CHAPTER 7

Joint Product and By-Product Costing

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Identify the characteristics of the joint production process.
2. Allocate joint product costs according to the benefits-received approaches and the relative market
value approaches.
3. Describe methods of accounting for by-products.
4. Explain why joint cost allocations may be misleading in management decision making.
5. Discuss why joint production is seldom found in service industries.

CHAPTER SUMMARY
This chapter describes the joint production processes and their outputs—joint products and by-
products. Several methods are developed to allocate joint costs to joint products. By-products are
not usually allocated any of the joint costs. Instead, noncost methods are frequently used to
account for by-products. This chapter concludes with the caution that allocated joint costs are not
useful for output and pricing decisions. Further processing costs are used in management
decision making.

CHAPTER REVIEW

I. General Characteristics of Joint Production

Joint products are two or more products produced simultaneously by the same process.
Joint products become separate and identifiable at the split-off point.

Review textbook Exhibit 7-1, which depicts the joint production process.

A. Cost Separability and the Need for Allocation

1. Joint costs are the total of the raw material, labor, and overhead costs incurred up to the
initial split-off point.
a. Joint costs can be allocated to the final product only in some arbitrary manner because
such costs cannot be traced directly to the products they benefit.
b. Joint cost allocation is performed to meet the requirements of financial reporting
(GAAP) and federal income tax law for income measurement and inventory valuation. In

147
148 Chapter 7

addition, joint cost allocation is useful in costing for government cost-type contracts and
in justifying prices for legislative or administrative regulations.
c. Joint cost allocation is much less useful for cost control and managerial decision
making.
2. Separable costs are those costs incurred after the split-off point; they can be easily traced to
individual products.
B. Distinction and Similarity Between Joint Products and By-Products
1. The distinction between joint products and by-products rests solely on the relative
importance of their sales value.
2. A by-product is a secondary product whose total sales value is relatively minor in
comparison with the sales value of the main product (joint product).
3. Relationships between joint products and by-products change over time as technology and
markets change.
a. By-products may become more and more important, eventually becoming joint
products.
b. When the relative importance of individual products changes, the products need to be
reclassified and the costing procedures need to be changed.

Review textbook Exhibit 7-3, which gives examples of

joint products and by-products for various industries.

II. Accounting for Joint Product Costs

A. Introduction
1. Joint cost allocations must be done for financial reporting purposes: to value inventory and
to determine income. An allocation method must be found, though arbitrary, to allocate the
joint costs as reasonably as possible.
2. The joint cost allocation approaches include the following:
a. Benefits-received approaches, which include the following methods:
 Physical units method
 Weighted average method
b. Allocation based on the relative market value, using the following methods:
 Sales-value-at-split-off method
 Net realizable value method
 Constant gross margin percentage method
 Sales-to-production-ratio method
B. Benefits-Received Approaches
1. Physical Units Method
a. Under the physical units method, units of physical output, such as heat content,
volume, or weight, that measure the benefits received are used to distribute joint costs.
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 149

This method allocates to each joint product the same proportion of joint costs as the
underlying proportion of units.
 Example: Manufacturers of forest products use the physical units method
to apply the average conversion cost to all finished products, regardless of their
type, grade, or market value.
b. Disadvantages of the physical units method include the following:
 It ignores the fact that not all costs are directly related to physical
quantities.
 It may result in incorrect managerial decisions because high profit may be
reflected from the sale of high-grade products, with low profit or losses reflected
from the sale of low-grade products.
2. Weighted Average Method
The weighted average method uses the weight factors to include such diverse elements as
amount of material used, difficulty to manufacture, time consumed, difference in type of
labor used, and size of unit.
Weighted physical units = Number of units × Weight factor

