VIP Report of Foundation Design
VIP Report of Foundation Design
2024.08
YJK Building Software
i
YJK Building Software
ii
YJK Building Software
γ(kN/m3)
Chapter 1 Design Basis Weighted average weight of soil above the foundation γ
m(kN/m3)
20.0
Is the bearing capacity of foundation always calculated Considering the stiffness of superstructure Consider
according to the following parameters No Equivalent beam height of shear wall on raft(m) 5.0
“No”means that separately defined values take precedence Meshing Control Length(m) 1.0
Method of calculation NAVFAC Design Manual 7.2 Node Trimming Control Error(mm) 100
Design value of foundation bearing capacity Rd(kPa) 180.00 Natural Foundation/Conventional Pile
Foundation type
Weight (or floating weight) of soil below foundation bottom 20.0 Foundation
3
YJK Building Software
The cap pile in the waterproof board is set as a fixed support No Waterproof Board Design
Loading ratio of post-cast strip before construction 0.5 Water buoyancy (high water level) and civil air defense are
Yes
considered at the same time
Considering the combination of dead load and live load Yes
3.5 Water buoyancy, civil air defense load
Internal force integral method for calculating the influence of
No
waterproof board on single foundation
Nominal combination coefficient of water buoyancy 1.00
Whether to consider the influence of waterproof board
Fundamental combination coefficient of water buoyancy 1.35 Yes
stiffness on pile cap bending moment and shear force
Historical lowest water level/perennial stable water level(m) 0.00 Design of Foundation Beam and Masonry Strip
Historical highest water level/anti-floating design water Foundation
0.00
level(m) Overlapping area correction is considered in checking
Yes
Historical lowest water level participates in load calculation of foundation bearing capacity
No
combination Beam element method for calculating internal force
No
Checking calculation of anti-floating (the highest water level reinforcement of foundation beam of raft
No
in history participates in load combination) The bottom reinforcement area of inverted T-shaped
All combinations of waterproof board loads are transferred foundation beam is output according to web and flange Yes
to the foundation respectively
No
(only anti-floating combinations are transferred when <no> Minimum reinforcement ratio of longitudinal reinforcement
0.20%
is selected) at the bottom of flange of inverted T beam
Civil air defense level Non-civil air defense Tie Beam Design
Equivalent static load of plate(kPa) 0 Torque reduction factor 0.40
4
YJK Building Software
Shear wall punching raft considering unbalanced moment Yes Generate SAFE data files No
Critical ratio of span to thickness[λ] 0.25 When the decimal place is reserved, carry when it is greater
4
than
Limit value of width-thickness ratio of short limb wall[L/B] 8.0
Automatic combination of long limb walls for punching
No
checking calculation
Chapter 4 Load, Load Combination
Settlement Calculation
Adopt new settlement trial calculation method Yes
Maximum number of iterations 6 4.1 Load
Convergence control error(mm) 2.0
'Basic model' adopts pile-soil stiffness of 'settlement model' No 4.1.1 Upper load
Automatic calculating according to
Specified maximum soil thickness(m) 5.3.5 of foundation code and 5.5.14 of Table 4-1 Table of Total Upper Loads
pile foundation code X-direction Y-direction Moment Moment
Axial force
Automatic calculating according to Load case shear shear about X axis about Y axis
N(kN)
Specified minimum calculated depth(m) 5.3.7/5.3.8 of foundation code and Vx(kN) Vy(kN) Mx(kN.m) My(kN.m)
5.5.8/5.5.14 of pile foundation code
Dead 18236.6 -0.0 0.0 912.6 -25.3
Implement 5.3.7 of Foundation Code,
Implementation clauses of layerwise summation method Live 2391.1 -0.0 0.0 120.0 -15.1
and the deformation ratio is ≤ 0.025
WindX -0.0 505.7 0.0 14.3 887.0
Implement 5.5. 6 ~ 5.5. 13 of Pile
Implementation clauses of equivalent action method WindY 0.0 -0.0 212.0 -451.5 1.8
Foundation Code
Mindlin method adopts additional load on pile top to EX 20.4 1359.5 330.1 100.6 2344.1
No
calculate settlement EY -38.9 79.1 1615.6 -3672.2 -3.7
Mindlin method adopts accurate integration to calculate EV 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Yes
settlement
5
YJK Building Software
X-direction Y-direction Moment Moment not be greater than 'Civil air defense load' in Table 4-1.
Axial force
Load case shear shear about X axis about Y axis
N(kN)
Vx(kN) Vy(kN) Mx(kN.m) My(kN.m) 4.1.4 Overburden weight
RF 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Table 4-4 Table of Total Weight of Covered Soil
Note: 1. Downward axial force is positive, and the bending moment and shear force are counted in
the overall coordinate system. Axial force
Load case
2. 'Civil air defense load' refers to the civil air defense load acting on the roof and N(kN)
transmitted from vertical members to the foundation. Dead 6169.1
3. When the inverted floor method is used to calculate civil air defense, the roof civil air
defense load is considered as the fixed support.
