Au 62 2e Excerpt
Au 62 2e Excerpt
Underwriting 1
Legal Liability: Torts, Contracts, and
Statutes
Every person and all organizations are exposed to liability loss. The possibility
of a liability loss is a liability loss exposure. To be able to identify, analyze, and Liability loss
properly handle an organization’s liability loss exposures, one must under- Any loss that a person or
stand the concept of legal liability and the common sources of liability loss an organization sustains
exposures. as a result of a claim or
suit against that person or
Anyone who wishes to evaluate an organization’s liability loss exposures must organization by someone
understand the various ways in which the organization may become legally seeking damages or some
other remedy permitted
liable. Legal liability imposed by civil law can be based on torts, contracts, or
by law.
statutes.
Legal liability
A liability insurance policy typically obligates the insurer to defend the The legally enforceable
insured against allegations that, if true, would be covered under the policy. obligation of a person or an
Therefore, an organization can experience a liability loss even as a result of organization to pay a sum
of money (called damages)
a suit in which it is not legally held liable. In addition, the policy obligates
to another person or
the insurer to pay damages for which the insured is legally liable. In most organization.
liability claims in which the insurer believes that its insured is legally liable, it
attempts to settle the claim (by offering to pay a certain amount of damages to
the claimant) in order to avoid the additional expense of a court proceeding.
1.3
Copyright American Institute For Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters
1.4 Underwriting Commercial Liability
[DA02515]
• A close causal connection between the negligent act (breach of duty) and
the resulting harm
• The occurrence of actual loss or damage of a type recognized by law and
measurable in monetary terms
For example, a motorist who drives at an unsafe and excessive speed and, as
a result, causes an accident that injures another motorist has committed the
tort of negligence.
A negligent act does not in and of itself qualify as the basis for a negligence
tort. All four elements of negligence must be present. For example, a motorist
who is driving at an unsafe speed and who narrowly misses another vehicle
has not committed the tort of negligence, although the act is negligent. The
motorist who is driving negligently may receive a ticket, but the motorist
whose vehicle was narrowly missed does not have the basis for a tort of negli-
gence because he or she did not experience actual loss or damage.
An intentional tort is a tort committed by a person who foresees (or should be Intentional tort
able to foresee) that his or her act will harm another person. The act does not A tort committed by a
necessarily have to be performed with malicious or hostile intent. An example person who foresees (or
of an intentional tort is libel, the publication of a false statement that dam- should be able to foresee)
that his or her act will harm
ages a person’s reputation.
another person.
Strict liability (or absolute liability) is liability that is imposed even though Strict liability
the defendant acted neither negligently nor with intent to cause harm. (absolute liability)
Common examples of strict liability include liability for abnormally danger- Liability imposed by a
ous instrumentalities (such as wild animals), ultrahazardous activities (such as court or by a statute
in the absence of fault
blasting), and dangerously defective products (such as malfunctioning smoke
when harm results from
detectors). activities or conditions that
are extremely dangerous,
Strict liability is also used to describe liability imposed by certain statutes,
unnatural, ultrahazardous,
such as workers compensation laws. extraordinary, abnormal, or
inappropriate.