ABB EE WhitePaper Metals 250422
ABB EE WhitePaper Metals 250422
W H I T E PA P E R
Energy efficiency
in iron and steel making
2 ENERGY EFFICIENCY
—
Reducing energy consumption,
costs and emissions in the iron
and steel industry
The iron and steel industry emits 2.3 Gt of CO2 per year, which amounts to
7% of total global carbon emissions.1 To meet global climate and energy
goals, the IEA estimates that these emissions must be cut by 50% by 2050.1
This will require both decarbonization of the steel process – meaning
removing coal/fossil fuels from the energy supply – and improving energy
efficiency.
IN IRON AND STEEL MAKING 3
—
Decarbonizing
the iron and steel industry
The largest industrial consumer of coal
On average, producing 1 ton of steel using traditional technology releases
1.85 tons of CO2 emissions. 2 The majority of these emissions come from the
two main steps in the process. First, the conversion of iron ore into iron using
blast furnaces and second, turning iron into steel using basic oxygen furnaces.
Even today, coal is used in iron and steel making to generate heat and to make
coke. As a result, the steel industry uses coal to meet 75% of its energy needs
making it the largest industrial consumer of coal. 3
—
70% of the steel produced in
the world uses coal.4
—
Energy and coal use in iron and steel making processes.
Coal
Basic oxygen furnance
Coke oven
Blast furnance
Casting
Rolling
Steel recycling
4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY
—
New processes are being
developed which could
completely decarbonize
iron making.
—
Energy use
in iron and steel making
A significant industry challenge Recycling to reduce energy use
Iron and steel production is very energy intensive, with The steel industry uses a high percentage of recycled raw
energy and raw materials accounting for 60-80% of the material and most steel production uses recycled scrap
costs.8 Globally, the industry accounts for 8% of global final steel. All the scrap steel that is collected globally is recycled,
energy use and it is estimated that steel production has with a recycling rate of approximately 85%. In plants that
doubled in the past two decades, which has caused a use electric arc furnaces, up to 100% of the raw materials
subsequent doubling of the industry’s greenhouse gas can be from recycled sources, while blast furnaces typically
emissions.9 Furthermore, it is predicted that by 2050, the use up to 30%. 11
demand for steel could increase by another 40%. 10
Compared to producing steel from iron ore, producing it
Due to the need to reduce energy consumption and from recycled steel saves significant amounts of energy
emissions, and energy costs, there is a big push in the because all the steps used to convert ore to iron, such as the
industry to find ways to improve energy efficiency. blast furnace process, are avoided. As a result, producing
These include improving the energy efficiency of current steel from recycled material also generates significantly
processes, improving material efficiency and developing fewer CO2 emissions than producing it from iron ore. It’s
new steel making technologies. Hydrogen and renewable estimated that every tonne of recycled steel scrap that is
energy are also likely to play a big role in fossil-free used to product steel prevents 1.5 tonnes of CO2 being
technology. emitted. 11 However, since the industry already has a
relatively high recycling rate, further reductions in energy
use and emissions will be hard to achieve via recycling alone.
—
Producing steel from
recycled scrap requires
1/8th of the energy
needed to produce steel
from iron ore.12
6 ENERGY EFFICIENCY
—
Iron and steel
production processes
Energy intensive processes with significant losses —
Fired heaters like blast furnaces and other furnaces use the Energy end-use in the steel industry13
majority of the energy involved in the iron and steel making
process, consuming about 81% of the final energy. There
can also be significant energy losses in an iron or steel
Other
plant, with up to 23% of the energy that enters the plant Facilities 2%
being lost to inefficiencies in equipment and distribution. 13 3%
Steam
While, motor systems account for a relatively small 7%
proportion of energy use, at around 7%, it has been Motor
estimated that up to 70% of the energy consumed by these systems
7%
motors is lost due to system inefficiencies. 1 This means
that there are actually very good opportunities to reduce
energy use in motor systems throughout the industry.
These kinds of improvements are straightforward and
quick to implement, and they typically have attractive pay-
back periods.
