Introduction To Ore Microscopy I
Introduction To Ore Microscopy I
Erich U. Petersen
OBJECTIVE
PROCEDURE
Read Craig and Vaughan (1981), Spry and Gedlinske (1987), and review the
accompanying summary before you begin work. Eight techniques will be used to
distinguish minerals in reflected-light.
1. Color - especially color contrasts between your unknown and known minerals.
Best seen in oil, but it's messy (We will not use oils).
2. Reflectivity - the amount of light reflected back by the mineral. In a lab set up for
quantitative work, monochromatic light sources are used, and the light reflected
from the mineral is measured by a photocell. We will simply note whether the
reflectivity is weak, moderate, or strong.
3. Hardness - In a lab set up for quantitative work, the size of indentations made by
small weights dropped for a fixed distance onto the polished surface are compared
from mineral to mineral (Microhardness testing). Instead, we will observe the
movement of the pseudo-Becke line, a faint bright line which moves into the softer
of two adjacent minerals as the objective/sample distance is increased.
1993 1
THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF ORE MINERALS
(A Primmer)
The optical properties of ore minerals determinable in polarized reflected light fall
naturally into two groups:
1. Properties observed without the analyzer: color, reflectivity, relative hardness, kalb
hardness, bireflectance, morphological character and pleochroism.
This handout describes these various optical properties and the procedures used to
observe them. For a theoretical explanation of these phenomena, the reader is referred to
the contributions of Cameron (1961) and Freund (1967).
In reflected light there is no optical path in the specimen and hence there is no
interference. The phenomena observed are due to surface reflection, and the most striking
is the reflectivity, which varies from below 10 to nearly 100 percent in opaque substances.
Reflectivity is defined as the ratio of the intensity of the light reflected by a mineral to the
intensity of the light incident upon it, expressed in percent. The qualitative degree of
reflectivity is judged in comparison with a known mineral. It must be considered that the
visual impression of the reflectivity is influenced markedly by the effect of contrast to
neighboring crystals with higher or lower reflectivity. In an environment of highly
reflecting crystals, a moderately reflecting crystal appears oppressed and pale or,
conversely, will seem brighter than would correspond to its real reflectivity. For example,
consider a polished specimen of quartzose gangue with molybdenite (R percent 20.9-40.0)
and arsenopyrite (R percent to 52.0). The molybdenite appears bright against the gangue,
but when there is arsenopyrite in the field, the molybdenite is so dull that it hardly appears
to be the same mineral as before. In such cases, use of the incident field stop (IFS) may be
of assistance in ascertaining relative reflectivity of ore minerals. Remember that the
brightest crystal present in the field of vision determines the impression of brightness of the
others.
Estimation by eye can rapidly establish an order of reflectivity in the ore minerals in
a specimen, but a difference in color can affect this subjective judgment. For example,
niccolite is pinkish-yellow and has a range of 52 to 58 percent reflectivity in white light.
Cobaltite is pinkish white and in the same light has a reflectivity of 52.7 percent, yet it
generally appears distinctly the brighter of the two. Even in well-polished sections
minerals vary in the way that they take the polish. If one mineral takes a less good polish
than another of similar reflectivity, then the first mineral will appear distinctly less highly
reflecting than the second.
1998 7 EUP
Dissolved impurities also affect reflectivity, but again, except in a few cases like
sphalerite where an increase in iron content increases reflectivity, the differences are
practically negligible as far as visual comparison is concerned.
B. Color of Reflection
The colors of ore minerals, which range from pure white to gray, are one of their
most characteristic and useful properties. The eye is poor at 'remembering' a particular
color after even a very short time lag, and hence consecutive comparisons of color can be
made only for large differences. This means that a color cannot be distinguished by a
name, except in a crude way. For example pyrrhotite has a characteristic color ('pyrrhotite
color') which the observer soon learns to recognize, but which has been described in the
literature as cream, pale brownish-cream, clear-bronze, pale yellowish-red, and so on. As
color is a function of the character of the human eye, each observer must make his own
descriptions of the colors of minerals and must not be disconcerted if the pale cream
mineral he has just observed is described as light yellow by someone else. As the eye is
quite sensitive to very slight differences in hue or brightness of two minerals lying side by
side, use of the double, or comparison microscope is strongly urged. This apparatus
allows an unknown mineral to be viewed in the same field with a standard mineral from
another specimen.
