0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

Frequency Table

Uploaded by

yuni nasution
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

Frequency Table

Uploaded by

yuni nasution
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Frequency Table

umur responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 17-25 Tahun 30 24.2 24.2 24.2

26-35 Tahun 92 74.2 74.2 74.2

36-45 Tahun 2 1.6 1.6 86.3

Total 124 100.0 100.0

pendidikan responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Pendidikan rendah 62 50.0 50.0 50.0

Pendidikan Tinggi 62 50.0 50.0 100.0

Total 124 100.0 100.0

pekerjaan responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak Bekerja 36 29.0 29.0 29.0

Bekerja 88 71.0 71.0 100.0

Total 124 100.0 100.0

pendapatan keluarga

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Rendah 57 46.0 46.0 46.0

Tinggi 67 54.0 54.0 100.0

Total 124 100.0 100.0


suku responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Batak 31 25.0 25.0 25.0

Mandailing 93 75.0 75.0 100.0

Total 124 100.0 100.0

agama responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Islam 70 56.5 56.5 56.5

Kristen 54 43.5 43.5 100.0

Total 124 100.0 100.0

Kondisi Tempat Tinggal

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Tidak Memenuhi 41 33.1 33.1 33.1


Syarat

Memenuhi Syarat 83 66.9 66.9 100.0

Total 124 100.0 100.0

Akses Pelayanan Kesehatan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Sulit 63 50.8 50.8 50.8

Mudaht 61 49.2 49.2 100.0

Total 124 100.0 100.0


Budaya Keluarga

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Negatif 55 44.4 44.4 44.4

Positif 69 55.6 55.6 100.0

Total 124 100.0 100.0

Kejadian KEK

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid KEK 48 38.7 38.7 38.7

Tidak KEK 76 61.3 61.3 100.0

Total 124 100.0 100.0

CROSSTABS /TABLES=Pendidikan Pekerjaan Pendapatan Kondisi Akses Budaya BY


KEK /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES /STATISTICS=CHISQ CC CORR RISK /CELLS=COUNT
EXPECTED ROW /COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

pendidikan responden * Kejadian KEK


Crosstab

Kejadian KEK

KEK Tidak KEK Total

pendidikan responden Pendidikan rendah Count 33 29 62

Expected Count 24.0 38.0 62.0

% within pendidikan responden 53.2% 46.8% 100.0%

Pendidikan Tinggi Count 15 47 62

Expected Count 24.0 38.0 62.0

% within pendidikan responden 24.2% 75.8% 100.0%

Total Count 48 76 124

Expected Count 48.0 76.0 124.0

% within pendidikan responden 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%


Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-side


Value df d) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 11.013a 1 .001

Continuity Correctionb 9.823 1 .002

Likelihood Ratio 11.222 1 .001

Fisher's Exact Test .002 .001

Linear-by-Linear Association 10.924 1 .001

N of Valid Cases 124

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 24,00.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .286 .001

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .298 .085 3.448 .001c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .298 .085 3.448 .001c

N of Valid Cases 124

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.


Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pendidikan respo 3.566 1.658 7.670


nden (Pendidikan rendah / Pend
idikan Tinggi)

For cohort Kejadian KEK = KEK 2.200 1.336 3.622

For cohort Kejadian KEK = Tidak .617 .457 .833


KEK

N of Valid Cases 124

pekerjaan responden * Kejadian KEK

Crosstab

Kejadian KEK

KEK Tidak KEK Total

pekerjaan responden Tidak Bekerja Count 27 9 36

Expected Count 13.9 22.1 36.0

% within pekerjaan responden 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

Bekerja Count 21 67 88

Expected Count 34.1 53.9 88.0

% within pekerjaan responden 23.9% 76.1% 100.0%

Total Count 48 76 124

Expected Count 48.0 76.0 124.0

% within pekerjaan responden 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%


Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-side


Value df d) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 28.159a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 26.045 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 28.322 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 27.932 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 124

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,94.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .430 .000

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .477 .081 5.987 .000c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .477 .081 5.987 .000c

N of Valid Cases 124

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pekerjaan respon 9.571 3.893 23.534


den (Tidak Bekerja / Bekerja)

For cohort Kejadian KEK = KEK 3.143 2.069 4.774

For cohort Kejadian KEK = Tidak .328 .184 .585


KEK

N of Valid Cases 124

pendapatan keluarga * Kejadian KEK


Crosstab

Kejadian KEK

KEK Tidak KEK Total

pendapatan keluarga Rendah Count 34 23 57

Expected Count 22.1 34.9 57.0

% within pendapatan keluarga 59.6% 40.4% 100.0%

Tinggi Count 14 53 67

Expected Count 25.9 41.1 67.0

% within pendapatan keluarga 20.9% 79.1% 100.0%

Total Count 48 76 124

Expected Count 48.0 76.0 124.0

% within pendapatan keluarga 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-side


Value df d) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 19.496a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 17.897 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 19.956 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 19.339 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 124

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22,06.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .369 .000

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .397 .083 4.771 .000c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .397 .083 4.771 .000c

N of Valid Cases 124

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pendapatan kelua 5.596 2.535 12.352


rga (Rendah / Tinggi)

