0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views

PEDro Scale Partitioned 4

Uploaded by

alexdicarlo64
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views

PEDro Scale Partitioned 4

Uploaded by

alexdicarlo64
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PEDro scale (partitioned): Rating sheet

The PEDro scale (partitioned) is used for rating the presence or absence of 8 internal validity
criteria and 2 statistical reporting criteria relevant to randomised controlled trials in the OTseeker
database www.otseeker.com It is an adaptation of the PEDro scale www.pedro.org.au and may
be copied with acknowledgement of both websites.
Please see the Guidelines and Explanations document for more information about each criterion.
If on a literal reading of the trial report it is possible that a criterion was not satisfied or reported,
that criterion receives a ‘No’.

Please note: The best interpretation of this information is to consider the potential impact
that the presence or absence of each of these criteria might have on the trial, rather than
the number of criteria met.

Internal Validity (8 Criteria)


Criteria Rating

1. Subjects were randomly allocated to groups (in a crossover study, Yes  No 


subjects were randomly allocated an order in which treatments were Where:
received).
Yes  No 
2. Allocation was concealed. Where:

3. The groups were similar at baseline regarding the most important Yes  No 
prognostic indicators. Where:

4. There was blinding of all assessors who measured at least one Yes  No 
key outcome. Where:

5. There was blinding of all subjects. Yes  No 


Where:

6. There was blinding of all therapists who administered Yes  No 


the therapy. Where:

7. Measures of at least one key outcome were obtained from more than Yes  No 
85%of the subjects initially allocated to groups. Where:

8. All subjects for whom outcome measures were available received the Yes  No 
treatment or control condition as allocated or, where this was not the case, Where:
data for at least one key outcome was analysed by ‘intention to treat’.

Statistical reporting (2 Criteria)


9. The results of between-group statistical comparisons are reported for Yes  No 
at least one key outcome. Where:

10. The study provides both point measures and measures of variability Yes  No 
for at least one key outcome. Where:

11. Eligibility criteria were specified (Reported separately) Yes  No 


Where:

The PEDro scale (partitioned) is a version of the PEDro scale adapted for OTseeker.
The PEDro scale was developed by the creators of PEDro (The Physiotherapy Evidence Database) http://www.pedro.org.au

You might also like