MSPM'S

DEOGIRI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES, CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR

Department of Civil Engineering

Semester VII

Academic Year 2024-25

DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, LONERE

Project Stage I
 Vision and Mission of the Institute

Vision

Nation building by creating opportunities for rural and urban students through excellence in education and research in the field of Engineering
and Management

Mission

1. To develop the students for best academic and industrial practices by implementing innovative teaching learning methodologies, promoting
all round development by giving exposure to series of activities
2. To prepare the students to face global challenges by equipping them with requisite technical expertise and developing entrepreneurship
skills among them.
3. To promote research attitude among faculty and students

Vision and Mission of the Department

Vision

Develop proficient Civil Engineer with technical competency and managerial ability so as to contribute in nation building.

Mission

1. To impart technical proficiency in civil engineering through quality teaching learning process.

2. To mentor civil engineering students for competitive services, higher studies and allied research to meet societal needs.

3. To inculcate managerial skills in students to evolve as an entrepreneur.

 Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)

PEO1. Graduate would be able to apply technical competence to identify and resolve problems of Civil Engineering and enabling them for lifelong
learning to meet specified needs of society.

PEO2. Graduate would be able to exhibit professionalism along with use of modern scientific advancements for successful careers in different
sectors of Civil Engineering.

PEO3. Graduate would be able to exhibit professional ethics, management and leadership qualities which will facilitate interpersonal skills and
thus evolving as an entrepreneur.

Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)

PSO 1. To provide the students with comprehensive and balanced understanding of core domains in Civil Engineering.

PSO 2. To be able to proficiently design and build Civil Engineering-based systems in divergent domains in consideration to the societal needs
to serve the community as ethical and responsible professionals.

PSO 3. Expertise to identify, analyze, design and delivering solutions to various Civil Engineering problems to promote sustainable development.
 Progress Monitoring Diary

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ ___________________________________ ______________

________________ ___________________________________ ______________

________________ ___________________________________ ______________

________________ ___________________________________ ______________

________________ ___________________________________ ______________

Project Topic:

Name of Guide:

Instructions to Students

1. Students should update weekly activity report in this diary.

2. Signature of Guide is compulsory on week wise activity report.

3. Student should communicate to Guide on regular basis regarding progress of Project Stage I.
 Guidelines for Project Stage I Evaluation
These are the guidelines for successful conduction of the B. Tech projects in an effective and uniform manner. The B.Tech. project stage I is a partial requirement
for successful completion of the degree. It is expected that these guidelines will help with overall improvement in the quality of B.Tech. Projects along with
improvement in the evaluation process.

Evaluation Procedure:

The students will be evaluated based on 3 Review Presentations, Evaluation by guide of the project, evaluation of project report and evaluation by external
examiner.

• For each of the above, students will be evaluated as per the Rubrics (Set of Rules) given in this document.

• For each of the assessment students will be evaluated against the parameters mentioned in rubrics using Three To four levels and for each level marks are
associated with the same.

• Students are informed to go through this document carefully and accordingly plan and execute their project work.
Rubrics for Major Project Assessment and Evaluation (Final Year Engineering)

Rubrics # Semester Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Overall

(Marks) Weightage (%)

Rubrics 1 VII Major Project Synopsis / Proposal Rubrics R1

Evaluation 10 10 %

Rubrics 2 (CA I) VII First Mid Term Project Stage I Evaluation Rubrics R2
20 20 %

Rubrics 3 (CA II) VII Second Mid Term Project Stage I Rubrics R3
20 20 %
Evaluation

External VII Evaluation by External Examiner

50 50 %
Examination (25 + 25)
 Rubrics R1: Project Stage I Synopsis / Proposal Evaluation (Review 1)

Evaluation Description of Performance Levels

Criteria
Excellent Good Average Acceptable Need (Out of
Improvement 20)

