Unit 2 - Constitution
Unit 2 - Constitution
A. Parliament
1. Composition
2. Parliamentary Sovereignty
3. Parliamentary Privileges
C. Judiciary
1. Jurisdiction of Supreme Court and High
Courts
2. Independence of Judiciary
PARLIAMENT
COMPOSITION OF PARLIAMENT
Case law
• Jaya Bachan v. UOI (2006)
• Lily Thomas v. UOI (2013)
• Lok Prahari (through General Secretary SN Shukla) v. Election Commission of India
(2018)
SPECIAL POWERS OF LOK SABHA
• Money Bill can be introduced only in Lok Sabha + special procedure for
passing it. (Art. 109).
Available to:
• These rights are mainly from the members of both
the Houses of Parliament.
Exceptions-
• Freedom of speech should be in accordance with the
constitutional provisions and subject to rules and procedures
of the parliament, stated under Article 118 of the Constitution.
• Under Article 121 of the Constitution, the members of the
parliament are restricted from discussing the conduct of the
judges of the Supreme Court and the High Court. But,
even if this happens, it is the matter of the parliament and the
court cannot interfere.
• No privilege and immunity can be claimed by the member for
anything which is said outside the proceedings of the house.
(2) Right to the publication of proceedings
Clause (2) of Article 105 (and article 194) expressly provides that
“no person shall be compelled to made liable in regards to the
publication by him or by under the authority of either house of the
parliament for any report, paper, journal, vote or proceedings”.
Exception-secret sitting
OTHER PRIVELEGES
• In re Keshav Singh
PARLIAMENTARY
SOVEREIGNTY
• Parliamentary sovereignty means supremacy of the
legislative body i.e parliament over all other
government institutions including executive and
judicial bodies. Sovereign legislature may change or
repeal any previous legislation and is not bound by
any written law like constitution.
CASE LAWS:
• Minerva Mills v. UOI (1986)
• Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala (1973
EXECUTIVE
PRESIDENT
Article 53
(1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the
President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through
officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision,
the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall
be vested in the President and the exercise thereof shall be
regulated by law
(3) Nothing in this article shall:
(a) be deemed to transfer to the President any functions conferred
by any existing law on the Government of any State or other
authority; or
(b) prevent Parliament from conferring by law functions on
authorities other than the President
ARTICLE 58 : QUALIFICATIONS FOR ELECTION AS
PRESIDENT
IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT
Art. 56 proviso (b) the President may, for
violation of the Constitution, be removed from
office by impeachment in the manner provided
in article 61.
ARTICLE 61 : PROCEDURE FOR IMPEACHMENT
OF THE PRESIDENT
(1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the
President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for
him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinance as the
circumstances appear to him to require
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and
effect as an Act of Parliament, but every such Ordinance
(a) shall be laid before both House of Parliament and shall cease to operate at
the expiration of six weeks from the reassemble of Parliament, or, if before
the expiration of that period resolutions disapproving it are passed by both
Houses, upon the passing of the second of those resolutions; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the President
Explanation: Where the Houses of Parliament are summoned to reassemble on
different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those
dates for the purposes of this clause
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision
which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact,
it shall be void.
• Ordinance making power of President is coextensive with legislative
power of Parliament.
PARDONING POWER
Article 72: The President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of
punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence
(a) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is by a court Martial;
(b) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to
which the executive power of the Union extends;
(c) in all cases where the sentence is a sentence of death.
• Discretionary Power
• Exercised on aid and advice of CoM: In Maru Ram v Union of India (1980), the Constitutional
Bench of Supreme Court held that the power under Article 72 is to be exercised on the advice of the
Central Government and not by the President on his own, and that the advice of the Government
binds the head of the Republic.
• Subject to Judicial Review: In a landmark judgment Epuru Sudhakar & Anr v. Govt. Of A.P. & Ors,
it was held by the Supreme Court that it is a well-set principle that a limited judicial review of
exercise of clemency powers is available to the Supreme Court and High Courts. Granting of
clemency by the President or Governor can be challenged on the following grounds:
(2) The question whether any, and if so what, advice was tendered
by Ministers to the President shall not be inquired into in any
court.
Article 75
(1) The Prime Minister shall be appointed by the President and the
other Ministers shall be appointed by the President on the advice of
the Prime Minister.
(2) The Minister shall hold office during the pleasure of the President.
(3) The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the
House of the People.
