Decoding Apple Done
Decoding Apple Done
Student Name:
Course Name:
Course Number:
Instructor's Name:
Due Date:
ABSTRACT
In the present era, technology firms have become an integral part of society’s lifestyle
and economic productivity and hence need a focus on continuous operations and sustainable
development. This paper uses Apple Inc. as a case study to provide financial statement analysis
focusing on liquidity ratios, solvency analysis, and profitability analysis from 2021 to 2023. The
information in this paper originates from Apple’s financial statements for the said period as well
as from other sources that have previously looked into this topic. With regards to liquidity, based
on the liquidity ratios, Apple has been in a tight position, though the figures have been
manageable. On the issue of solvency, based on the solvency ratios, the company has been seen
to have utilized a high level of leverage to drive its profitability. On the profitability analysis, the
company has maintained a high return on assets and equity, which has translated to handsome
returns to investors.
INTRODUCTION
Starting as a mere project in 1976, situated within a Silicon Valley garage, Apple Inc. has
always been at odds with the rest of its industries by continuously concentrating on innovation
(Library of Congress, n.d.). They had set out to make personal computing better through their
risky investment henceforth Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak are now associated with Apple Inc
which is a global technological giant that fuses modern hardware, software and services so well
that it is adored across the globe (Apple Inc, 2024). From Apple I and II computers to iPhone,
iPad and MacBook lines among other inventions like no other leading manufacturer before them;
they have kept on setting new standards for others to follow –this is what characterizes Apple’s
higher than industry benchmarks throughout its meteoric growth. Whether through making
experiences, this company always shows how much profit it earns annually and how plentifully
liquid assets it possesses (Lu, 2023). Their financial ability has enabled the company maintain a
competitive position while attracting various investors as well as researchers who analyze stock
financial obligations as they arise. This entails evaluating whether a business can convert its
current assets into cash or cash equivalents to clear the current debts. The main aim of this form
of analysis is to help establish whether or not a firm has enough liquid resources that would keep
Liquidity Ratios
The current ratio reflecting a company’s ability to cover liabilities due within one year. It
is gotten by dividing the current assets by the current liabilities of the company.
Current Ratio
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
—
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
p ct v c n b r r y n ul g p ct v c n b r r y n ul g p
Se O No De Ja Fe Ma Ap Ma Ju J Au Se O No De Ja Fe Ma Ap Ma Ju J Au Se
The diagram in figure 1 indicates that Apple’s current ratio since September 2021 to
September 2023. As such, Apple’s current asset could not pay off its current liabilities in the
period covered 2022 as the ratio was less than 1:1. However, the situation changed after
September 2023 when the ration became greater than one. This can be attributed to an increase in
current assets compared to current assets and the company has sustained the same since then.
The quick ratio is another liquidity ratio that measures the ability of a company to pay off
its short-term obligations using its most liquid assets excluding inventories. When the quick ratio
is below 1.0, it could be a sign of possible liquidity problems whereas a higher ratio shows
stronger position of liquidity of a company. Apple’s quick ratio also followed the same pattern
with current ratio in that it declined from 0.91 in 2021 to 0.71 in 2022 before rising to 0.84 in
2023.While the quick ratio was less than ideal at 1.0, it suggested that Apple had enough liquid
assets other than inventories so that they can stand on their own regarding their obligations.
Quick ratio
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
—
21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23
, 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
p ct v c n b r r y n ul g p ct v c n b r r y n ul g p
Se O No De Ja Fe Ma Ap Ma Ju J Au Se O No De Ja Fe Ma Ap Ma Ju J Au Se
Quick ratio
The cash ratio is considered the strictest liquidity measure as it only regards cash and
cash equivalents as liquid assets. The cash buffer to cover current liabilities by Apple fell from
0.50 in 2021 to 0.31 in 2022 meaning lower cash reserves for this purpose. It, however, increased
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
—
21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23
, 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
p ct v c n b r r y n ul g p ct v c n b r r y n ul g p
Se O No De Ja Fe Ma Ap Ma Ju J Au Se O No De Ja Fe Ma Ap Ma Ju J Au Se
Cash ratio
All in all, while there was a decline in Apple’s liquidity ratios during one year but they
began showing improvement signs during another year; nevertheless, not at an optimal level but
still manageable hence Apple having enough liquid resources for fulfilling short-term
commitments even though it shown some tightness regarding its liquidity position.
The solvency ratios of a company will help you understand its long-term financial
obligation and debt management capacity level. These figures give us an idea about the
owes compared to what shareholders have invested (Liu, 2024). Apple’s debt-to-equity ratio rose
from 1.99 in 2021 to 2.39 in 2022, showing greater amounts of debts in comparison to equity.