For cohort Kejadian KEK = KEK 2.855 1.710 4.766

For cohort Kejadian KEK = Tidak .510 .364 .716


KEK

N of Valid Cases 124

Kondisi Tempat Tinggal * Kejadian KEK

Crosstab

Kejadian KEK

KEK Tidak KEK Total

Kondisi Tempat Tinggal Tidak Memenuhi Count 25 16 41


Syarat
Expected Count 15.9 25.1 41.0

% within Kondisi Tempat Ting 61.0% 39.0% 100.0%


gal

Memenuhi Syarat Count 23 60 83

Expected Count 32.1 50.9 83.0


% within Kondisi Tempat Ting 27.7% 72.3% 100.0%
gal

Total Count 48 76 124

Expected Count 48.0 76.0 124.0

% within Kondisi Tempat Ting 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%


gal

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-side


Value df d) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 12.800a 1 .002

Continuity Correctionb 11.436 1 .001

Likelihood Ratio 12.703 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .001 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 12.696 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 124

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15,87.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .306 .000

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .321 .088 3.747 .000c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .321 .088 3.747 .000c

N of Valid Cases 124

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.


Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Kondisi Tempat Ti 4.076 1.849 8.985


nggal (Rumah Pribadi / Rumah S
ewa)

For cohort Kejadian KEK = KEK 2.200 1.438 3.366

For cohort Kejadian KEK = Tidak .540 .360 .809


KEK

N of Valid Cases 124

Akses Pelayanan Kesehatan * Kejadian KEK

Crosstab

Kejadian KEK

KEK Tidak KEK Total

Akses Pelayanan Kesehatan Sulit Count 34 29 63

Expected Count 24.4 38.6 63.0

% within Akses Pelayanan Kese 54.0% 46.0% 100.0%


hatan

Mudah Count 14 47 61

Expected Count 23.6 37.4 61.0

% within Akses Pelayanan Kese 23.0% 77.0% 100.0%


hatan

Total Count 48 76 124

Expected Count 48.0 76.0 124.0

% within Akses Pelayanan Kese 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%


hatan
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-side


Value df d) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 12.568a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 11.294 1 .001

Likelihood Ratio 12.865 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 12.466 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 124

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23,61.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .303 .000

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .318 .084 3.709 .000c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .318 .084 3.709 .000c

N of Valid Cases 124

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Akses Pelayanan 3.936 1.812 8.549


Kesehatan (Jauh / Dekat)

For cohort Kejadian KEK = KEK 2.351 1.407 3.929

For cohort Kejadian KEK = Tidak .597 .442 .807


KEK

N of Valid Cases 124


Budaya Keluarga * Kejadian KEK
Crosstab

Kejadian KEK

KEK Tidak KEK Total

Budaya Keluarga Negatif Count 39 16 55

Expected Count 21.3 33.7 55.0

% within Budaya Keluarga 70.9% 29.1% 100.0%

Positif Count 9 60 69

Expected Count 26.7 42.3 69.0

% within Budaya Keluarga 13.0% 87.0% 100.0%

Total Count 48 76 124

Expected Count 48.0 76.0 124.0

% within Budaya Keluarga 38.7% 61.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-side


Value df d) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 43.194a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 40.789 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 45.762 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 42.845 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 124

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21,29.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .508 .000

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .590 .073 8.075 .000c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .590 .073 8.075 .000c

N of Valid Cases 124

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Budaya Keluarga 16.250 6.536 40.400


(Ada / Tidak Ada)

For cohort Kejadian KEK = KEK 5.436 2.889 10.231

For cohort Kejadian KEK = Tidak .335 .219 .510


KEK

N of Valid Cases 124

Regression
Variables Entered/Removed

Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method

1 Budaya Keluarga, . Enter


pendidikan respond
en , pekerjaan resp
onden, Akses Pela
yanan Kesehatan,
Kondisi Tempat Tin
ggal, pendapatan k
eluargaa

a. All requested variables entered.


Model Summaryb

Std. Error of the Es


Model R R Square Adjusted R Square timate

1 .696a .484 .458 .360

a. Predictors: (Constant), Budaya Keluarga, pendidikan responden , pekerjaan r


esponden, Akses Pelayanan Kesehatan, Kondisi Tempat Tinggal, pendapatan k
eluarga

b. Dependent Variable: Kejadian KEK

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 14.251 6 2.375 18.320 .000a

Residual 15.168 117 .130

Total 29.419 123

a. Predictors: (Constant), Budaya Keluarga, pendidikan responden , pekerjaan responden, Akses Pelayanan
Kesehatan, Kondisi Tempat Tinggal, pendapatan keluarga

b. Dependent Variable: Kejadian KEK


Coefficientsa

Standardized Coef
Unstandardized Coefficients ficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) .129 .173 .745 .458

pendidikan responden .130 .070 .134 1.852 .067

pekerjaan responden .452 .099 .422 4.586 .079

pendapatan keluarga -.050 .097 -.051 -.519 .605

Kondisi Tempat Tinggal -.174 .099 -.168 -1.759 .081

Akses Pelayanan Kesehatan .094 .070 .097 1.345 .181

Budaya Keluarga .477 .105 .487 4.537 .000

a. Dependent Variable: Kejadian KEK

You might also like