Developmental Psychology Unit 1-2 - Part of Unit 3
Developmental Psychology Unit 1-2 - Part of Unit 3
Periods of Development – to meet the needs of understanding, development is divided into periods.
Stage Approximate Age
Prenatal Conception to birth
Infancy Birth to 3 years
Early childhood 3 years to 6 years
Middle & Late childhood 6-12 years
Adolescence 12-20 years
Young adulthood 20-40 years
Middle adulthood 40-65 years
Late adulthood 65 years to death
Prenatal stage is when the baby is still in the womb and is not formed yet.
It involves a rapid multiplication of cells to form a complex organism in an approx. 9 month period.
Infancy is a time of dependence. From birth to 2 years
For two years the baby is involved in acquiring psychological abilities such as language, thought, and
motor coordination
Early childhood is during the preschool years from 2-6 years
Children become self-sufficient, develop goal directed behaviour, and play with peers.
Middle & Late childhood correspond to the elementary school years. Age 6-11(puberty)
Fundamental skills of reading and writing are acquired, achievement becomes a central theme.
Formal introduction into one’s culture.
Adolescence involves a rapid growth spurt –physical and sexual. Age Puberty- 20 years
Issues of independence and identity
Thought becomes more abstract and logical
Understanding one’s sexuality becomes important.
Early adulthood involves establishing financial and individual independence. Age, 20-40 years
Page | 1
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
Middle adulthood involves increasing individual’s financial and developing social responsibility. Age, 40-
65 years.
Late adulthood involves developing and changing to new rules and dealing with loss of friends and family
members including spouse. Age 65>
Principles of Development – Provides a theoretical lens to the various aspects within the domains involved in
the study of lifespan development
Development is lifelong
Development involves both gain and loss
Development is Multidirectional: meaning that development takes place in different speeds.
Development is multidimensional: meaning that it moves in different domain, simultaneously.
Development is plastic: meaning that it can change whenever and is modifiable
Development is influenced by the historical and cultural context
Individual differences: Differences in characteristics, influences or developmental outcomes. They are based
on
Heredity and environment
Major contextual influences
Normative and non-normative influences
Heredity & Environment
Heredity: Inborn, innate characteristics that are inherited from the biological parents at conception through
genes
These affect multiple parts of development such as intelligence, personality and resilience.
Environment: the effect of the outside world on an individual.
Learning that comes from experience.
Major contextual Factors such as family and neighbourhood play a great role in shaping any individual. There
diversities must be kept in mind.
Normative & non-normative influences
Development must be understood in terms of changes that affect a majority and a minority
Normative: An event and its impact happens in a related way for most people that belong to a group.
Normative age graded influences: Natural and situational influences that are similar for individuals of
a specific age range.
Biological changes are usually more foreseeable than social changes e.g. adolescence as
compared to French revolution
Normative history graded influences: Natural and environmental effects that are related with historical
changes affect the group that exists around the same time.
These are common only for individuals of a specific generation e.g. world war 2
Non normative influences: An unusual event that happens to a specific person or a typical event that
happens at an exceptional point of time.
Non- normative influences are positive or negative
Embryonic Period
Page | 3
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
direction of the stroking. This helps the baby find the breast or bottle to start feeding.
This reflex lasts about 4 months
Sucking: This reflex doesn’t start until about the 32nd week of pregnancy and is not
fully developed until about 36 weeks. Premature babies may have a weak or
immature sucking ability because of this. Because babies also have a hand-to-mouth
reflex that goes with rooting and sucking, they may suck on their fingers or hands.
Eye Blink:
Tonic: When a baby’s head is turned to one side, the arm on that side stretches out
and the opposite arm bends up at the elbow. This is often called the fencing position.
This reflex lasts until the baby is about 5 to 7 months old.
Babinski: This reflex takes place when the foot of the baby is stroked and all its fingers
fan out
Moro: This reflex causes the baby to cry, throw back his or her head, and then pull his
or her limbs into the body
Darwinian Grasp/Palmar: Stroking the palm of a baby’s hand causes the baby to close
his or her fingers in a grasp. The grasp reflex lasts until the baby is about 5 to 6
months old. A similar reflex in the toes lasts until 9 to 12 months.
