor
H.O.D, Electrical&Electronic.)
1

DECLARATION

I, Suvendu Prasad Nayak of the student hereby declare that the

dissertation entitled “Geo Thermal Power Plant ”submitted by us in partial
fulfillment of the requirements of B. Tech. Electrical & Electronics is a record of
our bonafide work carried out by me under the guidance of Asst.Prof. Jagnyadutt
Nayak Department of Electric& Electronics Engineering, KIT, Berhampur.
The output of the work included in the report has not been submitted to any
other University / Institution for award of any degree or published by any person,
except us, in any form including electronic publication on the internet.

<SIGNATURE OF CANDIDATE>
1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all I would like to express my deep sense of gratitude to my seminar Supervisor
Jagnyadutta Nayak having been a constant source of encouragement and also for his
valuable guidance in each and every aspect of this project.
I would also thankful to Prof. (Dr).Pabitra Kumar Tripathy, Principal, KIT, for
encouraging me to complete this project report.
I am indebted to our HOD, Prof Narayan Tripathy, Department of Electrical and
Electronic engineering, KIT, Berhampur for her valuable suggestions in this regard.
I express my deep sense of gratitude to all the staff of KIT, Berhampur for supporting me and
help in successful completing my seminar Report.
It is my foremost duty to thank all my colleague and respondents who help me to complete my
work and collecting the questionnaires, without which this project could not
1

ABSTRACT

The paper gives an overview of the existing power plant technology. It addresses
various problems that have been encountered, and outlines countermeasures that
have been applied. Two main types of geothermal power plants are common, the
condensing power plant, using fluid from reservoirs with temperatures in the
range 200–20°C, and the binary fluid power plant using temperatures as low as
120°C. Also featured are the principal advantages appropriate to the utilisation of
geothermal resources for production of electricity.

The paper moreover touches upon some of the advantages accruable from the
integrated use of geothermal resources (using the same resource for electricity
production in cascade or parallel with production of hot water for alternative uses),
taking hybrid conversion as a case in point.

Also featured is a worldwide overview of the geothermal power plants by Bertani

(under the auspices of IGA in 2010). The survey categorises the power plants by
country, type of power conversion system used, and its role with respect to the
country’ total electricity generation and total power demand. Also addressed is the
actual geothermal electric power generation per continent relative to actual total
installed plant capacity. Finally the survey features the effect of resource
temperature on the power generation density. Also featured is a worldwide
overview of the geothermal power plants by Bertani (under the auspices of IGA in
2010). The survey categorises the power plants by country, giving the installed
capacity, annual electricity produced and number of units. Also addressed is the
worldwide distribution of geothermal power plants by plant type and the
distribution of unit capacity and turbine inlet pressure. Finally a survey presented
by Bartani in 2005 features the effect of resource temperature on the power
generation density. Environmental abatement measures, such as re-injection of
the spent (denuded of most of its thermal energy) geothermal fluid and methods of
minimising atmospheric
contamination by CO2 and H2S gases are also outlined, and so are the main
associated
technical problems.

1
 The paper closes with a comprehensive list of the parameters that should be
considered in designing a sustainable geothermal application scenario.

1. INTRODUCTION

The generation of electrical power using the thermal energy contained in the fluid circulating in deep
lying formations in geothermal areas is typically quite feasible in the fluid temperature range of 200°C to
320°C, which characterises so called high-temperature (high enthalpy) geothermal areas. Geothermal
fluid of this temperature is generally mined using current technology at resource depths between about
1200 m to 2500 –3000 m in Iceland and most other geothermal areas of the world, for instance the
USA, the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, New Zealand, Mexico, Kenya and El Salvador to name a few.

Geothermal energy is renewable, when measured relative to human age spans, and generally
categorised as such. It is environmentally benign (“reen” and has many advantages over other
renewable energy resources, such as hydro, wind, bioenergy and wave energy. The following are the
more important of these advantages:

· High degree of availability (>98% and 7500 operating hrs/annum common).

· Low land use.
· Low atmospheric pollution compared to fossil fuelled plants.
· Almost zero liquid pollution with re-injection of effluent liquid.
· Insignificant dependence on weather conditions.
· Comparatively low visual impact.

