Use of Behavioral Modification and Sensory Integration Strategies To Manage Symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Use of Behavioral Modification and Sensory Integration Strategies To Manage Symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Article QR
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/ccpr.51.05
History Received: December 14, 2022, Revised: May 07, 2023, Accepted: May 25, 2023
Jamil, H., Tariq, Z., & Bashir, N. (2023). Use of behavioral modification
Citation: and sensory integration strategies to manage symptoms of autism
spectrum disorder (ASD). Clinical and Counselling Psychology
Review, 5(1), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.32350/ccpr.51.05
Copyright: © The Authors
Licensing: This article is open access and is distributed under the terms of
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Conflict of
Interest: Author(s) declared no conflict of interest
A publication of
Department of Clinical Psychology
University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Use of Behavioral Modification and Sensory Integration Strategies to
Manage Symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Hareem Jamil*, Zarmin Tariq, Nazia Bashir
Centre for Clinical Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition
characterized by symptoms in two domains: Social communication/social
interaction and restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or
activities. The impairments associated with ASD often become
challenging in the clinical setting due to their broader impact across
developmental domains. Therefore, recent evidence suggests a
combination of behavioral and sensory integration strategies in managing
ASD. Several carefully designed interventional studies have also provided
information about the effects of caregiver training and direct instruction at
the interventional level. The current study presents the case of a four years
and six months old boy who was referred with complaints of poor
socialization and communication and repetitive behaviors. This study was
based on a single case-ABA design. Initial assessment of the client
involved several steps including a clinical interview, behavioral
observation, administration of Sensory Screening Checklist followed by a
diagnostic assessment based on the Childhood Autism Rating Scale
(CARS 2) and diagnostic criteria provided by DSM-5 TR. Based on the
assessment, the diagnosis of ASD was confirmed and a management plan
was formulated to address the presenting issues. A total of 26 therapy
sessions were carried out with the client that particularly focused on
managing repetitive behaviors using a combination of behavioral and
sensory integration strategies. Outcome analysis revealed that the client
demonstrated a reduction in behaviors including teeth grinding and
echolalia. The therapy sessions proved beneficial in addressing the client's
challenges, albeit with further work needed to achieve optimal outcomes.
Keywords: autism/ASD, behavioral management, echolalia, sensory
integration, sensory needs, teeth grinding
*
Corresponding Author: [email protected]
School of Professional Psychology
77
Volume 5 Issue 1, Spring 2023
Use of Behavioral Modification and Sensory…
Introduction
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), characterized by deficits in social
communication, repetitive behaviors, and narrow interests; typically
presents itself in one of three distinct onset patterns: Early onset,
regressive onset, or plateau onset. Early onset refers to the emergence of
symptoms within the first year of life, while regressive onset entails a loss
of previously acquired social and communicative skills typically occurring
in the second or third year. Conversely, plateau onset describes a
developmental trajectory where progression beyond initial year stagnates,
despite the retention of previously acquired skills (Boterberg, 2019).
Recent evidence based on a review of epidemiological studies suggests
that ASDs are prevalent conditions, with a globally estimated prevalence
of 7.6 cases per 100 (one in 132), (Alrehaili et al., 2023). It is regarded as
a lifelong complication and has a complex etiology that involves an
interplay of genetic, neurobiological, and environmental factors (Moussa
et al., 2016). A growing literature supports fetal origins and also looks into
various maternal conditions such as gestational diabetes, hypertension,
medications, etc. (Lyall et al., 2017; Moussa et al., 2016). One of these
potential risk factors is the mother’s age. Evidence suggests an association
between advancing maternal age and autism (Lyall et al., 2017). The
findings have also shown a U-shaped relationship between these two
variables. This implies that the chances of having an offspring with
autistic traits are comparable in both younger and older mothers, with a
higher risk among mothers who have autistic traits (Sari et al., 2022).
Considering the complexity of ASD, the diagnosis of autism provided
by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American
Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013, 2022) criteria for ASD aim to make
a clearer distinction between the underlying neurobiological causes and
the observable behavioral symptoms. This allows individuals
demonstrating the characteristic behavioral patterns of ASD from early
childhood to receive a diagnosis of ASD, while also facilitating the
identification of additional biomedical conditions (Lord & Jones, 2023).
In addition to behavioral difficulties, sensory issues are a common
presentation in ASD. Sensory processing can be difficult among children
with autism, especially insensitivity or extreme sensitivity to sensory input
from the environment (APA, 2013). These difficulties are likely to
child at the time of his birth. It was reported that since the client’s birth,
his family was living abroad; however, they had to move back to Pakistan
with his mother and sisters following COVID-19. Before the pandemic
when the client was about two and a half years old, he was an active
healthy child. However, due to the pandemic situation, the client was
restricted to his home and could only socialize with his immediate family.