 Example: The canning industry uses weight factors to distinguish between can sizes
or quality of product. The weighted average method allocates relatively more of the joint
cost to the high-grade products because they represent more desirable and profitable
products.
C. Allocation Based on Relative Market Value
The methods in this approach try to assign costs based on the product’s ability to absorb joint
costs. They are based on the assumption that the joint costs would not be incurred unless the
products yield enough revenues to cover all costs plus a reasonable profit.
The relative market value approach of allocation is better than the physical units approach if (1) the
physical mix of output can be altered by incurring more (or less) total joint costs, and (2) this
alteration produces more (or less) total market value.
1. Sales-Value-at-Split-Off Method
a. The sales-value-at-split-off method allocates joint cost based on each product’s
proportionate share of market or sales value at the split-off point.
b. In this method, the higher the market value, the greater the joint cost assigned to the
product.
2. Net Realizable Value Method
a. The net realizable value method allocates joint costs based on hypothetical sales
values because there may not be a ready market for the product at the split-off point.
b. This method is particularly useful when one or more products cannot be sold at the
split-off point but must be processed further.
Hypothetical sales value = Market price – Further processing costs after split-off point

3. Constant Gross Margin Percentage Method

a. The constant gross margin percentage method allocates joint costs such that the gross
margin percentage is the same for each product.
150 Chapter 7

b. This method assumes that the further processing yields an identical profit percentage
across all products.
c. Using the constant gross margin percentage method, the joint cost allocation steps
include the following calculations:

Grand gross margin percentage =

Joint product gross margin = Market price × Grand gross margin

Joint cost allocated to product = Market value – Gross margin – Separable costs

4. Sales-to-Production Ratio
a. The sales-to-production-ratio method allocates joint costs in accordance with
a weighting factor that compares the percentage of sales with the percentage of
production.
b. In this method, the products that sell the most are allocated a larger share of the joint
cost of current production.
c. Using the sales-to-production-ratio method, the joint cost allocation steps include:
(1) Compute the percentage of total sales based on the joint product units sold.
(2) Compute the percentage of total production based on the joint product units
produced.
(3) Compute the sales-to-production ratio of the joint product.

Sales-to-production ratio =

(4) Use the sales-to-production ratio to allocate joint cost.

5. The limitations of allocation based on relative market value include the following:
 All methods are based on price. If price is used to determine cost, then those costs
cannot be used to determine price. The decision would be circular.
 Changes in relative market prices will cause changes in the costs allocated to the
product, even when there has been no change in total costs or the method of production.
 Using allocation based on relative market value produces the same margin per dollar
of allocated cost. This could be misleading to management if the impression is created
that all products are equally profitable.

Review textbook Exhibit 7-5, which summarizes the joint cost allocation methods.

III. Accounting for By-Products

A. Introduction
1. The main objective of by-product accounting is to determine income and inventory for
financial reporting purposes. By-products are of less significance than the main products
and may not require precise cost allocation.
2. Relevant factors that influence by-product valuation and accounting include:
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 151

 The uncertainty of by-product value at the time of production.

 The use of the by-product in other production.
 The use of the by-product as an alternative to main products.
 The need for separate profit calculations for sales incentives or for control.
3. By-products can be accounted for using the following:
a. Noncost methods
 Other income
 By-product revenue deducted from main product cost
b. Cost methods
 Replacement cost method
 Total costs less by-products valued at standard price method
 Joint cost proration method
B. Noncost Methods of Accounting for By-Products
Noncost methods make no attempt to allocate joint cost to the by-product or its inventory but
instead make some credit either to income or to the main product.
1. Other Income Method
a. The net sales of by-products for the current period is recognized as “Other Income” or
“Miscellaneous Income” and is reported in the income statement. The market value of
by-product inventory, if material, should be reported in a footnote to the balance sheet.
b. The other income method is used by those firms where:
 The value of the by-product is small,
 Any other allocation would be more expensive than the benefits received,
or
 Carrying by-products with the main products would not appreciably affect
the cost of the main product.
c. Disadvantages of this method include the following:
 Inventories on the balance sheet are misstated since no value is placed on
the by-products.
 Matching of revenues with expenses is improper if production of by-
products occurs in one accounting period and sales occur in another. No entry for
by-products is made at the time of production, only at the time of sale.
 No attempt is made to control the inventory of by-products and to prevent
them from losses due to fraud or errors.
2. By-Product Revenue Deducted from Main Product Cost
a. The net sales of by-products will be treated as a deduction from the cost of the main
product.
 Example: The beef-packing industry uses this method because of the great
variety of products resulting from operations and the complexity of the processing.
b. Disadvantages of this method include the following:
152 Chapter 7

 The method tends to understate the value of the main product.

