0% found this document useful (0 votes)
103 views5 pages

ATGC Risk Assessment For Low Voltage Busway System (BAHRA TBS)

Uploaded by

Jeffry M.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
103 views5 pages

ATGC Risk Assessment For Low Voltage Busway System (BAHRA TBS)

Uploaded by

Jeffry M.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Activity Area Location 5 Towers, Mix Development Project Site location Radiant Square City of Lights, Al Reem Island

Method Statement for Installation, Testing & Date 06-Nov-2024 Ref No.
Description of work Commissioning of Low Voltage Busbar System
Review Date ……… Rev No. 0

Localized shutdown Required ✘ Not Required Contractor or Sub


Project Manager Syed Suhail
Department MEP DEPARTMENT (Name and Contact No)

Consultant Architectural Consulting Group (ACG) Contractor or Sub


HSE Manager or Engineer Beshoy Boshra
Malaih Investment & Development Company
Contractor (Name and Contact No)
LLC

HSE (Risk Assessment)


All worker will wear PPE (Helmet, Glasses, Gloves, Boots, Full sleeve cotton coverall as a minimum)
General safety condition
requirements Proper access (Stair with handrails and hard barricaders) shall be provided as per CONTRACTOR/ COMPANY HSE procedure.
Refer to attached activity Risk Assessment

Minimum PPE required Hard Hat, Safety goggles, Safety Gloves, Dust mask, Hi-Viz vest, Cover-all, Safety Shoes

LS Likelihood / Frequency
CS Severity of consequence

(Company aberration name Here) (Company complete name here)

E – Environmental

Consequence H – Health

S – Safety

ACTIVITY IDENTIFIED HAZARDS IDENTIFIED RISK EXISTING CONTROL MEASURES Risk ADDITIONAL CONTROL Residual Risk

is
R

k
Page 1 of 5
RISK RATING

RISK RATING
LIKELIHOOD

LIKELIHOOD

Acceptable
SEVERITY

SEVERITY
MEASURE REQUIRED
S. No.

(Give necessary
(Hierarchy of controls to be
description of Hazard)
followed)
L S R L S RR (Yes/No)

 Engineering Controls: Use forklifts,


cranes, or dollies to reduce manual
 Use appropriate lifting equipment (e.g., handling.
 Dropping or damaging
 Equipment damage forklifts, cranes)  Administrative Controls: Ensure
busbar sections.
1 Transportation and Handling of Busbars.
 Manual handling
 Strains, sprains, or  Ensure team members are trained in safe 3 4 12 only trained personnel handle 1 2 2 YES
back injuries. handling techniques. busbars and follow safe lifting
injuries.
 Use team lifts where necessary. practices.
 PPE: Use gloves and steel-toe
boots.

 Elimination: De-energize nearby


systems when possible.
 Use scaffolding, harnesses, and other fall
 Engineering Controls: Use
 Falls from height.  Personal injury protection
scaffolding, guardrails, and tool
 Dropping tools or (falls or struck by  Implement lockout/tagout (LOTO) for
lanyards to prevent falling objects.
2 Installation of Busbar Sections. materials falling objects) nearby electrical sources. 3 4 12
 Administrative Controls: Fall
1 2 2 YES
 Electric shock from  Electric shock or  Keep work area clear to prevent dropped
protection training and daily site
nearby live parts. electrocution. tools.
inspections.
 PPE: Hard hats, harnesses and non-
conductive gloves.

 Engineering Controls: Use torque


tools with calibrated settings to
 Ensure all connections are torqued to
ensure proper jointing.
 Faulty connections or manufacturer specifications
 Increased fire risk.  Administrative Controls: Follow
Jointing and Connection of Busbar loose joints.  Conduct visual and thermal imaging
3 Sections.  Electrical arcing or
 System damage or
inspections
3 4 12 manufacturer’s installation 1 2 2 YES
failure guidelines and conduct visual
overheating.  Train personnel on proper jointing
inspections.
techniques
 PPE: Insulated gloves and safety
glasses.

