Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Heliyon
journal homepage: www.cell.com/heliyon

Research article

Development of 3-phase fault detection, protection, and

automation application with the present of DG in AC power
system using GOOSE protocol
Zhongsheng Shi a, **, Zumrat Druzhinin b, c, *
a
Xinxiang Vocational and Technical College, Xinxiang, Henan, 453006, China
b
Tajik Technical University, Tajikistan
c
College of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Keywords: In this research work, a protection and automation solution is developed, encompassing SEL751
Protection relay and SEL751A protection relays that communicate through the IEC-61850 Generic Object-
GOOSE protocol Oriented Substation Event (GOOSE) protocol to deliver high-speed detection and clearance of a
IEC-61850
3-phase (3P) fault. The study case is a standard IEEE 13-bus grid including the main system
3-Phase fault detection
generator (G1), power lines, loads, distributed generation (DG), bus bars, and feeders, equipped
with protection relays for detecting over-current faults based on time and current. Two protection
relays, B1 in the main system and B2 on the DG side, are integrated with a GOOSE protocol
communication system. These settings are configured in such a way that, in the event of the main
system breaker being disconnected, the DG cannot be connected to the network, making it a
suitable setting for anti-islanding mode (AIM). The efficiency of the relay settings is tested by
subjecting the power grid to a 3P fault, by the selected Time-Overcurrent (TOC) U3 inverse curve.
Throughout the paper, the descriptions of the study, the grid, assumptions, settings calculations,
and analysis of results are systematically presented. For the verification of relay settings, the
performance of relays is practically tested and accurately analyzed in detail. The results obtained
indicate that the presented strategy is quite effective for the configuration, setting operation, and
coordination of relays for fast detection and communication through the GOOSE protocol.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

To improve the performance of the power grid, various methods are presented by researchers every day to increase efficiency,
optimization, reliability, resilience and network management [1,2]. In power systems, a protection relay plays a crucial role in
safeguarding electrical equipment and ensuring the reliability of the power supply. A protection relay is an advanced device designed
to monitor electrical parameters within a power system and initiate protective actions in the event of abnormal conditions or faults. Its

* Corresponding author. Tajik Technical University, Tajikistan.

** Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (Z. Shi), [email protected] (Z. Druzhinin).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27482
Received 10 July 2023; Received in revised form 28 February 2024; Accepted 29 February 2024
Available online 8 March 2024
2405-8440/© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

primary purpose is to detect and isolate faults swiftly to prevent damage to equipment, minimize downtime, and maintain the overall
integrity of the power system [3]. Overall, the key functions and characteristics of the protection relays in power systems can be
classified as following items [4,5]:

• Fault Detection: Protection relays continuously monitor parameters such as voltage, current, frequency, and phase angles. They
are capable of identifying abnormal conditions, including short circuits, overloads, and other faults.
• Quick Response: In the event of a detected fault, the protection relay must act swiftly to isolate the affected part of the system.
Rapid response helps prevent damage to equipment and minimizes the impact on the rest of the network.
• Selective Tripping: Protection relays are designed to selectively trip specific circuit breakers or disconnect specific components to
isolate the faulted area while keeping the rest of the system operational.
• Communication: Modern protection relays often feature communication capabilities, enabling them to exchange information with
other relays or control systems. This facilitates coordinated protection schemes and enhances overall system reliability.
• Diverse Protection Functions: Protection relays can be configured for various protection functions, such as overcurrent (OC)
protection, distance protection, differential protection, and others, depending on the specific requirements of the high-voltage
system.
• Adaptability: Protection relays are adaptable to different voltage levels and types of electrical systems, making them versatile
components in power distribution and transmission networks.
• Monitoring and Recording: Some protection relays are equipped with monitoring and recording capabilities, allowing operators
to analyze system events, track the performance of protective devices, and optimize system reliability.

Breakers or automatic switches fitted with protection relays are extensively employed to safeguard electrical circuits from the risks
of overload or short circuits, a common practice within the power grid. These devices require safeguarding due to the potential for
significant, irreparable damage and the risk of fire in the event of a fault occurring on a high-voltage line. Consequently, the necessity
for protection becomes paramount [6-7]. Relay protection serves as an indispensable component of power systems, tasked with the
crucial responsibility of identifying and isolating faults to prevent harm to equipment and ensure the stability of the system [8].
Traditional approaches to protection rely on the measurement of current and voltage to identify faults and initiate appropriate re­
sponses, such as tripping circuit breakers. These approaches predominantly hinge on extensive hardwiring between protection relays
and associated devices [9]. Various strategies for designing protection relays in power systems exist. For example, in a paper by
Ref. [10], the authors investigated Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) testing for SEL-351 protective relays in a sample distribution system
employing Real-Time Digital Simulator (RTDS). The study delves into relay settings calculations, configuration procedures, and fault
analyses, serving as a valuable resource for researchers engaged in HIL experimentation and enhancing comprehension applicable to
intricate power systems.
Each protective system integrates several protection relays, with some types described herein. Fault detection techniques in
overcurrent (O/C) relays encompass time-based, current-based, and current-time-based diagnoses. The overarching objective within
protection is to delineate the healthy segments of the system from the faulty ones [11], with further classification of error detection
methods provided in the subsequent paragraph.
Among the pivotal relays for transmission lines’ protection are O/C relays, tasked with identifying O/C conditions within the line
and mitigating associated faults. O/C relays are typically classified based on error detection methodologies and operating times. In
terms of fault detection, various relay types are typically incorporated [12,13], relays generally include the following types:

• Overcurrent
• Earth Fault (E/F)
• Directional Over Current
• Directional Earth Fault
• Sensitive Earth Fault
• Also, depending on the operating time, relays include the following types:
• Fixed Time Definite Time
• Inverse Time
• Instantaneous

In this paper, the implementation and performance analysis of a protection relay in a power network, comprising a transformer, bus
bar, and feeder, for detecting O/C errors based on time and current, are desired. This method is elucidated.

