Period 3 Part 3 - Guided Reading Notes
Period 3 Part 3 - Guided Reading Notes
Part 8 - Chapter 6
1. What were the characteristics of the men who met at the Constitutional Convention in
Philadelphia? What were their socio-economic backgrounds? (pgs. 204-205) - KC - 3.2.II.C
The men who met at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 shared several
defining characteristics. They were typically well-educated, politically experienced, and from
the upper echelons of society, representing the nation's elite. Many of them had backgrounds in
law, land ownership, or commerce, making them wealthy and influential within their
communities. These delegates, such as George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander
Hamilton, had a vested interest in shaping a strong central government that would protect
property rights and promote economic stability. Their backgrounds gave them a generally
conservative outlook on governance, favoring a structured and balanced government capable of
mitigating the perceived instability of the Articles of Confederation. This group was primarily
composed of men who held land, wealth, and influence, setting them apart from the average
American of their time, who had more modest means and less formal education.
2. What were the main positions of the Virginia and New Jersey Plans? (pg. 205) - KC - 3.2.II.C
The New Jersey Plan The Virginia Plan
The New Jersey Plan advocated for a The Virginia Plan proposed a bicameral (two-
unicameral (single-house) legislature where house) legislature with representation based
each state would have equal representation, on population, favoring larger states with
regardless of population size. This approach more influence. This plan called for a stronger
aimed to protect smaller states from being national government divided into three
dominated by larger states, giving all states branches—executive, legislative, and judicial
an equal say in legislative decisions. The New —empowered to make laws binding upon the
Jersey Plan also proposed a federal states. It also suggested that the legislature
government with limited powers, including would have the authority to select the
the ability to tax and regulate trade, while executive and judiciary, ensuring central
maintaining most authority within the states. control over the government’s branches.
Ultimately, the debate between these plans
was resolved by the Great Compromise, which
established a bicameral Congress: the Senate,
with equal representation for all states, and
the House of Representatives, with
representation based on population,
balancing the interests of both small and
large states.
Name __________________________________
APUSH - Period 3 pg. 2
3. How did the Great Compromise draw from those Plans? (pg. 206) - KC - 3.2.II.B
The Great Compromise blended elements of both the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan
to address representation concerns in the newly proposed government. The Virginia Plan,
favored by larger states, advocated for representation based on population, whereas the New
Jersey Plan, supported by smaller states, called for equal representation regardless of size. The
compromise resulted in a bicameral legislature: the House of Representatives would have
representation based on population (aligning with the Virginia Plan), and the Senate would
grant equal representation to each state (aligning with the New Jersey Plan). This agreement
balanced the interests of both large and small states, setting a foundation for legislative
structure in the Constitution.
4. How did sectionalism and the issue of slavery influence the Constitution? (pgs. 206-207) - KC
- 3.2.II.D
5. Outline the debate between Federalists and Antifederalists before the ratification of the
Constitution (pgs. 207-210) - KC - 3.2.II.E
Antifederalists Federalists
Opposed the Constitution as they feared it Supported the new Constitution, favoring a
would create an overly powerful central strong central government that could
government that might threaten individual maintain order, provide economic stability,
freedoms and state sovereignty. They argued and address collective issues that the weaker
that the Constitution lacked sufficient Articles of Confederation couldn't resolve.
protections for individual rights, which led to Key Federalists included Alexander Hamilton,
the eventual addition of the Bill of Rights. James Madison, and John Jay, who argued
Prominent Anti-Federalists included Patrick their case through the Federalist Papers to
Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams. sway public opinion in favor of ratification.
Name __________________________________
APUSH - Period 3 pg. 3
Part 9 - Chapter 7
What were the provisions of the Judiciary Act of 1789? (pg. 216)
It established the U.S. federal court system and laid the foundation for judicial authority under
the Constitution. It created the Supreme Court with six justices, set up 13 district courts as the
lowest federal level, and established three regional circuit courts. The act granted the Supreme
Court original jurisdiction in specific cases and appellate jurisdiction in others, allowing it to
review cases from lower courts. It also included a provision (Section 25) that permitted federal
courts to review state court decisions involving federal law, reinforcing federal supremacy. This
structure enabled a unified judicial system while balancing federal and state authority.
