Sub-Topic 1.5: The Production Possibility Curve (PPC)
Sub-Topic 1.5: The Production Possibility Curve (PPC)
5:
The
Production
Possibility
curve (ppc)
Learning intentions
2
introduction
1) 2) 3)
the quality and A simple economic
In any economy,
quantity of factors of
what is produced model, known as a
production production
is determined by determines an possibility curve
the quantity and economy’s
(PPC), can be used
quality of production to show the choices
resources that are possibilities – the available and how
available goods and services it
resources are
can produce with the allocated.
resources it has
available
5
Assumptions of ppc
1) 2) 3)
Economy is in full Resources The state of tech
employment & full available are fixed does not change
production and limited throughout
all FOR
capacity production. The
are
fully production
utilised
technology
4)
available is being
The country is only fully utilised
producing 2 types of goods Ceteris
peribus
6
The Production Possibility curve
The PPC has a negative slope (concave),
which indicates a trade-off between
producing one good or another.
-2
· ~PPC label the D .
=
I
Diagram
0 consumer
goods
7
empogeta
·
but cannot
-
Posiscarcity
tion
be achieved
of q Point F is desirable because it yields
more of both goods, but it is not
attainable given the amount of resources
available in the economy.
q Economy does not have the resources
inefficiency that are required to achieve this level of
output of both types of good.
q Point F represents a position of scarcity.
9
N I product only
12
The Law of Increasing
Opportunity Cost
è According to economic theory,
successive increases in the production of
one good will lead to an increasing sacrifice
in terms of a reduction in the other good.
èFor example, as an economy tries to
increase the production of good X , such as I
cameras, it must sacrifice more of the other
good, Y, such as mobile phones.
v PPC can be used to show the difficult choices that have to be made by many
low-income economies.
v Scarce resources need to be allocated to meeting present needs at the
expense of investing in a range of capital goods that will increase economic
potential in the longer term
28
Using the production possibility curve to show choices
Ø PPC shows the production of consumer goods is approaching its
maximum, leaving only a small amount of resources for capital
goods. With only a small allocation, new investment in capital
goods is often at best only to replace existing resources.
Ø What is needed to raise economic potential is that a greater
proportion of resources should be given to capital goods in order
to shift the production possibility curve outwards.
Ø A small reduction in the amount of consumer goods produced
from A to B can produce a greater relative increase in the
amount of capital goods from C to D.
Ø The effect of this is to increase the economy’s potential for
economic growth as shown by an outward shift of the
production possibility curve.
“
29
a
PPC Diagram
construction
A & Alty Aty
construction
projects e-Poc2 +
project I of labours
a -
PP Cl Shift upwards
L >
⑧ capital
E goods
I
>
capital
a
“
30
of resources
Wastage
.
&
X - shift inwards
I
31
⑧
L -
employer
L Socso/EPF
- gain
32
linefficient)
encourage fiscal
-
investment
/ most efficient)
export
33
- at a
given time
-
X .
B
-
A
34
-
↑
Resources
↑ efficiency
2 -
-
35
-
-
~
Ex
>
-
-
--
-
~ -
- --
36
-profit .
~
if increase input , output 4
SUB-TOPIC 1.6
CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS
AND SERVICES
arnet/market failure e
38
CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES
39
Economics
-
supply
no
are
prices
unlimited
-Does
need
not
FOP
goods and
free goods
-
cost
-
no opportunity to produce
40
ice cream
book
public beaches Excludability
kit kat calculator Public Park and rivalry
-
PRIVATE GOODS (ECONOMIC GOODS) : 41
characteristics
Excludability • If the price is not acceptable, then the good will not be
consumed.
• Once a private good has been purchased by one person, it
cannot then be consumed (purchased) by others
E.g.:
If you eat a packet of chips, then your friend can’t eat it/ if a firm builds a manufacturing plant on a
piece of land, then the lands is not available for use by local farmers.