1.2. Detection of O/C relays based on current/time

In this method, the relays are adjusted so that the cutoff time decreases as the error current increases, meaning that higher currents
trigger quicker operating times. These relays are known as Inverse Definite Minimum Time (IDMT) relays [14]. IDMT relays operate
based on predefined inverse curves, including: 1- Standard Inverse (SI), 2- Very Inverse (VI), 3- Extremely Inverse (EI), 4- Definite Time
(DT).
Fig. 1 illustrates the inverse time-O/C performance curves of these relays. Additionally, O/C relays can detect ground faults. To
ensure proper operation, the relay’s input currents must align with the specified adjustment of the secondary current of the CT or

2
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

current transformer. If the relay’s input current is three-element, it can detect O/C errors; if it’s four-element, it is able to detect ground
errors [15]. For example, the ANSI code standard defines 51/50 for O/C (overcurrent) and 50 N/51 N for E/F (earth fault). The codes
50 and 50 N signify instantaneous operation of current relays, while 51 and 51 N denote delayed operation. During the inverse time
delay, higher currents lead to shorter trip times, while lower currents lead to longer trip times. These relays receive input from the CT
that is able to sample the current from the main line as well as transmitting it to the relay for analysis and operation [16].
In a power network, the protection of different parts of the network must be done through relays that are well coordinated for
timely error detection and isolation. The basic rule in relay coordination is to first use identical relays in a series protection
arrangement, as well as to ensure that the farthest relay from the power supply has a higher time setting than the upstream relay (relays
close to the power supply).

1.3. Introduction to GOOSE protocol

The GOOSE protocol is an essential component of the International Electrotechnical Commission’s (IEC) 61850 standard for
substation automation. It facilitates high-speed communication and enables the exchange of data between intelligent electronic de­
vices (IEDs) in a substation. GOOSE messages, transmitted over Ethernet networks, offer significant advantages over traditional
hardwiring, including faster response times, reduced wiring complexity, and increased flexibility in reconfiguring protection schemes
[16].
The GOOSE protocol operates based on a publisher-subscriber model, where an IED acting as a publisher sends GOOSE messages
containing event data to multiple subscribers (other IEDs or relays) within the substation. These messages are multicast and provide
real-time updates on system conditions, enabling synchronized actions among devices [18].

1.4. Integration of DG in AC power systems

DG systems, such as wind turbines and solar photovoltaic installations, are being increasingly integrated into AC power systems to
enhance sustainability and support decentralized generation [19,20]. However, the presence of DG introduces new challenges to
traditional protection schemes due to the bidirectional power flow, intermittent nature of renewable energy sources, and potential
fault current contributions from DG during faults [21,22].
To address these challenges, advanced fault detection, protection, and automation techniques need to be developed. The proposed
application aims to detect and mitigate 3-phase-to-ground faults in the presence of DG by utilizing the GOOSE protocol for fast and
coordinated protection actions [23,24].

1.5. Motivation and main contributions of the paper

• Rising Importance of Relay Protection: Given the critical role of relay protection systems in maintaining the integrity of electrical
power systems, the paper is motivated by the growing significance of developing advanced techniques to safeguard against faults.
• Challenges Posed by DG: The integration of DG in AC power systems introduces dynamic and complex challenges. The paper is
motivated to address these challenges by enhancing fault detection, protection, and automation methods.
• Focus on 3-Phase Fault Detection: The main contribution of the paper lies in its focus on the development of a 3-phase fault
detection, protection, and automation application. This targeted approach aims to address a specific aspect of system protection
crucial for reliable operation.

Fig. 1. Inverse time-O/C curves [17].

3
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

• Utilization of GOOSE Message Protocol: The paper contributes to the field by utilizing the GOOSE message protocol for commu­
nication. This choice emphasizes the need for effective data exchange and coordination among relays and IEDs.
• Validation through Comparison: The paper validates its proposed methodology by comparing calculated results with simulation
measurements. This contributes to establishing the reliability and accuracy of the developed application in real-world scenarios.
• Demonstrated Performance and Timely Response: The results showcase the application’s performance, demonstrating that
appropriate relay settings yield proportional and timely responses.
• Seamless Data Exchange with GOOSE Protocol: The successful and flawless performance of sending and receiving data through the
GOOSE protocol is highlighted as a key contribution. The absence of delays underscores the protocol’s efficiency in network
protection.
• Efficient Network Protection through Accurate Settings: The overall contribution of the paper lies in proposing a protection strategy
utilizing the GOOSE protocol, which efficiently provides network protection through precise settings and calculations.