Walking/Stepping: This reflex is also called the walking or dance reflex because a
baby appears to take steps or dance when held upright with his or her feet touching a
solid surface. This reflex lasts about 2 months.
Most reflexes disappear soon
first 6 months to 1 year
Attributed to the increase in voluntary control over motor behaviour
Only reflexes that serve a protective functions remain
Blinking
Coughing
Gagging
Sneezing
Principles of Development:
Cephalocaudal: development occurs from top (head) to bottom (legs)
Proximodistal: Development occurs from the center of the body outward
Independence of systems: Development occurs independently in different part of the part
Interdependence of systems: development occurs as a result of coordination of the difference
part of the body, in conjunction with one another
Gross Motor Development
Begins with head control, movement – crawling to walking to running to jumping
Hand eye coordination begins
Depth Perception begins
Brain Development
Corpus callosum: helps coordinate between the hemispheres
Hemisphere specialization
Right: mechanical skills and spatial reasoning
Left:, logic, arithmetic, and language development
Size of the brain increases due to new connections
Synaptic pruning: removal of unrequired neurons is done
Page | 4
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
Page | 6
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
Page | 7
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
Page | 8
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
Page | 9
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
Page | 10
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
Chapter 1
Learning outcomes
– be able to critically evaluate the main themes and theories in developmental psychology;
– know who the key historical and contemporary figures are in developmental psychology;
psychology.
Introduction
Developmental psychology is the scientific study of age-related changes in mind and behaviour.
Originally it was believed that the development of all our skills and abilities was completed in
childhood. We now understand that development is a lifelong process; change does not stop
because we have reached adulthood. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the lifespan
approach to the study of development and to show you the importance of examining changes
that occur in adulthood, as well as those that occur in childhood. In Chapter 7, for example, we see
the way in which cognitive skills can continue to increase in adulthood or decline depending on
Page | 11
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
There are a number of themes that run right through developmental psychology. These are:
As a student of psychology you will come across the nature–nurture debate throughout your
studies. It is one of the most fundamental and oldest issues in psychology and philosophy, and
one that we will return to in later chapters. The debate concerns the relative contributions of
inheritance and the environment in determining our knowledge and behaviour. Philosophers
such as Plato and Descartes supported the idea that we are born with knowledge and innate skills.
Other thinkers such as John Locke argued for the concept of tabula rasa – the idea that the mind
is a blank slate at birth, with experience determining what we know. These philosophical viewpoints
have influenced some of the great thinkers in developmental psychology as you will see
• Are children born with innate knowledge or skills or are these acquired from interaction with
the environment?
In this context, nature refers to traits, abilities and capacities that are inherited. It includes anything
nature alone is known as maturation. In contrast, nurture refers to the environmental influences
that shape development. These can be biological; for example, substance misuse in pregnancy
may result in changes in growth and development of the unborn child. More often than not,
nurture refers to the social and cultural factors that shape our environment and way that the
behaviours of those around us influence our development. This includes the way we are raised as
Page | 12
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
children, the attitudes and behaviours of our peer group, our experiences and even the choices
we make as we get older. Societal factors, such as the socio-economic circumstances in which we
Developmental Psychology
One area where this debate has been quite prominent is that of language acquisition, a topic we
will return to in more detail in Chapter 3. A major question here is whether or not certain properties
of human language are specified genetically or simply acquired through learning. The nativist
position argues that the environmental input from language is insufficient for infants and children
to acquire the structure of language. A well-known proponent of this view is linguist Noam
Chomsky, who asserted that there is a ‘universal grammar’that applies to all human languages and
is pre-specified (Chomsky, 1979). He calls this the language acquisition device (LAD). This view
is supported by some contemporary psychologists, including Steven Pinker, who argues convincingly
that language is a human instinct, wired into our brains by evolution (Pinker, 2007).
In contrast, the empiricist position on the question of language acquisition suggests that
language input is sufficient to provide the information we require to learn the structure of
language. This perspective proposes that infants acquire language through a process of statistical
learning. Language is acquired by the general learning methods that apply to all aspects of human
development.