 The cost of the main product can vary from month to month because of the
varying quantities of by-products sold.
C. Cost Methods of Accounting for By-Products
Cost methods attempt to allocate some joint costs to by-products and to carry inventories at the
allocated cost levels.
1. Replacement Cost Method
The replacement cost method values the by-product inventory at its opportunity cost of
purchasing or replacing the by-products.
 Example: In the oil refining industry, increasing output of one product will cause a
reduction in the output and the profit of the other product.
2. Total Costs Less By-Products Valued at Standard Price Method
a. By-products are valued at a standard price to avoid fluctuations in by-product value.
b. The standard price approach shelters the main product cost from any fluctuations in the
by-product price.
c. The standard price may be set arbitrarily, or it may reflect an average price over time.
d. A variance account is used to account for the difference between actual and standard
prices.
3. Joint Cost Proration Method
The by-product is allocated some portion of the joint costs using any one of the joint cost
allocation methods mentioned in Section II. This method is rarely used in practice.

Review textbook Exhibit 7-5, which summarizes the by-product accounting treatments.

IV. Effect of Joint Product Costs on Cost Control and Decision Making

Joint product costing may affect cost control and decision making in the following areas: output
decisions, further processing of joint products, and pricing jointly produced products.
A. Output Decisions
1. Output decisions are normally based on the comparison of total cost of the joint products and
the combined sales revenues for measuring profitability at any given point.
2. If management cannot change the product mix or the product mix is determined by
customer demand, cost allocation is useless for output decisions because the entire package
has to be produced.
B. Further Processing Decisions
1. In making decisions on whether to sell a joint product at split-off or to process it further,
only the costs and revenues incurred after the split-off point are pertinent.
2. Joint costs include those costs incurred prior to the split-off point and, thus, are considered
sunk costs with respect to further processing decisions (that is, the joint cost is not a relevant
cost).
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 153

C. Pricing Joint Products

Methods used to set joint product prices include:
1. Sales or market price method
a. This method maintains a constant relationship of cost to market prices, but it cannot be
used to set prices since price has to be known in order to determine cost.
b. The method is circular but useful in limited situations.
 Example: The meat-packing industry uses the market value of by-products
as an important determinant of the main product’s price.
 Example: The natural gas industry uses it to justify prices and existing
price relationships to regulatory bodies. Joint cost allocation is used to determine
inventory values, not as a basis to determine a cost to be used in price regulation.
2. Historical market differentials between products method
When market differentials are stable over time, this method provides a guide to pricing
individual products by giving figures comparable to those of competitors.
D. Pricing Based on Cost of Further Production
This method differs from the benefits-received approaches because it does not assign average
cost based on physical or weighted units. It is different from the relative market value because
the joint product itself does not have a market value.
 Example: The practice of organ transplant sets the costs of the jointly available
organs based on the eventual cost of the subsequent transplant operation.

V. Joint Production of Services

Normally services do not yield a true joint output because a service can be directed to one effect
rather than to two effects simultaneously.
Joint cost allocation issues with services usually relate to pricing problems.
 Example: An insurance company may allow only a portion of a massage therapy charge to be
allocated to the therapeutic aspect.
 Example: The IRS might allow the cost of a two-day seminar as a deductible business expense.
But if the seminar were offered on a cruise ship and spread out over a five-day period, the IRS
would look closely if claimed as a deduction and not separated from the overall cost of the
cruise.
154 Chapter 7

KEY TERMS TEST

From the list that follows, select the term that best completes each statement and write it in the space provided.

net realizable value method sales-value-at-split-off method

noncost methods separable costs
physical units method split-off point
replacement cost method weight factor
sales-to-production-ratio method

1. Costs that are easily traced to individual products are _________________________.

2. The _____________________________________________________ allocates joint production costs

by comparing the percentage of sales to the percentage of production.