In compliance with current environmental, resource and economic sustainability principles it (Axelsson
et al., 2001, 2003, and 2005) is important to select technologies and operational systems for the highest
possible over all thermal efficiency for extracting the useful thermal energy, contained in the fluid,
before it is returned back to the reservoir. The advantage of adopting such policies is the reduced
number of production and injection wells required, less replacement drilling, higher level of
sustainability, and greater environmental benefits.
 The paper closes with a comprehensive list of the parameters that should be
considered in designing a sustainable geothermal application scenario.

1. INTRODUCTION

The generation of electrical power using the thermal energy contained in the fluid circulating in deep
lying formations in geothermal areas is typically quite feasible in the fluid temperature range of 200°C to
320°C, which characterises so called high-temperature (high enthalpy) geothermal areas. Geothermal
fluid of this temperature is generally mined using current technology at resource depths between about
1200 m to 2500 –3000 m in Iceland and most other geothermal areas of the world, for instance the
USA, the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, New Zealand, Mexico, Kenya and El Salvador to name a few.

Geothermal energy is renewable, when measured relative to human age spans, and generally
categorised as such. It is environmentally benign (“reen” and has many advantages over other
renewable energy resources, such as hydro, wind, bioenergy and wave energy. The following are the
more important of these advantages:

· High degree of availability (>98% and 7500 operating hrs/annum common).

In addition to the above three basic power conversion systems, there are in use, the so called hybrid
systems, which are in fact a combined system comprising two or more of the above basic types in
series and/or in parallel.

Condensing and back pressure type geothermal turbines are essentially low pressure machines
designed for operation at a range of inlet pressures ranging from about 20 –2 bar, and saturated steam.
They are generally manufactured in output module sizes of the following power ratings, i.e. 25 MW, 35
MW, 45 MW, 55 MW and 105 MW (the largest currently manufactured geothermal turbine unit is 117
MW). Binary type low/medium temperature units, whereof the Kalina Cycle or Organic Rankin Cycle type,
are
typically manufactured in smaller modular sizes, i.e. ranging between 1 MWe and 10 MWe in size. Larger
units specially tailored to a specific use are, however, available typically at a somewhat higher price.
2 Back pressure type systems
Back pressure type systems are the simplest of the above, least expensive and have the lowest overall
thermal efficiency. Currently they are largely used in multiple use applications (such as combined
electricity and hot water production), to provide temporary power during resource development, in the
mineral mining industry where energy efficiency has low priority, and most importantly as part of a
hybrid system. Their stand-alone scope of application covers the whole of the normally useful
geothermal resource temperature range, i.e. from about 320°C to some 200°C.
3 Condensing type systems
Condensing type systems are somewhat more complex in as much as they require a condenser, and gas
exhaust system. This is the most common type of power conversion system in use today. The turbine is
an expansion machine and the unit normally comprises two turbine sets arranged coaxially cheek to
cheek (hp end to hp end) to eliminate/minimise axial thrust. To improve its thermal efficiency and
flexibility, the unit is also available in a twin pressure configuration (say 7 bar/2 bar), where the lower
pressure (say 2 bar) steam is induced downstream of the third expansion stage. When these condensing
turbines are used in a co-generation scheme they may be fitted with extraction points to provide low
pressure steam to the district heating side. The hallmarks of the condensing system are long and
reliable service at reasonable over all thermal efficiency, and good load following capability. Their
stand-alone scope of application covers the high to medium (200–20°C) geothermal resource
temperature range.
4 Binary type systems
Binary type systems are of a quite different concept. The thermal energy of the geothermal fluid from
the production well field is transferred to a secondary fluid system via heat exchangers. The geothermal
fluid is thus isolated from the secondary fluid, which comprises a low boiling point carbohydrate (butane,
propane etc.) or specially designed low boiling point fluid, which complies with low ozone layer pollution
constraints, in the case of the Organic Rankin Cycle. In the case of the Kalina Cycle, the secondary or
motive liquid comprises water solution of ammonia. This heated secondary fluid thereupon becomes the
motive fluid driving the turbine/generator unit. The hallmark of the binary system is its ability to convert
low-temperature (120–90°C) geothermal energy to electric power albeit at a relatively low overall
thermal efficiency, and to isolate scaling, gas and erosion problems at an early point in the power
conversion cycle in a heat exchanger. The binary system is quite complex and maintenance intensive.
Typical geothermal back pressure, condensing, binary and hybrid systems are depicted in diagrams,
Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
FIGURE 1: Typical backpressure turbine/generator conversion system

