Lecture 7 Testing and Selection
Lecture 7 Testing and Selection
and Selection
Sabnam Basu
Selection
• Selection is the process of picking individuals (out of the pool of job applicants) with
requisite qualifications and competence to fill jobs in the organization.
• Mostly focuses on selecting applicants from outside the organization
• Effective selection is crucial for organizations
• to strive towards effective performance and also help them achieve competitive
advantage
• cost incurred in recruiting and hiring
Cost in terms of production or profit
• Outcomes of the Selection Decision: losses, damaged company reputation,
accidents due to negligence, absenteeism,
and the like
Failure Success
Predicted Predicted Costs of replacing an employee with a
fresh one—costs of hiring, training and
replacement
Rejected Applications
• The process might differ Selection Tests
among organizations and
between two different jobs Interview
within the same company
Reference and Background
• E.g., for senior managers it
Analysis
will be long-drawn and
rigorous, but it is simple and Selection decision
short for hiring shop-floor
workers
Physical Examination
Job Offer
Employment Contract
Evaluation
3
Internal and External Environment
• Supply and demand of specific skills in the labor market
• Unemployment rate
• Labor-market conditions
• Legal and political considerations
• Company’ image
• Company’s policy Internal
• HRP
• Cost of hiring
CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 4
4
Preliminary Screening
CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 5
Selection Tests
• Tests are used to determine the applicant’s ability, aptitude and personality
• Different types of tests may be administered, depending on the job and the company
Simulation
• Provided with situations representative of the job for which they’re applying, and
evaluate their responses. E.g., Pilots, military, etc. (involves use of simulation
machines and techniques)
• In business using work samples is a great technique
• Work samples: Actual job tasks used as samples for testing applicants’
performance
• Several Advantages:
• It measures actual job tasks, so it’s harder to fake answers.
• Is not as likely to be unfair to minorities (as might a personnel test that possibly
emphasizes middle-class concepts and values)
• Work sampling doesn’t delve into the applicant’s personality, so there’s almost no
chance of applicants viewing it as an invasion of privacy.
• Designed properly, work samples also exhibit better validity than do other tests
designed to predict performance.
Some other selection techniques
• Predictors: the human traits and skills you believe predict success on the job. For an
assembler’s job, predictors might include manual dexterity and patience.
• Criterion: The standards of success. You could use production related criteria (quantity,
quality, and so on), personnel data (absenteeism, length of service, and so on), or worker
performance (reported by supervisors).
• The next step is to decide how to test for them.
• Employers usually base this choice on experience, previous research, and “best guesses.”
• They usually don’t start with just one test. Instead, they choose several tests and combine
them into a test battery.
• The test battery aims to measure an array of possible predictors, such as
aggressiveness, extroversion, and numerical ability.
• Equal employment laws should be considered and test should be conducted in a manner
that is ethical and protects the test taker’s privacy
• Utility analysis CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 10
Important Characteristics of Tools/Tests
• Reliability: consistency of the test to yield similar result over time and different
occasions
• Test-retest reliability: administer a test to a group one day, re-administer the same test
several days later to the same group, and then correlate the first set of scores with the
second
• Equivalent or alternate form reliability: administer a test and then administer what
experts believe to be an equivalent test/alternative form of the same test later on.
• Split half reliability: Splitting the test into two equal halves
• Reliability coefficient: shows the degree to which the two measures are correlated
CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 11
Important Characteristics of Tools/Tests
• Validity: whether the test measures what it intends to measure
• With employee selection tests, validity often refers to evidence that the test is job
related—that performance on the test accurately predicts job performance
• Construct validity: A test that is construct valid is one that demonstrates that a selection
procedure measures a construct and that construct is important for successful job performance
• Content validity: A test that is content valid is one that contains a fair sample of the tasks and
skills actually needed for the job in question
• Criterion validity: A type of validity based on showing that scores on the test (predictors) are
related to job performance (criterion)
• Concurrent Validity: compare their test scores with their current performance
• Predictive validity: compare their test scores with their future performance
• A department store chain had very high turnover among its cosmetics sales associates.
• Chose 450 current cosmetics associates who filled out anonymous surveys aimed at identifying
employee traits.
• By using HR analytics to analyze these and other data, the company identified cosmetics
associates’ traits that correlated with performance and tenure.
• They had assumed that the best associates were friendly and enthusiastic about cosmetics.
• However, the best were actually problem solvers. They take information about what the
customer wants and needs, and solve the problem.
• HR analysis thereby helped them formulate better selection criteria.
14
Expectancy Chart
15
Extent of investigations and checks
In a survey of 700 HR managers,
–Reference checks (87%)
Reference and
Background Check –Background employment checks (69%) –Criminal records (61%)
–Driving records (56%)–Credit checks (35%)
Trends shaping HR
Reasons for investigations and checks
• Digital tools are changing the background-
checking process. Employers are Googling –To verify factual information provided by applicants.
applicants or checking Facebook and
–To uncover damaging information.