3. The ____________________________________ allocates joint production costs based on each

product’s share of total units.

4. The _________________________________________________ allocates joint production costs

based on each product’s share of revenue at the split-off point.

5. The _______________________________________________ allocates joint production costs based

on the proportionate share of the product’s eventual revenue less further processing costs.

6. A(n) _______________________ tries to incorporate the relative size of products or the difficulty to
produce them.

7. _____________________________ make no attempt to cost the by-product or its inventory.

8. The _________________________ is where the joint products become separate and identifiable.

9. The _________________________________________ values by-products at the opportunity cost of

purchasing or replacing the products.

MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUIZ
Complete each of the following statements by circling the letter of the best answer.

1. Which of the following is not an acceptable method of accounting for by-products?

a. The revenue from the sale of by-products is credited to “Other Income.”
b. The by-product is valued at its opportunity costs of purchasing or replacing the product.
c. The revenue from the sale of by-products is deducted from the costs of the main products.
d. The by-product is valued at a standard price; any fluctuations in the price are isolated in a variance
account.
e. All of the above methods are acceptable approaches to accounting for by-products.

2. Which of the following is a true statement regarding joint costs?

a. Joint costs are easily traced to individual products.
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 155

b. The primary reason for allocating joint costs is to determine whether a product should be sold
immediately or processed further.
c. The primary reason for allocating joint costs is for inventory valuation for financial reporting.
d. Joint costs consist only of overhead, never of materials or direct labor.
e. None of the above statements are true.

3. Which of the following costs of a joint process would be allocated to the joint products?
a. materials, labor, and overhead
b. labor and overhead only
c. materials and labor only
d. conversion costs less by-product values
e. prime costs less by-product values

4. The joint cost allocation method that yields the same gross margin percentage for each product is the:
a. net realizable value method.
b. sales-to-production-ratio method.
c. physical units method.
d. constant gross margin percentage method.
e. sales-value-at-split-off method.

5. The joint cost allocation method that assigns joint production costs based on the proportionate share of
eventual revenues less further processing costs is the:
a. net realizable value method.
b. sales-to-production-ratio method.
c. physical units method.
d. constant gross margin percentage method.
e. sales-value-at-split-off method.

6. The secondary product recovered in the course of manufacturing a primary product during a joint
process is:
a. a by-product.
b. a joint product.
c. a replacement product.
d. a split-off product.
e. none of the above.

7. Which of the following joint cost allocation methods is not acceptable for financial reporting under
generally accepted accounting principles?
a. net realizable value method
b. sales-value-at-split-off method
c. physical units method
d. constant gross margin percentage method
e. All of the methods are acceptable under GAAP.
Use the following information for Questions 8 through 10:
Allison, Inc., produces two products, X and Y, in a single joint process. Last month the joint costs
were $75,000 when 10,000 units of Product X and 15,000 units of Product Y were produced.
156 Chapter 7

Additional processing costs were $15,000 for Product X and $10,000 for Product Y. Product X
sells for $10, and Product Y sells for $5.

8. The joint cost allocations to Products X and Y using the net realizable value method would be:
X Y
a. $30,000 $45,000
b. $42,500 $32,500
c. $42,857 $32,143
d. $45,000 $30,000
e. none of the above.

9. The joint cost allocations to Products X and Y using the physical units method would be:
X Y
a. $30,000 $45,000
b. $42,500 $32,500
c. $42,857 $32,143
d. $45,000 $30,000
e. none of the above.

10. The joint cost allocations to Products X and Y using the constant gross margin percentage method
would be:
X Y
a. $30,000 $45,000
b. $42,500 $32,500
c. $42,143 $32,857
d. $45,000 $30,000
e. none of the above.