In summary, the paper’s motivation stems from the need to address challenges posed by DG in power systems. Its primary
contribution lies in the development of specific 3-phase fault detection, protection, and automation applications, emphasizing the
utilization of the GOOSE protocol for effective communication and coordination among relays and IEDs. The validation, demonstrated
performance and efficiency of the proposed strategy further enhance its significance in the field of advanced power system protection.

1.6. Paper structure

The rest of this research work is categorized as follows: In Part 2, the methodology and implementation of relay protection are
presented. Part 3 contains the calculations of settings for relay protection, while Part 4 illustrates the results and test verification of the
case study, and then we will discuss about the obtained results in Part 5. Finally, the research paper is concluded in Part 6.

2. Methodology and implementation

2.1. Application of SEL-751(A) relay

The SEL 751(A) is classified as a versatile protective relay employed for safeguarding and managing power systems, including
feeder, transformer, and motor protection. Offering a wide array of functions, it encompasses OC, under-voltage, over-voltage, and
frequency protection, among others. This relay enhances control scheme flexibility by incorporating time and instantaneous OC,
under-voltage, overvoltage, and frequency elements through a breaker fault protection system [25]. The utilization of the SEL-751A
relay enables the design and configuration of SEL devices within IEC 61850 installations via the SEL QuickSet Software and Architect
application. The Architect application facilitates the documentation and configuration of IEC 61850 communications between SEL
devices and devices from various manufacturers.
Architect is instrumental in documenting and configuring IEC 61850 systems, encompassing GOOSE messages, Manufacturing
Message Specification (MMS), and Sampled Values for process bus and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA)

Fig. 2. The assumed IEEE 13 bus power grid for the setting of a fast bus-tripping system.

4
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

applications. The IEC 61850 GOOSE protocol offers an Ethernet-based solution for swift bus tripping that ensures interoperability with
relays from compliant sellers [26,27].

2.2. Problem definition

Given that the setting, configuration, and coordination of relays are contingent upon the network they protect, an initial
assumption is made, presuming the availability of a sample network for examination. Based on the functional requirements, including
the need for a DG resource to be connected to the system and the presence of an auto-reclose system on the feeder, the IEEE 13 bus
system is suitable for the application. The IEEE 13 bus system is commonly used for distribution system studies and includes a network
configuration with 13 buses. It allows for the representation of distribution feeders and the interconnection of distributed generation
resources. With the IEEE 13 bus system, we can model the main generator and distributed generation resources at appropriate bus
locations to conduct relay settings and protection and automation application studies. Additionally, the presence of a feeder with an
auto-reclose system aligns with your project requirements. Therefore, the IEEE 13 bus system provides a suitable network topology for
designing and testing the protection and automation application required for interconnecting a distributed generation resource to a
distribution feeder. Within this study, a main bus relay on the system side is utilized, establishing communication with the feeder relay
on the DG side. Our assumed power grid for the configuration of a rapid bus-tripping system is depicted in Fig. 2. The locations of 3-
phase fault to ground are given in this Figure.
G1 functions in bus 1 as the primary system generator, while G2 in bus 11 serves as the generator for the DG. The connection of DG
to the system is contingent upon the feeder being linked to the grid system at the sourcing station. The feeder is equipped with an auto-
reclose system, allowing it to reclose after a 3-s delay. This delay facilitates the restoration of service to other customers on the line if
the disconnection of generation from the system at B2 is confirmed. If the fault persists after the first reclose, the breaker is opened and
locked as a precautionary measure.
The primary system relay features a time-O/C curve to coordinate O/C with the DG relay. Additionally, it incorporates an
instantaneous O/C element with a time delay to swiftly clear the bus during faults. When a fault occurs in the power grid, both relays
detect the fault and transmit block signals to one another. Simultaneously, the relay transmits a GOOSE message, signaling to the other
relay that a fault has transpired in the power grid. Subsequently, the relay inhibits the operation of the definite-time O/C element and
continues timing on its time-O/C curve. At the time of occurring a fault, the main system relay transitions into its instantaneous curve
after a specified time, ensuring it is not blocked by the DG relay. This unique feature decreases folding time, consequently mitigating
the risk of arc flash and damaging equipment. In cases where only the main system relay identifies the fault, it promptly detects the
issue. Since no message is received from the DG relay, the main system relay promptly initiates a trip, swiftly disconnecting the main
breaker. This sophisticated coordination and communication between relays enhance the overall reliability and responsiveness of the
protective system, minimizing potential damage and ensuring a swift and efficient response to faults in the power grid.

2.3. Assumption

The project’s functional requirements are outlined as follows.

• The connection of the DG to the system is permissible only if the feeder is linked to the grid system at the sourcing station.
• The feeder is equipped with an auto-reclose system, which initiates reclosure only after a 3-second delay. This delay allows for the
restoration of service to other customers on the line if the disconnection of generation from the system at B2 is confirmed. If the fault
persists after the first reclosure, the breaker will be opened and locked as a precautionary measure.
• Location B1 is equipped with SEL751 relay, while location B2 has SEL751A relay.

The network values for setting both protection relays with instantaneous and inverse-time protective functions are specified as
follows.