There is evidence to support components of both the nativist and the empiricist position, both for
language and for other aspects of development. In contemporary psychology the consensus view
is that development results from an interaction between genes and environment. However, that
does not mean that this issue has been put aside. The debate now concerns the relative role of
nature and nurture for different aspects of development. In language development, for example,
theorists such as Jerome Bruner (1983) agree with Chomsky’s notion of an LAD. However, Bruner
asserts that Chomsky gives too big a role to this aspect of language acquisition, noting that social
context, and the behaviour of parents in particular, have a significant impact on language
Page | 13
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
development. This aspect of the environment he calls the language acquisition support system
(LASS). According to Bruner, the LAD cannot function alone and every LAD therefore needs a LASS.
This issue concerns whether development follows a smooth continuous path, or whether it is a
same over the course of the lifespan. In this view, one behaviour or skill builds upon another, such
that later development can be predicted from what occurred early in life. Physical growth and
change, development occurs in distinct, usually abrupt stages. Each stage is qualitatively different
from the last. Examples sometimes cited from nature include the caterpillar that turns into a
The question for developmental psychology concerns whether psychological skills and abilities in
childhood are qualitatively different from those of adults. Or are children merely mini adults, who
simply lack the knowledge that comes with experience? One area in which this debate has been
of primary concern is cognitive development. Jean Piaget, for example, proposed a four-stage
theory to describe how children reason and interact with their surroundings (1952, 1962, 1983).
According to Piaget, children’s thinking is characterised at each stage by different forms of mental
organisation. This gives rise to qualitative differences in thinking and reasoning at each stage. This,
in turn, means that a child’s view of the world is different from that of an adult. In contrast to this,
information-processing models of cognitive development have proposed that this idea is flawed
and that cognitive change occurs because of an increase in quantitative advances, not qualitative
stem from a change in their capacity to handle information. This increased capacity, along with
Once again, psychologists generally agree that neither approach is complete. It is more likely that
some processes may be better described as continuous and others as occurring through stages.
There is also some suggestion that continuous and discontinuous processes may interact.
NeoPiagetian theory (e.g. Case, 1999) suggests that the changes in information-processing
Page | 14
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
mechanisms, such as speed and memory capacity, are responsible for the progression from stage to
stage.
A critical period is a specific time during development when a particular event has its greatest
impact. As you will see in Chapter 2, maternal diseases, such as rubella, have greater consequences
for foetal development in the eleventh week of pregnancy than in the thirtieth week.
Rubella contracted in the eleventh week may lead to blindness, deafness and heart problems.
Rubella in the thirtieth week may have no significant impact on prenatal development. In this
case, specific events during the critical period lead to atypical development. In developmental
psychology, a critical period for development usually implies that certain environmental stimuli
are necessary for typical development to occur. John Bowlby (1951), for example, suggested that,
if children did not receive the right kind of care in the first two years of life, their emotional
development would be adversely affected. According to Bowlby, between six months and two
years of age is a critical period for relationship formation. If children are not able to form a strong
attachment with a carer during this period, their ability to form relationships later in life will be
permanently damaged.
Better understanding of the plasticity and resilience of human nature has led to a reassessment
of this idea. Most developmentalists now agree that, rather than suffering permanent damage
from a lack of stimuli during early periods of development, it is more likely that people can use
later experiences to help them overcome deficits. It is now more common to talk about ‘sensitive’
rather than ‘critical’periods. In a sensitive period we may be more susceptible to particular stimuli;
however, the absence of those stimuli does not always result in irreversible damage.
Developmental Psychology
This issue concerns the extent to which early traits and characteristics persist throughout life or are
able to change. Does the shy child become a shy adult? Can a shy child become a gregarious adult?
The stability–change issue involves the degree to which we merely become older versions of our
younger selves. Theorists who believe in stability in development often argue from a nativist stance,
Page | 15
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
emphasising the role of heredity for the development of psychological characteristics. We inherit
aspects of our personality, for example, in much the same way that we inherit eye colour. From this
perspective we cannot change our psychological self, only learn to control it. Thus, the shy child
remains shy as an adult even if he or she learns to act in an outgoing manner in social situations.