Furthermore, the client’s family experienced some financial difficulties
upon which they had to move back to Pakistan. The client was three years
old at that time. Soon after the client moved back, he experienced
difficulties in adjusting to the new environment as well as due to the
absence of his father. Although client used to socialize and interact with
people in his immediate circle like other children of his age, however, at
that time he often showed tantrums and disliked interacting with
relatives/acquaintances and playing with children of his age. He also
experienced speech regression which remained non-concerning for the
family. However, when the client became three and a half years old, these
issues remained and his family sent him to an institute, for his regressed
speech and behavioral difficulties, at the suggestion of a psychiatrist and a
clinical psychologist where he received regular sessions for three months.
Relying on the slight improvement in tantrums, his parents decided to send
him to kindergarten at the age of four years. The client’s social and
communication difficulties worsened when he had to relate with his peers
and participate in the classroom. Considering the client’s repetitive
behaviors and poor language ability, compared to the children of his age,
his teacher referred him for the clinical assessment. Presently, this case is
focusing on interventions employed for sensory concerns, teeth grinding
behavior, and echolalia in the client.
Initial Screening
The initial screening of the client was done through a clinical
interview with his mother, behavioral observation, baseline for teeth
grinding, and reinforcer identification.
Table 1
Possible Factors Underlying Client’s Condition
Mother’s stress and high blood pressure during
Predisposing
pregnancy
factors
Mother’s age at the time of pregnancy
Behavioral Observation
The client was a physically healthy child with age-appropriate height
and weight. He greeted the therapist with a handshake and maintained
appropriate eye contact when directed by his mother. However, when tried
to engage in a conversation or addressed directly, he often lowered his
gaze, showed an indifferent attitude, or gave odd responses by making
loud noisy sounds. He often engaged in repeating the last word/sound of a
sentence said in front of him. When observed during play activities, he
preferred playing alone and used color-sorting puzzles while also grinding
his teeth during play. He displayed a good one-word vocabulary, named
animals with toy prompts, and sniffed objects. He repeatedly checked his
mother's bag for food and cried when denied. The echolalia and teeth
grinding behaviors were observable throughout the session and were
present even when the client was not directly involved in a conversation or
any activity.
Baseline for Teeth Grinding
The mother was provided with a baseline assessment to monitor teeth
grinding behavior displayed by including. This behavior was characterized
by clenching or moving the lower jaw to produce sounds as the teeth
rubbed together.
Table 2
Pre-Assessment of Teeth Grinding
Teeth Grinding Rating (pre-assessment)
7 times (when not involved in any tasks)
Average Frequency
3 times (when involved in a task)
Average Intensity 7
Average Duration 10 seconds
Singing his favorite poems together further eased the atmosphere, leading
to increased interaction and happiness at the start of therapy sessions.
Behavior Modification Techniques. In an effort to facilitate the client
with echolalia, cue-pause-point (CPP), natural language paradigm, and
verbal modeling plus positive reinforcement for appropriate responses
were used.
Cues-pause-point was introduced by McMorrow and Foxx (1986).
The cues-pause-point intervention consists of the therapist providing a
visual cue to the client to remain silent (cue). During the administration of
this technique, the therapist provided a visual cue to the client and
simultaneously provided instructions regarding the correct response. For
example, the therapist posed the question “What is your name?” and
provided a short pause following the question (pause). If the client
repeated the question, he was the verbal prompt of “No” to make him stop.
Finally, the therapist pointed to a page with his name written or his picture
to prompt the client to verbalize the answer to the question with his name
(point).
Modeling in the form of recasting was also used with the client to
increase his speech and lower the frequency of echolalia. In recasting, the
therapist repeated an error utterance back to the client with the error
corrected. The mother was also instructed to correct the child whenever he
was interacting with the mother.
Differential reinforcement of lower rates of behavior was used to
reduce the repeating behavior of teeth grinding. The client was presented
with a verbal cue, “no grinding”, paired with the touch of the therapist’s
index finger on his chin with a gentle push downwards to cue him to open
his mouth for 10 seconds. If resistance was met the cue was re-presented
only once. The client was given reinforcement when he stopped. He was
introduced to competing behaviors of eating carrots, cucumbers, hard
vegetables, and fruit to fulfill his sensory needs. Additionally, this
technique was also used to foster his social and communication skills such
as reinforcing the client’s interaction with peers and others, responding to
instructions, etc. This was done in collaboration with other therapists
through planning group sessions.
