Scribd
Upload
29 views2 pages

SC Judgements - MM

Uploaded by

prarittonk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views2 pages

SC Judgements - MM

Uploaded by

prarittonk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Maths Mania

SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS


SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS

MOHD. AHMED KHAN V. SHAH BANO BEGUM AND OTHERS (1985):


● RELATED TO UNIFORM CIVIL CODE (ARTICLE 44)

ANOOP BARANWAL VS UNION OF INDIA (2023)


● A five-judge constitution bench, headed by Justice KM Joseph, unanimously ruled that the
present mode of appointing the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners
would be modified.
● Now, a three-member committee, consisting of the PM, the Leader of the Opposition
party, and the Chief Justice of India (CJI), will advise the President of India on these
appointments until Parliament enacts relevant legislation.

SUPRIYO VS UNION OF INDIA (2023)


● A five-judge Constitution bench headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) has delivered its
verdict on the issue of same-sex marriage.
● The Court has taken some steps to protect same-sex unions from discrimination in India.
● However, in the final analysis, the Court did not grant recognition to same-sex marriage
and stated that there is no fundamental right to marry

MK RANJITSINH VS UNION OF INDIA (2024)


● In its decision on March 21, 2024 in M.K Ranjitsinh Versus Union of India in 2021, the
Supreme Court of India has held that the people have a right to be free from the adverse
effects of climate change within the ambit of fundamental rights.

JANHIT ABHIYAN V. UNION OF INDIA (2022)


● The 103rd constitutional amendment does not violate the Basic Structure of the
Constitution.
● The EWS quota is not in conflict with Equality or the fundamental principles of the
Constitution. Reservation is not limited to Socially and Educationally Backward Classes
(SEBCs), but also includes other disadvantaged groups.
● The 50% ceiling limit for reservations set in the Indra Sawhney case is not rigid and the
50% rule only applies to specific communities, not the general category.

AISHAT SHIFA V. STATE OF KARNATAKA (2022)


● Hijab case

Click here to follow - mm.abhishekrai Maths Mania mathsmaniassc

Page – ( 1/2 )
Maths Mania
SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS
● A Divisional Bench of the Supreme Court, delivered a split verdict on 13th October 2022.
● One judge: Secularity means Uniformity.Hijab would affect the creation of a homogenous
group of students and create a segmented society.
● Other judge: Secularity means tolerance to diversity, asking to take off hijab at school gate
is violative of Privacy and Dignity.
● The case has now been placed before the CJI to decide whether to refer the case to a 3-
judge bench or a 9-judge bench.

ANOOP BARANWAL VS UNION OF INDIA(2023)


● Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners shall appointed by the President
on the advice of a 3-member committee: PM
● Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha/Leader of largest opposition CJI.
● The Court clarified that this norm would continue to hold good till a law is made by
Parliament.

ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS VS UNION OF INDIA(2024)


(ELECTORAL BONDS SCHEME)
● SC in Association for Democratic Reforms vs Union of India (2024) unanimously struck
down Electoral Bonds Scheme (EBS), which aimed to enhance transparency in electoral
funding.
● It violates the Right to Information under Article 19(1)(a) and is therefore unconstitutional.

IMP JUDGEMENTS RELATED TO PREAMBLE OF THE CONSTITUTION


Important Cases Judgements

Berubari Union Case (1960) The Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.

Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) The Preamble is a part of the Constitution.

LIC of India Case (1995) The Supreme Court in this case once again
held that Preamble is the integral part of the
Constitution but is not directly enforceable in
a court of justice in India

Click here to follow - mm.abhishekrai Maths Mania mathsmaniassc

Page – ( 2/2 )

You might also like