FM Cont - Eva
FM Cont - Eva
(MBBA130L)
1. PROFITABILITY RATIO:
a) Gross Profit Margin Ratio:
= (Gross profit/ Revenue)* 100
Gross Profit= Revenue- COGS
= 1163.59- 164.98
= 998.61
Gross Profit Margin Ratio = (Gross profit/ Revenue)* 100
= (998.61/ 1163.59)*100
= 85.82%
2. LIQUIDITY RATIO:
a) Current ratio = current asset/current liabilities Current
Asset:
= Inventories+ Investments+ Trade Receivables+ Cash &
cash equivalents+ Bank balance+ Others+ Other current
asset+ Current Tax asset
= 229.01+ 100.13+ 4.16+ 32.71+ 0.24+ 4.54+ 21.84+
2.05
= 394.68
Current Liabilities:
= Borrowings+ Lease liabilities+ Trade payable+ Other
financial liabilities+ Other current liabilities+ Provisions
= 98.13+ 0.49+ 88.2+ 81.09+ 60.00+ 0.44
= 328.35
3. SHAREHOLDER RETURN:
a) Return on equity=
(ROE)
4. EFFICIENCY RATIO:
= a) Fixed asset turnoverRevenue/ Net fixed asset
ratio = 1163.59/ 2067.70
= 0.56 times
EPS= 1.25
1. PROFITABILITY RATIO:
a) Gross Profit Margin Ratio:
= (Gross profit/ Revenue)* 100
Gross Profit= Revenue- COGS
= 1030.97- 129.32
= 901.65
Gross Profit Margin Ratio = (Gross profit/ Revenue)* 100
= (901.65/ 1030.97)*100
= 87.45%
2. LIQUIDITY RATIO:
a) Current ratio = current asset/current liabilities
Current Asset:
= Inventories+ Investments+ Trade Receivables+ Cash
& cash equivalents+ Bank balance+ Others+ Other
current asset+ Current Tax asset
= 141.19+ 4.91+ 3.96+ 0.23+ 1.86+ 46.25+ 1.25
= 199.65
Current Liabilities:
= Borrowings+ Lease liabilities+ Trade payable+ Other
financial liabilities+ Other current liabilities+ Provisions
= 129.78+ 2.72+ 71.34+ 113.97+ 83.25+ 0.82
= 401.88
4. EFFICIENCY RATIO:
= a) Fixed asset turnoverRevenue/ Net fixed asset
ratio = 1030.97/ 1595.69
= 0.64 times
EPS= 1.15
1. PROFITABILITY RATIO:
a) Gross Profit Margin Ratio:
= (Gross profit/ Revenue)* 100
Gross Profit= Revenue- COGS
= 10918.05- 1618.94
= 9299.11
Gross Profit Margin Ratio = (Gross profit/ Revenue)* 100
= (9299.11/ 10918.05)*100
= 85.17%
2. LIQUIDITY RATIO:
a) Current ratio = current asset/current liabilities
Current Asset:
= Inventories+ Investments+ Trade Receivables+ Cash &
cash equivalents+ Bank balance+ Other financial asset+
Other current asset+ Current Tax asset+ Asset sale
Current Liabilities:
= Borrowings+ Lease liabilities+ Trade payable+ Other
financial liabilities+ Other current liabilities+ Provisions
= 1000.74+ 10.25+ 208.47+ 600+ 265.82+
842.58+103.84
= 3032.40
4. EFFICIENCY RATIO:
= a) Fixed asset turnoverRevenue/ Net fixed asset
ratio = 10918.05/ 10214.39
= 1.068 times
EPS= 107.50
JK CEMENTS (2022-23)
1. PROFITABILITY RATIO:
a) Gross Profit Margin Ratio:
= (Gross profit/ Revenue)* 100
= (Gross profit/ Revenue)* 100
Gross Profit= Revenue- COGS
= 9310.25- 1418.55
= 7891.7
Gross Profit Margin Ratio = (Gross profit/ Revenue)* 100
= (7891.7/ 9310.25)*100
= 85.73%
b) Net Profit Margin Ratio:
=(Net income/ Revenue)*100
=(505.98/ 9310.25) * 100
= 5.43%
2. LIQUIDITY RATIO:
a) Current ratio = current asset/current liabilities
Current Asset:
= Inventories+ Investments+ Trade Receivables+ Cash
& cash equivalents+ Bank balance+ Other financial
asset+ Other current asset+ Current Tax asset+ Asset
sale
= 863.54+ 70.82+ 410.76+ 239.15+ 574.06+ 792.16+
35.69+ 517.55+ 8.04
= 3511.77
Current Liabilities:
= Borrowings+ Lease liabilities+ Trade payable+ Other
financial liabilities+ Other current liabilities+ Provisions
= 816.04+ 9.65+ 97.84+ 655.37+ 253.75+ 729.14+
90.89
= 2652.68
3. SHAREHOLDER RETURN:
a) Return on equity (ROE)= (Net income/ Shareholder
equity)* 100
4. EFFICIENCY RATIO:
= a) Fixed asset turnoverRevenue/ Net fixed asset
ratio = 9310.25/ 9311.56
= 0.99 times
b) Total asset turnover ratio= Revenue/ Total asset
= 9310.25/ 12823.33
= 0.726 times
5. VALUATION RATIO: Market price per share/ EPS
a) Price earning=
ratio Market price per share=
Market capitalization/ Total no.