—
Improving energy efficiency
in iron and steel applications
Energy efficient motors
—
Motors are always required for applications like pumps, fans Overall motor system efficiency –
and compressors, and improving the energy efficiency of
the motor system can have a big impact on the efficiency
a comparison of reduction in energy
of the application overall. When looking for ways to improve consumption in a motor system
the energy efficiency of a motor system, it is worth
considering the efficiency of the system overall, life cycle
costs, as well as the age and efficiency class of the motor.
We should consider that while VSDs help increase the It is important to note that any upgrades must also take the
efficiency of motors of any age, many of the systems in efficiency of the motor system as a whole into account –
which they are employed are old and lag behind current IE efficiency gains in the motor may be squandered if the rest
standards. In these cases, particularly noticeable savings of the system is inefficient. Motor systems can be or can
may be realised through upgrading the motor to a higher become inefficient for many reasons. For example, poorly
class. maintained equipment is often responsible for significant
drops in efficiency. For pumps, it has been estimated that
regular maintenance can reduce energy consumption by
between 2% and 7%. As another example, over-dimensioned
equipment, such as motors, fans or pumps will also reduce
energy efficiency. Correcting oversized pumps could
reduce electricity consumption by 15% to 25%, estimates
suggest. 18
8 ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Water treatment
CUSTOMER CASE
The steel industry uses large quantities of water for
processes like cooling, descaling and dust scrubbing. For
example, an integrated steel plant has an average water
intake of about 28.6 m3 per tonne of steel produced.
However, after use around 90% of this water is cleaned,
cooled and returned to the source. At each stage of the
cycle, from extraction to use to cleaning and return, pumps
are used to transport the water, and this pumping consumes
a lot of energy. Therefore, an effective way to reduce energy
use is to prevent unnecessary pumping. One way to do this
is to reuse water this reduces the energy needed to extract
and transport water. Another way is to ensure that the
correct amount of water is provided. For example, in a hot
strip mill, automatic flow control systems with integrated Futureproofing rolling mill
VSDs can be used to the regulate water levels in the header efficiency
tanks to prevent the cooling water from overflowing. 23
Kanthal® – a world-leading brand in sustainable
Rolling mill processes heating technology and resistance materials – chose
In steel rolling mill processes, motor systems drive ABB solutions for their new drive system at their
applications like the actual rolling mills, as well as cooling, Hallstahammar blooming mill. The decades-old DC
lubrication and descaling pumps, furnace combustion motor and drive system was removed and replaced
and fume extraction fans, run out tables and other with a modern AC design. The system provides
material handling equipment. Due to the high loads and numerous benefits including enhanced reliability,
temperatures that these applications handle, they are very improved performance, and an increase in total
energy intensive. As a result, motor systems account for efficiency of around 3.5%.
about 40-45% of the total primary energy consumption
of a steel rolling mill. Since rolling mill applications involve
quickly changing loads, wide torque ranges and high
accuracy, modernizing the motor systems with VSDs and
CUSTOMER CASE
more efficient motors can reduce energy consumption and
maintenance, as well as improving production quality. 24
—
Conclusion
While iron and steel making will continue to require
significant amounts of energy, as discussed, there are clear
opportunities in the industry to improve energy efficiency
and reduce the use of fossil fuels. Production processes
can be decarbonized using electric arc furnaces and with
hydrogen-based technology. And, by modernizing
applications which rely on motor systems to reduce
inefficiencies, measurable savings in energy use and
energy costs can be achieved. Thanks to savings like these,
investments in technologies like VSD-motor systems can
quickly pay back, while also helping companies to meet
global climate and energy goals.
