E. Mounif - TTT Diagram of The Isothermal Crosslinking of An Epoxy-Amine System.
E. Mounif - TTT Diagram of The Isothermal Crosslinking of An Epoxy-Amine System.
ABSTRACT: Rotational molding is a new process for draw the TTT diagram. We have completed this diagram
thermosets, few research works have been done on this by adding the isoviscosity curves to determine the
subject. The goal of this study is to determine the optimal available domain for rotational molding. Ó 2008 Wiley Peri-
conditions (time, temperature, viscosity, etc) of this process odicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 108: 2908–2916, 2008
for an epoxy-amine system. The thermal and rheological
analysis help us to investigate the vitrification and the Key words: epoxy resin; TTT diagram; vitrification; gela-
gelation of the reactive system (DGEBA-DETDA) and to tion; rotational molding
d½E
¼ k1 ½A1 ½E k2 ½E½A2 (1)
dt
d½A1
¼ k1 ½E½A1 k1c K½A1 ½E½OH (2)
dt
d½A2
¼ k1 ½E½A1 þ k1c K½A1 ½E½OH k2 ½E½A2
dt
k2c K½A2 ½E½OH ð3Þ
d½OH
¼ k1 ½E½A1 þ k2 ½E½A2 þ 2k1c K½A1 ½E½OHþ
dt
2k2c K½A2 ½E½OH ð4Þ
d½EOH
¼ k1c K½A1 ½E½OH k2c K½E½A2 ½OH (5)
dt
Methods
Rheological analysis
Rheological properties are measured using an ARES
Rheometer from TA instrument equipped with
TABLE I
Initial Estimate and Intervals for the Kinetic Parameters
Minimum Maximum
Initial accepted accepted
Kinetic parameter estimate value value
k1 (kg mol21 min21) 0.1 1028 1
k1c (kg2 mol22 min21) 0.1 1028 1 Scheme 3 Chemical structures of prepolymer and hard-
r 0.25 1028 0.5 ener. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue,
which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
TABLE III
Kinetics Parameters of the Crosslinking Reaction
Between DGEBA and DETDA at 1308C and 1408C Cure
Temperature
1308C 1408C
21 21 24
k1 (kg mol min ) 1.6 3 10 7.6 3 1024
k2 (kg mol21 min21 ) 4.8 3 1025 2.6 3 1024
k1c (kg2 mol22 min21) 7.0 3 1023 1.1 3 1022
k2c (kg2 mol22 min21) 2.0 3 1023 3.8 3 1023
r 0.29 0.35
Vitrification
Figure 7 Glass transition temperature as a function of
When the increasing Tg value approaches the iso- DSC conversion ratio. Experimental results (Y) and Di
thermal cure temperature, the molecular mobility is Benedetto fit (—). [Color figure can be viewed in the
strongly reduced and the reaction becomes diffusion online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.
com.]
controlled and eventually breaks off. The variation
of the glass transition temperature (Tg) versus the for partly cured sample (Figs. 9 and 10). The same
crosslinking ratio, determined by DSC (x-DSC) is value for the pregel viscosity is founded and values
found to follow Di Benedetto equation: diverge only in the vicinity of the gel point because
of nonlinear effects of the built up network. The
lðTg1 Tg0 Þx
Tg ¼ Tg0 þ ; rheological behavior of different epoxy-amine reac-
1 ð1 lÞx tive systems in terms of scaling laws is studied in
details in literature.33–35 In our case we focused our
With k ¼ ðDC1 p =DCp Þ heat capacity change ratio. It is
0
interest on two essential phenomena: gelation and
measured through the glass transition for uncured vitrification.
and fully cured system by DSC. The measured value
of k 5 0.27 is different from that found by O’Brien
and White7 (i.e., k 5 0.392) but it is in good agree- Gelation
ment with the best fit obtained parameter (k 5 0.28) The gel point was obtained by considering the time
(Fig. 7). Until the gel point, the glass transition tem- to reach a value independent of the frequency (Fig.
perature Tg is smaller than the curing temperature 11), using multi-frequency experiments. One must
Tcure, which means that the gelation takes place
before the vitrification. The curve of Tg 5 f(x) is a
good tool to get the time to vitrification and to estab-
lish finally the vitrification curve (see TTT diagram).