of outstanding share = 22587 cr / 7.7268 cr
= 2923.19
EPS= 65.06
2) LIQUIDITY RATIOS
0.49:1 1.20:1
a) Current Ratio 0.027:1 0.43:1
b) Quick Ratio
3) SHAREHOLDERS RETURN
7.08 %
a) Return on Equity (ROE) 10.15 %
b) Return on capital 9.23 %
Employed 9.69%
(ROCE)
4) EFFICIENCY RATIOS
5) VALIDATION RATIOS
22.61 times 25.84 times
a) Price Earnings Ratio 16.70 times 15.50 times
b) EV/EBIT
Overall Observations
• The company has shown mixed results in profitability, with an improvement in net
profit but a decline in gross profit.
• The liquidity position has significantly improved.
• The company's efficiency in utilizing its assets has decreased. The market valuation
of the company has slightly increased.
JK CEMENTS LTD
RATIO NAME JK JK
CEMENTS CEMENTS
(2022-23) (2023-24)
1) PROFITABILITY RATIOS
85.73% 85.17%
a) Gross profit ratio 5.43 % 7.59 %
b) Net profit ratio
2) LIQUIDITY RATIOS
1.32:1 1.34:1
a) Current ratio 0.78:1 0.87:1
b) Quick Ratio
3) SHAREHOLDERS
RETURN 10.90 % 15.49 %
5) VALIDATION RATIOS
44.93 times 37.92 times
a) Price earnings Ratio 27.50 times 23.67 times
b) EV/EBIT
Overall Observations
• The company has shown improvement in profitability and efficiency.
• The liquidity position has also improved.
• The market valuation of the company has decreased.
1) PROFITABILITY RATIOS
2) LIQUIDITY RATIOS
0.49:1 1.32:1
a) Current ratio 0.027:1 0.78:1
b) Quick Ratio
3) SHAREHOLDERS RETURN
10.15 % 10.90 %
a) Return on equity (ROE)
b) Return on capital 9.69 % 10.91 %
Employed (ROCE)
4) EFFICIENCY RATIOS
5) VALIDATION RATIOS
22.61 times 44.93 times
a) Price earnings Ratio 16.70 times 27.50 times
b) EV/EBIT
1. Profitability Ratios:
• Gross Profit Ratio: Udaipur Cements has a slightly higher gross profit ratio
(87.45%) compared to JK Cements (85.73%). This indicates better cost control and
potentially higher pricing power for Udaipur Cements.
• Net Profit Ratio: JK Cements has a significantly higher net profit ratio (5.43%)
compared to Udaipur Cements (3.40%). This suggests that JK Cements is more
efficient in managing its overall expenses and generating profits.
2. Liquidity Ratios:
• Current Ratio: JK Cements has a significantly higher current ratio (1.32:1)
compared to Udaipur Cements (0.49:1). This indicates that JK Cements has a stronger
short-term liquidity position and can better meet its short-term obligations.
• Quick Ratio: Similarly, JK Cements has a much higher quick ratio (0.78:1) compared
to Udaipur Cements (0.027:1). This suggests that JK Cements has a better ability to
meet its immediate cash obligations.
2. Shareholders' Return Ratios:
• Return on Equity (ROE): Both companies have similar ROE figures, with JK
Cements slightly ahead (10.90%) compared to Udaipur Cements (10.15%). This
indicates that both companies are generating comparable returns for their
shareholders.
• Return on Capital Employed (ROCE): Both companies have similar ROCE figures,
with JK Cements slightly ahead (10.91%) compared to Udaipur Cements (9.69%).
This suggests that both companies are utilizing their capital efficiently to generate
returns.
2. Efficiency Ratios:
• Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio: JK Cements has a higher fixed asset turnover ratio
(0.99 times) compared to Udaipur Cements (0.64 times). This indicates that JK
Cements is more efficient in utilizing its fixed assets to generate sales.
• Total Asset Turnover Ratio: JK Cements also has a higher total asset turnover ratio
(0.726 times) compared to Udaipur Cements (0.57 times). This suggests that JK
Cements is more efficient in utilizing its overall assets to generate sales.