1. Steel Times International, March 2021, Driving energy efficiency and sustainability, page 27,
https://search.abb.com/library/Download. aspx?DocumentID=9AKK107992A1022&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartId=&Action=Launch)
2. European Parliament Briefing, The potential of hydrogen for decarbonizing steel production, December 2020, page 2-3;
The potential of hydrogen for decarbonising steel production | Think Tank | European Parliament (europa.eu)
3. EA, Iron and steel technology roadmap, Towards more sustainable steelmaking, October 2020, page 11;
https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel-technology-roadmap
4. https://www.worldcoal.org/coal-facts/coal-steel/#steel-production
5. Meinke-Hubeny_Vito_Carbon-free steel production_20210224.pdf, page 7;
www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/230504/Meinke-Hubeny_Vito_Carbon-free steel production_20210224.pdf
6. European Parliament Briefing, The potential of hydrogen for decarbonizing steel production, December 2020, page 4;
The potential of hydrogen for decarbonising steel production | Think Tank | European Parliament (europa.eu)
7. McKinsey & Company, Decarbonization challenge for steel, Hydrogen as a solution in Europe, April 2020, page 4-5;
https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Metals and Mining/Our Insights/Decarbonization challenge for steel/Decarbonization-
challenge-for-steel.pdf
8. IEA, Iron and steel technology roadmap, Towards more sustainable steelmaking, October 2020, page 16;
https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel-technology-roadmap
9. IEA, Iron and steel technology roadmap, Towards more sustainable steelmaking, October 2020, pages 32, 35 and 38;
https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel-technology-roadmap
10. IEA, Iron and steel technology roadmap, Towards more sustainable steelmaking, October 2020, page 57;
https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel-technology-roadmap
11. World Steel Association, Public Policy Paper, Climate change and the production of iron and steel, 2021, page 4;
Climate-change-and-the-production-of-iron-and-steel.pdf (worldsteel.org)
12. IEA, Iron and steel technology roadmap, Towards more sustainable steelmaking, October 2020, page 12;
https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel-technology-roadmap
13. ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY, Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities
for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry, An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers, October 2010, Chapter 4 Energy use, page 15; (PDF)
Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry An ENERGY STAR(R)
Guide for Energy and Plant Managers (researchgate.net)
14. U.S. DOE (2004) Energy Use, Loss and Opportunities Analysis: U.S. Manufacturing & Mining. U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Industrial Technologies Program. December 2004, page 45;
https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/11/f4/energy_use_loss_opportunities_analysis.pdf
15. ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY, Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities
for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry, An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers, October 2010, Chapter 11, Motor Systems, page 53;
(PDF) Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and
Plant Managers (researchgate.net)
16. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, U.S. industrial and commercial motor system market assessment report,
Volume 1: characteristics of the installed base, January 2021, Page 67, permalink: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/42f631k3 )
17. ABB White Paper, Designing for optimum energy management, page 4, July 2021;
https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=9AKK108386&DocumentPartId=&msclkid=91666413c46211ec863c9ce416af9402
18. ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY, Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and
Steel Industry, An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers, October 2010, Chapter 12, Pump Systems, Page 59; (PDF) Energy Efficiency
Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers (researchgate.net)
19. For an example of the calculations involved, see “Program Insights: Variable frequency drives,” Consortium for Energy Efficiency, 2019;
https://www.cee1.org/content/variable-frequency-drives)
20. ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY, Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel
Industry, An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers, October 2010, Chapter 13, Fan Systems, Page 65; (PDF) Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost
Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers (researchgate.net)
21. ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY, Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel
Industry, An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers, October 2010, Chapter 18, Steel Making BOF, Page 86; (PDF) Energy Efficiency Improvement and
Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers (researchgate.net)
22. ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY, Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel
Industry, An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers, October 2010, Chapter 14, Compressed Air Systems, Page 68; (PDF) Energy Efficiency
Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers (researchgate.net)
23. World Steel Association, Public Policy Paper, Water management in the steel industry, 2020, Page 5, Page 7;
https://worldsteel.org/publications/policy-papers/water-management-policy-paper/
24. UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME (UNEP), Manual on Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficient Technologies and Best Practices
in Steel Rolling Industries (Indonesia), 2014, Chapter 4.2 Rolling Mill, page 46; http://sameeeksha.org/books/Manual-on-Energy-Efficiency.pdf
25. https://new.abb.com/news/detail/1789/ABB-motor-sets-world-record-in-energy-efficiency-saves-half-a-million-dollars
IN IRON AND STEEL MAKING 11
—
ABB Motion
P.O. Box 1
FI-00232
Helsinki, Finland
3AXD50000903047