Sensory Integration Activities. To address the client's oral
hyposensitivity, sensory integration activities were introduced
Clinical and Counselling Psychology Review
86
Volume 5 Issue 1, Spring 2023
Jamil et al.
Table 7
Post-Assessment of Echolalia
Echolalia Rating (pre-assessment)
3 times (when not involved in any tasks)
Average Frequency
1 times (when involved in a task)
Average Duration 9 seconds
Discussion
The present case study presents the use of behavioral modification and
sensory integration strategies that were expertly employed to address the
client's behavioral challenges. The study provides evidence to use a
combination of behavioral and sensory integration strategies as promising
to manage symptoms or problematic behaviors associated with autism
which is also evident by existing literature (Jamal Uddin et al., 2021). It
also focuses on the use of direct instructions and client-caregiver
involvement in achieving ultimate therapeutic outcomes (Little et al.,
2022; Pfeiffer et al., 2011). Present findings underscored the overall
efficacy of behavioral and sensory interventions in mitigating problem
behaviors among individuals with autism. Notably, in tackling the issue of
echolalia, the implementation of the cue-pause-point (CPP) technique
yielded promising results, indicative of tangible improvements in the
client's condition. Indeed, preceding studies, as noted by Valentino et al.
(2012) and Al-Dawaideh (2014), have demonstrated the applicability of
the cue-pause-point (CPP) procedure in effectively reducing echolalia
during echoic training while concurrently bolstering correct responding.
Furthermore, the efficacy of the CPP procedure extends beyond singular
targets, as evidenced by its ability to swiftly induce behavioral changes
across subsequent objectives.
Addressing the client's repetitive behaviors, such as teeth grinding,
involved the strategic application of differential reinforcement. Existing
literature, as expounded by Efaw (2021), acknowledges both techniques as
effective in facilitating skill acquisition. However, the differential
reinforcement approach emerges as the more dependable method,
consistently yielding favorable outcomes. Preliminary findings, therefore,
advocate for the adoption of the differential reinforcement of unprompted
responses as the default approach in instructing children with autism.
Lord, C., & Jones, R. M. (2013). New strategies and findings for
behavioral interventions in autism spectrum disorders. Annals of the
New York Academy of Sciences, 1304(1), 70–
76. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12311
McMorrow, M. J., & Foxx, R. M. (1986). Some direct and generalized
effects of replacing an autistic man's echolalia with correct responses
to questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19(3), 289–297.
https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1986.19-289
Moussa, H. N., Srikrishnan, A., Blackwell, S. C., Dash, P., & Sibai, B. M.
(2016). Fetal origins of autism spectrum disorders: the non-associated
maternal factors. Future Science OA, 2(2), Article eFSO114.
https://doi.org/10.4155/fsoa-2015-0001
Neely, L., Gerow, S., Rispoli, M., Lang, R., & Pullen, N. (2016).
Treatment of echolalia in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A
systematic review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 3(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-015-0067-4
O'Donnell, S., Deitz, J., Kartin, D., Nalty, T., & Dawson, G. (2012).
Sensory processing, problem behavior, adaptive behavior, and
cognition in preschool children with autism spectrum disorders. The
American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of
the American Occupational Therapy Association, 66(5), 586–594.
https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2012.004168
Park, Y., & Kong, I. (2015). A systematic review of effects on sensory
integration intervention based on the vestibular-proprioceptive system
for children in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Sensory
Integration Therapists, 13(2), 53–
61. https://doi.org/10.18064/jkasi.2015.13.2.053
Pfeiffer, B. A., Koenig, K., Kinnealey, M., Sheppard, M., & Henderson, L.
(2011). Effectiveness of sensory integration interventions in children
with autism spectrum disorders: A pilot study. The American Journal
of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American
Occupational Therapy Association, 65(1), 76–85.
https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.09205
Sandbank, M., Bottema-Beutel, K., Crowley LaPoint, S., Feldman, J. I.,
Barrett, D. J., Caldwell, N., Dunham, K., Crank, J., Albarran, S., &
School of Professional Psychology
93
Volume 5 Issue 1, Spring 2023
Use of Behavioral Modification and Sensory…
Williams, K. L., Kirby, A. V., Watson, L. R., Sideris, J., Bulluck, J., &
Baranek, G. T. (2018). Sensory features as predictors of adaptive
behaviors: A comparative longitudinal study of children with autism
spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities. Research in
Developmental Disabilities, 81, 103–112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.002