From an empiricist viewpoint, stability in psychological characteristics stems from the impact
of early experiences that cannot be overcome. An individual is shy not because of a genetic
predisposition, but because during early experiences of interacting with others they encountered
considerable stress, leading them to avoid social interaction. This has much in common with the
idea described in the preceding section, that there are critical periods of development during
The alternative viewpoint is that there is potential for change throughout the life span. Later
experiences are believed to be able to influence development just as early ones do. The majority
of contemporary theorists accept this perspective. However, there is still some debate as to how
much change is possible. On the one hand, Baltes (2003) argues that, while adults are able to
change, their capacity to do so is less than that of a child and diminishes over time. On the other
hand, Kagan (2003) argues that personality traits such as shyness have a genetic basis; yet he also
provides evidence that even these inherited traits can be subject to change over time.
This concerns the extent to which development is driven by external factors or by something
inside each individual. Are children active agents who influence their own development or passive
agents who merely respond to forces in the developmental progression? Traditional views of
development see the individual as passive in their development. Empiricists see the child as a
passive recipient of stimuli, while nativists see the child as passively following a biological
programme. Most contemporary theories of development recognise an active role for children in
their own development. This thinking has its roots in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, who
argued for a synthesis of nativism and empiricism. He proposed that we are born with certain
mental structures that help us to interpret input from our senses in particular ways. By themselves,
they cannot give us knowledge. It is only through interaction with the environment that these
Page | 16
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
structures order and organise experience. He also proposed an active role for individuals as
Modern theories of development recognise children as central to their own development. The
individual is able to influence development directly through the choices they make and increasingly,
as they get older, by selecting their environment. They are also able to affect development
indirectly through their behaviour, which can affect how others respond to them and, to some
Theories of development
Miller (2002) defines a theory as a set of interconnected statements including definitions, axioms,
postulates, hypothetical constructs, laws and testable hypotheses, which describe unobservable
structures, mechanisms or processes and relate them to observable events. Complete theories of
theories serve as frames of reference for examining change in specific aspects of mind or
behaviour, such as cognition or emotional functioning. In this way, they are perhaps better viewed
view of development is usually based on a general set of assumptions about how change occurs
and the factors they believe to be most significant in producing developmental change. You may
well have come across some of these theoretical perspectives in other areas of psychology. While
there are many approaches in psychology, the most significant from a developmental standpoint
include the psychodynamic, learning, constructivist and social constructivist perspectives, which
are described briefly here. We will return to these theories later in the chapter when we look at
Psychodynamic theories
Proponents of the psychodynamic perspective believe that behaviour is motivated by inner forces,
memories and conflicts, of which a person has little awareness or control. These inner forces
usually result from childhood experiences and continue to influence behaviour across the lifespan.
Page | 17
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
The best-known theorists in this perspective are Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) and Erik Erikson
(1902–94).
Learning theories
This perspective suggests that the key to understanding development lies in observable
behaviour and an individual’s response to environmental stimuli. The assumption here is that
behaviour is a learned response to reinforcement provided by the environment. The learning and
Developmental Psychology
conditioning principles described in the behavioural theories of BF Skinner (1936) and John B
One area that behaviourist theories do not explain is the type of learning that takes place when
someone learns by observing a model. Called social learning by Albert Bandura (1963), this is the
process by which someone imitates the behaviour observed in another person when it appears
to have reinforcing consequences, and inhibits such behaviour when the observed consequence
is punishment.
Constructivism argues that learning and development occur when an individual interacts with the
environment around them. Individuals are seen as active learners who construct their own
understanding and knowledge of the world from their actions upon the environment. Development
is
suggested to take place in sequential stages and children’s thinking is proposed to be different
from that of adults. The most well-known theorist in this perspective is Jean Piaget (1896–1980),
Social constructivist theories are a variant of this perspective and emphasise the influence of the
social and cultural environment on development. The social context of development and an
individual’s interactions with other people are seen as playing an important role in development.
