Part 1 Carection File
Part 1 Carection File
BY
MS. PATEL KHUSHBU NATHUBHAI
BY
MS. PATEL KHUSHBU NATHUBHAI
HOSPITAL AT
SURAT.
BY
MS. PATEL KHUSHBU NATHUBHAI
HOSPITAL AT
SURAT.
I thank God for making all these wonderful things happen to me and pray for his continued
blessing and success.
MY HUSBAND: I am very grateful for being my back bond who always supporting me
throughout my study and research. Thank you very much for always believing in me and
motivating me in my tough time. I LOVE YOU THE MOST.
MY FAMILY: Thank you to my family for believing in me; for allowing me to further my
studies. Please do not ever doubt my dedication and love towards you.
It is my sincere thanks to our beloved principal, Mr. JEENATH JUSTIN DOSS. K, Ph.D.,
PGDCA, for his constant guidance, motivation, encouragement and support throughout the
study.
I am highly obliged the dynamic due, eminent personality Vice-principal, MR. SUNEESH P.M
M.Sc. (N), HOD, Department Medical Surgical Nursing, for his valuable suggestion, guidance,
support and encouragement to achieve this goal.
The present study has been accomplished under the expert guidance & supervision of and my
Guide MRS. SUDESHNA BANRJEE, (Assistant professor, HOD, Fundamental of nursing,
SAION), I would like to show immense gratitude for her valuable suggestions, guidance,
support and encouragement to achieve this goal. I consider it as a great honour and
privilege to have completed under her supervision. I am truly thankful for her continuous
support as it wouldn’ t has been possible to complete my study without her guidance.
Excellent teachers is a complex matrix of builder, artis, leader and harvester. I would like to
express my immense gratitude and whole hearted thanks to. MS. MITAL JAGATIYA., M.Sc.
(N), Department of medical surgical nursing, for their insisting support, constructive suggestions
and immense encouragement which enable us to reach my objectives. I consider it as a great
honor and privilege to have completed under their supervision. I would like to thanks for their
continuous support as it wouldn’t have possible to complete my study without their guidance.
I have immense pleasure in thanking
DR.J.P. SONAVALE, M.B.B.S., M., S.F.M.A.S.F.L.A.G.E.S. GENERAL &LAPAROSCOPIC
SURGEON who kindly consented to shoulder the most difficult task of our performance and for
his expert guidance and valuable suggestions, encouragement keen interest in the conception,
planning and execution of the study. I wish to extend my sincere thanks to head of department,
Doctors and staff of vibrant multispecialty hospital Surat, who offered timely support and
guidance in conducting the study.
I proudly and honestly express our deep sincere thanks and gratitude to, to MR. FRANCIS,
M.Sc.(N), ASSISTANT PROFFESOR, HOD OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, MS.
MITAL JAGATIYA, M.Sc.(N) TUTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL SURGICAL
NURSING, MS. TWINKLE VORA, M.Sc.(N) TUTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD
HEALTH NURSING, MS. CHANDANI APARNATHI ,M.Sc.(N) TUTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL SURGICAL NURSING, MRS MANSI MEHTA, M.Sc.
(N) TUTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, MS. JANKI
MARADIYA, M.Sc.(N) TUTOR, DEPARTMENT OF OBSTETRICS AND
GYNAECOLOGY, MR. PARTH BHANUGARIYA, M.Sc.(N) TUTOR, DEPARTMENT
OF COOMUNITY HEALTH NURSING, for their illuminating comments, patience and
intuitiveness and untiring interest shown throughout the study. They showed us different
ways to approach research.
I would like to thank my family members – GRAND PARENTS, PARENTS, BROTHERS,
and all my special friends, for their love, support, constant prayer and encouragements with
forbearance during the entire period of my study.
I would like to acknowledge and thank our college for allowing me to conduct my research and
providing any assistance requested special thanks goes to the members of staff for their continued
support. Their excitement and willingness to provide feedback made the completion of this
research an enjoyable experience.
With Regards,
The improvement of knowledge regarding Revised trauma score and its impact on prognosis of
patient with multiple injury in ICU has an important play in enabling the Knowledge with a
view to develop information booklet as an independence nursing intervention. The objective
of the study is to evaluate the knowledge levels among staff nurses.
The research design adopted was descriptive study in that pre- test post-test. The conceptual
framework for this study was based on Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1968) general system theory.
The study had been conducted in vibrant multispecialty hospital Surat.
Purposive sampling technique had been adopted to select the desired samples. The sample size
was 60. As a part of intervention, a view to developing information book let on knowledge
regarding revised trauma score and its impact on prognosis of patient with multiple injury in ICU
staff nurses 30 minutes and the data was collected by information booklet on the revised trauma
score with structured of questionnaires will be developed to assess the level of knowledge
regarding Revised trauma score.