Rheological analysis
The measurement of the rheological properties is
done using auto strain mode. The strain increases at
the beginning of the crosslinking till its maximum
allowed value and decreases at gel point to avoid
the breaking of the formed network (Fig. 8). To ver-
ify the linear viscoelasticity of the system and to see
the influence of this mode on the rheological proper-
ties, we have carried out a dynamic strain sweeps
TABLE IV
Activation Energies as Estimated from NIR Measurement
for Catalytic and Noncatalytic Mechanisms
k1 k2 k1c k2c Figure 8 Experimental curves of the real part of dynamic
ln A) 55 61 13 19 viscosity h0 (~), and strain g_ (&) versus time during
Ea (kJ mol21) 213 237 61 85 isothermal crosslinking of the DGEBA-DETDA reactive
system.
with the gel time. The Arrhenius plot of the gel times
pay attention to the minimal frequency value (fmin) listed in the Table V is shown in Figure 12.
which can be used; this value depends on the curing
temperature (Tcure). In fact, at every frequency, the E
tgel ¼ AeRT
reaction rate has to be low during measurements.
We considered the condition proposed by Izuka where Ea is the activation energy, T is the absolute
et al.36: (1/G*) (@ G*/@ t) (2p/x) < 0.1. In our case, temperature of reaction, and R is the universal
the gel times measured by different rheological crite- gas constant. The activation energy of the reaction is
ria are almost the same. The gel times of the DGEBA- equal to 60 kJ mol21, which is a reasonable value
DETDA system for several isothermal conditions are compared with the one of bisphenol A type epoxy
summarized in Table V. Measuring the gel time at resin and aromatic amine compounds.37 When com-
higher temperatures is inaccurate because the temper- paring the gel point as measured by the parallel
ature stabilization time is considerable compared plate rheometry for different temperatures, we found
that the critical conversion ratio as measured by
DSC was about x 5 0.70 which is different from
the theoretic critical value calculated by Flory rela-
tionship. In the case of our system [tetra functional
hardener (diamine) 1(bi functional epoxy)], the
calculated critical value xgel is equal to 0.58. The
main reason for this is the difference in reactivity
(substitution effect delays the gel point38) between
primary and secondary amines groups.
TABLE V
Figure 10 Dynamic viscosity of reactive system measured Gel Times for Different Isothermal Cure Temperatures
by strain sweeps at various times of the crosslinking. The Curing temperature (8C) 120 130 135 140 150
different parts of Figure 9 were connected considering the Gel time (min) 100 63 46 42 29
elapsed curing time.
CONCLUSIONS
The kinetic parameters of a DGEBA-DETDA thermo-
set crosslinking are identified. A catalytic and nonca-
talytic mechanism is considered for modeling the
evolution of epoxy and amine conversion ratios ver-
sus time. The gelation of the reactive system is stud-
ied in isothermal curing conditions. The gel time is
determined as a congruency in the time evolution of
the tan d curves obtained at different frequencies.
The variation of glass transition temperature versus
conversion ratio is found to be in a good agreement
with Di Benedetto equation. Finally the TTT diagram
is established coupling the thermal and rheological
measurements.
Our next work is to couple these interfered phe-
nomena: chemical reaction and heat conduction to
predict the flow of the reactive fluid.
Figure 12 Arhennius plot of gel times.
References
linking proceeds until gelation (end of polymer 1. Harkin-Jones, E.; Crawford, R. Adv Polym Technol 1996, 15,
flow and polymer processing) without being dis- 71.
turbed by the vitrification phenomenon. We verified 2. Corrigan, N.; Harkin-Jones, E.; Brown, E.; Coates, P. D.; Craw-
the thermal stability of the isothermally formed net- ford, R. J. Plast Rubber Compos 2004, 33, 37.
3. Marcilla, A.; García, J. C.; Ruiz, R.; Sánchez, S.; Vargas, C.;
work by TGA measurement: The onset of thermal Pita, L.; Beltrán, M. I. Int Polym Process 2005, 20, 47.
degradation is far away from gelation and vitrifica- 4. Tcharkhtchi, A.; Verdu, J. Adv Eng Mater 2004, 6, 983.
tion times. 5. Pascault, J. P.; Sautereau, H.; Verdu, J.; Williams, R. In Ther-
In the case of reactive rotational molding, the mosetting Polymer; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2002.
processing is controlled by the viscosity variation 6. Liu, H.; Uhlherr, A.; Varley, R. J.; Bannister, M. K. J Polym Sci
Part A: Polym Chem 2004, 42, 3143.
