0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Lab 11

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Lab 11

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

LABORATORY ACTIVITY 11:

VALIDITY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS


STANDARD PROGRESSIVE MATRICES 1998 EDITION
J Raven, JH Court, JC Raven

Cognitive Test (1998)


DETAILS OF VALIDITY

Criterion-Oriented Validity
The concurrent and predictive validities of the SPM
vary with the age, possibly sex, and homogeneity of the
sample, the conceptual relevance of the criterion to
which the SPM will be related and the quality of its
assessment.
DETAILS OF VALIDITY

Content Validity

Measured by the internal consistency of the test, varies


markedly when different test items are considered. It
has good to excellent discriminative power for most
items.
DETAILS OF VALIDITY

Factorial Construct Validity


Tagged as one of the purest and best measures of "g" or
general intellectual functioning available. Evidence for
this claim comes from several factor-analytic studies
involving large numbers of children and adults. Cross-
cultural studies confirm the high g saturation of SPM.
Differential Aptitude Test 5th Edition
George K. Bennett, Harold G. Seashore, Alexander Wesman

Aptitude Test (1990)


Differential Aptitude Test 5th Edition
-are design to measure students ability to learn or succeed
in a different areas including verbal reasoning, numerical
reasoning, abstract…
-help students to choose educational and career option on
the basis of strength and weaknesses.
-help students to understand better why they do
well/poorly in some subject.
Details of Validity

Content Validity
The DAT is characterized by satisfactory
predictive validity, evidenced by its correlation
with academic performance indicators such as
grade point averages.
Details of Validity

Construct Validity

Construct validity examines whether a test


measures the theoretical construct it's
intended to measure. Various studies have
supported the DAT's construct validity by
linking its scores to broader cognitive abilities
and academic skills, thereby confirming its
intended purpose.
Details of Validity

Criterion-Related Validity
Research has demonstrated that the DAT can
effectively predict academic achievement,
particularly in high school settings. For
instance, the DAT's scores correlate
significantly with achievement criteria, which
enhances its applicability in educational
assessment and guidance.
APTITUDES TO BE MEASURED
TEST DESCRIPTION NO. OF ITEMS

measure the ability


Verbal Reasoning (VR) to see relationships 40
among words.

measure the ability to


Numerical Reasoning (NR) perform mathematical 40
reasoning task.

assesses how well


Abstract Reasoning
students can reason 50
with geometric figures
or design.

Perceptual Speed and Accuracy measures the ability


to compare and mark 100
written lists quickly
and accurately .
APTITUDES TO BE MEASURED
TEST DESCRIPTION NO. OF ITEMS

measure the ability to


understand basic 60
Mechanical Reasoning
mechanical principle
of machinery, tools,
& motion.
measure the ability to 50
Space Relation visualize the three-
dimentional pattern, &
to visualize how this
object would look if
rotated in space. 40

Spelling to spell common


english.
detect errors in gram- 40
Language Usage
mar, punctuation &
capitalization.
CONCLUSION

In summary, the validity evidence for the DAT 5th edition


indicates its effectiveness in measuring various aptitudes
relevant to academic and vocational success. Continuous
research affirming its reliability, construct validity, and
criterion-related validity supports its use as a significant
tool in educational settings. This evidence reinforces the
importance of the DAT in guiding students towards suitable
educational paths based on their aptitude profiles.
THANK YOU FOR LISTENING !
MEMBERS:
Jersa Garcia
Xylie Baguio
Alexander Famor
Xyrille Ann Dultra
French Miles Velez
Kyle Francine Espina

You might also like