HRM Answer
HRM Answer
Question 1
1. CONFRONTATION:
Situation to use:
When you are sure that you are right
When an emergency situation exists
When stakes are high and issues are important
Purpose:
To gain status or demonstrate position power
2. COLLABORATION
Situation to use:
When you both get at least what you want
When there is enough time and skills are complementary
When you want to preclude later use of other methods
When there is mutual trust, respect and confidence
5
Purpose:
To reduce overall costs
To gain commitment and create a common power base
To maintain future relationships
1
3. COMPROMISE
Situation to use:
For temporary solutions
For backup if collaboration fails
When you can’t win or don’t have enough time
When others are as strong as you are
When you get nothing if you don’t compromise
When goals are moderately high
Purpose:
To maintain your relationship with your opponent
4. ACCOMODATION
Situation to use:
When stakes are low and liability is limited
When any solution will be adequate
When you’ll lose anyway
Purpose:
To reach an over-reaching goal
To create obligation for a trade-off at a later date
To maintain harmony, peace and goodwill
To gain time
5. AVOIDANCE
Situation to use:
When you can’t win or the stakes are low
When the stakes are high, but you are not ready yet
When you think the problem will go away by itself
When a cooling-off period is needed to gain better understanding of the conflict
situation and also when the other party is both unassertive and uncooperative.
Purpose:
To gain status or demonstrate position power
To gain time
To discourage your opponent
To maintain neutrality or reputation
Question 2
Communicate your attendance policy across all levels in the organization clearly
Measure and thereby monitor the rate of absenteeism in your company on a regular
basis
Engage supervisors to speak to employees who were absent and have returned to
work
Keep your employees motivated and try making the organization a fun place to work
Chp 12
Question 1
Fear of an unfavorable outcome, such as: less money, personal inconvenience, more
work)
Question 2
1. Unfreeze:
Determines what needs to change
Ensure there is strong support from management
Create the need for change
Manage and understand the doubts and concerns
2. Change:
Communicate often
Dispel rumour
Empower action
Involve employees in the process
3. Refreeze
Anchor the changes into the culture
Develop ways to sustain the change
Provide support and training
Celebrate successes
Q1.
Skill variety
The extent to which a job requires a variety of skills to carry out the tasks involved.
Task identity
The degree to which a job requires completing a "whole" piece of work from
beginning to end (e.g., building an entire component or resolving a customer's
complaint).
Task significance
The extent to which the job has an important impact on the lives of other people.
Autonomy
The degree to which the job allows an individual to make decisions about the way
the work will be carried out.
Feedback
The extent to which a person receives clear information about performance
effectiveness from the work itself.
Q2.
RATIONAL
⚫ Information on alternatives can be gathered and quantified
BOUNDED RATIONALITY
⚫ The minimum criteria are clear; due to time and other constraints, unable to
invest in making decisions
⚫ Satisficing-choosing a solution is that meets minimum qualification, one that is
“good enough”
INTUITIVE
⚫ Goals are unclear
⚫ Due to time constraint, immediate action needed to save cost
⚫ have previous experience with the problem
CREATIVE
⚫ Solutions to the problem are not clear
⚫ New solutions need to be generated
Q3.
Group Team
Emphasizes on the individual Emphasizes on mutual accountability
accountability
1. Central Tendency:
• The inclination to rate people in the middle scale even when the performance
clearly warrants a substantially higher or lower rating.
• The attitude of the rater is to play safe.
2. Halo Effect:
Inappropriate generalizations from one good aspect of a person’s performance to all
areas of that person’s performance.
3. Horn Effect:
One negative aspect might influence an employee’s overall performance
assessment.
4. Rater Effect:
• Includes favouritism, stereotyping, and hostility to influence the
evaluation.
• Evaluation determined by rater’s attitude towards the subject
5. Severity:
A rater’s style of evaluation either being overly critical of the employee’s
performance.
6. Primacy Effect:
The rater’s ratings are heavily influenced either by behaviour exhibited by the
subject during the early stages of the review period.
7. Recency Effect:
Outcomes or behaviours exhibited near the end of the review period.
8. Contrast Effect:
9. Stereotyping:
Question 1
Diversity Management competencies
⚫ Active, non-judgment listening;
⚫ Willingness to change one’s own concepts about diversity;
⚫ Collaboration skills;
⚫ Experience with conflict resolution and change management;
⚫ Sensitivity towards terms labelling groups regarding diversity;
⚫ Ability to identify diversity issues and understand related
tensions;
⚫ Intercultural team building – ability to express respect and
appreciation;
⚫ Openness to learning about others who are different;
⚫ Ability to educate others on how to build diverse people skills;
⚫ Ability to provide appropriate responses
7 leadership styles
⚫ Authoritarian Leadership
Pros
it is best used in crisis. It can be an efficient and effective tool when quick
decisions are needed, and work needs to get done.
Downside
People may resent being treated this way. Consistently using this style may lead to a
loss of team members, and high turn over.
⚫ Laissez-Faire Leadership
Pros
This leadership style can be effective if the leader monitors performance and gives
feedback to team members regularly. It is most likely to be effective when individual
team members are experienced, skilled,
self-starters.
Downside
it can be damaging if team members don't manage their time well or if they don't
have the knowledge, skills, or motivation to do their work effectively.
⚫ Servant Leadership
Pros
Subordinates have a better chance to express their needs and use their rights through
self-sacrifice of leaders and prioritization of employees.
Downside
Pros
It can help the leaders can assert their authority due to the clearly established
roles and boundaries in a hierarchy and clarifies everyone's roles and
responsibilities. People who are ambitious or who are motivated by exchanges and
rewards of a leader often thrive.
Downside
Too conventional to allow much creative innovation.
⚫ Democratic Leadership
Pros
Team members tend to have high job satisfaction and are productive because they're
more involved in decisions. This style also helps develop people's skills. Even
participation takes time, but the result is often good and the approach can be most
suitable
Downside
It can often hinder situations where speed or efficiency is essential because it needs
to take some time to gather people's input. Some team
members are also might not have the knowledge or expertise to provide high quality
input.
⚫ Bureaucratic Leadership
Pros
Each person is only responsible for a specific task. That allows each person to focus
their strengths toward what they do best, including the leader, who helps to ensure
that all questions are solved by the correct people.
Downside
It will limit productivity because bureaucratic leaders use rules and regulations to
create consistency. As more rules are added into the mix, workers are forced to
slow down to ensure they are meeting required standards.
⚫ Transformational Leadership
Pros
Employees are motivated easily by the leader's passion and influence to do what is
asked of them. The productivity will gain when everyone is pulling in the same
direction, as all people can see the big picture and feel united in a common cause.
Downside
They would need support from more detail-oriented and organized people, which
means that other executives, assistants or certain team members would be needed
to help maintain a transactional focus that can keep the vision of these leaders
moving in the right direction.
Question 2
Forming: Team acquaints and establishes group rules. Formalities are preserved
and members are treated as strangers
Storming: Members start to communicate their feelings but still view themselves as
individuals rather than part of the team. They resist control by group leaders and
show hostility.
Norming: People feel part of the team and realize that they can achieve work if they
accept other viewpoints.
Performing: The team works in an open and trusting atmosphere where flexibility is
the key and hierarchy is of little importance.
⚫ Clear objectives
⚫ Roles for all members clearly understood
⚫ Appreciation of each others qualities
⚫ Openness of thoughts , beliefs and actions
⚫ Trust among members
⚫ Co-operation in team members
⚫ Effective leadership
⚫ Ability to deal with conflict
⚫ Good communication
⚫ Purpose of unity
⚫ Shared goals and objective