11. Nathan Company produces three products (A, B, and C) in a single joint process. All of the products
are salable immediately upon split-off. Alternatively, any of the products could be processed further
and sold at a higher price. Cost and price information is as follows:
Product Price at Split-Off Additional Processing Cost Price After Processing Unit Volume
A $10 $10,000 $12 10,000
B 15 25,000 18 5,000
C 20 50,000 30 8,000

The decision that would maximize profits would be:

A B C
a. sell now sell now sell now
b. process further process further process further
c. sell now process further sell now
d. process further sell now process further
e. none of the above.
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 157

12. Laker Company produces two products along with a single by-product. The joint process costs total
$200,000. Product A can be sold for $450,000 after additional processing of $250,000; Product B
can be sold for $600,000 after additional processing of $200,000. The by-product BP can be sold for
$25,000 after packaging costs of $5,000. The by-product is accounted for using the by-product revenue
deducted from the main product cost approach. What would be the joint cost allocation using the net
realizable value method?
A B
a. $60,000 $120,000
b. $66,667 $133,333
c. $77,143 $102,857
d. $85,714 $114,286
e. none of the above

13. Lankip Company produces two main products and a by-product out of a joint process. The ratio of
output quantities to input quantities of direct material used in the joint process remains consistent from
month to month. Lankip employs the physical units method to allocate joint production costs to the
two main products. The net realizable value of the by-product is used to reduce the joint production
costs before the joint costs are allocated to the main products. Data regarding Lankip’s operations for
the current month are presented below. During the month, Lankip incurred joint production costs of
$2,520,000. The main products are not marketable at the split-off point and, thus, have to be processed
further.
First Main Product Second Main Product By-Product
Monthly output in pounds............... 90,000 150,000 60,000
Selling price per pound.................... $30 $14 $2
Separable process costs.................... $540,000 $660,000

The amount of joint production cost that Lankip would allocate to the Second Main Product by using
the physical units method to allocate joint production costs would be:
a. $1,200,000.
b. $1,260,000.
c. $1,500,000.
d. $1,575,000.
e. $1,650,000.

Use the following information for Questions 14 and 15:

Petro-Chem, Inc., is a small company that acquires high-grade crude oil from low-volume
production wells owned by individuals and small partnerships. The crude oil is processed in a
single refinery into Two Oil, Six Oil, and impure distillates. Petro-Chem does not have the
technology or capacity to process these products further and sells most of its output each month to
major refineries. There were no beginning inventories for finished goods or work in process on
November 1. The production costs and output of Petro-Chem for November are as follows:
Crude oil acquired and placed in production.................................... $5,000,000
Direct labor and related costs.......................................................... 2,000,000
Factory overhead............................................................................. 3,000,000
Production and sales:
 Two Oil:300,000 barrels produced; 80,000 barrels sold at $20 each
 Six Oil: 240,000 barrels produced; 120,000 barrels sold at $30 each
158 Chapter 7

 Distillates: 120,000 barrels produced and sold at $15 per barrel

14. The portion of the joint production costs assigned to Six Oil based on physical output would be:
a. $3,636,000.
b. $3,750,000.
c. $1,818,000.
d. $7,500,000.
e. $4,800,000.

15. The portion of the joint production costs assigned to Two Oil based on the relative sales value of
output would be:
a. $4,800,000.
b. $4,000,000.
c. $2,286,000.
d. $2,500,000.
e.$4,445,000.
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 159

PRACTICE TEST

EXERCISE 1
Ron Chemicals produces four products from a joint process costing $150,000 per month. After
leaving the joint process, the products must be further refined before they are salable. You
have been provided with the following information:
Product Volume Further Processing Costs Selling Price per Unit
A-1 15,000 $350,000 $80
B-3 25,000 400,000 40
C-2 10,000 100,000 22
Q-9 50,000 250,000 10

Required:
1. Allocate the joint costs using the physical units method.