However, it reduced to 1.80 in 2023 indicating a slight recovery of these capital structures for
this organization. This could be a strong indication that the company debt was being managed
The debt to asset ratio looks at how much of the company’s assets are financed using
funds borrowed. A high debt to asset ratio would indicate that the company is exposed to the risk
of missing debt repayment due to the high amounts borrowed to acquire assets (Hasanuh &
Shahfira, 2022). Debt The debt to asset ratio of Apple has been on the decline over the period in
question. It began at 0.36 in 2021, then declined to 0.34 in 2022 and finally to 0.32 in 2023. This
is trend is owed to the fact that the amount debt reduced during the period as the value of assets
increased. This is a strong indication that the debt is being managed and the assets are sufficient
Debt to capital ratio measures the extent that a firm's capitalization consists of borrowed
funds (Yu & Kim, 2023). Apple’s debt-to-capital ratio followed similar trend increasing from
0.67 in 2021 to reach a peak of 0.70 during year 2022; then down again 0.64 as indicated
towards year 2023 as shown in table 1. This indicates that apple has relied heavily on borrowing
In general terms, this implies that solvency ratios indicate Apple has highly leveraged
capital structure with an extensive dependency on debt for funding growth initiatives and
operations however; having strong net profitability position and sizable operating income has
enabled the Apple Inc. maintain a solid capacity for dealing with liabilities arising from
borrowed funds and even servicing them as well as paying other costs associated with fixed
commitments.
Profitability ratios offer insights into a firm’s capability to create profits from its business
undertakings and investments. These are very essential in appraising corporate financial
performance as well as the extent of dividends that can be distributed to shareholders (Sari &
Daryanto, 2021).
It is expressed as Net Profit Margin (NPM) which shows how much of every dollar
earned by Apple is converted to actual profit after all expenses have been met. For this period,
Apple’s net profit margins remained consistently high at 25.31% in 2023 and 2022 and then
increased though it was a decrease slight from 25.88% in 2021 hence reflecting a remarkable
given for ROI, it is important to use this measure to assess the effects of Apple’s investment
decisions on profitability.
This ratio measures how profitable a company is relative to its shareholders’ equity or
assets. From above, Apple’s ROE has demonstrated an impressive trend with rates ranging
between 150.07% during 2021 and peaking at 196.96%. However, it declined slightly before
reaching156.08% in 2023, but this may be due to other factors beyond poor management
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, Apple’s financial performance is excellent, this can be seen through the
liquidity ratios, solvency ratios and profitability ratios which show a company with great strength
and a well-managed financial position. Despite facing temporary liquidity challenges in 2022,
Apple improved its liquidity ratios by 2023 showing that it has enough buffer to meet its short-
term obligations.
Solvency ratio analysis points out at Apple’s aggressive capital structure characterized by
a heavy dependence on debt financing. Nevertheless, the company has been servicing excellently
its debt obligations due to significant operating profits as well as adequate profitability hence
covering fixed charges and thus minimizing the associated financial risks.
The profitability ratios of Apple are superb; they have impressive net profit margins,
returns on equity and returns on assets that are exceeding the industry averages. These figures
mirror high earnings from operations by the firm itself, efficient utilization of shareholders’
Hasanuh, N., & Shahfira, D. (2022). The Influence of Company Size and Debt to Asset Ratio on Return On
Assets. Moneter - Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan.
Library of Congress. (n.d.). The Founding of Apple Computer, Inc. Retrieved from Library of Congress:
https://guides.loc.gov/this-month-in-business-history/april/apple-computer-
founded#:~:text=and%20Photographs%20Division.-,Apple%20Computer%2C%20Inc.,in%20their
%20homes%20or%20offices.
Liu, Z. (2024). A Financial Analysis of Apple based on its External and Internal Enviroment. Changsha:
School of Economics and Management, Changsha University of Science & Technology.
Lu, Y. ( 2023). Financial statement analysis and revenue forecast for Apple Inc. Birmingham: Department
of Business School, University of Birmingham.
Pan, H. (2023). Analysis of the Product Evolution and Marketing Strategy of Apple Company. Advances in
Economics Management and Political Sciences, 214-220.
Sari, B. P., & Daryanto, W. M. (2021). PROFITABILITY RATIO ANALYSIS AS MEASUREMENT TOOL OF
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law.
Stock Analysis On Net. (n.d.). Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) Analysis of Liquidity Ratios. Retrieved from Stock
Analysis On Net: https://www.stock-analysis-on.net/NASDAQ/Company/Apple-Inc/Ratios/
Liquidity#Ratios-Summary
Yahoo Finance . (2024, 05 1). Apple Valuation Measures. Retrieved from Yahoo Finance :
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AAPL/key-statistics/
Yu, J. P., & Kim, S. E. (2023). The Effects of Profitability and Debt-To-Equity Ratio on Operating Leverage.
International Journal of Business & Management Studies.