• All voltages are assumed to be 1.00 per unit (p.u.).

• The main generator impedance is XSYS = 0.45 p.u. on bus 1.
• The DG impedance is XDG = 0.7 p.u. on bus 11, and the apparent power of DG is SDG = 3 MVA.
• The apparent power of load 1 on bus 9 is SL1 = 1 MW + 0.9 MVAR, and that of load 2 on bus 10 is SL2 = 1 MW + 0.7 MVAR.
• The base power and voltage values of the systems are set to 100 MVA and 25 kV, respectively. The system operates at 25 kV.
• All sequence impedances are equal, with positive sequence impedance for each device.

Table 1
Base values.
Type Value

SB 100 × 106 (V.A)

VB 25 × 103 (V)
IB 2.309 × 103 (A)
ZB 6.25(Ω)

5
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

Each relay will be equipped with a definite time O/C protective function and an inverse-time O/C function to safeguard the entire
length of the line. The base power of the system can be denoted as SB = 1.0 (p.u.). Based on the system’s assumptions, the base values of
apparent power, voltage, current, and impedance are given in Table 1. Furthermore, it is necessary to acquire the impedances of both
generators and all three segments of the line in Table 2. In order to calculate these values, there are equations related to them in Refs.
[28,29].
Where ZG1 and ZG2 represent the impedances of the main generator on bus 1 and DG on bus 11. ZL1, ZL2, and ZL3 are lines im­
pedances. To assess the performance of the relay settings and in alignment with the chosen TOC-U3 inverse curve, the system’s ability
to detect and clear a three-phase-to-ground fault close to the load side is tested. Additionally, one of the objectives of this research is to
investigate the influence of the IEC 61850 GOOSE message and communication link. To establish appropriate settings in the relays, the
values of the following elements must be determined: 51P1P (time O/C trip pickup), 51P1T (time O/C trip), VB001 (block. signal),
50P1P (max. phase O/C trip pickup), and 50P1T (max. phase O/C torque).

3. Strategy and calculations

In order to ensure rapid clearing of three-phase faults and design and implement a protection and automation strategy, it is essential
to establish the base values. It is required to have loads power in the complex format, as well as the impedances of loads, which are
obtained from equations (1)–(4).

SL1 = (1 − 0.9i) × 106 (VA) (1)

SL2 = (1 − 0.7i) × 106 (VA) (2)

VB 2
ZP1 = = (345.304 + 310.773i)(Ω) (3)
SL1

VB 2
ZP2 = = (419.463 + 293.624i)(Ω) (4)
SL2
The next step is to calculate the max. fault current of G1. The current seen by B1 using equation (5) is calculated.
VB ( )
IF P1 G1 = = 6.78 × 103 ∠ − 90◦ (A) (5)
ZG1 + ZL1

Where IF P1 G1 represents the fault current of the line supplied by G1. This amount needs to operate at least after 0.4 s. Additionally, the
fault at DG observed by the B1 relay should be calculated. To determine the current in this electrical circuit, obtaining the voltage with
equivalent impedances in series and parallel forms is necessary. Following this, we will have equation (6):
VB ( )( )
IF G2 G1 = ( ) = 3.506 × 103 ∠ − 52.997◦ A (6)
(ZG2 +ZL3 )×ZP2
+Z ×ZP1
(ZG2 +ZL3 )+ZP2 L2
ZG1 + ZL1 + ( )
(ZG2 +ZL3 )×ZP2
+Z +ZP1
(ZG2 +ZL3 )+ZP2 L2

Where IF G2 G1 represents the fault current seen by G1 when the fault is in front of G2. It is assumed that all loads are supplied from one
end. It is essential to ensure that there is no tripping on load, so calculating the largest served loads is necessary. Therefore, the amount
of power and current that should be provided by the main system generator G1 is obtained from equations (7) and (8) in succession.
VB ( )
SG1 load = SL1 + SL2 = = 2.5611 × 106 ∠ − 38.66◦ (VA) (7)
ZG1 + ZL1

SG1 load
IG1 load = √̅̅̅ = (59.15∠ − 38.66◦ )(A) (8)
3 × VB
The next step is to select the circuit transformer ratio (CTR). Usually, there are some standard CTRs to be used such as 20, 50, 100,
150, 200, 250, 300, 600, 800, 1000, and 1200 [30]. The nominal value of the CT secondary current must be below 1 A for normal load

Table 2
Impedances of the generators and lines.
Type Value

ZG1 2.813i(Ω)
ZG2 4.375(Ω)
ZL1 0.875i(Ω)
ZL2 1.5i(Ω)
ZL3 0.5i(Ω)

6
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

conditions and up to 20 A for fault conditions. A CTR value of 1000 is chosen for calculation purposes. With the selected CTR, the
current supplied by the main system generator G1 of CT can be calculated using Eq. (9).
IG1 load
IG1 load CT = = (0.059∠ − 38.66◦ )(A) (9)
CTR
Next, we need to calculate the pickup current of G1 measured by CT. Based on the setting, it can be between 2 and 3 times bigger
than the current load supplied by the main system generator G1. Based on the U3 (very inverse) curve given by the instruction manual
of the relay, it should be in an acceptable range. Therefore, equation (10) can be used:
Ipickup G1 = 2.5 × IG1 load CT = (0.148∠ − 38.66◦ )(A) (10)

Considering the CTR, the current seen by B1 in CT using equation (11).