2. Allocate the joint costs using the net realizable value method.
160 Chapter 7

EXERCISE 2
Bishop Corporation produces three products at a joint manufacturing cost of $1,250,000. The
following information has been provided:
Product Volume Further Processing Costs Selling Price per Unit
A 25,000. $750,000 $40
B 40,000 750,000 50
C 35,000 210,000 20

Required:
Allocate the joint costs using the constant gross margin percentage method.

EXERCISE 3
Quorum, Inc., has joint processing costs of $1,000,000. There are no further processing costs. The
demand for Quorum’s products has been fluctuating greatly; production has remained relatively
constant. The following information for the past year has been provided:
Product Units Sold Selling Price per Unit Units Produced
Q-80 25,000 $4.00 30,000
R-34 40,000 5.00 30,000
S-99 35,000 2.00 50,000
T-14 50,000 1.50 60,000
U-62 75,000 3.50 80,000
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 161

Required:
Allocate the joint costs using the sales-to-production-ratio method.
162 Chapter 7

EXERCISE 4
Granite City Monument Works is a manufacturer of cemetery headstones and architectural
granite slabs. Granite City excavates blocks of granite from its quarry from its joint processes of
Quarry and Cutting. Two joint products (cemetery monuments and architectural granite) are
produced along with a by-product called grit.
Cemetery monuments are cut, polished, and engraved in a variety of standard shapes, sizes,
and patterns and sold to funeral homes. Architectural granite slabs are special-ordered by
contractors for office buildings. These slabs are cut and polished to exacting specifications. The
small pieces of granite resulting from the cutting process are crushed and sold to farm-supply
outlets as poultry grit.
Granite City has provided the following costs and output information:
Process Cost Tons of Output
Quarry $350,000 100,000
Cutting 250,000 90,000
Monuments 300,000 25,000
Granite slabs 400,000 60,000
Grit 10,000 5,000
Quarry and Cutting are joint processes. A local farm-supply distributor purchases all of the grit
that is produced at $40 per ton. Assume that Granite City uses the physical units method to
allocate joint costs.

Required:
1. What would be the cost per ton of monuments and granite slabs, assuming that the grit is accounted
for as “Other Income”?
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 163

EXERCISE 4 (CONTINUED)
2. What would be the cost per ton of monuments and granite slabs, assuming that the grit is accounted
for as by-product revenue deducted from the main product cost?

EXERCISE 5
Taldot Company produces three products (X, Y, and Z) in a joint process costing $100,000.
The products can be sold as they leave the process, or they can be processed further and sold.
The cost accountant has provided you with the following information:
Sales Price Separable Further Sales Price After
Product Unit Volume at Split-Off Processing Costs Further Processing
X 3,000 $10 $60,000 $25
Y 4,000 15 50,000 30
Z 8,000 20 90,000 35
Assume that all processing costs are variable costs.

Required:
Which products should Taldot sell at split-off, and which products should be processed further?
164 Chapter 7

“CAN YOU?” CHECKLIST

 Can you define the terms joint product, split-off point, by-product, and separable costs?
 Can you allocate joint product costs using a benefits-received approach such as the:
 physical units method?
 weighted average method?
 Can you allocate joint product costs using a relative market value approach such as the:
 sales-value-at-split-off method?
 net realizable value method?
 constant gross margin percentage method?
 sales-to-production-ratio method?
 Can you identify different methods for accounting for by-products? Can you explain how to distinguish
between a by-product and a main product?
 Can you explain joint cost allocations related to:
 output decisions?
 further processing decisions?
 pricing of joint products?
 pricing based on the cost of further production?
 Can you explain how joint production costing could be used in a service industry?