FIGURE 2: Condensing type turbine/generator unit in combined utilisation

(courtesy Reykjavík Energy)
FIGURE 3: Kalina cycle converter (courtesy Xorka Ltd.)
FIGURE 4: Ormat type Organic Rankin cycle (courtesy Ormat Technologies Inc.)
 FIGURE 5: Condensing single and twin pressure t/g unit (courtesy Landsvirkjun,
Iceland)

FIGURE 6: Hybrid conversion system

5 Hybrid conversion system

The hybrid conversion system is a combined system, as said before, encompassing two or more of the
basic types in series and/or in parallel. Their hallmark is versatility, increased overall thermal efficiency,
improved load following capability, and ability to efficiently cover the medial (200–60°C) resource
temperature range (Tester, 2007). To illustrate the concept a hybrid configuration encompassing a
backpressure flashed steam turbine/generator unit and three binary units in series is depicted in Figure
4. Two of the binary units utilise the exhaust steam from the back pressure unit, and the remaining
binary t/g unit utilises the energy content of the separator fluid. The fluid effluent streams are then
combined for re- injection back into the geothermal reservoir, so maintaining sustainability of the
resource in a most elegant manner.

3. WORLD SURVEY ON GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANTS

Summary reports of the worldwide geothermal utilisation are presented at the World Geothermal
Congresses organized by the International Geothermal Association (IGA) every five years. In Table 1 the
electricity generation from geothermal resources in 2010 presented at the WGC 2010 in Bali, Indonesia,
is reproduced (Bertani, 2010). Figure 7 shows the installed capacity in MW and the total number of units
for each category from the same source, based on the standard plant classification. It shows that the
largest installed capacity corresponds to single-flash units.

TABLE 1: Geothermal power generation worldwide in 2010 (Bertani, 2010)

 Installed capacity Annual electricity produced Number of units
MWe GWh/year
Australia 1.1 0.5 2
Austria 1.4 3,8 3
China 24 150 8
Costa Rica 166 1,131 6
El Salvador 204 1,422 7
Ethiopia 7.3 10 2
France (Guadeloupe) 16 95 3
Germany 6.6 50 4
Guatemala 52 289 8
Iceland 575 4,597 25
Indonesia 1,197 9,600 22
Italy 843 5,520 33
Japan 536 3,064 20
Kenya 167 1,430 14
Mexico 958 7,047 37
New Zealand 628 4,055 33
Nicaragua 88 310 5
Papua New Guinea 56 450 6
Philippines 1,904 10,311 56
Portugal 29 175 5
Russia 82 441 11
Thailand 0.3 2 1
Turkey 82 490 5
USA 3,093 16,603 210
TOTAL 10,715 67,246 526
FIGURE 7: Worldwide distribution of geothermal power plants by plant type,
based on installed capacity (left) and number of units (right)
 FIGURE 8: Distribution of unit capacity (left) and turbine inlet pressure (right) in geothermal electricity
production worldwide (Japan Geothermal Energy Association, unpublished data sheets) Figure 8 shows
data from a worldwide survey made by the Japan Geothermal Energy Association in 2001. It shows the
distribution of unit capacity of geothermal power plants (left) and the distribution of inlet pressure of all
turbine units included in the survey (right). The sizes of 5, 20 and 55 MWe are clearly the most common,
although several

small units are in operation as well as a small number Table 3.

of much larger units. The inlet pressure lies generally TABLE 2: Effect of reservoir temperature on
in the range 6-8 bars, but also here a wide range of production indices. Hotter >250°C, and cooler
values is reported. <250°C. Values in the second and third column are
mean and standard deviations (Bertani, 2005)
Bertani’ paper from WGC-2005 gives calculated
values for power density (MWe/km)2 as well as the
number of productive wells per square kilometre; see

Index Hotter Cooler

Power density (MWe/km)2 7.8 ± 6.46.5 ± 5.2
Well density (Wells/km2) 1.9 ± 1.41.9 ± 1.6
Well productivity (MWe/well) 4.7 ± 3.34.2 ± 2.2