(4) Before a Minister enters upon his office, the President shall
administer to him the oaths of office and of secrecy according to the
forms set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.
(5) A Minister who for any period of six consecutive months is not a
member of either House of Parliament shall at the expiration of that
period cease to be a Minister.
(6) The salaries and allowances of Ministers shall be such as
Parliament may from time to time by law determine and, until
Parliament so determines, shall be as specified in the Second Schedule
The Attorney General for India.
• Term (Art. 67): The Vice-President shall hold office for a term of
five years from the date of his appointment.
(a) a Vice President may, by writing under his hand addressed to the
President, resign his office;
(b) a Vice President may be removed from his office by a resolution
of the council of States passed by a majority of all the then
members of the council and agreed to by the House of the People;
but no resolution for the purpose of this clause shall be moved
unless at least fourteen days notice has been given of the intention
to move the resolution;
(c) a Vice President shall, notwithstanding the expiration of his
term, continue to hold office until his successor enters upon his
office.
• Every Vice-President shall make an Oath or
Affirmation on entering upon his office before the
President, or some person appointed in that behalf
by him. (Article 69)
Legislative Powers:
• It’s in his power to prorogue the state legislature
and dissolve the state legislative assemblies.
• He addresses the state legislature at the first
session of every year.
• Assent to bill
• If the speaker of the legislative assembly is absent
and the same is Deputy Speaker, then Governor
appoints a person to preside over the session.
• Governor nominates ⅙ of the total members of
the legislative council from the fields of Literature,
Science, Art, Cooperative Movement, Social
Service.
• He can consult Election Commission for the
disqualification of members.
• With respect to the bill introduced in the state
legislature, he can give his assent, withhold his
assent, return the bill, reserve the bill for the
President’s consideration.
• An ordinance can be promulgated by him
when either the Legislative Assembly or
Council (Unicameral/Bicameral) are not in
session. (Art. 213)
• The following reports are laid by him:
1. State Finance Commission
2. State Public Service Commission
3. Comptroller and Auditor General
Financial Powers:
• He looks over the state budget being laid
in the state legislature.
• His recommendation is a prerequisite for
the introduction of a money bill in the state
legislature.
• He recommends for the demand for
grants which otherwise cannot be given.
• Contingency Fund of State is under him
and he makes advances out that to meet
unforeseen expenditure.
• State Finance Commission is constituted
every five years by him.
Judicial Powers:
• Power of Pardon (Art. 161):Previously, the governor
cannot pardon the death sentence, which only the Indian
President can do. But, recently on 3rd August 2021, the
Supreme Court in The State Of Haryana & Ors. v. Raj
Kumar @ Bittu(2021), held that the Governor of a State
can pardon prisoners, including death row ones.The
Governor’s power to pardon overrides Section 433A of the
Code of Criminal Procedure which mandates that a
prisoner’s sentence can be remitted only after 14 years of
jail.
• Art. 163: (1) There shall be a council of Ministers with the chief Minister at
the head to aid and advise the Governor in the exercise of his functions,
except in so far as he is by or under this constitution required to exercise his
functions or any of them in his discretion.
(2) If any question arises whether any matter is or is not a matter as respects
which the Governor is by or under this Constitution required to act in his
discretion, the decision of the Governor in his discretion shall be final, and
the validity of anything done by the Governor shall not be called in question
on the ground that he ought or ought not to have acted in his discretion
(3) The question whether any, and if so what, advice was tendered by
Ministers to the Governor shall not be inquired into in any court.
(1) The President, or the Governor or Rajpramukh of a State, shall not be answerable to
any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or
for any act done or purporting to be done by him in the exercise and performance of
those powers and duties.
Provided that the conduct of the President may be brought under review by any court,
tribunal or body appointed or designated by either House of Parliament for the
investigation of a charge under Article 61.
(3) No process for the arrest or imprisonment of the President, or the Governor of a
State, shall issue from any court during his term of office.
(4) any civil proceedings in which relief is claimed against the President, or the Governor
of a State, shall be instituted during his term of office in any court in respect of any act
done or purporting to be done by him in his personal capacity, whether before or after he
entered upon his office as President, or as Governor of such State, until the expiration of
two months next after notice in writing has been delivered to the President or
Governor, as the case may be, or left at his office stating the nature of the proceedings,
the cause of action therefor, the name, description and place of residence of the party
by whom such proceedings are to be instituted and the relief which he claims.