The data were analysed by using both descriptive and inferential statistical method paired ‘t’ test
was used to evaluating the effectiveness of an information booklet on knowledge regarding
Revised trauma score. The obtained value 9.39, which shows highly significant at the level
of 0.001 their findings of the study revealed, that distribution of booklet was effective in
improving knowledge regarding Revised trauma score and prognosis of patients with multiple
injury in ICU. There is significant association between demographic variables such as age,
knowledge, from, previous. Source of information, previous experience of any educational
section, previous knowledge about trauma care.
OBJECTIVE
1. To assess the knowledge levels among ICU staff nurses regarding the Revised Trauma score
and its impact on the prognosis of patients with multiple injuries in ICU.
4. To find out association between selected demographic variables and post – test level of
knowledge of staff nurses regarding revised trauma score & its impact on prognosis of patient
with multiple injury in ICU.
HYPOTHESES
H1: There will be significant improvement in level of knowledge regarding revised trauma score
among nurses working in ICU.
H01: There will be no significant improvement in level of knowledge regarding revised trauma
score among nurses working in ICU.
H2: There will be no significant association between the demographic variables and pre – test
level of knowledge of revised trauma score among nurses working in ICU.
H02: There will be no significant association between the demographic variable and pre- test
level of knowledge of revised trauma score among working in ICU.
H3: There will be significant between the demographic variables and post- test level of
knowledge of revised trauma score among nurses working in ICU.
H03: There will be no significant association between the demographic variables and post- test
level of knowledge of revised trauma score among nurses working in ICU.
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH APPROCH
RESEARCH DESIGN
Pre experimental one group pre – test post - test research design
VARIABLES
Independent variable: Information booklet on knowledge regarding revised trauma
score
Dependent variable: knowledge regarding revised trauma score among staff nurses working in ICU.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
1.Findings related to assessment of pre and post – test level of knowledge level among staff nurse
working in ICU.
The finding of in pretest score of level knowledge shows that, 36 (60%) of staff nurses had
inadequate knowledge and 21 (35%) of them had moderate knowledge only. 3 (5%) of them had
adequate knowledge.
The finding of post test score level knowledge shows that, 5 (9%) of staff nurse had inadequate
knowledge and 10(17%) of them had moderate knowledge and only 45(75%) of them had
adequate knowledge.
2.Findings related to comparison of pre and posttest level of knowledge score among staff nurse
working in ICU.
The analysis revealed that the mean score was increased from 10.95 to 17.50 which showed a
marked difference of 6.55 respectively and the standard deviation was decreased from 5.33 to
4.35 after the administration of structured teaching programme. The paired’ “t” test value at, 9.39
was very highly significant at p<0.001 level. It indicates the effectiveness of structured teaching
programme on increasing the level of knowledge regarding revised trauma score and its impact
on prognosis of patient with multiple injury in ICU among staff nurses.
3.The finding related to association between the selected demographic variables and their mean
differed score on level of knowledge.
It is interesting to note that six variables significant association between knowledge score of staff
nurses working in ICU unit with knowledge as revealed by statical chi square test (>0.01).
CONCLUSION
The main conclusion of this present study is that most of the college students had inadequate and
moderately adequate level of knowledge in pre-test and they improved to moderately adequate
and adequate knowledge in post-test. This shows the imperative need to understand the purpose
of structured teaching programme regarding revised trauma score and its impact on prognosis of
patient with multiple injury in ICU among staff nurse.
TABLE OF CONTENT
SERIAL NO. CONTENT. PAGE NO.
INTRODUCTION
1
Background of study
5
Need for the study
9
Statement of the problem
9
Operational definition
9
Objectives
1. 10
Hypothesis
10
Assumption
10
Delimitation 12
Conceptual framework
LITRATURE REVIEW 18
• Studies related to knowledge 18
regarding revised trauma score.
2. • Studies related access impact of RTS 19
on prognosis in Trauma patient
• Study related access RTS and another 21
trauma score.
3. METHODOLOGY
• Schematic representation of 26
methodology
• Research approach 28
• Research design• Variables 28
• Setting of the study 28
• Population 29
• Sample 29
• Criteria for sample selection 29
•Inclusion criteria 29
• Exclusion criteria 29
• Sampling techniques 29
• Development of tool 29
• Description of tool 30
• Description of intervention 30
• Validation of tool 30
• Pilot study 31
• Data collection 32
procedure
• Data analysis plan
33
33
33
• Protection of human
rights
• Ethical clearance
35
DATA ANALYSIS &
INTERPRETATION 37
4. Analysis of demographic
variable 45
Analysis of knowledge score
DISSCUSSION, SUMMARY,
5. CONCLUSION, & 55
RECOMMENDATIONS
6. REFERENCES 64
7. APPENDIX
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE NUMBER
10 Master Sheet