ANSWERS

KEY TERMS TEST

1. separable costs 6. weight factor
2. sales-to-production-ratio method 7. Noncost methods
3. physical units method 8. split-off point
4. sales-value-at-split-off method 9. replacement cost method
5. net realizable value method

MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUIZ
1. e 4. d 7. e
2. c 5. a
3. a 6. a
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 165

8. b Net realizable values are computed as follows:

X: (10,000 units × $10) – $15,000 = $ 85,000
Y: (15,000 units × $ 5) – $10,000 = 65,000
Total net realizable value = $150,000
Joint cost allocation ratios are computed using the net realizable value method, and joint cost allocation is per formed as
follows:
X: ($85,000 / $150,000) × $75,000 = $42,500
Y: ($65,000 / $150,000) × $75,000 = $32,500

9. a Joint cost allocation ratios are computed using the physical units method, and joint cost allocation is performed as
follows:
X: (10,000 units / 25,000 units) × $75,000 = $30,000
Y: (15,000 units / 25,000 units) × $75,000 = $45,000

10. c Joint cost allocation ratio is computed using the constant gross margin percentage method as follows:
Estimated gross margin = $175,000 – $75,000 – $25,000 = $75,000
Estimated gross margin ratio = $75,000 / $175,000 = 42.857%
Joint cost allocation is computed as follows:
X: $100,000 – $15,000 – ($100,000 × 42.857%) = $42,143
Y: $75,000 – $10,000 – ($75,000 × 42.857%) = $32,857

11. d A: Incremental revenue if processed further = ($12 – $10) × 10,000 units = $20,000
Additional processing cost = $10,000
Conclusion: Process further because the incremental revenue is higher than the incremental costs.
B: Incremental revenue if processed further = ($18 – $15) × 5,000 units = $15,000
Additional processing cost = $25,000
Conclusion: Sell immediately because the incremental revenue is lower than the incremental costs.
C: Incremental revenue if processed further = ($30 – $20) × 8,000 units = $80,000
Additional processing cost = $50,000
Conclusion: Process further because the incremental revenue is higher than the incremental costs.

12. a Adjusted joint cost after reduction of net sale of by-product = $200,000 – ($25,000 – $5,000) = $180,000
Joint cost allocation ratios are computed using the net realizable value method as follows:
A: $450,000 – $250,000 = $200,000
B: $600,000 – $200,000 = 400,000
Total net realizable value = $600,000
Joint cost allocation is computed as follows:
A: $200,000 / $600,000 × $180,000 = $60,000
B: $400,000 / $600,000 × $180,000 = $120,000
13. c Total revenue $2,520,000 – By-product net sales (60,000 pounds × $2) = $2,400,000
Allocation ratio for Second Main Product = 150,000 pounds / (90,000 pounds + 150,000 pounds) = 0.625
Joint cost allocated to Second Main Product = $2,400,000 × 0.625 = $1,500,000
14. a Total units produced = 300,000 + 240,000 + 120,000 = 660,000 barrels
Allocation ratio for Six Oil = 240,000 barrels / 660,000 barrels = 0.3636
Joint cost allocated to Six Oil = ($5,000,000 + $2,000,000 + $3,000,000) × 0.3636 = $3,636,000
15. b Two Oil ($20 × 300,000 barrels) = $ 6,000,000
Six Oil ($30 × 240,000 barrels) = 7,200,000
Distillates ($15 × 120,000 barrels) = 1,800,000
Total $15,000,000
Allocation ratio = $6,000,000 / $15,000,000 = 40%
Joint cost allocation = ($5,000,000 + $2,000,000 + $3,000,000) × 40% = $4,000,000
166 Chapter 7

PRACTICE TEST
EXERCISE 1 (RON CHEMICALS)
1. Physical Units Method
Product: A-1 B-3 C-2 Q-9 Total
Units............................................................... 15,000 25,000 10,000 50,000 100,000
Allocation %................................................... 15% 25% 10% 50%
Joint cost allocated (% × $150,000)................ $22,500 $37,500 $15,000 $75,000 $150,000
2. Net Realizable Value Method
Product: A-1 B-3 C-2 Q-9 Total
Units............................................................... 15,000 25,000 10,000 50,000
Unit price........................................................ × $80 × $40 × $22 × $10
Total revenue.................................................. $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $220,000 $500,000
Less: Further processing costs........................ 350,000 400,000 100,000 250,000
Net realizable value......................................... $ 850,000 $ 600,000 $120,000 $250,000 $1,820,000
Allocation %................................................... 46.7% 33.0% 6.6% 13.7%
Joint cost allocated (% × $150,000)*.............. $70,054.95 $49,450.55 $9,890.11 $20,604.40 $ 150,000
*Differences due to rounding

