References

1. Yang, T.; Zhou, S.; Fang, S. Nonlinear vibration energy harvesting and vibration suppression
technologies: Designs, analysis, and applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2021, 8, 031317.

2. Cao, D.; Guo, X.; Hu, W. A novel low-frequency broadband piezoelectric energy harvester
combined with a negative stiffness vibration isolator. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2019, 30,
1105–1114.

3. Yang, T.; Cao, Q.; Hao, Z. A novel nonlinear mechanical oscillator and its application in
vibration isolation and energy harvesting. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2021, 155, 107636.

4. Wang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Xu, D. Design and experimental investigation of ultra-low frequency
vibration isolation during neonatal transport. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2020, 139, 106633.

5. Ye, K.; Ji, J.C.; Brown, T. Design of a quasi-zero stiffness isolation system for supporting
different loads. Sound Vib. 2020, 471, 115198.

6. Wang, K.; Zhou, J.; Ouyang, H. A semi-active metamaterial beam with electromagnetic quasi-
zero-stiffness resonators for ultralow-frequency bandgap tuning. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2020, 176,
105548.

7. Priya, S.; Inman, D.J. Energy Harvesting Technologies; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009.

8. Zhou, S.; Cao, J.; Erturk, A.; Lin, J. Enhanced broadband piezoelectric energy harvesting
using rotatable magnets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 173901.

9. Yan, Z.; Sun, W.; Tan, T. Nonlinear analysis of galloping piezoelectric energy harvesters with
inductive-resistive circuits for boundaries of analytical solutions, Commun. Nonlinear Sci.
Numer. Simul. 2018, 62, 90–116.

10. Margielewicz, J.; G ˛aska, D.; Litak, G. Nonlinear dynamics of a new energy harvesting
system with quasi-zero stiffness. Appl. Energy 2022, 307, 118159.

11. Barton, D.A.W.; Burrow, S.G.; Clare, L.R. Energy harvesting from vibrations with a
nonlinear oscillator. J. Vib. Acoust. 2010, 132, 021009.

12. Abolfathi, A.; Brennan, M.J.; Waters, T.P. On the effects of mistuning a force-excited system
containing a quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolator. J. Vib. Acoust. 2015, 137, 044502.

13. Li, S.; Feng, G.; Zhao, Q. Design and research of semiactive quasi-zero stiffness vibration
isolation system for vehicles. Shock Vib. 2021, 2021, 5529509.

14. Davis, R.B.; McDowell, M.D. Combined Euler column vibration isolation and energy
harvesting. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 055001.
15. Cobb, R.G.; Sullivan, J.M.; Das, A.; Davis, L.P.; Hyde, T.T.; Davis, T.; Rahman, Z.H.;
Spanos, J.T. Vibration isolation and suppression system for precision payloads in space. Smart
Mater. Struct. 1999, 8, 798.

16. Virgin, L.N.; Santillan, S.T.; Plaut, R.H. Vibration isolation using extreme geometric
nonlinearity. J. Sound Vib. 2008, 315, 721–731.

17. Thakadu, K.; Li, K. A Passive Vibration Isolator Integrated a Dynamic Vibration Absorber
with Negative Stiffness Spring. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2022, 10, 71–82.

18. Valeev, A.; Kharisov, S. Application of vibration isolators with a low stiffness for the
strongly vibrating equipment. Procedia Eng. 2016, 150, 641–646.

19. Anvar, V.; Alexey, Z.; Artem, T. Study of application of vibration isolators with quasi-zero
stiffness for reducing dynamics loads on the foundation. Procedia Eng. 2017, 176, 137–143.

20. Ali, S.; Ramaswamy, A. Testing and modeling of MR damper and its application to SDOF
systems using integral backstepping technique. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 2009, 131, 021009.

21. Lee, C.T.; Moon, B.Y. Simulation and experimental validation of vehicle dynamic
characteristics for displacement-sensitive shock absorber using fluid-flow modelling. Mech.
Syst. Signal Process. 2006, 20, 373–388.

22. Nie, S.; Zhuang, Y.; Wang, Y. Velocity & displacement-dependent damper: A novel passive
shock absorber inspired by the semi-active control. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 99, 730–
746.