2. Validation Ratios:
• Price Earnings Ratio (P/E Ratio): JK Cements has a significantly higher P/E ratio
(44.93 times) compared to Udaipur Cements (22.61 times). This indicates that the
market values JK Cements' earnings at a higher premium, potentially reflecting higher
growth expectations or perceived value.
• EV/EBIT: JK Cements also has a higher EV/EBIT ratio (27.50 times) compared to
Udaipur Cements (16.70 times). This suggests that the market values JK Cements'
overall business at a higher premium, potentially reflecting higher growth
expectations or perceived value.
Overall Comparison
Based on the analysis, JK Cements appears to have a stronger overall financial performance
compared to Udaipur Cements. JK Cements has a better liquidity position, higher
efficiency in utilizing assets, and a higher valuation from the market. However, both
companies have similar profitability and return on capital ratios.
2023-24
RATIO NAME UDAIPUR CEMENTS JK CEMENTS (2023-
(2023-24) 24)
1) PROFITABILITY RATIOS
a) Return on equity
(ROE) 7.08 % 15.49 %
b) Return on capital
9.22 % 15.14 %
Employed (ROCE)
4) EFFICIENCY RATIOS
5) VALIDATION RATIOS
1. Profitability Ratios:
• Gross Profit Ratio: Both companies have similar gross profit ratios, with JK
Cements slightly ahead (85.17%) compared to Udaipur Cements (85.82%). This
indicates comparable cost control and pricing power for both companies.
• Net Profit Ratio: JK Cements has a significantly higher net profit ratio (7.59%)
compared to Udaipur Cements (5.40%). This suggests that JK Cements is more
efficient in managing its overall expenses and generating profits.
2. Liquidity Ratios:
• Current Ratio: JK Cements has a slightly higher current ratio (1.34:1) compared
to Udaipur Cements (1.20:1). This indicates that JK Cements has a slightly
stronger short-term liquidity position and can better meet its short-term
obligations.
• Quick Ratio: JK Cements also has a higher quick ratio (0.87:1) compared to
Udaipur Cements (0.43:1). This suggests that JK Cements has a better ability to
meet its immediate cash obligations.
3. Shareholders' Return Ratios:
• Return on Equity (ROE): JK Cements has a significantly higher ROE (15.49%)
compared to Udaipur Cements (7.08%). This indicates that JK Cements is
generating significantly higher returns for its shareholders.
• Return on Capital Employed (ROCE): JK Cements has a significantly higher
ROCE (15.14%) compared to Udaipur Cements (9.22%). This suggests that JK
Cements is utilizing its capital more efficiently to generate returns.
4. Efficiency Ratios:
• Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio: JK Cements has a significantly higher fixed asset
turnover ratio (1.068 times) compared to Udaipur Cements (0.56 times). This
indicates that JK Cements is much more efficient in utilizing its fixed assets to
generate sales.
• Total Asset Turnover Ratio: JK Cements also has a higher total asset turnover
ratio (0.764 times) compared to Udaipur Cements (0.472 times). This suggests
that JK Cements is more efficient in utilizing its overall assets to generate sales.
5. Validation Ratios:
• Price Earnings Ratio (P/E Ratio): JK Cements has a significantly higher P/E
ratio (37.92 times) compared to Udaipur Cements (25.84 times). This indicates
that the market values JK Cements' earnings at a higher premium, potentially
reflecting higher growth expectations or perceived value.
• EV/EBIT: JK Cements also has a higher EV/EBIT ratio (23.67 times) compared
to Udaipur Cements (15.50 times). This suggests that the market values JK
Cements' overall business at a higher premium, potentially reflecting higher
growth expectations or perceived value.
Overall Comparison
Based on the analysis, JK Cements appears to have a significantly stronger overall
financial performance compared to Udaipur Cements. JK Cements has better
profitability, liquidity, efficiency, and a higher market valuation.
Intra-Company Analysis:
• Udaipur Cements:
o Improved liquidity position
o Mixed results in profitability (increased net profit,
decreased gross profit)
o Decreased efficiency in asset utilization o Slightly
increased market valuation JK Cements:
o Improved profitability o Improved liquidity
position o Increased efficiency in asset utilization o
Increased market valuation
Inter-Company Analysis (2022-23):
• JK Cements has stronger liquidity, efficiency, and market valuation
compared to Udaipur Cements.
• Both companies have similar profitability and return on capital
ratios.
Inter-Company Analysis (2023-24):
• JK Cements has significantly stronger performance in profitability,
liquidity, efficiency, and market valuation compared to Udaipur
Cements.
Key Takeaways:
• JK Cements has consistently shown stronger financial performance
compared to Udaipur Cements in both intra-company and
intercompany analyses.
• Investors may want to consider JK Cements as a potentially better
investment option due to its superior financial performance.
• Further analysis is needed to understand the underlying reasons for
the differences in performance between the two companies.