4. PREVAILING PROBLEM TYPES AND COUNTERMEASURES IN OPERATION OF

POWER PLANTS

Different parts of the surface components of power generation system have associated different problem
flora. It is therefore expedient to divide the system into the following seven principal portions:
 · Power house equipment: Comprising of turbine/generator unit complete with
condenser, gas exhaust system.
· Automatic control and communication system: Consisting of frequency
control,
servo valve control, computer system for data collection, resource and maintenance
· monitoring, internal and external communication etc.
Cooling system: Cooling water pumps, condensate pumps, fresh water (seawater)
· cooling, or cooling towers.
Particulate and/or droplet erosion: This is an erosion problem that is typically
associated with the parts of the system where the fluid is accelerated (e.g. in control
valves, turbine nozzles, etc.) and/or abruptly made change direction (e.g. via pipe
· bends,
T-fittings or wanes).
Heat exchangers: These are either of the plate or the tube and shell type. These are
· generally only used in binary and hybrid type conversion systems, and/or in integrated
systems.
Gas evacuation systems: High temperature geothermal fluid contains a significant
quantity of non-condensable gases (C02, N2, H2S, and others). These have to be
·
removed
for instance from the condensing plant for reasons of conversion efficiency. Some
·
countries require the gas to be cleaned of H2S or Hg to minimise atmospheric pollution.
Re-injection system: Comprising liquid effluent collection pipelines, injection pumps,
injection pipelines, injection wells and control system.
Chemical injection system: In order to reduce scaling of calcite in production wells
sometimes a scale inhibitor is injected through a capillary tubing down hole. Similar
injection is applied with caustic soda to neutralize acid wells to reduce the corrosivity.
Acid is used for pH modification in order to arrest the scaling of silica in waste water
The problemgoing
pHareastotypical
reinjection, forofcases
for each thesewhere the water
conversion is supersaturated.
components Chemical
are now outlined control
in turn eachofunder
its own chapter heading.
by caustic sodaItand
must, however,is be
of biofilms alsoemphasised thatcooling
applied to the the featured problems and counter
water (turbine
measures can only be addressed
condenser/cooling towers).in general terms because of their site and locality specific nature. A
locality specific case by case pre-engineering study is decidedly required in order to address this subject
matter in any detail.

4 Power house equipment

5 Turbine
The problems potentially associated with the turbine are scaling of the flow control valve and nozzles
(primarily in the stator inlet stage); stress corrosion of rotor blades; erosion of turbine (rotor and
stator) blades and turbine housing. The rate and seriousness of scaling in the turbine are directly
related to the steam cleanliness, i.e. the quantity and characteristics of separator “arry-over“ Thus the
operation and efficiency of the separator are of great importance to trouble free turbine operation.
Prolonged operation of the power plant off-design point also plays a significant role. Most of the
scaling takes place in the flow control valve and the first stator nozzle row. The effect of this scaling is:

· A significant drop-off in generating capacity as sufficient steam cannot enter the turbine,
and;

· Sluggish response to load demand variations.

This situation is easily monitored, since the build-up of scales causes the pressure in the steam chest
 between the control valve and the inlet nozzles to increase over time.

Significant turbine and control valve scaling is avoided by the adoption of careful flasher/separator plant
operating practices that minimise “arry-over“ and moreover selecting a high efficiency mist eliminator
by the power plant.

Significant scaling in turbine and control valve requires scheduled maintenance stops for inspection and
cleaning, every second or third year. Another means of reducing turbine cleaning frequency, is to inject
condensate into the inlet steam during plant operation and run the turbine at say 10% wetness for a
short period. This washes away nozzle scaling, in particular the calcite component thereof, and
simultaneously weakens the silica scale structure, which then tends to break off. This cleaning
technique if properly applied has been found to reduce the frequency of major turbine overhaul.

6 Generator

It must be pointed out here that high-temperature steam contains a significant amount of carbon dioxide
CO2 and some hydrogen sulphite H2S and the atmosphere in geothermal areas is thus permeated by
these
gases. All electrical equipment and apparatus contains a lot of cuprous or silver components, which are
highly susceptible to sulphite corrosion and thus have to be kept in an H2S free environment. This is
achieved by filtering the air entering the ventilation system and maintaining slight overpressure in the
control room and electrical control centres.
The power generator is either cooled by nitrogen gas or atmospheric air that has been cleaned of H2S by
passage through special active carbon filter banks.