4o
2. Explain the key aspects of Hamilton’s three proposals: (pgs. 216-218) - KC - 3.2.III.B
Hamilton proposed that the Hamilton advocated for a Hamilton's plan encouraged
federal government assume national bank to provide a industrial growth to diversify
state debts from the safe place for federal funds, the economy beyond
Revolutionary War, issue stable currency, and agriculture. He proposed
consolidating them into a offer loans to encourage government incentives,
national debt. By doing so, he business growth. He argued including protective tariffs on
intended to establish U.S. that this bank would help imported goods, to nurture
creditworthiness and foster standardize currency and domestic manufacturing and
loyalty to the federal support federal and private reduce dependency on foreign
government among creditors. economic interests, products. This vision aimed to
This would enable the U.S. to although it faced opposition make the U.S. economically
borrow money at favorable from those who saw it as an self-sufficient and foster a
rates in the future and create overreach of federal power. strong industrial base.
a unified economic
foundation.
3. Why did Hamilton believe a national debt would strengthen the United States and help
ensure its survival? (pgs. 216-218) - KC - 3.2.III.B
Name __________________________________
APUSH - Period 3 pg. 4
Hamilton believed that a national debt would strengthen the United States by establishing a
sense of shared interest among various stakeholders, including wealthy creditors and
bondholders. He argued that when individuals and institutions invested in government bonds,
they would have a vested interest in the country's success and stability. This would foster
loyalty to the federal government, as creditors would be more likely to support policies that
ensured the government could meet its financial obligations. Additionally, a well-managed
national debt could enhance the U.S.'s creditworthiness, allowing the government to borrow
money at lower interest rates. This financial stability would provide the federal government
with the resources needed to respond to national challenges, ultimately helping to ensure the
country's survival.
4. How did Jefferson’s vision for the country differ from the vision put forward by Alexander
Hamilton? (pgs. 218-219) - KC - 3.2.III.B (ABSOLUTELY VITAL QUESTION, BTW)
Jefferson’s vision for the country significantly differed from Hamilton’s in several key areas.
While Hamilton advocated for a strong central government with an emphasis on commerce,
manufacturing, and a robust financial system, Jefferson favored a more decentralized
government that prioritized agrarian interests and individual liberties. He believed that the
strength of the nation lay in its independent farmers, who would embody republican values and
safeguard democracy. Jefferson was wary of centralized power and feared that Hamilton’s
proposals, especially the national bank, could lead to tyranny and corruption. Additionally,
Jefferson championed strict constitutional interpretation, opposing Hamilton’s loose
interpretation that justified a broad scope of federal authority. Ultimately, these contrasting
visions represented a fundamental debate over the future direction of the United States,
shaping the nation’s political landscape and party system.
4o mini
6. What were the reasons for the Whiskey Rebellion? Who was it aimed at particularly? (pg.
219) - KC - 3.3.I.B
It was a response to the federal excise tax on whiskey, which was implemented by the
government under Alexander Hamilton's financial plan to help pay off national debt. Many
western farmers relied on whiskey production as a critical source of income, and they viewed
the tax as an unfair burden, disproportionately affecting their livelihoods compared to more
affluent eastern interests. The rebellion was particularly aimed at the federal government,
especially targeting the perceived overreach of federal authority by Hamilton and the
administration. The unrest culminated in protests and violent resistance, highlighting the deep
frustrations among rural communities regarding federal policies.
7. How did Washington's reaction to the Whiskey Rebellion underscore the difference between
the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation? (pg. 219) - KC - 3.3.I.B
Washington's decisive response to the Whiskey Rebellion demonstrated a significant shift from
the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation to the stronger framework established by the
Constitution. Under the Articles, the federal government lacked the authority to raise a
standing army or enforce laws effectively, which had led to challenges in quelling uprisings and
maintaining order. In contrast, Washington quickly mobilized federal troops to suppress the
rebellion, emphasizing the federal government's capability to enforce its laws and maintain
order. This reaction illustrated the Constitution’s stronger provisions for federal authority and
the ability to respond to domestic insurrections, reinforcing the idea of a unified national
government capable of regulating commerce and ensuring the rule of law.