23. Konieczny, Ł. Analysis of simplifications applied in vibration damping modelling for a

passive car shock absorber. Shock Vib. 2016, 2016, 6182847.

24. Xu, T.; Liang, M.; Li, C. Design and analysis of a shock absorber with variable moment of
inertia for passive vehicle suspensions. J. Sound Vib. 2015, 355, 66–85.

25. Bazinenkov, A.M.; Mikhailov, V.P. Active and semi active vibration isolation systems based
on magnetorheological materials. Procedia Eng. 2015, 106, 170–174.

26. Choi, S.B.; Lee, H.K.; Chang, E.G. Field test results of a semi-active ER suspension system
associated with skyhook controller. Mechatronics 2001, 11, 345–353.

27. Valášek, M.; Novak, M.; Šika, Z. Extended ground-hook-new concept of semi-active control
of truck’s suspension. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 1997, 27, 289–303.

28. Kamaruzaman, N.A.; Robertson, W.S.P.; Ghayesh, M.H. Vibration Isolation Performance of
an LQR-Stabilised Planar Quasi-zero Stiffness Magnetic Levitation System. In Vibration
Engineering for a Sustainable Future; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 237–243.
29. Zhang, Q.; Yang, Z.; Wang, C. Intelligent control of active shock absorber for high-speed
elevator car. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2019, 233, 3804–3815.

30. Ebrahimi, B.; Bolandhemmat, H.; Khamesee, M.B. A hybrid electromagnetic shock absorber
for active vehicle suspension systems. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2011, 49, 311–332.

31. Zheng, P.; Wang, R.; Gao, J. A comprehensive review on regenerative shock absorber
systems. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2020, 8, 225–246.

32. Brennan, M.J.; Tang, B.; Melo, G.P. An investigation into the simultaneous use of a
resonator as an energy harvester and a vibration absorber. J. Sound Vib. 2014, 333, 1331–1343.

33. Li, Y.; Baker, E.; Reissman, T. Design of mechanical metamaterials for simultaneous
vibration isolation and energy harvesting. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 251903.

34. Mofidian, S.M.M.; Bardaweel, H. A dual-purpose vibration isolator energy harvester:

Experiment and model. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 118, 360–376.

35. Satpute, N.; Iwaniec, M.; Narina, R. Energy harvesting shock absorber with linear generator
and mechanical motion amplification. Vib. Phys. Syst. 2020, 31, 2020104-1–2020104-8.

36. Shen, W.; Zhu, S.; Zhu, H. Experimental study on using electromagnetic devices on bridge
stay cables for simultaneous energy harvesting and vibration damping. Smart Mater. Struct.
2016, 25, 065011.

37. Dalela, S.; Balaji, P.S.; Jena, D.P. A review on application of mechanical metamaterials for
vibration control. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2022, 29, 3237–3262.

38. Zou, D.; Liu, G.; Rao, Z. A device capable of customizing nonlinear forces for vibration
energy harvesting, vibration isolation, and nonlinear energy sink. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
2021, 147, 107101.

39. Wang, K.; Zhou, J.; Ouyang, H. A dual quasi-zero-stiffness sliding-mode triboelectric
nanogenerator for harvesting ultralow-low frequency vibration energy. Mech. Syst. Signal
Process. 2021, 151, 107368.

40. Woodard, S.E.; Housner, J.M. Nonlinear behavior of a passive zero-spring-rate suspension
system. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 1991, 14, 84–89.

41. Yan, G.; Zou, H.X.; Wang, S. Large stroke quasi-zero stiffness vibration isolator using three-
link mechanism. J. Sound Vib. 2020, 478, 115344.

42. Gatti, G.; Shaw, A.D.; Gonçalves, P.J.P. On the detailed design of a quasi-zero stiffness
device to assist in the realisation of a translational Lanchester damper. Mech. Syst. Signal
Process. 2022, 164, 108258.
43. Wang, X.; Shi, Z.; Wang, J. A stack-based flex-compressive piezoelectric energy harvesting
cell for large quasi-static loads. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 055005.

44. Alabuzhev, P.M. Vibration Protection and Measuring Systems with Quasi-Zero Stiffness;
CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989.