JUDICIARY
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
• Established on: 26 January 1950
• The Indian Constitution under Article 124(1) states that there shall be a Supreme Court
of India consisting of a Chief justice of India (CJI) and 34 judges, including the CJI.
• Term: SC judge shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years. (Art. 124
(2))
• Oath: Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he
enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person
appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for
the purpose in the Third Schedule. (Art. 124 (6))
Original Jurisdiction
(Art 131)
Writ Jurisdiction
(Art 32)
Appellate Jurisdiction
(Art 131-136)
Advisory Jurisdiction
(Art 143)
Review Jurisdiction
(Art 137)
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (Art.131)
• Art. 134A. Certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court- Every High Court,
passing or making a judgment, decree, final order, or sentence, referred to in
clause (1) of article 132 or clause (1) of article 133, or clause (1) of article 134-
(a) may, if it deems fit so to do, on its own motion; and
(b) shall, if an oral application is made, by or on behalf of the party
aggrieved, immediately after the passing or making of such judgment, decree,
final order or sentence,
determine, as soon as may be after such passing or making, the question
whether a certificate of the nature referred to in clause (1) of article 132, or
clause (1) of article 133 or, as the case may be, sub-clause (c) of clause (1) of
article 134, may be given in respect of that case.
Article 135: Until Parliament by law otherwise provides, the Supreme
Court shall also have jurisdiction and powers with respect to any matter to
which the provisions of Article 133 or Article 134 do not apply if
jurisdiction and powers in relation to that matter were exercisable by the
Federal Court immediately before the commencement of this Constitution
under any existing law.
CURATIVE PETITION
Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra (2002)
Zakarius Lakra v. UOI (2005)
ADVISORY JURISDICTION (Art. 143)
• Composition: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other
Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint. (Art.
216)
• Term: HC judge shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-two years. (Art.
217 (1))
1. Original Jurisdiction
2. Appellate Jurisdiction
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai vs. Ram Chander Rai laid down the
following differences:
i. Firstly, the writ of certiorari is an exercise of its original jurisdiction (Article 226) by
the High Court; exercise of supervisory jurisdiction (Article 227) is not an original
jurisdiction and in this regard, it is akin to appellate revisional or corrective
jurisdiction.
ii. Secondly, in a writ of certiorari, the record of the proceedings having been certified
and sent up by the inferior court or tribunal to the High Court, the High Court if inclined
to exercise its jurisdiction, may simply annul or quash the proceedings and then do no
more (Art 226). In exercise of supervisory jurisdiction (Art 227) the High Court may not
only quash or set aside the impugned proceedings, judgment or order but it may also
make such directions as the facts and circumstances of the case may warrant, may be by
way of guiding the inferior court or tribunal as to the manner in which it would now
proceed further or afresh as commended to or guided by the High Court. In appropriate
cases the High Court, while exercising supervisory jurisdiction, may substitute the
impugned decision with a decision of its own, as the inferior court or tribunal should have
made.
iii. The jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is capable of being exercised on
a prayer made by or on behalf of the party aggrieved but the power conferred under
Article 227 viz the supervisory jurisdiction is capable of being exercised suo moto as
well.
POWERS OF HIGH COURT
3. Judicial Review
INDEPENDENCE
OF
JUDICIARY
Union of India v. R. Gandhi (2010)
• Watchdog of Constitution
• Impartial Justice
• Fair Interpretation
• Rule of Law
Art. 124 (2): Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by
warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the
Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem
necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years.
Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the
Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted.
Art. 217 (1): Every Judge of a High Court shall be appointed by the President by
warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, the
Governor of the State, and, in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the
chief Justice, the chief Justice of the High court, and shall hold office, in the case of an
additional or acting Judge, as provided in Article 224, and in any other case, until he
attains the age of sixty two years.
Art. 222(1): The President may, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India,
transfer a Judge from one High Court to any other High Court.
• SP Gupta v. Union of India (AIR 1982 SC 149)
• Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of
India (AIR 1994 SC 268)
• In Re Special Reference No.1 of 1998 ( AIR 1999 SC 1)
• National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC)
constituted under Constitution (Ninety Ninth) Amendment
Act, 2014
• Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of
India (2015 (11) SCALE 1):
“It would be of utmost importance therefore, to shield judicial
appointments, from any political-executive interference, to
preserve the “independence of the judiciary”, from the regime
of the spoils system. Preserving primacy in the judiciary, in
the matter of selection and appointment of Judges to the
higher judiciary would be a safe way to do so.”