Free goods 42
• Once the good has been provided for one consumer, it is impossible to
Non- stop anyone else from benefiting from the good
excludability
• A public good must be non-rival. As more and more people consume the
good, the benefit to those already consuming the product must not be
Non-rivalry reduced
· funded by government
45
PUBLIC GOODS
PUBLIC GOODS :
toilet
-public
-figcity
-
Public Park -playground
-
c . B ipad - National
Library
-
STD -
vehicle - Public cricket pitch
-National Defense
- Toll road
-
firework display
-Public transpot -fire services
53
Defined as a good that is better for a person than the person who may consume
MERIT the good realises
GOODS Goods that have benefits for more people than the quantities produced in the
market
↓ Underproduction/ underconsumption exists or is underprovided by the market
example
of Due to lack of perfect information and the positive externalities present
market failure
preventive
healthier ind
For instance, people do not take health insurance if they feel they eat right and
could stay healthy
Another instance, parents may not provide enough education for their children, but
it is the interest of the child to receive the highest quality of education
subsidy
- >
awareness
campaign
55
Goods that have more costs to other people yet are still
being produced in the market
Ø There is a huge quantity of information on a wide range of products available to consumers on the
internet to help them make informed decisions about what to buy.
Ø In some countries, better labelling on consumer products, such as food, drink and non-prescription
medicines, can help consumers when deciding what to buy.
labelling
Ø For other products, such as tobacco products and medicines, the labelling may contain reasons to
stop or limit the consumption of a product.
to what extent
?
- short an
Ø In principle, the ever-increasing information available to consumers should enable them to take
rational decisions that maximise consumer welfare. Where this happens, the market works
efficiently; if not there will be an inefficient allocation of resources.
57
~income-tax
Ø Consumers may recognise the benefits of merit goods but lack the disposable income to be able
to afford to buy the goods in the quantity they would like or not at all. This is typically the case
with education and healthcare:
i. All forms of education and training, if successfully completed, should produce benefits to the
individual in terms of improved and new skills, better pay and positive employment prospects.
There are wider benefits to the economy – a better-qualified workforce is an important source of
economic growth and can improve the competitiveness of an economy. Human Capital
ii. A healthy population benefits both individuals and the economy. If people have to pay for access to
doctors, hospitals and medicines, then there will be underconsumption among low-income families.
It is morally wrong that only better-off families can use healthcare services in full; for this reason,
most governments try to provide a minimum level of healthcare for their people.
59
OVER CONSUMPTION OF DEMERIT GOODS
Ø Consumers may be ignorant of the harmful effects of demerit goods on themselves and on others.
Consumers might be indifferent, choosing not to care. This is particularly true of ‘junk food’ which is
of low nutritional value, readily available, cheap and quick to consume.
Ø In high-income economies especially, adult and child obesity is already a serious problem and
expected to get worse. Obesity can be partly attributed to the overconsumption of fast foods and
high-sugar drinks, especially in low-income households. - >
US
Ø Smoking, especially passive smoking, is another example of a demerit good. Smoking is often no
longer allowed in public places, such as offices and restaurants.
government deenrior
regulation
Ø Governments seek to reduce cigarette consumption by imposing heavy indirect taxes, advertising
restrictions and health warnings and images on cigarette packets. It is not possible to say with
certainty whether these measures are effective, not least because cigarette smoking is still popular
among young people in many countries. The ban on smoking in public places has been more
successful
60
OVER CONSUMPTION OF DEMERIT GOODS
Ø Some economists argue that there is no such thing as merit goods and demerit goods. They put
forward the view that in health care and smoking, it should be the individual and not the government
who knows what is best for them. This contradicts the underlying assumption that the government
knows better than the individual what is good or bad for them because it has considerable information
at its disposal.
Ø An important question with regard to merit and demerit goods is ‘Who is to say what is ‘good’ or
‘bad’ for a person’?
Ø If an individual consumer makes a decision to consume a product, what right has society to say
that the individual is making a ‘wrong’ decision? If society is able to tell consumers that they do
not fully realise what is good or bad for them, then it follows that ‘society knows best’ and has a
right to make value judgements.
Government intervention
61
2. Demerit goods
1. Merit goods - Ban consumption
- Direct provision by - Taxes on producers
government
- Subsidised provision
- Regulation
- Regulation à government - Advertising campaign
may leave provision to the
private sector but force
consumers to buy merit
goods or producers to provide
a merit good
- Advertising campaign
Eg: car insurance law à compulsory
62
-
L ·
~
63
~
~
L
-
C
-
-
65
Useful video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNwhtQS5zoQ