during the crosslinking. For that reason, we overlay 7. Miller, D. R.; Macosko, C. W. Macromolecules 1980, 13, 1063.
the curve of isoviscosity on the TTT diagram 8. Halley, P. J.; Mackay, M. E.; George, G. A. High Perform
(Fig. 13). The suitable interval of viscosity for rota- Polym 1994, 6, 405.
tional molding depends on other processing parame- 9. Pascault, J. P.; Williams, R. J. J. S. Polym Bull 1990, 24, 115.
ters39 like the mold dimensions and the rotation rate 10. Enns, J. B.; Gillham, J. K. J Appl Polym Sci 1983, 28, 2567.
11. De Miranda, M. I. G.; Samios, D. Eur Polym J 1997, 33, 325.
to achieve a stationary stable flow (rimming flow) 12. Núñez, L.; Fraga, F.; Castro, A.; Núñez, M. R.; Villanueva, M.
before the gelation. Polymer (Guildford) 2001, 42, 3581.
13. Blanco, M.; Corcuera, M. A.; Riccardi, C. C.; Mondragon, I.
Polymer 2005, 46, 7989.
14. Smith, I. T. Polymer 1961, 2, 95.
15. Horie, K.; Hiura, H. J Polym Sci Part A-1: Polym Chem 1970,
8, 1357.
16. Flammersheim, H. J. Thermochim Acta 1998, 310, 153.
17. Rozenberg, B. A. Epoxy Resins and Composites II; Springer-
Verlag: Berlin, 1986; p 113.
18. Mezzenga, R.; Boogh, L.; Månson, J. A. E.; Pettersson, B. Mac-
romolecules 2000, 33, 4373.
19. Vinnik, R. M.; Roznyatovsky, V. A. J Therm Anal Calorim
2003, 74, 29.
20. Matejka, L. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 3611.
21. Ramos, J. A.; Pagani, N.; Riccardi, C. C.; Borrajo, J.; Goyanes,
S. N.; Mondragon, I. Polymer 2005, 46, 3323.
22. Paz-Abuin, S.; Pellin, M. P.; Paz-Pazos, M.; Quintela, A. L.
Polymer 1997, 38, 3795.
23. Flammersheim, H. J. Opfermann, J. Thermochim Acta 1999,
337, 141.
24. Deng, Y.; Martin, G. C. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 5147.
25. Prolongo, S.; Mikes, F.; Cabanelas, J.; Paz-Abuin, S.; Baselga, J.
J Mater Process Technol 2003, 143, 546.
Figure 13 Time-Temperature-Transformation diagram 26. Wise, C.; Cook, W.; Goodwin, A. Polymer 1997, 38, 3251.
with isoviscosity curves 500 (^), 0.1 (l), 10 (^) Pa s. Vit- 27. Swier, S.; Assche, G. V.; Mele, B. V. Thermochim Acta 2004,
rification (~), gelation (3). 411, 149.
28. Lagarias, J. C.; Reeds, J. A.; Wright, M. H.; Wright, P. E. SIAM 34. Eloundou, J. P.; Gerard, J. F.; Harran, D.; Pascault, J. P. Macro-
J Optim 1998, 9, 112. molecules 1996, 29, 6917.
29. Poisson, N.; Lachenal, G.; Sautereau, H. Vib Spectrosc 1996, 12, 237. 35. Eloundou, J. P.; Ayina, O.; Ngamveng, J. N. Eur Polym J 1998,
30. Naffakh, M.; Dumon, M.; Dupuy, J.; Gérard, J. F. J Appl Polym 34, 1331.
Sci 2005, 96, 660. 36. Izuka, A.; Winter, H. H.; Hashimoto, T. Macromolecules 1994,
31. O’Brien, D. J.; Mather, P. T.; White, S. R. J Compos Mater 27, 6883.
2001, 35, 883. 37. Ishii, Y.; Ryan, A. J. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 158.
32. O’Brien, D. J.; White, S. R. Polym Eng Sci 2003, 43, 863. 38. Miller, D. R.; Macosko, C. W. Macromolecules 1980, 13,
33. Eloundou, J. P.; Feve, M.; Gerard, J. F.; Harran, D.; Pascault, 1063.
J. P. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 6907. 39. Throne, J. L.; Gianchandani, J. Polym Eng Sci 1980, 20, 899.