IF P1 G1
IF P1 G1 CT = = (6.78∠ − 90◦ )(A) (11)
CTR
The multiple of the pickup value (M) needs to be obtained for G1. Based on the U3 curve given by the instruction manual of the
relay, it should be in an acceptable range. Therefore, the maximum amount of M can be calculated using equation (12):
|IF P1 G1 CT |
Mmax = ⃒⃒ ⃒ = 45.848 (12)
Ipickup G1 ⃒

As given earlier, the tripping time should be around 0.4 s (tp1 = 0.4). The Time Dial (TD) is set based on the next equation, which is
the lowest TD value available for special protection of the grid. Therefore, equation (13) is given.
tp1
TD = ( ) = 4.076 (13)
0.0963 + M3.88
max
2

Similarly, for fault at DG (G2) point, the tripping current at the secondary of the CT is given by equation (14):
IF G2 G1
IF G2 G1 CT = = (3.506∠ − 52.9971◦ )(A) (14)
CTR
Here, the amount of M should be calculated for G2. The minimum amount of M can be obtained from equation (15):
|IF G2 G1 CT |
Mmin = ⃒⃒ ⃒ = 23.709 (15)
Ipickup G1 ⃒

The tripping time at G2 as seen from G1 can be given as [equation (16)]:

( )
3.88
tp2 = TD × 0.0963 + 2
= 0.421 (16)
Mmin − 1
As can be seen, the difference between the two obtained amounts of tripping time (tp1-tp2) is 21 milliseconds which shows how fast
the rely trips at the faulty G2 location versus the G1 location which is a good number. To set the definite time O/C for fault at location
G1, the calculation of the current fault using equation (17) needs to be performed.
VB ( )
IF G1 = = 8.889 × 103 ∠ − 90◦ (A) (17)
ZG1
This current in the secondary of the CT will be [equation (18)]:
IF G1
IF G1 CT = = (8.889∠ − 90◦ )(A) (18)
CTR
It is assumed that the setting needs a 10% coefficient, so the current for element 50 of the relay works with no time delay using
equation (19):
I50 set = |IF P1 G1 CT × 1.1| = 7.458(A) (19)
The obtained values for elements 51 and 50 settings are given in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3
Obtained values for element 51 setting.
Type Value

