EXP5 Total Carbohydrates
EXP5 Total Carbohydrates
chapter
Total Carbohydrate
by Phenol-Sulfuric Acid
Method
S.Suzanne Nielsen
Department of Food Science, Purdue University,
West Lafayette, IN, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
S.S. Nielsen, Food Analysis Laboratory Manual, Food Science Text Series, 137
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44127-6_14, © Springer International Publishing 2017
138 S.S. Nielsen
14.3 DATA AND CALCULATIONS (See Chap. 3 in this laboratory manual, Ci = initial
concentration; Cf = final concentration)
1. Summarize your procedures and results for all
standards and samples in the tables immedi- Ci = ( 49.57 mg glucose / 2 mL ) ´ ( 2000 mL / 1mL )
ately below. Use the data for the standard curve ´ ( 2 mL / 1mL ) = 99.14 mg / mL
samples in the first table to calculate the equa- = 99 .14 mg / mL
tion for the line, which is used to calculate the
concentrations in the original samples reported = 99.14 g / L
in the second table.
2. Construct a standard curve for your total carbo-
Standard Curve: hydrate determinations, expressed in terms of
glucose (A490 versus μg glucose/2 mL).
A490 A490
Sample identity msmt 1 msmt 2 Avg.
Determine the equation of the line for the stan-
dard curve.
Blank 3. Calculate the concentration of glucose in your
Std. 20 μg soft drink samples and beer samples, in terms
Std. 40 μg of (a) grams/liter and (b) g/12 fl. oz. (Note:
Std. 60 μg
29.56 mL/fl. oz.)
Std. 80 μg
4. Calculate the caloric content (based only on
Std. 100 μg
carbohydrate content) of your soft drink
samples and beer samples in term of
Samples: Cal/12 fl. oz.
Glucose
equivalent g Glucose/ Measured Nutrition label
A490 ug Dilution μg/mL, g/L, Sample 12 fl. oz. Cal/12 fl. oz. Cal/12 fl. oz.
Sample glucose/ scheme original original Soft drink
identity 2 mL sample sample
Regular
Soft drink,
reg. Diet
5. Plot the absorbance spectra obtained by mea- soft drinks (US Department of Agriculture
suring the absorbance between 450 and 550 nm. Nutrient Database for Standard Reference indi-
cates ca. 3 g carbohydrate/fl. oz.), how could
wave- 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 you have calculated the 2000-fold dilution was
length appropriate if you wanted to use 1 mL of diluted
soft drink in the assay. Show all calculations.
Abs.
5. How does your calculated value compare to the
caloric content on the food label? Do the round-
ing rules for Calories explain any differences?
14.4 QUESTIONS (See Metzger and Nielsen, 2017, Table 3.3). Does
the alcohol content (assume 4–5% alcohol at
1. What are the advantages, disadvantages, and
7 Cal/g) of beer explain any differences?
sources of error for this method to determine
6. Was it best to have read the absorbance for the
total carbohydrates?
standard curve and other samples at 490 nm?
2. Your lab technician performed the phenol-
Explain why a wavelength in this region is
H2SO4 analysis on food samples for total carbo-
appropriate for this reaction.
hydrates but the results showed low precision,
and the values seemed a little high. The techni-
Acknowledgment This laboratory was developed with
cian had used new test tubes (they had never
input from Dr Joseph Montecalvo, Jr., Department of Food
been used, and were taken right from the card- Science & Nutrition, California Polytechnic State University,
board box). What most likely caused these San Luis Obispo, California.
results? Why? Describe what happened.
3. If you started with a glucose standard solution
of 10-g glucose/liter, what dilution of this solu- RESOURCE MATERIALS
tion would be necessary such that you could
pipette 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, and 1.0 mL of the BeMiller JN (2017) Carbohydrate analysis, Ch. 19. In: Nielsen
diluted glucose standard solution into test tubes SS (ed) Food analysis, 5th edn. Springer, New York
and add water to 2 mL for the standard curve Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956)
tubes (20–100 μg/2 mL)? Show all calculations. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and
4. If you had not been told to do a 2000-fold dilu- related substances. Anal Chem 28: 350–356
Metzger LE, Nielsen SS (2017) Nutrition labeling. Ch. 3. In:
tion of a soft drink sample, and if you know the
Nielsen SS edn. Food analysis, 5th edn. Springer,
approximate carbohydrate content of regular
New York