LinkedIn, and what they’re finding isn’t
always pretty. Should be done with caution and be in line with the equal
• E.g., One candidate described his interests employment laws of the country. Many times taking
on Facebook as smoking pot and shooting
content from the employee is mandatory
people. The student may have been kidding,
but didn’t get the job (2006, The New York
Times)
• Should be careful while using social media Reference providers’ concerns
as rejecting someone based on social media • Fear of legal reprisal for defamation
information can be contested. • Not wanting to damage the applicant’s chances
• Certain information like race, ethnic origin • Helping to get rid an incompetent employees
may led to discrimination
• Nowadays blockchain technology is
being used to do background check as there • In India Aadhaar verification is being used to verify biometrics,
are thousands of database that are residence and bank details.
available/ being created. • Government jobs require police verification 16
Interviews
• Existence of several types of interviews:
- Selection interview - Appraisal Interview
- Exit Interview
Structured Unstructured
Interview Interview
17
Types of Interview
based on Content
Situational Interviews Behavioural Interviews Job-related Interviews Stress Interviews
• Job related questions • Job-related questions that • Job-relevant past • The interviewer seeks to make
about how the candidate focus on how the candidate experiences. the applicant uncomfortable
would behave in given reacted to actual situations • The questions here don’t with occasionally rude
situation. in the past. revolve around questions.
• E.g., How would you act • E.g., Can you think hypothetical or actual • The aim is supposedly to spot
in response to a • of a time when you handles situations or scenarios sensitive applicants and those
subordinate coming to a crisis? • E.g., Which courses did with low (or high) stress
work late 3 days in a • EY India and KPMG India you like best in business tolerance.
row? often conduct selection school?” • The stress interview’s invasive
• How would one behave interview by giving a case and ethically dubious nature
in a hypothetical study that includes a demands that the interviewer
situation in the future business scenario be both skilled in its use and
sure the job really requires
handling stress.
Technical Interviews • In India, banks many times
uses stress interviews for sales
• Focuses on the subject understanding of a candidate
function
• Many Indian companies particularly the IT and technology
• However, companies like
firms conduct this kind of interviews
Philips are nowadays focusing
• In a survey, it was found that MNBCs use technical
more on mutual discovery and
interviews separately
stress free interviews 18
Computer- Web-based
Types of Interview Phone Face to face
based job video
interviews interviews
based on Mode interviews interviews
One-on-one interview: two people meet alone, and one interviews the other by
seeking oral responses to oral inquiries.
Sequential (or serial) Interviews: several persons interview the applicant, in sequence, one-on-one, and then
make their hiring decision
• Unstructured sequential interview
–An interview in which each interviewer forms an independent opinion after asking different questions.
• Structured sequential interview
–An interview in which the applicant is interviewed sequentially by several persons; each rates the applicant
on a standard form.
A panel interview (board interview): interview conducted by a team of interviewers (usually two to
three), who together question each candidate and then combine their ratings of each candidate’s answers
into a final panel score.
An even more stressful variant is the mass interview. Here a panel interviews several candidates
simultaneously. The panel might pose a problem, and then watches to see which candidate
takes the lead in formulating an answer. 19
• First Impression (Snap Judgements):
Avoiding Errors • Making up one’s mind even before interview starts, based on the application and appearance.
• Negative bias: Interviewers are more influenced by unfavorable than favorable information
• Their impressions are much more likely to change from favorable to unfavorable than from
unfavorable to favorable.
52 HR specialists • Misunderstanding the job
watched videotaped job .
Applicants’ verbal content was • More job knowledge translated into better interviews.
identical.
Nonverbal behavior differed markedly. • E.g., just knowing that it is for a position of secretary as compared to knowing more
One group was told to exhibit minimal information like bilingual skills are required for this post
eye contact, a low energy level, and low
voice modulation. • Candidate-Order (Contrast) Error and Pressure to Hire
And opposite to the second group.
23 of 26 of high-eye-contact, high- • An error of judgment on the part of the interviewer due to interviewing one or more very good or
energy-level candidate were invited for very bad candidates just before the interviewee in question.
second interview.
None from the low-eye-contact, low- • Pressure to hire might accentuate this problem
energy-level group.
• Nonverbal behavior and
• Interviewers’ inferences of the interviewee’s personality from the way he or she acts in the
interview have a large impact on the interviewer’s rating of the interviewee.
• Impression management
• Clever interviewees attempt to manage the impression they present to persuade interviewers to
view them more favorably by praising the interviewers or agreeing with their opinions, thus
Diversity signaling they shared similar beliefs.
• Self-promotion means promoting one’s own skills and abilities to create the impression of
competence
• Effect of Personal Characteristics: Attractiveness, Gender, Race
• Halo effect: positive impressions of a person in one area to positively influence one's opinion
or feelings in other areas
• People generally attribute favorable traits and more success to attractive people. 20
• Same race or ethnicity
Thank You
21