CTR 1000
TD 4.076
I pickup 0.148
Curve U3

7
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

4. Results

The next step involves selecting testing values for the protecting relay operating characteristics. To evaluate the efficiency of the
relay settings, tests are conducted on relays in various states, in accordance with the selected U3 inverse curve. After loading the relay
settings and making sure the connection of two relays is correct and determining the test modes, we test the relays in the laboratory.
The time to complete the whole test is 4 s, the 3P fault occurs in the first 0.5 s. After 3 s and the line is cleared, the relay connects once to
the main network breaker and the DG breaker remains in disconnected (open) mode. Fig. 3 shows the result of the input and output
signals of the B1 relay. It should be noted that the fault occurs in 0.5 s and is cleared in 3.5 s and the grid is re-energized, so the total
time of the fault and power outage is 3 s. This information is displayed in the Human Machine Interface (HMI) after processing. HMI is
used to monitor, view, and adjust the parameters of industrial devices such as Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and inverters. HMI
is a monitor that can be programmed and with its help, we can change various parameters and control the system.
As shown in Fig. 3 in the current section, the current curve has normal operation for the first half second and there are no faults. In
0.5 s, when the 3P trip occurs, and the short-circuit current passes several times the nominal current, according to the pickup current
(I-Pickup) that is set in the relay settings, the B1 relay detects the fault and sends an OUT303 disconnection signal to the main system
breaker. This signal is also sent to the other relay B2 through a GOOSE message, which shows that the main breaker of the grid has been
disconnected (open).
Based on these results, it is shown that no signal from OUT302 is sent or displayed because this element sends and displays the close
or reclose signal of the breaker. Hence, there is no reclosing of the circuit breaker in 0.5. Element IN301 is an indicator and receiver of
the voltage of the main breaker, so it shows the close or open status of the main system breaker. After the inter-tripped of the breaker,
the voltage signal value changed from 1 to 0 zero in 0.5 s.
As can be seen from VB001 (blocking the signal), in the first 0.5 s, this element receives the communication signal that indicates the
close state of the DG breaker from relay B2 through the communication protocol and GOOSE message. After the trip, by opening the DG
breaker, the blocking signal is received from the breaker and changes from 1 to 0, which indicates the open status of the DG breaker.
Table 5 shows the results values of different elements for the B1 relay.
As can be seen from Table 5, 50P1P (max. phase O/C trip pickup), 50P1T (max. phase O/C torque), and 51P1P (time O/C trip
pickup) are asserted at 13:35:42:180. At the same time, element OUT303 asserted and sent an open signal. IN301 receives the open
signal from the main breaker with a 11-ms delay, which confirms the correct operation of the relay, and breaker. After a 15-ms delay,
elements OUT303 and VB001 are de-asserted which means the blocking signal is received from other relay B2.
After clearing the fault after 3 s, in 13:35:45:181, element OUT302 asserted which means the reclosing signal was sent to the main
system breaker with a 1-ms delay. In addition, element IN301 asserted which shows the reclosing signal is sent to the main breaker
with a 10-ms delay. Element OUT302 is de-asserted after 22 milliseconds that the main breaker is reclosed and the grid is powered.
Similarly, there are results of the test for relay B2.
Fig. 4 shows the result of the input and output signals of the B2 relay. It should be noted that the fault occurs in 0.5 s and is cleared in
3.5 s and the grid is re-energized, so the total time of the fault and power outage is 3 s.
As shown in Fig. 4 in the current section, the current curve has normal operation for the first half second and there are no faults.
When the fault signal is received by B2 from the main system relay B1, element OUT303 immediately sends an open signal to the DG
breaker. In addition, the breaker open signal of DG is sent to the main relay B1, which indicates that the DG breaker is disconnected.
This situation will be similar to when a fault has occurred separately in front of the B2 relay, and the B2 relay itself sees the fault. After 3
s and clearing the fault in the grid, even though the main breaker of the grid is closed, because the possibility of reclosing the DG
breaker is not defined in the logic, the DG breaker will not be closed. As a result, OUT302 has not sent any breaker close signal. Also,
element IN301 after opening and inter-tripping the breaker, by changing the signal from 1 to 0, shows that it received the trip signal
and was opened in 0.5 s and remained disconnected until the end of the test. The VB001 element receives the communication and
status of the corresponding relay B1. From the beginning of the test to the time of the fault in 0.5 s, it receives the connection status of
the main system breaker from B1 and the power of the grid through the GOOSE message. From 0.5 to 3.5 s, when the main system
breaker is opened due to the fault, B2 receives a 0 signal from the B1 relay. After clearing the fault and reclosing the main system
breaker in 3.5 s, it receives the closing signal again from relay B1. Table 6 shows the results values of different elements for the B2 relay.
As shown in Tables 6 and in 13:35:42:181, elements 50P1P (max. phase O/C trip pickup), 50P1T (max. phase O/C torque), and
51P1P (time O/C trip pickup), and OUT303 of B2 is asserted, which indicates the fast operation of the relay to receive the opening and
blocking signal. At this time the signal for opening the breaker of the DG is sent with 0.0 s delay. Also, element VB001 (block. signal) is
de-asserted with a 3-ms delay, and after 15 milliseconds, element IN301 is de-asserted; also, element OUT303 is de-asserted after 20-
ms delay which illustrates that the DG breaker signal is opened and has no voltage.
With clearing fault after 3 s, in 13:35:45:200, with a 20-ms delay VB001 is asserted, which confirms the correct operation of the
relay to receive communication signal through GOOSE message. This shows that the main system breaker is reclosed and working in

Table 4
Obtained values for element 50 setting.
Type Value

I_TRIP 7.458
Tdelay 0.0
Curve U3

8
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

Fig. 3. The result of the input and output signals of the B1 relay.

Table 5
The results values of different elements for the B1 relay.
B1 SER Records Date/TIME ITEM STATE

2024-02-16 13:35:42:180 50P1P Assert.

2024-02-16 13:35:42:180 50P1T Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42: 180 51P1P Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42: 180 OUT303 Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42: 191 IN301 Deassert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42:191 SV01 Deassert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42:195 OUT303 Deassert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42:195 VB001 Deassert.
2024-02-16 13:35:45:181 OUT302 Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:45:190 SV01 Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:45:190 IN301 Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:45:202 OUT302 Deassert.

normal condition. However, the DG breaker remains open. In order to illustrate the advantages of the proposed protection relay
approach, Table 7 provides a comparison of key aspects in relay testing vs. two simulation-based studies (references [31,32]).

5. Discussion

The primary focus of this paper revolves around creating and assessing a 3-phase fault detection, protection, and automation
system that utilizes the GOOSE message protocol. The aim is to tackle challenges arising from the growing integration of DG in AC
power systems and to ensure the dependable and efficient operation of relay protection systems. By comparing calculated results with
laboratory measurements, valuable insights into the relay protection system’s performance are gained. One significant observation is
the close correlation between experimental and calculated values, especially concerning critical parameters like pickup and trip times.
The successful de-assertion of element OUT302 after 22 milliseconds, corresponding to the main breaker’s reclosure and the resto­
ration of power to the grid, underscores the accuracy and reliability of the relay settings.

9
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

Fig. 4. The result of the input and output signals of the B2 relay.

Table 6
The results values of different elements for the B2 relay.
B2 SER Records Date/TIME ITEM STATE

2024-02-16 13:35:42:181 50P1P Assert.

2024-02-16 13:35:42:181 51P1P Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42:181 50P1T Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42:181 OUT303 Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42:184 SV01 Assert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42:185 VB001 Deassert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42:196 IN301 Deassert.
2024-02-16 13:35:42:201 OUT303 Deassert.
2024-02-16 13:35:45:201 VB001 Assert.