45. Trimboli, M.S.; Wimmel, R.; Breitbach, E.J. Quasi-active approach to vibration isolation
using magnetic springs. In Smart Structures and Materials 1994, Passive Damping; SPIE:
Bellingham, WA, USA, 1994; Volume 2193, pp. 73–83.

46. Platus, D.L. Negative-stiffness-mechanism vibration isolation systems. In Vibration Control

in Microelectronics, Optics, and Metrology; International Society for Optics and Photonics:
Bellingham, WA, USA, 1992; Volume 1619, pp. 44–54.

47. Mizuno, T.; Toumiya, T.; Takasaki, M. Vibration isolation system using negative stiffness.
JSME Int. J. Ser. C Mech. Syst. Mach. Elem. Manuf. 2003, 46, 807–812.

48. Lee, C.M.; Goverdovskiy, V.N.; Samoilenko, S.B. Prediction of non-chaotic motion of the
elastic system with small stiffness. J. Sound Vib. 2004, 272, 643–655.

49. Lee, C.M.; Bogatchenkov, A.H.; Goverdovskiy, V.N. Position control of seat suspension
with minimum stiffness. J. Sound Vib. 2006, 292, 435–442.

50. Carrella, A.; Brennan, M.J.; Waters, T.P. Static analysis of a passive vibration isolator with
quasi-zero-stiffness characteristic. J. Sound Vib. 2007, 301, 678–689.

51. Kovacic, I.; Brennan, M.J.; Waters, T.P. A study of a nonlinear vibration isolator with a
quasi-zero stiffness characteristic. J. Sound Vib. 2008, 315, 700–711.

52. Carrella, A.; Brennan, M.J.; Kovacic, I. On the force transmissibility of a vibration isolator
with quasi-zero-stiffness. J. Sound Vib. 2009, 322, 707–717.

53. Peng, X.; Zhang, S.X. Nonlinear resonance response analysis of a kind of passive isolation
system with quasi-zero stiffness. J. Hunan Univ. 2011, 38, 34–39.

54. Niu, F.; Meng, L.S.; Wu, W.J. Recent advances in quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolation
systems. Appl. Mech. Mater. Trans. 2013, 397, 295–303.

55. Li, B.; Shuai, C.; Xu, W. Review on Low Frequency Control of Quasi-Zero Stiffness. In
Proceedings of the 2021 13th International Conference on Computer and Automation
Engineering (ICCAE), Melbourne, Australia, 20–22 March 2021; pp. 59–63.

56. Le, T.D.; Ahn, K.K. Experimental investigation of a vibration isolation system using
negative stiffness structure. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2013, 70, 99–112.
57. Zhou, J.; Wang, K.; Xu, D. Vibration isolation in neonatal transport by using a quasi-zero-
stiffness isolator. J. Vib. Control 2018, 24, 3278–3291.

58. Ding, H.; Ji, J.; Chen, L.Q. Nonlinear vibration isolation for fluid-conveying pipes using
quasi-zero stiffness characteristics. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 121, 675–688.

59. Attary, N.; Symans, M.; Nagarajaiah, S. Performance evaluation of negative stiffness devices
for seismic response control of bridge structures via experimental shake table tests. J. Earthq.
Eng. 2015, 19, 249–276.

60. Attary, N.; Symans, M.; Nagarajaiah, S. Numerical simulations of a highway bridge structure
employing passive negative stiffness device for seismic protection. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
2015, 44, 973–995.

61. Attary, N.; Symans, M.; Nagarajaiah, S. Performance assessment of a highway bridge
structure employing adaptive negative stiffness for seismic protection. In Proceedings of the
Structures Congress 2013, Bridging Your Passion with Your Profession, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,
2–4 May 2013; pp. 1736–1746.

62. Ishida, S.; Suzuki, K.; Shimosaka, H. Design and experimental analysis of origami-inspired
vibration isolator with quasi-zerostiffness characteristic. J. Vib. Acoust. 2017, 139, 051004.

63. Burian, Y.A.; Silkov, M.V.; Trifonova, E.N. Support with quasi-zero stiffness effect for
processing equipment. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019,

2141, 03006.

64. Bouna, H.S.; Nbendjo, B.R.; Woafo, P. Isolation performance of a quasi-zero stiffness
isolator in vibration isolation of a multi-span

continuous beam bridge under pier base vibrating excitation. Nonlinear Dyn. 2020, 100, 1125–
1141.