The most significant theorists to take account of social and cultural factors in development are
There are two key areas to be aware of with regard to the progress of developmental psychology
as a discipline. First, there has been a change in the focus of interest from development in
childhood, to development across the lifespan. Second, there has been a gradual change in the
The scientific study of children began in the second half of the nineteenth century, when Charles
Darwin (1809–82) first put forward his theory of evolution. In his book On the Origin of Species
(1859), Darwin focused attention on the significance of the immaturity of human infants. In
theory, individual development replicates the evolution of the species. For example, in the very
early stages of development the human embryo looks like a fish, even having gill slits. This fits well
with the evolutionary idea that humans evolved from other vertebrates. Darwin also kept a
detailed record of his infant son’s development, which he later reported in the journal Mind (1877).
Baby biographies such as this one were popular during the late nineteenth century and are often
credited with being some of the first studies in human development. While not scientifically
sound, these single case studies made human development a legitimate topic for study.
A number of other scientists of the time were influenced by these baby biographies and
Darwin’s theories, most notably Granville Stanley Hall (1846–1924), the founder of the American
Psychological Association. Well aware of the shortcomings of the baby biographies, Hall became
a strong advocate of the need to base child-rearing on scientific principles. His own studies used
questionnaires in an attempt to collect more objective data and to explore the contents of children’s
minds(Hall, 1891). At around the same time in England, James Sully (1842–1923) established a new
Initially, developmental psychology focused on the changes that take place in childhood. It was
only in the early twentieth century that adolescence began to be studied as a distinct life stage.
One of the first psychologists to study and write about adolescence was Hall (1904), who
suggested that this was an important period of change, typified by intense emotional turmoil,
Page | 19
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
which he called ‘storm and stress’. The importance of psychological development as a process that
continues throughout adulthood as well as childhood and adolescence was not fully recognised
until much later in the twentieth century. Hall himself wrote about changes in adulthood in 1922;
however, one of the most important theories to suggest that psychological development
Although some early theorists such as Hall saw all phases of the lifespan as worthy of investigation,
for much of the twentieth century the study of human development was divided into age-related
specialities. Some researchers focused on infancy and childhood, others specialised in adolescence
and some focused on gerontology, the study of ageing and old age. So while many areas of
the lifespan were being studied, this was being done in quite separate, self-contained disciplines.
In this traditional approach to studying development the emphasis is on the idea that most
period of relative stability. Finally, old age is believed to be characterised by decline. This is quite
different from the lifespan perspective, which began to emerge as a distinct discipline in the 1960s
and 1970s. According to this perspective, developmental change occurs throughout the lifespan
and changes in adulthood are as important as those in childhood. No age period dominates
development. Changes that occur as we age may also be positive; ageing is not defined by decline.
decrease, others expand. Furthermore, development includes both gain and loss throughout the
lifespan and these may even occur together. Development is also believed to be multidimensional;
that is, it consists of biological, social, emotional and cognitive changes, all of which
goal. It is also recognised that development can be influenced by the environment in which an
individual lives. Thus, the socio-cultural context of development is seen as highly relevant to
developmental change. Finally, the plasticity of human development – the idea that we retain
capacity for change in response to environmental factors right across the lifespan – is emphasised.
This lifespan approach to development has become increasingly popular in recent years, perhaps
Page | 20
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
in response to increases in life expectancy. This is undoubtedly because of the optimistic view it
gives of ageing. Rather than being seen as the endpoint of development as it is in the traditional
view, adulthood is seen as an important time of growth and change. Furthermore, adulthood and
ageing are no longer portrayed as a period of decline; positive change is seen to take place even
for older adults. As we shall see in Chapter 7, there is a lot of evidence that supports this positive
view of ageing.
In the late nineteenth century, the new study of child development used a systematic approach
to investigating age-related changes. The methods used were based on those used in the natural
sciences and involved evaluating theories of development by generating and testing hypotheses.