The study’s findings validate the effectiveness of the GOOSE message protocol for data transmission, emphasizing its precision and
seamless performance without noticeable delays. The precise relay data transfer achieved through the GOOSE protocol emerges as a
crucial factor contributing to the efficiency of the protection strategy. This underscores the potential of the proposed approach in
enhancing network protection in dynamic and complex electrical power systems.
The overall success of the relay protection system in the experimental setup, alongside the alignment between calculated and
measured values, suggests that the developed application can offer robust fault detection and protection in the presence of distributed
generation. The accurate settings and calculations, coupled with the reliable data transfer facilitated by the GOOSE protocol, enhance
the system’s overall reliability and effectiveness in ensuring the stability of AC power systems.

6. Conclusion

Relay protection systems are pivotal in ensuring the safety and reliability of electrical power systems by guarding against faults. As
DG becomes increasingly integrated into AC power systems, it becomes essential to develop advanced fault detection, protection, and
automation techniques capable of navigating these dynamic and intricate environments. This paper centers on crafting a 3-phase fault
detection, protection, and automation application utilizing the GOOSE message protocol. The study employs the IEEE 13-bus system,
which encompasses generators, power lines, loads, DG units, bus bars, and feeders, all outfitted with protection relays designed to
detect overcurrent (OC) faults based on time and current parameters. The main generator, DG, and loads are distributed across
different buses with varying line impedances. By comparing the calculated results with laboratory measurements, the study establishes
a correlation between the experimental performance and the relay settings, indicating a close alignment between the two sets of data.

10
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

Table 7
A comparison of key aspects in relay testing vs. simulation-based studies.
Criteria Reference [31] Reference [32] Advantages of the proposed
approach in this study

Experimental Setup Simulation environment with Microgrid system modeling using ETAP PowerStation Detailed relay testing in a
symmetrical sources and distance with fault analysis and protection logic laboratory setting simulating grid
protection relay implementation. configurations. states.
Fault Testing Simulation-based fault scenarios and Fault analysis in both grid-connected and islanded Rigorous relay testing with
validation of distance protection relay modes, considering various fault parameters. simulated faults and clear
model. presentation of relay response.
Equipment and Symmetrical sources, distance Microgrid system with HCPV solar, wind power, Focus on relay settings,
Systems protection relays, and real-time microturbines, and PCS 100 energy storage. connections, and HMI for
simulation in HYPERSIM. Protection logic configurations using Arcteq_F215 monitoring.
IEDs.
Communication Implementation of IEC 61850 modules Detection of operating modes using GOOSE messages Emphasis on communication
and Control for substation wiring reduction. and MMS, with detailed protection logic between relays using GOOSE
configurations. messages.
Results Validation of distance protection relay Comprehensive fault analysis, operating mode Detailed relay operation timing and
Presentation model with fault scenarios and real- detection, and protection logic configurations are signal states are presented in tables
time simulation results. presented in tables and figures. and figures.
Conclusion Emphasis on simulation-based distance A comprehensive study covering fault analysis, Focused on relay performance and
relay validation and fault scenarios. operating modes, and protection logic configurations fault testing in a laboratory
in a microgrid system. environment.

Notably, element OUT302 de-asserted after 22 milliseconds, coinciding with the reclosure of the main breaker and the restoration of
power to the grid. This demonstrates that the difference between the pickup and trip times in the calculations mirrors that observed in
the testing phase. The performance of data transmission using the GOOSE protocol is found to be accurate and seamless, devoid of any
discernible delays. The results underscore the efficacy of the presented protection strategy, facilitated by the GOOSE protocol’s ability
to transmit relay data accurately. Through precise settings and calculations, the protection strategy efficiently enhances network
protection in AC power systems.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhongsheng Shi: Validation, Software, Resources, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. Zumrat Druzhinin: Writing –
review & editing, Writing – original draft, Software, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to
influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1] N. Ghadimi, E. Yasoubi, E. Akbari, M.H. Sabzalian, H.A. Alkhazaleh, M. Ghadamyari, SqueezeNet for the Forecasting of the Energy Demand Using a Combined
Version of the Sewing Training-Based Optimization Algorithm, Heliyon, 2023.
[2] H. Takele, Distributed generation adverse impact on the distribution networks protection and its mitigation, Heliyon 8 (6) (2022) e15278.
[3] M. Ghiasi, Z. Wang, M. Mehrandezh, H.H. Alhelou, N. Ghadimi, A new fast bus tripping system design of protection relay in an AC power network, in: 2023 IEEE
IAS Global Conference on Emerging Technologies (GlobConET), IEEE, 2023 e15278.
[4] H.C. Kiliçkiran, İ. Şengör, H. Akdemir, B. Kekezoğlu, O. Erdinç, N.G. Paterakis, Power system protection with digital overcurrent relays: a review of non-
standard characteristics, Elec. Power Syst. Res. 164 (2018) 89–102.
[5] N. Rezaei, M.N. Uddin, An analytical review on state-of-the-art microgrid protective relaying and coordination techniques, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 57 (3) (2021)
2258–2273.
[6] M. Ghiasi, Detailed study, multi-objective optimization, and design of an AC-DC smart microgrid with hybrid renewable energy resources, Energy 169 (2019)
496–507, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.083.
[7] S.S. Heidary Yazdi, J. Milimonfared, S.H. Fathi, K. Rouzbehi, Optimal placement and control variable setting of power flow controllers in multi-terminal HVDC
grids for enhancing static security, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 102 (2018) 272–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.05.001.
[8] Hua Zhang, et al., Efficient design of energy microgrid management system: a promoted Remora optimization algorithm-based approach, Heliyon 10 (2024)
e15278.
[9] M. Ghiasi, N. Ghadimi, E. Ahmadinia, An analytical methodology for reliability assessment and failure analysis in distributed power system, SN Applied
Sciences, journal article 1 (1) (2018) e15278, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-018-0049-0.
[10] Min Zhang, et al., Improved chaos grasshopper optimizer and its application to HRES techno-economic evaluation, Heliyon 10 (2024) e15278.
[11] N. Ghadimi, M. Sedaghat, K.K. Azar, B. Arandian, G. Fathi, M. Ghadamyari, An innovative technique for optimization and sensitivity analysis of a PV/DG/BESS
based on converged Henry gas solubility optimizer: a case study, in: IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2023 e15278.