7 Condenser

The steam-water mixture emitted from the turbine at outlet contains a significant amount of non
condensable gases comprising mainly CO2 (which is usually 95–8% of the total gas content), CH4 and
H2S,
and is thus highly acidic. Since most high-temperature geothermal resources are located in arid or semi-
arid areas far removed from significant freshwater (rivers, lakes) sources, the condenser cooling choices
are mostly limited to either atmospheric cooling towers or forced ventilation ones. The application of
evaporative cooling of the condensate results in the condensate containing dissolved oxygen in addition
to
the
to non-condensable gases, which make the condenser fluid highly corrosive and require the condenser
be clad on the inside with stainless steel; condensate pumps to be made of stainless steel, and all
condensate pipelines either of stainless steel or glass reinforced plastic. Addition of caustic soda is
A problem
required to sometimes encountered
adjust the pH within
in the cooling the condenser
tower is the water
circuit. Make-up deposition of almost pure
and blow-down sulphur
is also used on
to
walls and nozzles within the condenser. This scale deposition must be periodically cleaned by high
avoid
pressure water spraying etc.
accumulation of salts in the water caused by evaporation.
8 Automatic control and communication system
Modern power plants are fitted with a complex of automatic control apparatus, computers and various
forms of communication hardware. These all have components of silver and cuprous compounds that
are
extremely sensitive to H2S corrosion. They are therefore housed inside “lean enclosures” i.e. airtight
enclosures that are supplied with atmospheric air under pressure higher than that of the

ambient atmospheric one and specially scrubbed of H2S. Entrance and exit from this enclosure is
through a clean air blow-through antechamber to prevent H2S ingress via those entering the enclosure.
A more recent
design is to clean all the air in all control rooms by special filtration and maintain overpressure.
Most other current carrying cables and bus bars are of aluminium to prevent H2S corrosion. Where copper
cables are used a field applied hot-tin coating is applied to all exposed ends.
9 Cooling tower system
10 Cooling tower and associated equipment
Most high-temperature geothermal resources are located in arid or semi-arid areas far removed from
significant freshwater (rivers, lakes) sources. This mostly limits condenser cooling choices to either
atmospheric cooling towers or forced ventilation ones. Freshwater cooling from a river is, however,
used for instance in New Zealand and seawater cooling from wells on Reykjanes, Iceland. In older
power plants the atmospheric versions and/or barometric ones, the large parabolic ones of concrete,
were most often chosen. Most frequently chosen for modern power plants is the forced ventilation
type because of environmental issues and local proneness to earth quakes. The modern forced
ventilation cooling towers are typically of wooden/plastic construction comprising several parallel
cooling cells erected on top of a lined concrete condensate pond. The ventilation fans are normally
vertical, reversible flow type and the cooling water pumped onto a platform at the top of the tower
fitted with a large number of nozzles, through which the hot condensate drips in counter- flow to the
airflow onto and through the filling material in the tower and thence into the condensate pond,
whence the cooled condensate is sucked by the condenser vacuum back into the condenser. To
minimise scaling and corrosion effects the condensate is neutralised through pH control, principally
via addition of sodium carbonate.
Three types of problems are found to be associated with the cooling towers, i.e.

· Icing problems in cold areas.

· Sand blown onto the tower in sandy and arid areas.
· Clogging up by sulphitephylic bacteria.

The first mentioned is countered by reversing the airflow cell by cell in rotation whilst operating thus
melting off any icing and snow collecting on the tower. The second problem requires frequent cleaning
of nozzles and condensate pond. The last mentioned is quite bothersome. It is most commonly
alleviated by periodic application of bacteria killing chemicals, and cleaning of cooling tower nozzles
by water jetting. The sludge accumulation in the condensate pond, however, is removed during
scheduled maintenance stops. A secondary problem is the deposition of almost pure sulphur on walls
and other surfaces within the condenser. It must be periodically cleaned by high pressure water
spraying etc., which must be carried out during scheduled turbine stops.

11 Condenser pumping system

The condensate pumps must, as recounted previously, be made of highly corrosion resistant materials, and
have high suction head capabilities. They are mostly trouble free in operation.
The condensate pipes must also be made of highly corrosion resistant materials and all joints efficiently
sealed to keep atmospheric air ingress to a minimum, bearing in mind that such pipes are all

in a vacuum environment. Any air leakage increases the load on the gas evacuation system and thus the
ancillary power consumption of the power plant.