Identification Detailed and extensive Good explanation of the `Average explanation Moderate explanation of the Minimal explanation of 6M
of Problem explanation of the purpose and need of the of the purpose and purpose and need of the the purpose and need of
Domain and purpose and need of the project is presented. need of the project is project is presented. the project is presented.
Detailed project is presented. presented.
Analysis (5-6) (4) (3) (2) (0-1)

Study of the Detailed and extensive Collected a great deal of Moderate study of the Explanation of the Minimal explanation of 8M
Existing explanation of the information and good existing systems and specifications and the the specifications and the
systems and specifications and the study of the existing collected some basic limitations of the existing limitations of existing
Feasibility of limitations of the systems is presented. information. systems not very systems presented.
the Project existing systems is satisfactorily. Limited Incomplete Information
(Literature presented. information collected. collected.
Review) (6-8) (5) (4) (3) (0-2)

Objectives and All objectives of the Good justification to the Incomplete Only Some objectives of the Objectives of the 6M
Methodology proposed work are well objectives; Methodology justification to the proposed work are well proposed work are either
of the defined; Steps to be to be followed is objectives proposed; defined; Steps to be followed not identified or not well
Proposed followed to solve the specified but detailing is Steps are mentioned to solve defined problem are defined, Incomplete, and
Work defined problem are not done. but unclear; without not specified properly. improper specification.
clearly specified. justification to
objectives.
(5-6) (4) (3) (2) (0-1)
 Rubrics R2 (CA I): First Midterm Project Stage I evaluation (Review 2)
Performance Level Good (Meet level of attainment) Average (Meet Satisfactory level Needs improvement. (Meet moderate /No Score
of attainment) Attainment) (Out of
20)

Criteria of Performance Performance Level Description

Attendance and ∙ Reports to the guide regularly and ∙ Not very regular but consistent in work ∙ Irregular in attendance and inconsistent in work. 3M
Teamwork consistent in work (100%). ∙ Exchanges some views but requires ∙ Make little or no attempt to collaborate in a
∙ Collaborate and communicate in guidance to collaborate with others. group situation.
a group situation and integrates the
views of others. (2) (1)
(3)

Presentation ∙ Contents of Presentations are ∙ Contents of Presentations are appropriate ∙ Contents of Presentations are not appropriate. 4M
appropriate and well delivered. and well delivered. ∙ Poor delivery of presentation.
∙ Proper eye contact with the audience ∙ Clear voice with good spoken language
and clear voice with good spoken but less eye contact with audience.
language. (3-4) (2) (1)

Implementation and ∙ All defined objectives are achieved. ∙ All defined objectives are achieved. ∙ Some of the defined objectives are achieved. 8M
Depth of knowledge ∙ Each module working well and ∙ Each module working well and properly ∙ modules are not working properly.
properly demonstrated. demonstrated. ∙ Integration of all modules is not done, and
∙ All modules of the Project are ∙ Integration of all modules is not done, system working is not accurate.
well integrated and system working is and system working is not accurate. ∙ Basic Knowledge about the area of topic
accurate. ∙ Basic Knowledge about the area of topic was very poor.
∙ Basic Knowledge about the area of was satisfactory.
topic was very clear. (3-6) (1-2)
(6-8)

Report Writing Report is properly written and aligned Report is somewhat properly written and Report is not properly written and aligned. 3M
including already checked abstract, aligned including already checked but not Abstract is not clear, keywords are not added,
keywords, Introduction, and updated abstract, keywords, Introduction, Introduction, and literature review chapters are
literature review chapters. and literature review chapters. Some also not up to mark. References are indicated at
References are properly indicated in References are indicated but not all in appropriate places.
chapters at appropriate places. chapters at appropriate places.
(3) (2) (1)

Question and Answer Answered all questions with Answered many questions with satisfactory Answers were not satisfactory. 2M
excellent justification and justification and explanation.
explanation. (2) (1) (0)
 Rubrics R3 (CA II): First Midterm Project Stage I evaluation (Review 3)
Performance Level Good (Meet level of attainment) Average (Meet Satisfactory level Needs improvement. (Meet moderate /No Score
of attainment) Attainment) (Out of
20)