4.1.5 Foundation self weight
4.1.2 Additional load
Table 4-5 Table of Total Foundation Self Weight
6
YJK Building Software
Note: Downward dead load, live load, wind load, seismic load and civil air defence load are (14) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.75Live-0.45WindX
positive, while upward water buoyancy are positive. (15) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.75Live-0.45WindY
(16) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.7EX
4.2 Load combination (17) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.7EY
(18) StandComb 1.0Dead-0.7EX
4.2.1 Quasi-permanent combination (19) StandComb 1.0Dead-0.7EY
(20) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.75Live+0.52EX
Table 4-8 Quasi-permanent combination table (21) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.75Live+0.52EY
Combination (22) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.75Live-0.52EX
Combination
number
(23) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.75Live-0.52EY
(1) QuasiComb 1.0Dead+0.5Live (24) StandComb 0.6Dead+0.7EX
Note: Quasi-permanent combination is used for settlement calculation and raft center of gravity (25) StandComb 0.6Dead+0.7EY
check.
(26) StandComb 0.6Dead-0.7EX
(27) StandComb 0.6Dead-0.7EY
4.2.2 Nominal combination
Note: The nominal combination is used to check the bearing capacity of foundation and pile
foundation.
Table 4-9 Nominal Combination Table
Combination
number
Combination 4.2.3 Fundamental combination
(2) StandComb 1.0Dead
Table 4-10 Fundamental Combination Table
(3) StandComb 1.0Dead+1.0Live
Combination
(4) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.6WindX Combination
number
(5) StandComb 1.0Dead+0.6WindY (28) BasicComb 1.4Dead
(6) StandComb 1.0Dead-0.6WindX (29) BasicComb 1.2Dead+1.6Live
(7) StandComb 1.0Dead-0.6WindY (30) BasicComb 1.2Dead+1.0Live+1.0WindX
(8) StandComb 0.6Dead+0.6WindX (31) BasicComb 1.2Dead+1.0Live+1.0WindY
(9) StandComb 0.6Dead+0.6WindY (32) BasicComb 1.2Dead+1.0Live-1.0WindX
7
YJK Building Software
Combination Bottom
Combination Concret Top protective
number Stirru protective Minimum
Componen e Reinforcemen layer
(33) BasicComb 1.2Dead+1.0Live-1.0WindY p layer reinforcemen
t Strength t Grade thickness(mm
Grade thickness(mm t ratio
(34) BasicComb 0.9Dead+1.0WindX Grade )
)
(35) BasicComb 0.9Dead+1.0WindY Beam
(36) BasicComb 0.9Dead-1.0WindX Raft C30 G60 — 40 40 0.00%
(37) BasicComb 0.9Dead-1.0WindY Raft
(38) BasicComb 1.2Dead+1.0Live+1.0EX pile(pile
C30 G60 G60 40 — 0.00%
(39) BasicComb 1.2Dead+1.0Live+1.0EY under
beam)
(40) BasicComb 1.2Dead+1.0Live-1.0EX
Tie beam C20 G60 G60 40 — 0.00%
(41) BasicComb 1.2Dead+1.0Live-1.0EY
Strip
(42) BasicComb 0.9Dead+1.0EX C20 G60 G60 40 — 0.00%
Foundation
(43) BasicComb 0.9Dead+1.0EY
(44) BasicComb 0.9Dead-1.0EX
5.2 Design Value of Reinforcement Strength
(45) BasicComb 0.9Dead-1.0EY
Note: The fundamental combination is used for punching, shear, local compression checking Table 5-2 Reinforcement strength table
calculation and reinforcement design.
Reinforcement Design value of tensile Design value of compressive
grade strength(N/mm2) strength(N/mm2)
8
YJK Building Software
Raft hole 0
Waterproof board 0 0.0 Chapter 7 Checking Calculation of Bearing
Cap pile 0 0.0
Pile Non-cap pile 0 0.0 Capacity of Foundation and Pile Foundation
Anchor 0 0.0
Tie beam 0 0.0
7.1 Checking calculation of foundation bearing capacity
Strip foundation 0 0.0
Total 154.2
7.1.1 Single foundation
9
YJK Building Software
7.1.4 Masonry strip foundation 7.4 Checking Calculation of Horizontal Bearing Capacity of
There is no strip foundation in this project! Pile Foundation
7.2 Checking Calculation of Vertical Bearing Capacity of Pile There is no pile in this project!
10
YJK Building Software
Punching-shear Fl h0 Punching-shear Fl h0
R/S Conclusion R/S Conclusion
cone No. (kN) (mm) cone No. (kN) (mm)
W-7 592(39) 350 2.16 Satisfied ZD-10 1035(40) 350 1.32 Satisfied
W-8 536(41) 350 2.47 Satisfied ZD-10 1035(40) 350 1.45 Satisfied
Z-1 976(40) 350 1.14 Satisfied Note: 1. Fl is the pressure design value of the control combination, and the numbers in brackets
Z-2 1549(29) 550 1.32 Satisfied are the combination number;
Z-3 931(29) 550 2.32 Satisfied 2. Z-*Column,W-*Wall,ZH-*Pile,ZD-*Pier,DJ-*Single foundation,CT-*Cap,
JHQ-*Thickened area.