12 Particulate/droplet erosion and countermeasures

Geothermal production wells in many steam dominated reservoir have entrapped in the well flow minute
solids particles (dust), which because of the prevailing high flow velocities may cause particulate erosion
in the well head and downstream of it. Such erosion in the well head may, in extreme cases, cause
damage of consequence to wellhead valves, and wellhead and fittings, particularly in T-fittings and
sharp bends in the fluid collection pipelines. This is, however, generally not the case and such damage
mostly quite insignificant. It is, however, always a good practice to use fairly large radius pipe bends to
minimise any such erosion effects.
Droplet erosion is largely confined to the turbine rotor and housing. At exit from the second or the third
expansion stage the steam becomes wet and condensate droplets tend to form in and after the
expansion nozzles. Wetness of 10% to 12% is not uncommon in the last stages. The rotor blades have
furthermore reached a size where the blade tip speeds become considerable and the condensate
droplets hit the blade edges causing erosion. The condensate water which has become acidic from the
dissolved non condensable gas attaches to the blades and is thrown against the housing. This water has
the potential to cause erosion problems. The most effective countermeasures are to fit the blade edges
of the last two stages with carbide inserts (Stellite) that is resistant to the droplet impingement and the
housing with suitable flow groves that reduce the condensate flow and thereby potential erosion
damage.
In addition to the erosion the blades and rotor are susceptible to stress corrosion in the H2S
environment inside the turbine housing. The most effective countermeasure is to exercise great care in
selecting rotor,
expansion nozzle and rotor blade material that is resistant to hydrogen sulphite corrosion cracking. The
generally most effective materials for the purpose are high chromium steels.
13 Heat exchangers
In high-temperature power generation applications heat exchangers are generally not used on the well
fluid. Their use is generally confined to ancillary uses such as heating, etc. using the dry steam. In
cogeneration plants such as the simultaneous production of hot water and electricity, their use is
universal. The exhaust from a back pressure turbine or tap-off steam from a process turbine is passed
as primary fluid through either a plate or a tube and shell type heat exchanger. The plate type heat
exchanger was much in favour in cogeneration plants in the seventies to nineties because of their
compactness and high efficiency. They were, however, found to be rather heavy in maintenance. The
second drawback was that the high corrosion resistance plate materials required were only able to
withstand a relatively moderate pressure difference between primary and secondary heat exchanger
media. Thirdly the plate seals tended to degenerate fairly fast and stick tenaciously to the plates
making removal difficult without damaging the seals. The seals that were needed to withstand the
required temperature and pressure were also pricy and not always in stock with the suppliers. This has
led most plant operators to change over to and new plant designers to select the shell and tube
configurations, which demand less maintenance and are easily cleaned than the plate type though
requiring more room.

In low-temperature binary power plants shell and tube heat exchangers are used to transfer the heat
from the geothermal primary fluid to the secondary (binary) fluid. They are also used as condensers/and
or regenerators in the secondary system. In supercritical geothermal power generation situation it is
foreseen that shell and tube heat exchangers will be used to transfer the thermal energy of the
supercritical fluid to the production of clean steam to power the envisaged power conversion system.

In all instances it is very important to select tube and/or plate material in contact with the geothermal
fluid that will withstand the temperature, pressure and corrosion potential of the fluid. Some inconel,
titanium and duplex stainless steel alloys have given good service. It is also important to make space
allowance for tube withdrawal for maintenance and/or tube cleaning procedures. High pressure water-
jet cleaning has for instance proved its value.

Scaling will normally be present. Provisions should therefore be made timely for scale abatement such
as by hydrothermal operation or chemical scale inhibitor injection, and/or mechanical cleaning.
14 Gas evacuation system
As previously stated the geothermal steam contains a significant quantity of non-condensable gas (NCG)
or some 0.5% to 10% by weight of steam in the very worst case. To provide and maintain sufficient
vacuum in the condenser, the NCG plus any atmospheric air leakage into the condenser must be forcibly
exhausted. The following methods are typically adopted, viz.:

· The use of a single or two stage steam ejectors, economical for NCG content less than 1.5%
by weight of steam.
· The use of mechanical gas pumps, such as liquid ring vacuum pumps, which are
economical for high concentration of NCG.
 · The use of hybrid systems incorporating methods 1 and 2 in series.