This is known as the hypothetico-deductive method. When following this scientific experimental
method, the aim is to collect objective data and carry out a quantitative analysis in order to
provide accurate descriptions and explanations of how and why change occurs. It is also common
An underlying assumption in this traditional scientific approach is that there is an objective reality
in the world that can be observed, measured and categorised. This is sometimes referred to as a
positivist approach and has been used widely in developmental psychology since the study of
human development began. This approach has produced much of the theoretical work and
research described in this book. However, in the last 20 to 30 years, there has been increasing
debate about whether the approach taken in traditional science is appropriate for the study of
human development. One important objection that we will encounter throughout this book is
that, in traditional lab-based research, development is being studied outside a meaningful social
context. The findings may therefore lack ecological validity, which means that they may no
longer hold true when people are behaving naturally in their everyday settings. It is also argued
that people’s behaviour during a research study may also be changed because of other factors,
such as the uneven power relationship between the researcher and the participant. It has also
been suggested that researchers may impose on participants their own ideas of what is being
Page | 21
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
measured, by the research tools that they use and the way they design the study. Thus a
participant’s behaviour during the study may not be completely natural but may, in part, be an
artifact of participating in the research. The problem of the uneven power relationship has been
suggested as a particular issue when working with children and is something we will return to in
later chapters.
These objections to the positivist approach have resulted in a different emphasis in the way that
some developmental psychologists conduct their research. They may do this while still following
the core principles of the traditional scientific approach. For example, studies have been carried out
to investigate the influence of context on people’s behaviour, but using traditional experimental
methods. A good example of this is the work of Margaret Donaldson (1978), which looked at how
children’s cognitive performance changed according to the language used and the meaningfulness
of the situation. More studies have been carried out to research people’s behaviour in everyday
situations using observations and quasi-experimental methods. The collection of more qualitative
data, using open-ended questions in questionnaires and interviews that allow participants to raise
ideas that the researcher had not included, has also become more common.
Other psychologists have shown a more radical reaction to the debate about the traditional
scientific approach. They reject the idea that human thought and behaviour can ever be studied
objectively. This is because they argue that there is no single objective reality; rather, each one of
us constructs our own understandings and interpretations of ‘reality’, which are embedded in the
context of our interactions with others. ‘Reality’ is therefore highly individualised and subjective.
These psychologists argue that it is the interactions between people that should be the focus for
psychological research. The aim is to describe the subjective experience of participants and
understand individuality in order to build ‘local theories’ that apply to the specific social context
of an event. Unlike ‘scientific’theories, they are not concerned with generating predictions as much
as making sense of phenomena. These are some of the key features of what is referred to as a
qualitative approach, and sometimes called ‘new paradigm’research. The difference between this
and the traditional approach is illustrated by Grieg and Taylor’s (1999) suggestion that, in the
positivist approach, children are determined, knowable, objective and measurable, whereas in the
qualitative approach they are subjective, contextual, self-determining and dynamic. It is important
Page | 22
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
to recognise that there is some overlap between these differing approaches. Many researchers use
a variety of methods and seek to gain both quantitative and qualitative data.
There are a number of key figures in developmental psychology. These are the theorists whose
ideas and research have changed the way we think about human development. The aforementioned
Granville Stanley Hall (1904, 1912, 1922), for example, is often called the ‘father’ of
developmental psychology, as he carried out some of the first systematic studies of children. He
also taught one of the first courses in child development and established scientific journals for the
publication of child development research. His belief that children’s development recapitulates
the evolution of the species has long since been discredited. However, he retains importance as a
historical figure as he inspired a great deal of the work on human development upon which this
book is based. The theories of those who followed in Hall’s footsteps have also not always stood
up to close scrutiny. However, there are some theorists whose work remains critical to our
Watson created the behaviourist approach to psychology at the beginning of the twentieth
century (Watson, 1913). He believed that human behaviour can be understood in terms of
called instead for the objective study of observable, measurable behaviours. In 1928, in his book
Psychological Care of the Infant and Child, he presented his view that all behaviour is the product
of environment and experience. Biological factors had no role, according to Watson. His theory
Watson believed that learning occurs through operant conditioning, when an association is
made between a behaviour and the consequence of that behaviour. Consequences will either
reinforce a behaviour, thus making it more likely to reoccur, or will be aversive, thus decreasing the
likelihood of the behaviour reoccurring. A reinforcer is therefore any event that strengthens or
increases the behaviour that it follows. There are two kinds of reinforcers.
