Writing To Persuade
Writing To Persuade
Okay, so you've been asked to write to persuade. But what's the difference
between persuading and arguing? Well... not a lot! In fact, you'll be creating two very
similar styles of writing. This is because they are both writing that has a similar purpose,
that of seeking to influence. But, you've guessed it... there are key differences that the
examiner looks for and knowing about these will help push up your marks and help you
towards a higher grade!
When you set out to persuade someone, you want them to accept your opinion on an issue:
you want to change that person's mind to your way of thinking. To do this, you will - just as
with 'writing to argue' - be presenting a form of written argument; but when you are trying
to persuade, your argument is expected to be more passionate, even more one-sided than
the far more balanced presentation of views typical of "Writing to Argue". This is because
persuasion is based on a personal conviction that your way of thinking is
the right way.
This does not mean you should ignore your opponent's views - far from it. That's a
sure fire way to 'put their back up' if ever there was one! And lose marks! You're
looking only for success and high marks. Are you persuaded yet? Read on...
When writing to argue, you're expected to take account of opposing views and find
ways to counter and overcome these, mostly through the use of well-reasoned
points. This is because when you are asked to argue, you need to show you have
recognises that other equally valid views exist on the subject.
This difference means that when you write to persuade, you can afford to be:
use an effective and persuasive structure built up through several clear topic
paragraphs
use what are called discourse markers (i.e. 'argument sign-posts' such as, for a
start..., on the other hand..., therefore..., to continue..., as you can see...,
however..., but..., to conclude...).
o These help your ideas flow and help your reader follow your
argument
show you are aware of the form you are writing in and its genre conventions
show a clear awareness of your intended audience by writing in a suitable style
use effective persuasive techniques.
CLASSICAL RHETORIC
If the two ancient teachers Aristotle and Cicero were helping you
write to persuade, they would be trying to convince you
(using rhetorical language, no doubt...) that the ideal form of
argument was through the use of one thing and one thing
alone... reason (which they called logos); however, these ancient
scholars both realised that, humans being human after all, we
were prone to being persuaded by two other techniques: an appeal
to character (which they called ethos) and an appeal
to emotion (which they called pathos).
LOGOS
THE APPEAL TO REASON
Most people believe themselves to be reasonable and to have a
logical mind, so appealing to a person's sense of reason is
generally thought to be the single most effective means of
convincing them to change their way of thinking (e.g. 'If you do
this, then that will happen...').
ETHOS
THE APPEAL TO CHARACTER
We all share certain common ideas about what is right, just or fair.
By demonstrating your own, or appealing your opponent's, sense
of what is right and fair, you can create quite a powerful
persuasive device. (E.g. 'Both of us, I'm sure, would agree that
trampling roughshod over a child's rights must be very wrong...').
PATHOS
THE APPEAL TO EMOTION
It is said that when emotion comes in through the door, reason
leaves via the window, thus when trying to persuade, using
emotional pleas need great care. That said, persuasion does very
often succeed by the careful and considered use of an emotional
plea - especially one that shows just how passionate you feel for
your point of view (E.g. 'Can we genuinely call ourselves human
beings when we allow this kind of thing to continue unabated..?).
Just imagine how difficult it would be to persuade a stranger! Always 'get to know'
your reader by working out what brought them to think the way they do. Showing
a close awareness of your audience is a key aspect of the mark scheme for this
particular question in the exam.
2. Show you have thought long and hard about why you are writing -
your purpose
Read your question with care until you are absolutely absorbed into the scenario it
requires: try to become the person that holds this viewpoint. Only then will you be
at your most convincing.
But be realistic: your purpose is to change minds and sometimes a compromise is the most
sensible next step in the process. Minds rarely change quickly and easily: take this into
account when working out your objectives - maybe a meeting to discuss the issue is a
sensible objective to hold?
3. Show clearly you have considered the needs of what you are
creating - its form
Be sure you know the conventions required for various forms of writing
You need to understand how to write in a variety of forms: formal and informal
letters, magazine articles, essays, speeches, and so on.
Make sure you understand the particular conventions of whichever form you must
use for example, if you write a speech use a conversational tone without speech
marks if you write a letter, set it out correctly and neatly.
Whichever form you use, you must capture and hold on to your reader's attention -
but be subtle and consider exactly what would appeal to that kind of reader with that
kind of mind-set.
The examiner absolutely expects to see a 'consciously shaped essay, letter, speech
or article. Plan well and give what you write a progressively effective structure one
that is interesting and clear. Build each paragraph around one topic that is
introduced by an initial 'topic sentence aim to link each paragraph smoothly together
by finishing with a sentence that subtly 'hooks into the opening topic sentence of the
following paragraph.