Notes:
1. A difference in reflectivity can affect the eye, and where two minerals have a similar
color but different reflectivity, the one of higher reflectivity appears the clearer
because of its greater brightness.
3. Color is a function of the index of refraction of the immersion medium (the medium
comprising the space between the objective and the surface of the mineral).
Covellite in air (R.I. = 1.00) is deep blue, in water (R.I. - 1.333) violet blue, in
cedar oil (1.515) red violet, and in methelene iodide (R.I. = 1.74) orange red.
4. It should be stressed that many minerals which occupy solid solution fields (for
example ilmenite, sphalerite, pentlandite) will exhibit color variations, even in
identically oriented sections; occasionally, this leads to an overlapping of the colors
of minerals which may normally distinguished readily.
In some cases the change of color produced by immersion in cedar oil is an aid to
identification.
TO OBSERVE COLOR:
1998 8 EUP
C. Bireflectance and Pleochroism
The change of tint may make it difficult to be certain of change in intensity, if this is
slight. These two phenomena are manifestations of anisotropy in the mineral section. The
bireflectance depends on the difference between the two reflectivities (O and E) whereas the
pleochroism depends on the differences between the dispersions of the two reflectivities. It
must be remembered that for a given mineral, the intensity of the bireflectance varies with
the orientation of the section and that the highest bireflectance observed for the mineral in a
polished section is not necessarily the maximum for the mineral. For example, only a
vertical section of a uniaxial mineral (//C) will show the maximum bireflectance for the
mineral in question. For all practical purposes, four degrees of intensity can be
distinguished:
1. Bireflectance strong:
graphite, molybdenite, pyrolusite, covellite, marcasite, stibnite
2. Bireflectance medium:
ilmenite, pyrrhotite, niccolite, cubanite
3. Bireflectance weak:
arsenopyrite, enargite, hematite, loellingite (Best observed by contrast
against neighboring isotropic crystals)
1998 9 EUP
Examples of Reflection Pleochroism
Notes:
3. Bireflectance is also shown by the carbonate of Pb, Fe, Mg and Ca, but not by the
common rock-forming silicates.
4. When studying a section, always record the strength of the bireflectance, and also
any color changes, if detectable, for several grains of each bireflectant mineral,
noting the relationships between the positions of maximum and minimum
reflectance and crystal outline, cleavage traces, etc.
One final note . . . when you can detect the bireflectance of pyrrhotite and
arsenopyrite your eye is trained to a satisfactory sensitivity. Congratulations.
1998 10 EUP
D. Measurement of Hardness
To observe these phenomena, both the analyzer and polarizer must be crossed.
When the stage is rotated with the polars crossed, it is noticeable that certain ore grains
remain dark; these are referred to as uniradial sections (mono-reflecting) and are either
isometric minerals or else basal sections of some uniaxial mineral. These basal sections can
be recognized as such because different sections of the same mineral are bireflecting.
Sometimes the section, although uniradial, is not completely dark; this is the case with
minerals of high (metallic) reflectivity. But such sections can be recognized as being
uniradial because the slight luminosity remains constant on rotation of the stage; this can be
more easily observed if the polarizer is uncrossed very slightly (2 or 3o ). Thus, under
crossed polars, an isotropic mineral will show one of two kinds of behavior:
1998 11 EUP
1. It will remain completely dark through 360o of rotation. Examples of isotropic
minerals with good extinction (i.e. low to medium reflectivity) are sphalerite,
magnetic and chromite.
2. It will be very faintly illuminated, but will show no change in color or intensity of
illumination through 360o of rotation. Isotropic minerals with poor extinction (i.e.
of high reflectivity) are pyrite and native silver.
One precaution must be kept in mind, however. Not all isometric minerals are fully
isotropic. Pyrite and bornite, for example, are often anisotropic, although many X-ray
studies have shown that pyrite at least is invariably isometric. Anomalous anisotropism is
very weak, however, and it rarely hinders identification.