Page | 23
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
• Positive reinforcers are favourable outcomes presented after the behaviour. In positive
reinforcement, a response or behaviour is strengthened by the addition of something such as
• Negative reinforcers involve the removal of an unfavourable outcome after the display of a
considered unpleasant.
Conversely, punishment occurs when an adverse outcome causes a decrease in the behaviour it
• Negative punishment occurs when a favourable outcome is removed after a behaviour occurs.
Although we now believe development to be far more complex than behaviourism allows,
modern application of many of the ideas presented in Watson’s learning theory can still be found,
most especially in Applied Behavioural Analysis (ABA) – an intervention programme often used
Bandura believes that behavioural learning theories are inadequate as a framework for
understanding human development. He suggests that many human behaviours are learned from
observing others. According to Bandura’s social learning theory (1963), people learn through
observing others’behaviour and attitudes, using this as a model for their own behaviour. However,
• Attention: in order for the behaviour to be learned, the observer must see the modelled
behaviour.
• Reproduction: the observer must have the skills to reproduce the action.
• Motivation: the observer must be motivated to carry out the action they have observed and
remembered, and must have the opportunity to do so. Motivation may include seeing the
model’s behaviour reinforced, while punishment may discourage repetition of the behaviour.
Page | 24
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
According to Bandura, the observer will imitate the model’s behaviour only if the model possesses
characteristics that the observer finds attractive or desirable. Therefore, we do not always imitate
others’actions. We choose who to imitate – learning is not an automatic response but depends on
internal processes as well as environmental ones. This is very different from Watson’s view of
learning, and social learning theory has sometimes been called a bridge between behaviourist and
Sigmund Freud is best known in developmental psychology for his model of psychosexual
development (1905). This theory is in sharp contrast to the objective approach advocated by
Watson. His is one of the best known, but also one of the most controversial theories of
development. It was based on his own and his patients’ recollections of their childhood. According to
Freud, personality develops through a series of stages, during which the psychosexual energies of
the id become focused on different areas of the body as the child grows to adulthood. This
psychosexual energy, or libido, was described as the driving force behind behaviour. Freud
proposed five stages of development (see Table 1.1). If each psychosexual stage is completed
successfully, the result is a healthy personality. However, if certain issues are not resolved at the
appropriate stage, fixation occurs. Until this issue or conflict is resolved, the individual remains
stuck in this stage. For example, a person who is fixated at the oral stage may be overdependent
on others and may seek oral stimulation through smoking, drinking or eating.
Freud’s model is an interactionist one, in which development is determined by both biology and
the environment. Thus, the sequence and timing of the stages are biologically determined;
child at each stage. The details of Freud’s developmental theory have been widely criticised, and
few psychologists today accept his theory of development as accurate. One problem with his
theory is that concepts such as the libido are impossible to measure, and therefore cannot be
tested scientifically. Furthermore, Freud’s theory is based on case studies and not empirical
research. Freud based his theory on the recollections of his adult patients, not on actual
Page | 25
Course Code:
Course Name: Developmental Psychology
Oral Birth to 1 year An infant’s primary interaction with the world is through the mouth.
The mouth is vital for eating, and the infant derives pleasure from oral
this need is not met, the child may develop an oral fixation later in life,
and overeating.
Anal 1 to 3 years Freud believed that the primary focus of the libido was on controlling
children and parents. Too much pressure can result in an excessive need
for order or cleanliness later in life, while too little pressure from parents
Phallic 3 to 6 years Freud suggested that the primary focus of the id’s energy is on the
to the opposite sex parent. To cope with this conflict, children adopt the
superego.
Latent 6 to 11 years During this stage, the superego continues to develop, while the id’s
Genital 11 to 18 years The onset of puberty causes the libido to become active once again.
During this stage, people develop a strong interest in the opposite sex.
Page | 26