Page 2 of 5
 Engineering Controls: Only allow
use of insulated calibrated testing
 Electric Shock due to
 Use insulated gloves and tools. tools
incorrect test setup or
 Only trained personnel to conduct  Administrative Controls: Ensure
Insulation Resistance and Continuity exposed conductors.  Personal injury
4 Testing  Equipment malfunction (electric shock)
insulation resistance & continuity tests 3 4 12 tests are conducted by certified 1 2 2 YES
 Ensure equipment is properly calibrated personnel
leading to inaccurate
and in good condition.  PPE: Insulated gloves and face
test results or injury.
shields

 Electric Shock from


 Engineering Controls: Use torque
accidental contact with
tools with calibrated settings to
energized parts.  Follow lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures
 Personal injury ensure proper jointing.
 Improper Phasing to confirm no live parts.
(falls or struck by  Administrative Controls: Follow
potentially causing  Inspect tap-off units before installation and
5 Tap-off Unit Installation phase imbalance or
falling objects)
verify phase alignment.
3 4 12 manufacturer’s installation 1 2 2 YES
 Electric shock or guidelines and conduct visual
failure.  Train personnel on correct installation and
electrocution. inspections.
 Unintended power secure all connections.
 PPE: Insulated gloves and safety
supply to connected
glasses.
equipment.

 Elimination: Perform checks to


ensure all connections and
components are verified before
 Electric Shock due to
 Restrict access and inform personnel of energization.
direct exposure to live
 Severe burns or testing schedules.  Engineering Controls: Install
parts.
injury from arc  Require arc-rated PPE, insulated gloves, barriers and use remote switching
 Risk of explosion due to
Energizing and Testing the Busway flash. and face shields. to reduce direct exposure.
6 System a fault.
 Electric shock  Inspect thoroughly before energizing to
3 4 12
 Administrative Controls: Restrict
1 2 2 YES
 Component failure
 Equipment damage identify unsecured connections. access to authorized personnel
potentially causing
or failure.  Monitor system during initial energizing only; set up exclusion zones and
project delays or safety
under supervision of qualified staff. port warning signs.
incidents.
 PPE: Full arc-rated PPR, including
face shield gloves, and fire-resistant
clothing.

Page 3 of 5
 Accidental contact with  Elimination: De-energize system
live parts. where possible for maintenance.
 Implement scheduled maintenance
 Exposure to live parts. If  Engineering Controls: Implement
 Electric Shock routines
energized parts are not LOTO procedures and use insulated
7 Routine Maintenance and Inspection. fully isolated.
 Increased risk of  Use insulated tools and PPE 3 4 12
tools
1 2 2
equipment failure.  Shut down the system when possible
 Mechanical failures due  Administrative Controls: Conduct
during maintenance
to improperly secured regular inspections and scheduled
busway components. maintenance.
 PPE: Non-Conductive gloves, safety
glasses.

 Elimination: De-energize and


isolate the busway system
 Injury from improper before beginning any
lifting.  Apply lockout/tagout (LOTO) to ensure no component removal.
 Residual electrical residual power in removed components.  Engineering Controls: Use
charge. Risk of shock if  Use mechanical aids for lifting or team insulated tools and lifting aids
Removal and Replacement of  Electric Shock
components are not lifting for heavy items. (e.g., pulleys) for heavy
8 Components properly de-energized.
 Increased risk of
 Inspect replacement parts to ensure they
3 4 12 1 2 2
components.
equipment failure
 Equipment damage. meet project specifications.  Administrative Controls:
Potential for damage if  Conduct post-installation inspections to Implement lockout/tagout
replacements are not verify alignment and secure fittings. (LOTO) to prevent accidental
properly secured. energization.
 PPE: Insulated gloves, safety
boots, and face shield.

Risk Rating Matrix


CONSEQUENCES
LIKELIHOOD
Insignificant (1) Minor (2) Moderate (3) Major (4) Catastrophic (5)
Rare (1) 1 2 3 4 5
Possible (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Likely (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Often (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Frequent / Most Certain
5 10 15 20 25
(5)
Extreme
15-25 Absolutely Unacceptably High Activity should not proceed in current form
Risk
8-12 High Risk Unacceptably High Activity should be modified to include remedial planning and action and be subject to detailed HSE assessment

4-6 Moderate Acceptable but must be managed at ALARP, Activity can operate subject to management and/or modification,

Page 4 of 5
Risk
1-5 Low Risk Acceptable without required further action, NO action required unless acceleration of risk is possible.

Designation Name Signature Date

HSE Manager/ HSE


Prepared By:
Engineer

Approved By: Project Manager

Page 5 of 5

You might also like