All of this will show that you are using a sophisticated and subtle
persuasive style. It is such points as these that will allow the
examiner to give you the high grade you want.
Switch roles!
Which points and style would
change your mind?
Here is a small section of the mark scheme the examiners from a
major examining board use when they award a grade A:
1. Plan
2. Write
3. Check
1. PLAN
Planning: in the mark scheme, you are awarded extra marks if your writing shows
clear evidence that it has been consciously shaped; this means creating writing
that is well-structured. A plan is the best way to make sure your writing scores
highly in this area.
Think hard about the requirements of the form of your writing: what voice must you
adopt; what layout is needed; what genre conventions must you adhere to. Is it an
essay, an article, a speech, a letter... or what?
Decide on a suitable style: what kind of language and layout
will appeal to, engage and convince your reader?
Brainstorm to create a list of the best points in favour of your idea - many students
use a 'spider diagram' but others prefer two columns of 'for' and 'against' ideas.
Choose four or five of the most convincing points from your brainstorm.
Check that each point is truly separate and not a part of a larger, more general
point. If it is, use only the larger point.
Make sure each point is truly convincing - switch roles: would it persuade
you?
Organise your points into a progressively persuasive order.
What is the strongest reason against your view? What are the 'other side's
views? At all costs, avoid making the other side feel foolish for believing differently
from yourself - but do counteract their most important beliefs by showing, with
evidence (which needs to be sensible and, if necessary, made up) that your way of
thinking is the better considered.
Engage your reader's attention by being lively and interesting.
Always avoid stating the boringly obvious.
Create a sense of authenticity - if you truly believe what you say you do, sound as
if you do! Make your writing sound sincere and trustworthy.
Create a sense of authority - consider making up some believable evidence to
support your views (a survey, a respected opinion, etc.).
2. WRITE
THE OPENING PARAGRAPH
Engage or 'grab your reader's attention straight away - involve and interest
them at the outset.
State why you are writing
Involve your reader by using 'you', 'we - if appropriate!
State why you have the authority to write on this topic and that you are
reasonable and trustworthy.
Forge common ground between you and your reader - mention an outcome both
of you would endorse.
Use a rhetorical question.
Choose your words with precision and care.
THE BODY (CENTRAL) PARAGRAPHS
Start each paragraph with a topic sentence that tells what it's about.
Use one further rhetorical question - make it subtle.
Develop only a single main point only per paragraph.
Explain the topic of the paragraph by writing four to five extra sentences,
using 'connectives such as 'therefore...', 'and so...', 'so you see...'.
Acknowledge the main opposing view but with care, subtlety and
tact countering it tactfully to show how much more likely your view is to produce the
desired outcome (i.e. the common ground between you).
Help your reader relate and involve them - use an interesting (and if
appropriate, amusing) anecdote.
Add authority - quote an acknowledged expert, a survey or any similar appropriate
and sensibly made up support for your case.
Use vivid description - create a vivid image that will help your reader see your
point of view.
Use emotion carefully. Again, an anecdote might work well, e.g. 'People think that
living on the streets is a matter of choice, but let me tell you about Alex. He was
twelve when he left home...'.
Make your argument powerful by using a few, well chosen rhetorical
devices:
RHETORICAL DEVICES
LINKING EXPRESSIONS
'However... 'although...', 'if so...', 'and so...', 'but...',
'clearly...', 'on the other hand...', 'therefore...',
'supposing that...', 'furthermore...', 'looked at another
way...', 'in contrast...', 'on the contrary...', etc.
3. CHECK
Each year, literally thousands of students fail to achieve the marks they could.
Don't be one of them ALWAYS CHECK YOUR WRITING BEFORE HANDING IN!
Avoid creating overly short paragraphs as this suggests either a) you do not know what a
paragraph is or b) that you have no explained the point of the paragraph in sufficient detail.
Try to make sure that each paragraph flows naturally on from its predecessor by using the
final sentence of each paragraph to subtly 'hook into the topic of the next paragraph.
To correct a missed paragraph simply put this mark where you want in to be: //
then, in your margin write: // = new paragraph. The examiner will not mark you
down for this so long as you have not forgotten all of your paragraphs.
And when one of two nouns belong to the other, show which one possesses which by adding
apostrophe+s to its end. So the school's entrance is correct because the entrance is
'possessed by the school, also Alan's book shows a similar possession.
But watch out for your use of it's. With an apostrophe this is always a shortened form of it
is or it has, as in it's cold. If you mean belonging to it, as in its fur is shiny and
smooth, no apostrophe is needed.
KWIKGUIDE TOP OF PAGE