65. Liang, H.; Hao, G.; Olszewski, O.Z. A review on vibration-based piezoelectric energy
harvesting from the aspect of compliant

mechanisms. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 331, 112743.

66. Robertson, W.S.; Kidner, M.R.F.; Cazzolato, B.S. Theoretical design parameters for a quasi-
zero stiffness magnetic spring for

vibration isolation. J. Sound Vib. 2009, 326, 88–103.

67. Xu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J. On the analytical and experimental assessment of the
performance of a quasi-zero-stiffness isolator.
J. Vib. Control 2014, 20, 2.

68. Liu, C.; Yu, K. Superharmonic resonance of the quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolator and its
effect on the isolation performance.

Nonlinear Dyn. 2020, 100, 95–117.

69. Liu, X.; Huang, X.; Hua, H. On the characteristics of a quasi-zero stiffness isolator using
Euler buckled beam as negative stiffness

corrector. J. Sound Vib. 2013, 332, 3359–3376.

70. Huang, X.; Liu, X.; Sun, J. Vibration isolation characteristics of a nonlinear isolator using
Euler buckled beam as negative stiffness

corrector: A theoretical and experimental study. J. Sound Vib. 2014, 333, 1132–1148.

71. Carrella, A.; Brennan, M.J.; Waters, T.P. On the design of a high-static–low-dynamic
stiffness isolator using linear mechanical

springs and magnets. J. Sound Vib. 2008, 315, 712–720.

72. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Y. Analytical study of a quasi-zero stiffness coupling using a
torsion magnetic spring with negative

stiffness. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 100, 135–151.

73. Sun, X.; Xu, J.; Jing, X. Beneficial performance of a quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolator
with time-delayed active control. Int. J.

Mech. Sci. 2014, 82, 32–40.

74. Zhou, N.; Liu, K. A tunable high-static–low-dynamic stiffness vibration isolator. J. Sound
Vib. 2010, 329, 1254–1273.

75. Xu, J.; Yang, X.; Li, W. Design of quasi-zero stiffness joint actuator and research on
vibration isolation performance. J. Sound Vib.

2020, 479, 115367.

76. Ahn, K.K. Active pneumatic vibration isolation system using negative stiffness structures for
a vehicle seat. J. Sound Vib. 2014,

333, 1245–1268.

77. Li, M.; Cheng, W.; Xie, R. A quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolator using a cam mechanism
with user-defined profile. Int. J. Mech.
Sci. 2021, 189, 1059.

78. Zhou, J.; Wang, X.; Xu, D. Nonlinear dynamic characteristics of a quasi-zero stiffness
vibration isolator with cam–roller–spring

mechanisms. J. Sound Vib. 2015, 346, 53–69.

79. Zou, W.; Cheng, C.; Ma, R. Performance analysis of a quasi-zero stiffness vibration isolation
system with scissor-like structures.

Arch. Appl. Mech. 2021, 91, 117–133.

80. Liu, C.; Zhao, R.; Yu, K. In-plane quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolator using magnetic
interaction and cables: Theoretical and

experimental study. Appl. Math. Model. 2021, 96, 497.

81. Wu, Z.; Jing, X.; Sun, B. A 6DOF passive vibration isolator using X-shape supporting
structures. J. Sound Vib. 2016, 380, 90–111.

82. Zhou, J.; Xiao, Q.; Xu, D. A novel quasi-zero-stiffness strut and its applications in six-
degree-of-freedom vibration isolation

platform. J. Sound Vib. 2017, 394, 59–74.

83. Diala, U. Application of Nonlinear System Frequency Analysis and Design to Vibration
Isolation and Energy Harvesting. Ph.D.

Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2019.

84. Li, M.; Jing, X. A bistable X-structured electromagnetic wave energy converter with a novel
mechanical-motion-rectifier: Design,

analysis, and experimental tests. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 244, 114466.

85. Liang, H.; Hao, G.; Olszewski, O.Z. Ultra-low wide bandwidth vibrational energy harvesting
using a statically balanced compliant

mechanism. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2022, 219, 107130.

86. Lu, Z.Q.; Wu, D.; Ding, H. Vibration isolation and energy harvesting integrated in a Stewart
platform with high static and low

dynamic stiffness. Appl. Math. Model. 2021, 89, 249–267.

