The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden

Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information
The line graph presents the production of carbon dioxide gases per capita in four countries-United
Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal-from 1967 to 2007, measured in metric tonnes.

Overall, the United Kingdom was the highest producer of CO2 throughout the 40-year period,
although it experienced a gradual reduction in emissions. Sweden, initially the second-highest
emitter in 1967, experienced noticeable fluctuations in its CO2 levels over the period. In contrast,
Italy and Portugal exhibited a steady upward trajectory in CO2 emissions throughout this period.

In 1967, the United Kingdom emitted approximately 11 metric tonnes of CO2 per person. This figure
decreased gradually to about 8.5 metric tonnes by 2007. In contrast, Sweden’s CO2 emissions, which
began slightly above 8 metric tonnes in 1967, surged dramatically to just over 10 metric tonnes in
early 1977 before falling sharply to just below 6 metric tonnes by the end of the period.

On the other hand, both Italy and Portugal showed a consistent increase in CO2 emissions. Italy’s
CO2 level rose steadily from about 4 metric tonnes in 1967 to nearly 8 metric tonnes by 2007,
overtaking Sweden in the mid-1980s. Portugal, starting with the lowest emissions at approximately
1.5 metric tonnes in 1967, also experienced a steady rise, reaching nearly 6 metric tonnes by the end
of the period.

In summary, while both the United Kingdom and Sweden experienced an overall decrease in CO2
emissions, Italy and Portugal displayed a contrasting trend, with their emissions rising progressively
over the 40 years.
Practice 2

The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries
living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison
where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the proportion of people living in urban areas from four Asian countries as
Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia from 1970 to 2020, and the projection until 2040.

Overall, it can be seen an upward trend of urbanization for all countries. Although Philippines was
the highest number of the urban population rather than other countries, Malaysia projected to be
the top of the rest nations in 2040. In addition, Indonesia had the lowest population in 1970, but it
will become the second highest number of urban residents at the end of period.

In 1970, Philippines and Malaysia were the largest number of populations, at around 32% and 30%
respectively. There was a slight increase of citizen’s Malaysia in 1980, surpassing Philippines at 40%,
then it fluctuated until 1990. From 1990, the number of populations of Malaysia increased rapidly
until the end of period, while population of Philippines dropped slightly by 2010 then has risen
moderately until the end of period.

In terms of two other countries, Thailand made up almost a fifth of total population, while Indonesia
stood below Thailand around 15% in 1970. There was a gradual growth in populations of Indonesia
until 200, overtaking Thailand’s and it increased rapidly and predicted to be the second top of total
population living in cities.

Score: 6
Revision

The line graph illustrates the proportion of people living in urban areas from four Asian countries as
Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia from 1970 to 2020, and the projection until 2040.

Overall, all the countries show an upward trend in urbanization. Although the Philippines was the
highest proportion of the urban population compared to other countries in 1970, Malaysia is
projected to overtake all other nations by 2040. In addition, Indonesia had the lowest proportion in
1970, but it will become the second highest number of urban residents at the end of period.

In 1970, Philippines and Malaysia were the largest number of populations, at around 32% and 30%
respectively. In 1980, Malaysia experienced a slight increase in its urban population, surpassing the
Philippines at 40%. After a brief fluctuation, the proportion continued to rise rapidly until the end of
period.

As for the other countries, Thailand accounted for nearly a fifth of the population, while Indonesia
had only 15% living in urban areas in 1970. There was a gradual growth in the proportion of urban
residents of Indonesia until 2000, overtaking Thailand’s and the proportion increased rapidly and
predicted to be the second top of total population living in cities at the end of period.

Revision by chatgpt

The line graph illustrates the proportion of people living in urban areas from four Asian countries -
the Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia - from 1970 to 2020, and the projection until
2040.

Overall, all countries show an upward trend in urbanization. Initially, the Philippines had the highest
proportion of urban residents compared to the other countries, but Malaysia is expected to have the
largest proportion by 2040. Indonesia, which had the lowest percentage of urban population in 1970,
is expected to become the second largest percentage by the end of the period.

In 1970, the Philippines and Malaysia had the largest urban population, at around 32% and 30%
respectively. By 1980, the urbanization rate in Malaysia rose to 40%, surpassing the Philippines. It
continued to grow rapidly, reaching nearly 80% by 2040. The urban population of the Philippines
declined slightly to around 40% by 2010. However, it has shown a moderate growth since then,
reaching nearly 60% by the end of the period.

Thailand’s urban population accounted for almost a fifth of the total in 1970, while Indonesia had
only around 15%. Indonesia’s urban population experienced a steady rise, overtaking Thailand
around 2000. It is projected to reach approximately 60% by 2040, making it the second largest
proportion among the four countries.