The advantages of the ejector systems are the low maintenance, and high operational security of such
systems. The disadvantage is the significant pressure steam consumption, which otherwise would be
available for power production.

The advantages of the vacuum pumps are the high degree of evacuation possible. The disadvantage is
the electric ancillary power consumption, sensitivity to particulate debris in the condenser, and high
maintenance requirements.
To reduce the ambient level of H2S in the proximity of the power plant, the exhausted NCG is currently in
most countries discharged below the cooling tower ventilators to ensure a thorough mixing with the air
as
it is being blown high into the air and away from the power plant and its environs. In the USA and Italy
H2S abatement is mandatory by law, and in Italy also mercury (Hg) and thus require chemical type
abatement measures.
In some of the older Geysers field power plants the H2S rich condenser exhaust was passed through a
bed of iron and zinc oxide to remove the H2S. These proved a very messy way of getting rid of the H2S
and
were mostly abandoned after a few years. In a few instances the Stretford process and other equivalent
ones have been used upstream of the power plant to convert H2S gas into sulphur for industrial use. This
has proved expensive and complex and is not in use in other geothermal fields than the Geysers field in
California.
The main H2S abatement methods currently in use worldwide are (only some are currently used for
geothermal NCG):

· Claus (Selectox).
· Haldor Topsöe – WSA process.
· Shell-Paques Biological H2S removal process/THIOPAC.
· LO-CAT (wet scrubbing liquid redox system).
· Fe-Cl hybrid process.
· Aqueous NaOH absorbent process.
· Polar organic absorbent process.
· Photo catalytic generation process.

· Plasma chemical generation process.

· Thermal decomposition process.
· Membrane technology.

A study into feasible H2S abatement methods for the Nesjavellir Geothermal Project was carried out by
Matthíasdóttir (2006). Matthíasdóttir and Gunnarsson, from the Iceland Technology Institute, came to
the
conclusion that of the above listed methods the following four merited further study for Nesjavellir, i.e
the
Haldor Topsöe-WSA, THIOPAQ (with bacteria), LO-CAT and the Fe-Cl hybrid process.
15 Re-injection system
In most geothermal areas the geothermal fluid may be considered to be brine because of the typically
high chloride content. It may also contain some undesirable tracer elements that pose danger to
humans, fauna and flora. In considering the most convenient way of disposing of this liquid effluent
other than into effluent ponds on the surface, the idea of injecting the liquid effluent back into the
ground has been with the geothermal power industry for a long time (Stefánsson, 1997). Initially the
purpose of re-injection was simply to get rid of the liquid effluent in a more elegant way than dumping it
on the surface, into lakes or rivers, and even to the ocean. Many technical and economic drawbacks were
soon discovered. The more serious of these were the clogging up of injection wells, injection piping and
the formations close to the borehole; the cold
effluent migrated into the production zone so reducing the enthalpy of the well output with consequent
fall-off in power plant output. Injection into sandstone and other porous alluvial formations was and is
fraught with loss of injectivity problems that are still not fully understood.

Soon, however, it became generally understood and accepted that returning the effluent liquid back into
the reservoir had even greater additional benefits, viz.:

· Greatly reducing the rate of reservoir pressure and fluid yield decline.
· Improved extraction of the heat content contained within the reservoir formations.
· Reducing the fluid withdrawal effect on surface manifestations, e.g. hot pools, steam vents etc.

All the above items serve to maintain resource sustainability and are thus of significant environmental
benefit. Re-injection should be considered an integral part of any modern, sustainable and
environmentally friendly geothermal utilization, both as a method of effluent water disposal and to
counteract pressure draw-down by providing artificial water recharge (Stefánsson, 1997). Re-injection
is essential for sustainable utilization of virtually closed and limited recharge geothermal systems.
Cooling of production wells, which is one of the dangers associated with re-injection, can be minimised
through careful testing and research. Tracer testing, combined with comprehensive interpretation, is
probably the most important tool for this purpose. Many different methods have and are still being
tried to overcome these technical problems mentioned above such as the use of settling tanks that
promote polymerisation of the silica molecules and settling in the tanks prior to injection; injection of
the effluent liquid directly from the separators at temperatures in the range of 145–60°C, so called “ot
injection” both to avoid contact with atmospheric air and to hinder scaling in the injection system;
controlling the pH of the effluent commensurate with reduction in the rate of silica/calcite precipitation
using acids and add condensate from the plant to dilute the silica in the brine, to name a few. The
danger of production well cooling can be minimised through careful testing and research. Tracer
testing, combined with comprehensive interpretation, is probably the most important tool for this
purpose. One way to delay the effects of