87. Yang, T.; Cao, Q.; Li, Q. A multi-directional multi-stable device: Modeling, experiment
verification and applications. Mech. Syst.

Signal Process. 2021, 146, 106986.

88. Liu, C.; Zhao, R.; Yu, K. A quasi-zero-stiffness device capable of vibration isolation and
energy harvesting using piezoelectric

buckled beams. Energy 2021, 233, 121146.

89. Liu, C.; Zhao, R.; Yu, K. Simultaneous energy harvesting and vibration isolation via quasi-
zero-stiffness support and radially

distributed piezoelectric cantilever beams. Appl. Math. Model. 2021, 100, 152–169.

90. Sun, X.; Wang, F.; Xu, J. Nonlinear piezoelectric structure for ultralow-frequency band
vibration energy harvesting with magnetic

interaction. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2019, 6, 671–679.

91. Iwaniec, J.; Litak, G.; Iwaniec, M. Response Identification in a Vibration Energy-Harvesting
System with Quasi-Zero Stiffness and

Two Potential Wells. Energies 2021, 14, 3926.

Energies 2022, 15, 7066 22 of 23

92. Lu, Z.Q.; Shao, D.; Fang, Z.W. Integrated vibration isolation and energy harvesting via a
bistable piezo-composite plate. J. Vib.

Control 2020, 26, 779–789.

93. Zhao, L.C.; Zou, H.X.; Yan, G. A water-proof magnetically coupled piezoelectric-
electromagnetic hybrid wind energy harvester.

Appl. Energy 2019, 239, 735–746.

94. Rajarathinam, M.; Ali, S.F. Energy generation in a hybrid harvester under harmonic
excitation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018,

155, 10–19.

95. Karami, M.A.; Inman, D.J. Equivalent damping and frequency change for linear and
nonlinear hybrid vibrational energy

harvesting systems. J. Sound Vib. 2011, 330, 5583–5597.

96. Lallart, M.; Inman, D.J. Mechanical effect of combined piezoelectric and electromagnetic
energy harvesting. In Structural Dynamics

and Renewable Energy; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; Volume 1, pp. 261–272.

97. Wang, K.; Ouyang, H.; Zhou, J. A nonlinear hybrid energy harvester with high ultralow-
frequency energy harvesting performance.

Meccanica 2021, 56, 461–480.

98. Yang, T.; Cao, Q. Time delay improves beneficial performance of a novel hybrid energy
harvester. Nonlinear Dyn. 2019, 96,

1511–1530.

99. Tao, Y.; Zhou, S.X.; Cao, Q.J. Some advances in nonlinear vibration energy harvesting
technology. Li Xue Xue Bao 2021, 53,

2894–2909.

100. Fulcher, B.A.; Shahan, D.W.; Haberman, M.R. Analytical and experimental investigation of
buckled beams as negative stiffness

elements for passive vibration and shock isolation systems. J. Vib. Acoust. 2014, 136, 031009.

101. Oyelade, A.O. Vibration isolation using a bar and an Euler beam as negative stiffness for
vehicle seat comfort. Adv. Mech. Eng.

2019, 11, 1687814019860983.

102. Mehreganian, N.; Fallah, A.S.; Sareh, P. Structural mechanics of negative stiffness
honeycomb metamaterials. J. Appl. Mech. 2021,

88, 051006.

103. Meng, H.; Huang, X.; Chen, Y. Structural vibration absorption in multilayered sandwich
structures using negative stiffness

nonlinear oscillators. Appl. Acoust. 2021, 182, 108240.

104. Kashdan, L.; Seepersad, C.C.; Haberman, M. Design, fabrication, and evaluation of
negative stiffness elements using SLS. Rapid

Prototyp. J. 2012, 18, 194–200.

105. Sarlis, A.A.; Pasala, D.T.R.; Constantinou, M.C. Negative stiffness device for seismic
protection of structures. J. Struct. Eng. 2013,
139, 1124–1133.

106. Montenbruck, O.; Steigenberger, P.; Darugna, F. Semi-analytical solar radiation pressure
modeling for QZS-1 orbit-normal and

yaw-steering attitude. Adv. Space Res. 2017, 59, 2088–2100.