Name __________________________________
APUSH - Period 3 pg. 7
Part 10 - Chapter 7
1. Identify the factors the led to the rise of political parties. (pg. 223) - KC - 3.2.III.B
The rise of political parties in the United States was influenced by several factors, including
differing views on the role of the federal government, economic interests, and regional
priorities. Key players like Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had contrasting visions for
the nation: Hamilton favored a strong central government and an economy based on
manufacturing and trade, while Jefferson advocated for states’ rights and an agrarian-based
economy. The emergence of factions around these leaders, combined with debates over policies
such as the national bank and the Whiskey Rebellion, solidified divisions. Additionally, the need
to organize political support and mobilize voters in a rapidly growing nation further encouraged
the formation of political parties, leading to the establishment of the Federalists and
Democratic-Republicans.
2. What caused the "quasi-war" with France during the Adams administration? What was the
XYZ affair? - (pg. 223) - 3.3.II.B
The "quasi-war" with France, occurring between 1798 and 1800, stemmed from rising tensions
between the United States and France, primarily due to disputes over U.S. neutrality during the
French Revolutionary Wars and French interference with American shipping. The situation
escalated after the XYZ Affair in 1797, when American diplomats were sent to negotiate with
France but were approached by French agents (referred to as X, Y, and Z) who demanded
bribes and loans as a precondition for negotiations. This incident ignited public outrage in the
United States, leading to calls for war against France and a naval buildup. While the conflict
primarily involved naval engagements and privateering rather than full-scale war, it
underscored the fragile diplomatic relations and growing tensions between the two nations
during Adams's presidency.
4. What were the key issues in the 1800 presidential election? Why was it called one of the
dirtiest presidential campaigns in U. S. history? (Well, until 2016.) (pg. 225-226) - 3.2.I.B
The 1800 presidential election was marked by key issues such as the direction of the federal
government, the role of political parties, and differing visions for the future of the United
States. Candidates Thomas Jefferson and John Adams represented opposing factions—Jefferson
leading the Democratic-Republicans and Adams the Federalists. Central issues included the
Alien and Sedition Acts, the size and scope of the federal government, and foreign policy,
particularly relations with France. The campaign was characterized as one of the dirtiest in U.S.
history due to its intense mudslinging, personal attacks, and the spread of misinformation.
Supporters of both candidates engaged in vicious propaganda, accusing each other of
everything from corruption to treason, which heightened political animosities and divisions.
Name __________________________________
APUSH - Period 3 pg. 9
6. Why did the United States go to war against western Indians so quickly after the Am.
Revolution? (pgs. 226-227 KC - 3.3.I.A and D
Answer: Details:
The United States went to
war against western Indians Treaty of Fort Stanwix
shortly after the American Signed in 1768 between the British government and several
Revolution due to a Native American tribes, the Treaty of Fort Stanwix aimed to
combination of territorial resolve territorial disputes in the Ohio River Valley. The treaty
expansion, the influx of established a boundary line that limited colonial expansion into
settlers, and the desire for Native American lands, particularly the territories of the
land. Following the Iroquois Confederacy. However, it was largely ignored by
Revolution, American colonists, leading to further conflicts over land rights and the
settlers were eager to move eventual displacement of Native American tribes.
westward into territories
inhabited by Native
American tribes, driven by
economic opportunities and Treaty of Greenville
the promise of fertile land. Signed in 1795 following the Northwest Indian War, the Treaty
The U.S. government sought of Greenville established a boundary between Native American
to assert control over these lands and American settlements in the Northwest Territory. It
western lands, viewing them resulted from negotiations between the United States and
as vital for national growth several Native American tribes, including the Shawnee and the
and prosperity. Native Miami, after a series of conflicts. The treaty ceded large
American tribes resisted this portions of territory to the U.S. government while granting
encroachment, aiming to certain rights to the tribes. It aimed to stabilize relations in the
maintain their autonomy, region and facilitate American expansion, but it also led to
which led to conflicts as further loss of land for Native Americans.
