Scribd
Upload
48 views3 pages

Court Is Free To Me

This information is experimental at this time. We are seeking ways to make the paper work even stronger.

Uploaded by

jpes
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
48 views3 pages

Court Is Free To Me

This information is experimental at this time. We are seeking ways to make the paper work even stronger.

Uploaded by

jpes
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

This information is experimental at this time.

We are seeking ways to make the paper work


even stronger.

For those being charged to file fees in a court for example the 60.00 fee in the US Tax Court and
if not paid, the Judge is dismissing your case for Lack of Jurisdiction, cut and paste the wording
below and fill out another Petition #2 exactly like the one you sent in originally then attach
Exhibit # 1 words to the Petition on top. Re-send to the court.

If your case has been dismissed for not filing the 60.00 and it is not finalized then prepare an
amendment to your present Petition by typing and writing the word amendment in front of the
word Petition and again make your Petition exactly the same as the Petition you sent originally to
the Tax Court then cut and paste on a blank paper wording below on top of your Petition.

If your case has been dismissed and finalized you need to make changes from the 1st one you
sent, START over with a new Petition # 2 and change what information needed then go ahead
and re-do it plus attach the wording below as an Exhibit # 1 if so desired. Do not use your old
docket number. You want this to be a new case.

CUT AND PASTE Wording Below:

Exhibit #

“Living as we do under a common government, charged with the great concerns of the
whole Union, every citizen of the United States from the most remote States or territories,
is entitled to free access, not only to the principal departments established at Washington,
but also to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State in the Union. . . . For all
the great purposes for which the Federal government was formed we are one people, with
one common country. [73 U.S. 35, 49] We are all citizens of the United States, and as
members of the same community must have the right to pass and repass through every
part of it without interruption, as freely as in our own States.” Crandell v. Nevada, 6 Wall
35 "The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is entitled
to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State in the Union (2 Black
620, see also Crandell v. Nevada, 6 Wall 35).

Plaintiff should not be charged fees, or costs for the lawful and constitutional right to
petition this court in this matter in which he is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing
fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be
applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief. Hale v. Henkel, 201
U.S. 43]"

Notice: My due process has been violated due to the Respondent has never served me with
any Notice of Deficiency or Determination for all the years so stated on the Petition
attached.
NOTICE: EXEMPTION FROM FEES
Take Mandatory judicial Notice and cognizance (Federal Rules of evidence 201) (b) that
“plaintiff” I.e. Libellant has a lawful right to proceed without, cost, based
on the following law:
Rule 201. Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts.
(b) Kinds of facts that can be judicially Noticed. The court may judicially notice a fact that is not
subject to reasonable dispute because it:
(2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be
questioned
(c)Taking Notice. The court:
(1) may take judicial Notice on its own; or
(2) must take judicial notice if a party requests it and the court is supplied with the necessary
information.
Law.cornell.edu/rules. The rule 201
U.S. Code Title 28. JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE: PART V. PROCEDURE
chapter 123. Fees and costs Section,8 1915. Proceedings in forma pauperis.
Swampedmcdonnell.edu/uscode/text/28/1915.
It has been written, “that if a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it
expects what never was and never will be.” Filter V City of Homer, 75 P'D 1059 (2003) (1).
Petitioner (Libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no fee can be placed upon a citizen as a
condition precedent to exercise his/her Constitutional Rights, his/ her rights are secured by the
Constitution. A fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by public officers or for use of a
privilege under control of government.” Fort
1 of 3 26 July 2021

Smith Has Co.V Wiseman 4 SW. 2d 789, 790, from Blacks Law Dictionary 5th Edition
Plaintiff (libellant) should not be charged fees or costs for the lawful and Constitutional Right to
petition this court in this matter in which he/she is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing
fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the state and should not be
applied to the plaintiffs who is a natural individual and entitled to relief. (Hale v Henkel, 201
U.S. 43; NAACP v Button, 371 US 415); United Mine Workers v Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and
Johnson v Avery, 89 S. CT. 747 (1969).
The cornerstone of democracy is the ability of its people to question, investigate, and monitor the
government. Free access to public records is a central building block of our constitutional
framework enabling citizen participation in monitoring the machinations of the republic.
Conversely, the hallmark of totalitarianism is secrecy and the foundation of tyranny is ignorance.
FABE, Chief Justice (Supreme Court of Alaska) PER CURIAM.
THE U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is “entitled to free
access.... To its judicial tribunals and public offices in every state of the union” (2 Black 620; see
also: Caramel v Nevada, 6 Wall 35).

There rules do not really apply


Notification:
‘Every sovereign state is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign state, and
the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done
within its own territory. Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained through
the means open to be available of by sovereign powers as between themselves.’ Underhill v.
Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252, 18 S. Sup. Ct. 83, 84 (42 L. Ed. 456); American Banana Co. v.
United Fruit Co., 213 U.S. 347, 29 Sup. Ct. 511, 16 Ann. Cas. 1047.);
--

You might also like