107. Liu, Y.; Abu-Rub, H.; Ge, B. Front-end isolated quasi-z-source dc–dc converter modules in
series for high-power photovoltaic

systems—Part II: Control, dynamic model, and downscaled verification. IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron. 2016, 64, 359–368.

108. Yan, B.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z. Enhanced lever-type vibration isolator via electromagnetic
shunt damping. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2022,

218, 107070.

109. Dong, G.; Zhang, X.; Xie, S. Simulated and experimental studies on a high-static-low-
dynamic stiffness isolator using magnetic

negative stiffness spring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2017, 86, 188–203.

110. Xu, D.; Yu, Q.; Zhou, J. Theoretical and experimental analyses of a nonlinear magnetic
vibration isolator with quasi-zero-stiffness

characteristic. J. Sound Vib. 2013, 332, 3377–3389.

111. Li, H.; Li, Y.; Li, J. Negative stiffness devices for vibration isolation applications: A
review. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2020, 23, 1739–1755.

112. Zeng, Y.; Ding, H.; Du, R.H. A suspension system with quasi-zero stiffness characteristics
and inerter nonlinear energy sink. J. Vib.

Control 2022, 28, 143–158.

113. Tang, L.; Yang, Y.; Soh, C.K. Improving functionality of vibration energy harvesters using
magnets. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.

2012, 23, 1433–1449.

114. Qian, F.; Hajj, M.R.; Zuo, L. Bio-inspired bi-stable piezoelectric harvester for broadband
vibration energy harvesting. Energy

Convers. Manag. 2020, 222, 113174.

115. Zhou, S.; Cao, J.; Lin, J. Exploitation of a tristable nonlinear oscillator for improving
broadband vibration energy harvesting. Eur.

Phys. J.-Appl. Phys. 2014, 67, 30902.

116. Huynh, B.H.; Tjahjowidodo, T.; Zhong, Z.W. Design and experiment of controlled bistable
vortex induced vibration energy

harvesting systems operating in chaotic regions. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 98, 1097–
1115.

117. Tan, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L. Piezoelectric autoparametric vibration energy harvesting with
chaos control feature. Mech. Syst.

Signal Process. 2021, 161, 107989.

118. Liu, D.; Xu, Y.; Li, J. Randomly-disordered-periodic-induced chaos in a piezoelectric

vibration energy harvester system with

fractional-order physical properties. J. Sound Vib. 2017, 399, 182–196.

119. Huang, D.; Zhou, S.; Han, Q. Response analysis of the nonlinear vibration energy harvester
with an uncertain parameter. Proc.

Inst. Mech. Eng. Part K J. Multi-Body Dyn. 2020, 234, 393–407.

120. Suman, S.; Balaji, P.S.; Selvakumar, K. Nonlinear vibration control device for a vehicle
suspension using negative stiffness

mechanism. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2021, 9, 957–966.

Energies 2022, 15, 7066 23 of 23

121. Nagarajaiah, S.; Pasala, D.T.R.; Reinhorn, A. Adaptive negative stiffness: A new structural
modification approach for seismic

protection. Adv. Mater. Res. Trans. 2013, 639, 54–66.

122. Davoodi, E.; Safarpour, P.; Pourgholi, M. Design and evaluation of vibration reducing seat
suspension based on negative stiffness

structure. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2020, 234, 4171–4189.

123. Cheng, C.; Li, S.; Wang, Y. Force and displacement transmissibility of a quasi-zero
stiffness vibration isolator with geometric

nonlinear damping. Nonlinear Dyn. 2017, 87, 2267–2279.

124. Araki, Y.; Kimura, K.; Asai, T. Integrated mechanical and material design of quasi-zero-
stiffness vibration isolator with superelastic

Cu–Al–Mn shape memory alloy bars. J. Sound Vib. 2015, 358, 74–83.

125. Santhosh, B. Dynamics and performance evaluation of an asymmetric nonlinear vibration

isolation mechanism. J. Braz. Soc. Mech.

Sci. Eng. 2018, 40, 1–14.

126. Han, H.; Sorokin, V.; Tang, L.; Cao, D. A nonlinear vibration isolator with quasi-zero-
stiffness inspired by Miura-origami tube.

Nonlinear Dyn. 2021, 105, 1313–1325.

