In The Hon'Ble Court of - Delhi
In The Hon'Ble Court of - Delhi
DELHI
Sushant …PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
Neha …DEFENDANTS
PROFITS.
1. That the Plaintiff had been married to the Defendant i.e Neha. Their
marriage got disputed due to certain factors and the defendant i.e.
accommodation.
been paying the EMI of the said suit property. Documents Pertaining
defendant had stolen the keys of the said suit property in question
and was living there without the permission of the plaintiff who has
6. That the defendant clearly is liable for trespassing the said suit
7. That the cause of action first arose when the defendant went into
said suit property at first for living by stealing the keys of the said
8. That when the plaintiff countered the defendants, the defendant had
no reply.
9. That this caused a lot of mental agony and harassment for the
plaintiff.
evict the suit property and pay damages and that too without any
suit.
11. That cause of action for filling the present suit arose in favour
but they are still in the possession and had failed to vacate the
territorial jurisdiction of this Hon'ble court therefore this has got the
13. That the valuation of the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction
and court fee for the relief mandatory and permanent injunction is
________The requisite court fee is been affixed along with the plaint.
14. That this Hon'ble Court has got the pecuniary jurisdiction to
15. That present suit has been filed within the statutory period of
limitation.
PRAYER:-
The plaintiff therefore prays that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased
property and award future profits and award costs and such other
relief as the Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances
of the case.
Be pleased to consider,