Criteria of Performance Performance Level Description

Attendance and ∙ Reports to the guide regularly and ∙ Not very regular but consistent in work ∙ Irregular in attendance and inconsistent in work. 2M
Teamwork consistent in work (100%). ∙ Exchanges some views but requires ∙ Make little or no attempt to collaborate in a
∙ Collaborate and communicate in guidance to collaborate with others. group situation.
a group situation and integrates the
views of others. (2) (1)
(3)

Presentation ∙ Contents of Presentations are ∙ Contents of Presentations are appropriate ∙ Contents of Presentations are not appropriate. 3M
appropriate and well delivered. and well delivered. ∙ Poor delivery of presentation.
∙ Proper eye contact with the audience ∙ Clear voice with good spoken language
and clear voice with good spoken but less eye contact with audience. (1)
language. (3-4) (2)

Implementation and ∙ All defined objectives are achieved. ∙ All defined objectives are achieved. ∙ Some of the defined objectives are achieved. 7M
Depth of knowledge ∙ Each module working well and ∙ Each module working well and properly ∙ modules are not working properly.
properly demonstrated. demonstrated. ∙ Integration of all modules is not done, and
∙ All modules of the Project are ∙ Integration of all modules is not done, system working is not accurate.
well integrated and system working is and system working is not accurate. ∙ Basic Knowledge about the area of topic
accurate. ∙ Basic Knowledge about the area of topic was very poor.
∙ Basic Knowledge about the area of was satisfactory.
topic was very clear. (3-6) (1-2)
(6-8)

Report Writing Report is properly written and aligned Report is somewhat properly written and Report is not properly written and aligned. 6M
including already checked abstract, aligned including already checked but not Abstract is not clear, keywords are not added,
keywords, Introduction, and updated abstract, keywords, Introduction, Introduction, and literature review chapters are
literature review chapters. and literature review chapters. Some also not up to mark. References are indicated at
References are properly indicated in References are indicated but not all in appropriate places.
chapters at appropriate places. chapters at appropriate places.
(3) (2) (1)

Question and Answer Answered all questions with Answered many questions with satisfactory Answers were not satisfactory. 2M
excellent justification and justification and explanation.
explanation. (2) (1) (0)
Week: 1

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 2

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 3

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 4

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 5

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 6

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 7

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 8

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 9

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 10

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 11

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

Week: 12

Date Task Assigned Task Completion Status

Roll No. Name of Student Student Sign

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

________________ _________________________________ ____________

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

 Review 1 Evaluation of Project Stage I
Objectives and
Identification of Methodology of Converted
Literature Total Student
Roll No Name of Student Problem Domain the Proposed Marks
Review (08 M) Marks (20) Sign
(06 M) Work (10)
(06 M)

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

 Review 2 (CA-I) Evaluation of Project Stage I

Implementation Report Question

Attendance Total
Presentation and knowledge Writing and Student
Roll No Name of Student Marks
(03 M) (04 M) (03 M) Answer Sign
(08 M) (20)
(02 M)

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

 Review 3 (CA-II) Evaluation of Project Stage I

Implementation Report Question

Attendance Total
Presentation and knowledge Writing and Student
Roll No Name of Student Marks
(02 M) (03 M) (06 M) Answer Sign
(07 M) (20)
(02 M)

Name of Guide: Signature of Guide:

 CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that Mr./Ms.1.____________________________________________Roll No._____________

2. ____________________________________________Roll No._____________

3. ____________________________________________Roll No._____________

Studying B.Tech in Civil Engineering branch, at Deogiri Institute of Engineering & Management Studies affiliated to
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere has successfully completed Project Stage I in this Semester.

Project Guide HOD Dean Academics