Scribd
Upload
8 views5 pages

REEADO 4v1

Uploaded by

Vernon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
8 views5 pages

REEADO 4v1

Uploaded by

Vernon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

A Derivation of the Quantum Mechanical

Momentum Operator in the Position


Representation
Ryan D. Reece
September 23, 2006

Abstract
I show that the momentum operator in quantum mechanics, in
the position representation, commonly known to be a derivative with
respect to a spacial x-coordinate, can be derived by identifying mo-
mentum as the generator of space translations.

1 Translation Operator
Given an eigenstate of position |~xi, with eigenvalue x, we define a Transla-
tion Operator, T (~a), which transforms an eigenstate of position to another
eigenstate of position, with the eigenvalue increased by ~a.

T (~a) |~xi ≡ |~x + ~ai (1)

By the following argument, we note that the adjoint of T (~a) moves a state
backward. It transforms an eigenstate of position to another eigenstate of
position, with the eigenvalue decreased by ~a.

h~x0 | T (~a) | ~xi = h~x0 | ~x + ~ai (2)


= δ((~x + ~a) − ~x0 ) (3)
= δ(~x − (~x0 − ~a)) (4)
= h~x0 − ~a | ~xi (5)

⇒ h~x0 | T (~a) = h~x0 − ~a| (6)

1
T † (~a) |~x0 i = |~x0 − ~ai (7)
Note that if we translate forwards by some amount, it is the same as trans-
lating backwards by negative that amount.

T (~a) = T † (−~a) (8)

If we translate a state forwards and then backwards by the same amount,


the state remains unchanged. This implies that the translation operator is
unitary.
T † (~a) T (~a) |~xi = |~xi (9)
⇒ T † (~a) = T −1 (~a) (10)
Any unitary operator can be written as
~
T (~a) = e−iK·~a (11)

1 = T † (~a) T (~a) (12)


~ † ·~a
iK ~ a
−iK·~
= e e (13)
~ † −K)·~
i(K ~ a
= e (14)
~ =K
⇒ K ~† (15)
Where evidently, K ~ must be hermitian. In general, when writing a unitary
~ are known as the generators of what ever
operator this way, the operators K
unitary operator one is expressing, in this case: translation.

2 ~
Eigenstates of K
~ which are also eigenstates of T (~a), |~ki.
Let us call the eigenstates of K,
~
~ |~ki = ~k |~ki
K and T (~a) |~ki = e−ik·~a |~ki (16)

Let us consider the position projection of the translation operator acting


on an eigenstate of translation. Letting the translation operator, operate to
the right, we have
~
h~x|T (~a)|~ki = e−ik·~a h~x|~ki (17)
−i~k·~a
= e ψ~k (~x) (18)

2
where we have defined the wavefunction to be
ψ~k (~x) = h~x|~ki (19)
Now consider the same projection, replacing T (~a) with T † (−~a), and let-
ting it operate to the left.
h~x|T (~a)|~ki = h~x|T † (−~a)|~ki (20)
= h~x − ~a|~ki (21)
= ψ~k (~x − ~a) (22)
Equating the two methods, we have
~
ψ~k (~x − ~a) = e−ik·~a ψ~k (~x) (23)
Letting ~x = 0, and ~a = −~y , we recognize that this gives plane wave solutions
for the wavefunction.
~
ψ~k (~y ) = ψ~k (0) eik·~y (24)
As hypothesized by de Broglie, and first experimentally verified by elec-
tron diffraction, a particle in an eigenstate of momentum has a wavefunction
with with a wavevector, ~k, related to its momentum p~ by
p~ = ~ ~k (25)
This means that the K~ operator that we have been discussing is indeed the
wavevector operator. We can now write the translation operator as
~
T (~a) = e−iP ·~a/~ (26)
Aside from the constant, ~, momentum is the generator of translation.

3 Matrix Elements of P~ in the |~xi Basis


For simplicity, let us now consider translation in only one dimension.
T (a) = e−iP a/~ (27)
The following clever manipulation reveals how to write the momentum op-
erator in terms of the translation operator.
∂ i
T (a) = − P (28)
∂a a=0 ~

3
∂
P = i~ T (a) (29)
∂a a=0
We should now ask what the matrix elements are of the momentum operator
in the position basis.

∂
hx0 | P | xi = i~ hx0 | T (a) | xi (30)
∂a a=0
∂
= i~ δ(x + a − x0 ) (31)
∂a a=0
= i~ δ 0 (x − x0 ) (32)

4 P~ Acting on a Wavefunction
We should now take a digression to investigate what is meaning of this deriva-
tive of a delta function, δ 0 (x). We integrate by parts, a δ 0 (x − y) acting on
some arbitrary function, f (x). Note that the boundary term is zero because
δ(x − y) is zero on the boundary, provided a boundary of integration is not
at position y.
Z Z
δ (x − y) f (x) dx = 0 − δ(x − y) f 0 (x) dx
0
(33)
= −f 0 (y) (34)

Evidently, the derivative of a delta function is sort of a tool for evaluating


the derivative of some function at a certain point.
Now we may ask how we can represent the momentum operator in the
position basis. Because the number of states in the position basis are un-
countably infinite, a matrix representation would be awkward. We see by
the following argument that there is a much more elegant way of writing the
momentum operator.
Consider the momentum operator acting on the wavefunction of some

4
state state |ψi.

P ψ(x) = hx | P | ψi (35)
Z
= hx|P |x0 i hx0 |ψi dx0 (36)
Z
= i~ δ 0 (x0 − x) ψ(x0 ) dx0 (37)
∂ψ(x0 )
= −i~ (38)
∂x0 x0 =x
∂ψ(x)
= −i~ (39)
∂x
∂
∴ P → −i~ (40)
∂x

You might also like