170LB Lab Report 6
170LB Lab Report 6
Section 17099
Lab # 6:Characterization of Bipolar Junction Transistors and
MOSFETs
Date of Experiment:
I. Procedure
Lab 6 focused on examining particular characteristics of Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJTs) and
charge carriers across two junctions and come in two types: NPN and PNP, with current
controlled by the base. In contrast, MOSFETs are voltage-controlled devices, with an insulated
gate that controls the flow of current between the source and drain that can be used as an
amplifier or switch. This experiment will explore the relationship between applied voltage and
the current through the transistor. When voltage is applied to a Bipolar Junction Transistor (BJT),
the current through it increases exponentially with the base-emitter voltage, as it is controlled by
current flow between the drain and source is controlled by the gate voltage, with current
increasing linearly and then saturating as gate voltage rises beyond the threshold level. A simple
circuit was built with two voltage sources, one constant and one which we adjusted, to measure
the current between the drain and source (MOSFET), or collector and base (BJT). These values
were collected and compared for a constant voltage input and adjusted voltage and plotted to
BJT:
Table 1: V2 = 5V
V1 VBE VR Ic
0 0.2 0 0
0.2 0.2 0 0
0.4 0.4 0 0
0.6 0.6 0.3 0.0003
0.8 0.6 2.57 0.00257
1 0.67 4.82 0.00482
1.2 0.675 4.86 0.00486
1.4 0.678 4.88 0.00488
1.6 0.68 4.89 0.00489
1.8 0.683 4.9 0.0049
2 .685 .491 0.000491
Table 2: V1 = 0.7
V2 VCE VR IC
0 1.8 mV 0 0
0.2 26.5 mV .2 0.0002
0.4 43.3 mV .4 0.0004
0.6 60.3 mV .55 0.00055
0.8 74.7 mV 0.71 0.00071
1 92.8 mV 0.9 0.0009
1.2 .112 V 1.1 0.0011
1.4 .185 V 1.2 0.0012
1.6 .364 V 1.23 0.00123
1.8 .578 V 1.24 0.00124
2 .807 V 1.25 0.00125
2.5 1.25 V 1.25 0.00125
3 1.66 V 1.26 0.00126
3.5 2.1 V 1.27 0.00127
4 2.689 1.28 .00128
4.5 3.19 1.29 .00129
5 3.7 1.3 .0013
Table 3: V1 = 0.8
V2 VCE VR IC
0 1.81 mV 0 0
0.2 17.5 mV 0.2 0.0002
0.4 28.9 mV 0.4 0.0004
0.6 38.9 mV 0.58 0.00058
0.8 46.7 mV 0.75 0.00075
1 55.4 mV 1 0.001
1.2 63.2 mV 1.2 0.0012
1.4 71 mV 1.33 0.00133
1.6 78.7 mV 1.5 0.0015
1.8 87.2 mV 1.7 0.0017
2 97.5 mV 1.9 0.0019
2.5 .134 V 2.37 0.00237
3 .394 V 2.6 0.0026
3.5 .864 V 2.6 0.0026
4 1.35 2.64 0.00264
4.5 1.82 2.66 0.00266
5 2.3 2.69 0.00269
MOSFETS:
Table 4: V2 = 5V
V1 VGS VR ID
0 0 0 0
0.2 0.2 0 0
0.4 0.4 0 0
0.6 0.6 0 0
0.8 0.8 0 0
1 1 0 0
1.2 1.2 0 0
1.4 1.4 0 0
2 2 0.14 0.00014
V2 VDS VR ID
0 0 0.092 0.000092
Beginning with the BJT transistors, our results confirm the outcomes expected. Table and Chart !
reveal that the voltage applied to the transistor from V1 produces virtually no current until the
threshold voltage of 0.7V is reached. Upon reaching that value, we expect it to increase
exponentially, but given the small sample it appears linear. That said, we would expect this
sudden rise in current to occur after the threshold voltage is exceeded. In Table and Chart 2 we
observe a constant voltage for V1 and incrementally increase V2. In the plot we notice a linear
increase in current from 0.0V to approximately 0.5V, where it reaches the active region and
begins to normalize. Subsequently, we see in Table and Chart 3, that increasing V1 slightly
establishes a new active current of approximately .0026A. This is a higher Ic , with a linear
relationship in the saturation zone, given a higher VCE which we expect to see.
One must note that in our plots for the MOSFET, there was a formatting error and the
horizontal axis values are shown from 0 to 12. This is incorrect, and should reflect the VDS, GS
values in the above charts. With that noted, the MOSFET also followed the expected results. We
see in Table and Chart 4 an exponential relationship between ID and VGS . In Table and Chart 5 we
see the expected linear relationship between ID and VDS which then levels off in the saturation
zone and stays nearly constant with increases in voltage. Table 6 and Chart 6 likely reflect an
error in our execution of the experiment or recorded data. We would expect to see a graph similar
to that in Chart 5, but with an ID that is greater. This chart and this data reflects a linear
relationship, which was not expected and likely a result of our circuit set-up and execution.