cooling is also to locate the re-injection wells far enough away from the production area, say 2 km.
Another way gaining popularity is to inject deep into the reservoir, even where there is small
permeability, by pumping at high pressures (60–00 bar).

Surface disposal contravenes the environmental statutes of most countries and the use of settling tanks
has ceased mostly because of associated cost and complexity. The most commonly adopted injection
methods are the last two, i.e. hot re-injection and chemical pH control ones. The main disadvantage of
the hot re- injection technique is the lowered overall thermal efficiency and the consequent greater fluid
production (more wells to yield the same power output) required. The main disadvantage of the pH
control scheme is the very large acid consumption (cost) and uncertainties regarding its long-term
effects. Hot re-injection is precluded in low-temperature power generation and the most common
technique is to make use of the reverse solubility of calcite in water by operating the conversion system
at a pressure level
above the CO2 bubble point and only reduce the pressure once the fluid temperature has attained a level
low enough to prevent calcite dissipation prior to re-injection.

5. POWER PLANT DESIGN PARAMETERS

The most important power plant design parameters are:

· Resource
1. Steam conditions: Optimum turbine inlet steam pressure. Gas (% NCG) in steam.
2. Size (thickness and areal extent), and long term capacity, and natural recharge.
3. Temperature and pressure of deep resource fluid.
4. Chemical composition (liquid and gas phase) of deep fluid.
5. Geology, stratigraphy, lithology and geothermal reservoir properties (faults, fractures,
formation porosity, mineral alteration types and age, type of permeability).
6. Reservoir permeability.
 7. Thickness of production/injection zones.
8. Well productivity/injectivity.
9. Two phase zones.
10. Reservoir response to production/injection.
11. Natural state modelling, computer simulation of reservoir, and model predictions.
12. Reservoir monitoring and management.
· Accessibility
1. Topography of resource area.
2. Remoteness from population centres.
3. Closeness to nature parks and environmentally restricted areas.
· Market
1. Size, type and security of market.
2. Proximity of market.
3. Accessibility to existing power transmission lines, substations.
· Permits etc.
1. Resource concessions.
2. Exploration permits.
3. Drilling permits.
4. Development permits.
5. Environmental Impact Assessment.
6. Building and other permits.
· Pre and post investment studies, business plan

All the above parameters are important to the development plan, production and injection well drilling
and well design. They are no less important in the selection of power plant type, siting of power station,
production and injection well siting arrangement (well spacing, etc.), production and injection well
numbers etc. It also plays a key-role in planning development increment size and timing. Early
information of resource fluid liquid and gas phase chemical composition is extremely important since it
affects most component design, materials selection, types of components selected etc.

REFERENCES

Bertani R., 2005: World geothermal power generation in the period 2001–005.
Geothermics, 34, 651–90.

Axelsson G., Á. Gudmundsson, B. Steingrímsson, G. Pálmason, H. Ármannsson, H. Tulinius, Ó.G.

Flóvenz, S. Björnsson and V. Stefánsson, 2001: Sustainable production of geothermal energy:
suggested definition. IGA-News, Quarterly No. 43, 1–.

Axelsson G. and Stefánsson V., 2003: Sustainable management of geothermal resources. Proceedings:
International Geothermal Conference 2003, Reykjavík, September 2003, 9 p. Axelsson G., V. Stefánsson
and G. Björnsson, 2005a: Sustainable utilization of geothermal resources for 100–00 years.
Proceedings: World Geothermal Congress 2005, Antalya, Turkey, April 2005, 8 p. Tester J. W. et al.,
2007: The Future of Geothermal Energy. Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United
States in the 21st Century. MIT, Boston. http://geother-

mal.inel.gov/publications/future_of_geothermal_energy.pdf

Stefánsson V., 1997. Geothermal re-injection experience.

Geothermics, 26, 99–30.