settlers advanced into their
territories. Despite attempts
by the federal government to
negotiate treaties, many Assimilation
agreements were ignored or Assimilation refers to the process by which individuals or
violated by settlers. As groups from one culture adopt the customs, values, and
tensions escalated and behaviors of another culture, often leading to the erosion or
Name __________________________________
APUSH - Period 3 pg. 10
violence erupted, leaders like disappearance of the original cultural identity. In the context
President George of Native American history, assimilation policies were
Washington and Thomas implemented by the U.S. government to integrate Native
Jefferson opted for military Americans into European-American society, often through
action to pacify the region education, religious conversion, and the promotion of
and facilitate further agriculture and private land ownership. These policies aimed
settlement, fueling a rapid to "civilize" Native peoples and diminish their distinct cultural
escalation into warfare practices, frequently resulting in significant cultural and social
against western Indian tribes disruption.
in the years following the
Revolution.
7. Why were the main causes of migration in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth
centuries? (pgs. 228-230) - KC 3.3.I.B
The main causes of migration in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries included
economic opportunities, westward expansion, and social factors. As the United States sought to
develop its agricultural economy, the promise of fertile land in the western territories attracted
many settlers, particularly following events like the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. The quest for
land was motivated by the desire for economic independence and the potential for wealth
through farming and commerce. Additionally, the growth of the industrial economy in the East
spurred internal migration as people moved to urban areas in search of jobs in factories and
other industries. Social factors, including the pursuit of religious freedom and the desire to
escape social constraints or conflicts in their current locations, also drove many to seek new
beginnings in different regions. Together, these factors contributed to significant population
movement across the country, shaping the demographic and cultural landscape of the United
States during this period.
Name __________________________________
APUSH - Period 3 pg. 11
Part 11 - Chapter 8
1. How did companionate marriages differ from traditional marriages? (pg. 258) - KC- 3.2.I.D
Companionate marriages, which emerged in the early nineteenth century, differed from
traditional marriages in their emphasis on mutual affection, companionship, and partnership
rather than solely on economic or social considerations. While traditional marriages were often
arranged for practical reasons—such as consolidating wealth, securing family alliances, or
maintaining social status—companionate marriages prioritized emotional bonds and personal
choice. This shift reflected broader societal changes, including the rise of individualism and the
belief in the importance of personal happiness and fulfillment in marital relationships. As a
result, companionate marriages encouraged couples to build their relationships on love and
friendship, fostering a more egalitarian dynamic within the household compared to the
hierarchical structures often seen in traditional marriages.
4. What beliefs encouraged northern states to pursue policies of manumission? (pgs. 264- 265)
- KC - 3.2.III.C
Northern states pursued policies of manumission in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth
centuries due to a combination of Enlightenment ideals, religious convictions, and economic
factors. The Enlightenment emphasized individual rights, liberty, and equality, prompting many
to view slavery as incompatible with the principles of freedom and democracy that the
American Revolution espoused. Additionally, religious groups, particularly Quakers and
abolitionists, advocated for the moral imperative of ending slavery, arguing that it was a sin
against God and humanity. The economic landscape in the North was also shifting; with the
growth of industrialization, there was less reliance on slave labor, leading many to view
manumission as a feasible and humane alternative. These beliefs collectively fostered an
environment that favored gradual emancipation and the rights of free African Americans,
contributing to the development of manumission policies across northern states.
Name __________________________________
APUSH - Period 3 pg. 13
5. How / why did the south still defend slavery? (pg. 266) - KC - 3.2.III.C
The South defended slavery through a combination of economic, social, and cultural
arguments. Economically, slavery was deeply entrenched in the Southern agricultural
system, particularly in the production of cash crops like cotton and tobacco, which
relied heavily on enslaved labor for profitability. Many Southern whites believed that
their economic survival depended on maintaining the institution of slavery. Socially,
proponents of slavery argued that it was a positive good, suggesting that it provided a
civilizing influence on enslaved people and framed it as a benevolent system where
enslaved individuals were cared for in contrast to the perceived hardships of Northern
industrial labor. Culturally, the South embraced a sense of regional identity that
romanticized the plantation lifestyle and viewed slavery as integral to their way of life.
Additionally, racist ideologies and beliefs in white supremacy justified the continuation
of slavery, depicting it as a natural order that upheld Southern social hierarchies. These
arguments combined to create a strong defense of slavery, which persisted even in the
face of growing abolitionist movements in the North.