0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views

GE1401 Unit 8 Peer Review Form

Uploaded by

Hà Chi Nguyễn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views

GE1401 Unit 8 Peer Review Form

Uploaded by

Hà Chi Nguyễn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

GE1401 University English

Unit 8 Peer Review Form


Please send this form to your peer review partner after the session.

Name of Reviewer: Nguyen Ha Chi


Name of Essay Writer: Chris Yin
Section

A. Feedback Summary (around 80-100 words)

The overall essay is clear and structured. The topic is interesting, captivating, and
relatable. You can improve some parts through some sentence rearrangements and
clearer wordings. Focus should be improved in paragraph 2 of body.

B. Look at your partner’s work and annotate their draft. You can also give more
detailed/ collective comments in the boxes.
Aspect Reviewer’s comments
Task Fulfilment
Does the essay make a clear The argument should be clearer throughout the essay,
argument? especially in counterargument and conclusion

Does it have a clearly Although the argument is clear, the thesis statement should
identifiable thesis? be sharper and direct. Currently, it is containing too much
details.
Is the organisational structure Yes, it is generally clear.
clear and effective?
Is the relationship among ideas It is generally clear within each paragraph, however,
clear? regarding the overall structure, the big ideas could be
more well-connected
Does each paragraph have a The first paragraph have a clear focus. The second
clear focus? paragraph introduces more ideas and concepts, so it is less
clear compared to the first
Discourse Competencies
Has the writer used a good The writer generally have a good academic style. However,

1
academic style (no informal there are some parts for revision:
vocabulary / contractions / - “we” in the last paragraph

abbreviations)? Jot down - “Asians” is overused and it is general


- “And it never stopped until today”
things for revision here.
- “heavily changed” – significantly impact
- “WWII” should be written in full
Is the use of modality in There are some parts that the writer needs to be cautious
hedging effective? Highlight in the essay (I have highlighted in the essay)

any problems in the essay. - The thesis


- Some supporting arguments
Are all the body paragraphs Overally, yes
opened by a clear and relevant Paragraph 2 of body needs a clearer and more high-

topic sentence? coverage topic sentence

Is the right amount and type of Transitions could be improved to clearer state the
signposting (connectives) used relationship between parts

to help show how ideas relate


to each other?
Is the counterargument There is a counterargument but it does not mention clear
properly introduced? Has the points potentially challenge the his arguments; it is quite

writer offered a good refutation general


Some parts needs further explanation.
for the opponent’s view?
Should reinforce the thesis after the counterargument.
Language Competencies
Is there a good range of Yes
grammatical structures (as
opposed to sticking to the safe
basics)?
Is the text free of grammatical Some parts have grammatical errors
errors?
Are words used accurately? There are 1-2 minor errors
Is spelling accurate? Yes
Is punctuation accurate? Mostly correct
Source Integration
Does the essay use academic / Yes
scholarly sources?

2
Are in-text citations in APA Yes
style?
Is the reference list in APA Yes, but missing 1 citations of Chiarini, 2020
style?
Is the reference list in Yes
alphabetical order?
Any other comments: - The thesis is missing in the conclusion
- You should not number the citations list and
should change the format of citation to APA

Please send this form to your peer review partner after the session.

You might also like