11
Z. Shi and Z. Druzhinin Heliyon 10 (2024) e27482

[12] E. Han, N. Ghadimi, Model identification of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells based on a hybrid convolutional neural network and extreme learning
machine optimized by improved honey badger algorithm, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 52 (2022) 102005.
[13] Le Chang, Zhixin Wu, Noradin Ghadimi, A new biomass-based hybrid energy system integrated with a flue gas condensation process and energy storage option:
an effort to mitigate environmental hazards, Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 177 (2023) 959–975.
[14] M. Singh, A. Agrawal, Voltage–current–time inverse-based protection coordination of photovoltaic power systems, IET Gener., Transm. Distrib. 13 (6) (2019)
794–804.
[15] Z. Yang, W. Liao, Q. Zhang, C. L. Bak and Z. Chen, "Fault Coordination Control for Converter-Interfaced Sources Compatible With Distance Protection During
Asymmetrical Faults," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 6941-6952, July 2023, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3204946.
[16] N. Ali, M. Eissa, Accelerating the protection schemes through IEC 61850 protocols, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 102 (2018) 189–200.
[17] M. Shabani, A. Karimi, A robust approach for coordination of directional overcurrent relays in active radial and meshed distribution networks considering
uncertainties, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems 28 (5) (2018) e2532.
[18] Ligui Zhu, et al., Multi-criteria evaluation and optimization of a novel thermodynamic cycle based on a wind farm, Kalina cycle and storage system: an effort to
improve efficiency and sustainability, Sustain. Cities Soc. (2023) 104718.
[19] M. Ghiasi, T. Niknam, Z. Wang, M. Mehrandezh, M. Dehghani, N. Ghadimi, A comprehensive review of cyber-attacks and defense mechanisms for improving
security in smart grid energy systems: past, present and future, Elec. Power Syst. Res. 215 (2023) 108975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108975.
[20] M. Ghiasi, Z. Wang, M. Mehrandezh, S. Jalilian, N. Ghadimi, Evolution of smart grids towards the Internet of energy: concept and essential components for deep
decarbonisation, IET Smart Grid 6 (1) (2023) 86–102, https://doi.org/10.1049/stg2.12095.
[21] Mohammad Ghiasi, et al., Multipurpose FCS model predictive control of VSC-based microgrids for islanded and grid-connected operation modes, IEEE Syst. J.
(2022) 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2022.3215437.
[22] Shunlei Li, et al., Evaluating the efficiency of CCHP systems in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region: an optimal strategy based on improved mother optimization
algorithm, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 54 (2024) 104005.
[23] D. Yu, N. Ghadimi, Reliability constraint stochastic UC by considering the correlation of random variables with Copula theory, IET Renew. Power Gener. 13 (14)
(2019) 2587–2593.
[24] M. Ghiasi, Z. Wang, T. Niknam, M. Dehghani, H.R. Ansari, Cyber-physical security in smart power systems from a resilience perspective: concepts and possible
solutions, in: H. Haes Alhelou, N. Hatziargyriou, Z.Y. Dong (Eds.), Power Systems Cybersecurity: Methods, Concepts, and Best Practices, Springer International
Publishing, Cham, 2023, pp. 67–89.
[25] D.T. Dantas, H. Li, T. Charton, L. Chen, How to Improve Reliability on IEC 61850 Substations, IET, 2021.
[26] Instruction Manual, SEL-751A Feeder Protection Relay, 2020.
[27] SEL-751A Feeder Protection Relay." https://selinc.com/products/751A/(accessed 9/April/2022.
[28] M.A. Salam, Fundamentals of Electrical Power Systems Analysis, Springer, 2020.
[29] P. Ponce, A. Molina, O. Mata, L. Ibarra, B. MacCleery, Power System Fundamentals, CRC Press, 2017.
[30] M. Kaczmarek, Two channels opto-isolation circuit for measurements of the differential voltage of voltage transformers and dividers, Energies 15 (7) (2022)
2694.
[31] A. Delavari, P. Brunelle, C.F. Mugombozi, Real-time modeling and testing of distance protection relay based on IEC 61850 protocol, Can. J. Electr. Comput. Eng.
43 (3) (2020) 157–162.
[32] J.C. Gu, C.H. Liu, J.M. Wang, M.T. Yang, Using IEC 61850 GOOSE messages in microgrid protection, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems 29
(12) (2019) e12122.

12