Or be

Contoh simple

The line graph shows the percentage of the population living in four Asian nations between 1970 and
2020 and additional projections for 2030 and 2040.
 Overall, it can be seen a growing trend for all countries. In 1970, the Philippines was the highest
value rather than other countries, but in 2040, Malaysia would be placed at the top of the rest
nations.

From 1970 to 2020, the Philippines with around 32% of the population was higher than other
Asian cities. Of course, the second highest amount was dedicated to Malaysia with just 30% and the
lowest value was related to Indonesia with around 15%. To look at the details, there were upward
and downward movements in the Philippines between 1970 and 2010 that ultimately reached
around 45%.

From 2020 to 2040, Malaysia with around 78% of the population placed at the top level,
whereas Thailand around 30% of the total population measured was the lowest amount.
Eventually, in 2040, Malaysia with nearly 82% would placed at the highest level.

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

The debate over science

Science explains many things about phenomenon that we do not understand. For over decade,
there are amount of discoveries ease our daily. This reason makes science substantial for people. I
believe that the purpose of science must be for the sake of development of lives as it helps various
aspect such as health and technology.

First and foremost, science facilitates human to understand their bodies. It brings a lot of easiness
for scientist to comprehend how viruses attack human’s antibody. As a result, this method will
help discoveries of antibiotics or vaccines. Moreover, recent research is developing the cure of
cancer. As long as we know, cancer is the terminal illness that hard to be healed. It needs various
medication and therapy such as chemotherapy and radiation. By science, it helps researcher to find
the method that will cure cancer effectively. So, it will save million people lives.

Furthermore, it can be said that historically science save us from darkness. Thomas Alfa Edison
needed 1001 experiments to discover a bulb. Then the technology develops until we have
computer and also the most sophisticated tools, which is AI that works like second brain of human.
Nowadays, people can transport crossing the continent within hours by plane. Previously, they
migrated by shape which took months even years. However, there are destructive side of further
study of science without ethics. For instance, making of nuclear bom or biological weapons to
reduce the number of populations for the sake of political interest.

In conclusion, the goal of development of science needs to be balancing with moral value. The
improvement must give positive side to human being.
Revision karena grammar

Science explains various phenomena that we do not understand. Over the past decade, there have
been numerous discoveries that ease our daily lives. This reason makes science essential for
people. I believe that the purpose of science must be for the sake of development of lives as it
plays vital roles such as health and technology.

First and foremost, science helps human to understand their bodies. It helps scientists to
comprehend how viruses attack human immune system. As a result, this knowledge will aid
discoveries of antibiotics and vaccines. Moreover, recent research is working on developing a cure
for cancer. As we know, cancer is a terminal illness that is difficult to treat. It requires various
medications and therapies such as chemotherapy and radiation. Through science, researchers can
find methods to cure cancer more effectively, which could save millions of lives.

Historically, science brought humankind out from darkness. Thomas Alfa Edison conducted
hundreds experiments to invent a light bulb. Then the technology has developed significantly since
then, leading the creation of computer and advanced tools like Artificial Intelligence (Ai), which
acts as a second brain for human. Nowadays, people can travel across continents within hours by
plane, while in the past, they travelled by ship, which took months or even years.

However, there is destructive side to scientific study without ethical considerations. For instance,
the creation of nuclear bombs or biological weapons to reduce populations for political gain. Many
lives have suffered because of those inventions.

In conclusion, the development of science needs to be balanced with moral value. Its
advancements should always aim to benefit humanity, ensuring that the scientific progress serves
the greater good than causing harms.
WT2

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to the cities so the population in the
countryside is decreasing

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

1. Org2 akan ke kota

Many nations are facing urbanization issues, causing various problem for society. People tend to
move to urban areas for financial and educational opportunities. Consequently, while the rural
population will decline, the urbans will grow. I strongly agree this action will lead to negative
development such as creating slump area, traffic issue, and lack of resources.

First and foremost, the imbalance of facility in countryside makes people leave their hometown to
get more opportunities. For instance, many young adults go to big city to pursuit a higher
education because there is no university in their hometown. When they graduated, they also will
look for job opportunities in metropolitan area. Moreover, businessman also wants to develop
their franchise in crowded area for higher amount of customer. This means, as times by,
urbanization rate will growth rapidly. This action will cause overcrowding, traffic congestion and
insufficient resources.

Furthermore, overcrowding and insufficient resource will trigger emerging of slump area as there
are not enough room for housing. It affects the urban planning of these area such as plumbing and
electricity system, and green space for recreational purpose. The unsatisfaction system can give
disadvantages for quality of people lives as it makes them difficult to access water or other
facilities. Additionally, traffic congestion will happen, since many people commute to their office at
the same time. So, people will lack of time to rest and sleep, then causing a decrease in their
health. As a result, government needs to provide more public transportation or elevated road to
accommodate this issue.

In conclusion, the urbanization needs to be regulated for authority. Since, it will give disadvantage
for society.