Z-4 1029(40) 350 1.09 Satisfied
Z-5 1218(39) 550 1.99 Satisfied
8.1.4 Waterproof board
Z-6 1003(40) 550 2.33 Satisfied
Z-7 802(38) 517 2.01 Satisfied There is no waterproof board in this project!
Z-8 1221(38) 350 1.05 Satisfied
Z-9 1129(40) 350 1.00 Satisfied 8.2 Shear checking calculation
Z-10 1108(40) 367 1.02 Satisfied
Z-11 844(38) 350 1.29 Satisfied 8.2.1 Single Foundation
Z-12 696(41) 350 1.85 Satisfied
Z-13 1278(39) 350 1.02 Satisfied There is no single foundation in this project!
Z-14 982(40) 350 1.10 Satisfied
Z-15 445(38) 350 2.82 Satisfied 8.2.2 Pile cap
Z-16 595(40) 350 2.18 Satisfied
There is no pile cap in this project!
Z-22 760(38) 350 1.37 Satisfied
Z-23 1048(40) 350 1.28 Satisfied
8.2.3 Flange plate of inverted T-shaped foundation beam
ZD-2 1414(29) 350 1.08 Satisfied
ZD-2 1414(29) 350 1.14 Satisfied There is no foundation beam that needs to be checked in this project!
ZD-3 753(29) 350 2.22 Satisfied
ZD-3 753(29) 350 2.45 Satisfied 8.2.4 Masonry strip base flange plate
ZD-5 1114(39) 350 2.01 Satisfied
ZD-5 1114(39) 350 3.12 Satisfied There is no strip foundation in this project!
11
YJK Building Software
12
YJK Building Software
2. Z-*Column, W-*Wanll, ZH-*Pile. Note: 1. The reinforcement area in the table is the reinforcement area per linear meter
(mm*mm/m), which is the larger of the calculated and constructional reinforcement areas;
8.4 Reinforcement design 2. Figures in brackets refer to reinforcement ratio (%).
Table 8-4 Reinforcement Design of Slab Strip under Column
Lower reinforcement
8.4.1 Single Foundation No. Over-reinforced
X direction Y direction
13
YJK Building Software
10 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) NO Note: 1. The reinforcement area in the table is the reinforcement area per linear meter
(mm*mm/m), which is the larger of the calculated and constructional reinforcement areas;
11 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) NO
2. Figures in brackets refer to reinforcement ratio (%).
12 1688(0.48) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) NO
There is no slab strip perpendicular to the foundation beam in this project!
13 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 0(0.00) NO
14 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1313(0.38) NO 8.4.5 Waterproof board
15 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) NO
16 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) NO There is no waterproof board in this project!
17 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) NO
18 1317(0.38) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) NO 8.4.6 Masonry strip foundation
19 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) 1167(0.33) NO
There is no strip foundation in this project!
14
YJK Building Software
8.6 Checking calculation of anti-floating stability Note: 1. The overall anti-floating checking calculation is based on Articles 3.0. 3 and 6.4. 1 ~ 6.4.
3 of the Technical Standard for Anti-floating of Construction Engineering (JGJ476-2019);
2. Zone-* denotes the area number, Raft-* denotes the raft number, and Fsb-* denotes the
Table 8-8 Checking calculation of anti-floating stability
waterproof board number;
Included 3. G is the sum of dead weight, ΣRt is the sum of uplift bearing capacity of pile, and Nw,k
Total Gk Nw,k Checking
Area No. plate Gk/Nw,k is the value of buoyancy.
area(m*m) (kN) (kN) results
number 4. comb: control combination number, kw: anti-floating stability factor, [kw] anti-floating
RaftZone-1 Raft-1 386 28139 4553 6.18 Satisfied stability safety factor.
Note: 1. The overall anti-floating checking calculation is based on the Code for Design of 5. The positive and negative signs of each load: downward direction is positive and the
Building Foundation Article 5.4. 3 of GB50007-2011; upward direction is negative.
2. The sum of pile uplift bearing capacity only includes the characteristic value of pile
uplift bearing capacity with uplift stiffness greater than 100;
3. Since the pile can not give full play to its uplift bearing capacity, the overall anti floating
checking results considering the pile uplift bearing capacity are only for reference, and the local anti
floating checking results of [foundation soil / pile bearing capacity checking] and [uplift bearing
15
YJK Building Software
16