Care must be taken in using anisotropy not to confuse reflection from scratches or
roughness of polish for a true anisotropic. Poorly polished pyrite often shows apparent
anisotropy which will disappear if the polish is improved. It must also be remembered that
any anisotropic mineral may show an isotropic section by fortuitous orientation. More than
one grain must be observed before concluding that a mineral is isotropic.
niccolite Blue 0o
Deep blue -1o
Dark violet gray -2o
Deep brownish-yellow -4o
1998 12 EUP
Clear orange-brown -5o Bluish-white to clear blue
cubanite Bluish-gray 0o
Deep violet -2o
Reddish brick-brown -5o to -4o Bluish-gray
Leather-brown -6o to -5o yellowish-white
Purplish -6o
After focusing the specimen in reflected light, turn off the vertically incident light
and view the surface in a strong beam of obliquely incident light. Scratches on the polished
surface will appear bright, but if the focus is lowered slightly, internal reflections may be
observed. Table 2 (Short, p. 293) lists minerals with distinctive internal reflections. Non-
opaque minerals, for example, quartz and the feldspars, will also show internal reflections -
- usually white or perhaps yellow in the case of biotite.
Most internal reflections are in the range from red to brown to yellow. Some
experience is required for distinguishing the color of internal reflections of different
minerals in the above color range. Consequently, it is mostly not the color of internal
reflections of different minerals that is useful in the determination of minerals, but rather the
presence or absence of internal reflections, and, where present, their frequency and
intensity. Some examples are listed below:
1998 13 EUP
Sometimes visible in air chromite brownish-red
and often in oil hematite blood red
wolframite deep brown
ilmenite very deep brown
IAD opened
IFS opened or closed down
Nicols crossed 40X or 10X objective
Cedar oil immersion (R.I. = 1.515) strongly recommended for use with 100X
objective
Large grains generally show internal reflections best
It is hoped that these summary notes will be useful in giving you an appreciation of
some of the important optical techniques available for the identification of ore minerals.
The only way to become proficient in this art is through continued, diligent practice, and so
the ball is now in your court . . . . .
Focus initially at
F2 F1; Lower mineral
specimen so that the
F1 focus is now at F2
and observe th Kalb
line.
M2 M1
1998 14 EUP
Reflected Light Properties of Some Ore Minerals
1998 15 EUP
covellite CuS Hexagonal H = 1.5-2
Indigo blue to bluish white strongly pleochroic
pinkish and lighter relative to chalcocite
Moderate reflectivity
Extremely anisotropic: fiery orange ± to reddish brown
1998 16 EUP
magnetite Fe3O4 Isometric H = 6
Gray often with a brown tint
admixed TiO2 gives a brown tint
admixed MnO gives a yellow-green tint
much darker and browner than hematite
lighter than ilmenite
lighter than sphalerite
darker and duller than psilomelane
Low reflectivity
Isotropic
1998 18 EUP
pyrite FeS2 Isometric H = 6-6.5
Yellowish white
yellower than marcasite, arsenopyrite, and galena
less yellow than chalcopyrite
gray-green relative to silver
High reflectivity
Isotropic
1998 19 EUP
REFERENCES
Craig, J.R. and Vaughan, D.J., 1981, Ore Microscopy and Ore Petrography. Wiley,
New York, 1-14, 33-47, 315-377.
Klein, C. and Hurlbut, C.S., Jr., Manual of Mineralogy, (Any Edition), John Wiley and
Sons.
Palache, C., Berman, H. and Frondel, C., 1944, Dana's System of Mineralogy, Volume I,
(Seventh edition), John Wiley and Sons, 834 p.
Spry, P.G. and Gedlinske, B.L., 1987, Tables for the Determination of Common Opaque
Minerals. Economic Geology.
Wuensch, B.J., 1974, Sulfide crystal chemistry, Sulfide Mineralogy, (P.H. Ribbe, Ed.),
W21- W44.
Zoltai, T. and Stout, J.H., 1984, Mineralogy: Concepts and Principles, Burgess
Publishing Company.
1998 20 EUP
Mineral Identification Tree
Color Colored W eakly Colored
Pleochroism S W W S
(1 filter)
A nisotopism
(2 filters) S M W W M S
InternalReflections P A P A P A P A
Hardness S M H S M H S M H S M H
M ineralGroup 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20