EXERCISE 2 (BISHOP CORPORATION)

Constant Gross Margin Percentage Method
Product: A B C Total
Units............................................................... 25,000 40,000 35,000
Unit price........................................................ × $40 × $50 × $20
Revenue.......................................................... $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $700,000 $3,700,000)
Less: Joint processing cost............................. (1,250,000)
Less: Separable further processing costs......... $750,000 $750,000 $210,000 (1,710,000)
Gross margin................................................... $ 740,000)
Gross margin ratio = $740,000 / $3,700,000 = 20%

Joint Cost Allocation

Revenue.......................................................... $1,000,000) $2,000,000) $ 700,000) $3,700,000)
Less: Gross margin at 20%............................. (200,000) (400,000) (140,000)
Less: Separable further processing costs......... (750,000) (750,000) (210,000)
Joint cost allocated.......................................... $ 50,000) $ 850,000) $ 350,000) $1,250,000)

EXERCISE 3 (QUORUM, INC.)

Sales-to-Production-Ratio Method
Percentage Percentage Sales-to- Joint Cost
Units of Total Units of Total Production Allocation Joint Cost
Product Sold Sales Produced Production Ratio Ratio Allocation
Q-80 25,000 11.11% 30,000 12.00% 0.9259 17.97% $ 179,695
R-34 40,000 17.78% 30,000 12.00% 1.4815 28.75% 287,511
S-99 35,000 15.56% 50,000 20.00% 0.7778 15.09% 150,943
T-14 50,000 22.22% 60,000 24.00% 0.9259 17.97% 179,695
U-62 75,000 33.33% 80,000 32.00% 1.0417 20.22% 202,156
Total 225,000 250,000 5.1528 $1,000,000
Joint Product and By-Product Costing 167

EXERCISE 4 (GRANITE CITY MONUMENT WORKS)

Sales of grit (5,000 tons × $40)................................. $200,000
Less: Separable costs of processing........................... 10,000
Shown as “Other Income”.......................................... $190,000
1. Grit accounted for as “Other Income”:
Joint cost to be allocated = $350,000 Quarry + $250,000 Cutting = $600,000
Product: Monuments Slabs Total
Tons.................................................................... 25,000 60,000 85,000
Allocation ratio................................................... 29.412% 70.588%
Joint cost allocation (% × $600,000).................. $176,472 $423,528 $600,000
Add: Separable further processing costs............. 300,000 400,000
Total................................................................... $476,472 $823,528
Divided by tons................................................... ÷ 25,000 ÷ 60,000
Cost per ton........................................................ $ 19.06 $ 13.73

2. Grit accounted for as by-product revenue deducted from main product cost:
Joint cost to be allocated = $350,000 Quarry + $250,000 Cutting – $190,000 By-product net sales = $410,000
Product: Monuments Slabs Total
Tons.................................................................... 25,000 60,000 85,000
Allocation ratio................................................... 29.412% 70.588%
Joint cost allocation (% × $410,000).................. $120,589 $289,411 $410,000
Less: Separable further processing costs............. 300,000 400,000
Total................................................................... $420,589 $689,411
Divided by tons................................................... ÷ 25,000 ÷ 60,000
Cost per ton........................................................ $ 16.82 $ 11.49

EXERCISE 5 (TALDOT COMPANY)

Incremental Revenue Separable Further Additional
Product if Processed Further Processing Costs Contribution Margin
X $ 45,000 ($25 – $10) × 3,000 $60,000 $(15,000)
Y 60,000 ($30 – $15) × 4,000 50,000 10,000
Z 120,000 ($35 – $20) × 8,000 90,000 30,000
Based on the analysis above, Product X should be sold immediately at the split-off point. Products Y and Z should be processed
further and then sold because they can generate more profit if processed further.