127. Jin, G.; Wang, Z.; Yang, T. Cascaded quasi-zero stiffness nonlinear low-frequency
vibration isolator inspired by human spine.

Appl. Math. Mech. 2022, 43, 813–824.

128. Yan, G.; Qi, W.H.; Shi, J.W. Bionic paw-inspired structure for vibration isolation with
novel nonlinear compensation mechanism.

J. Sound Vib. 2022, 525, 116799.

129. Yan, G.; Zou, H.X.; Wang, S. Bio-inspired vibration isolation: Methodology and design.
Appl. Mech. Rev. 2021, 73, 020801.

130. Yan, G.; Zou, H.X.; Wang, S. Bio-inspired toe-like structure for low-frequency vibration
isolation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2022,

162, 108010.

131. Yan, G.; Wu, Z.Y.; Wei, X.S. Nonlinear compensation method for quasi-zero stiffness
vibration isolation. J. Sound Vib. 2022,

523, 116743.

132. Yu, M.; Gao, X.; Chen, Q. Study of the mechanical properties and vibration isolation
performance of a molecular spring isolator.

Shock Vib. 2016, 2016, 6451829.

133. Li, Z.; Chen, Q.; Gu, F. Modeling a Mechanical Molecular Spring Isolator with High-Static-
Low-Dynamic-Stiffness Properties.
Shock Vib. 2020, 2020, 8853936.

134. Nie, G.; Li, Z.; Chen, Q. Application of a hydrophobic microporous material in vehicle
suspension. AIP Adv. 2022, 12, 015216.

135. Chen, Z.; Guo, B.; Yang, Y. Metamaterials-based enhanced energy harvesting: A review.
Phys. B Condens. Matter 2014, 438, 1–8.

136. Hu, G.; Tang, L.; Liang, J. Acoustic-elastic metamaterials and phononic crystals for energy
harvesting: A review. Smart Mater.

Struct. 2021, 30, 085025.

137. Fan, H.; Yang, L.; Tian, Y. Design of metastructures with quasi-zero dynamic stiffness for
vibration isolation. Compos. Struct. 2020,

243, 112244.

138. Zhou, Y.; Chen, P.; Mosqueda, G. Analytical and numerical investigation of quasi-zero
stiffness vertical isolation system. J. Eng.

Mech. 2019, 145, 04019035.

139. Hom, C.L.; Pilgrim, S.M.; Shankar, N. Calculation of quasi-static electromechanical

coupling coefficients for electrostrictive

ceramic materials. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 1994, 41, 542–551.

140. Shaw, A.D.; Gatti, G.; Gonçalves, P.J.P. Design and test of an adjustable quasi-zero
stiffness device and its use to suspend masses

on a multi-modal structure. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2021, 152, 107354.

141. Hu, X.; Zhou, C. The effect of various damping on the isolation performance of quasi-zero-
stiffness system. Mech. Syst. Signal

Process. 2022, 171, 108944.

142. Zhang, Y.; Cai, C.S. A retrofitted energy harvester for low frequency vibrations. Smart
Mater. Struct. 2012, 21, 075007.

143. Yan, B.; Zhou, S.; Litak, G. Nonlinear analysis of the tristable energy harvester with a
resonant circuit for performance enhancement.
Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 2018, 28, 1850092.

144. Zhou, S.; Lallart, M.; Erturk, A. Multistable vibration energy harvesters: Principle,
progress, and perspectives. J. Sound Vib. 2022,

2022, 116886.

145. Guyomar, D.; Badel, A.; Lefeuvre, E. Toward energy harvesting using active materials and
conversion improvement by nonlinear

processing. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2005, 52, 584–595.

146. Lefeuvre, E.; Badel, A.; Richard, C. A comparison between several vibration-powered
piezoelectric generators for standalone

systems. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2006, 126, 405–416.

147. Lallart, M.; Wu, W.J.; Hsieh, Y. Synchronous inversion and charge extraction (SICE): A
hybrid switching interface for efficient

vibrational energy harvesting. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 115012.

148. Cheng, C.; Chen, Z.; Xiong, Y. A high-efficiency, self-powered nonlinear interface circuit
for bi-stable rotating piezoelectric

vibration energy harvesting with nonlinear magnetic force. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech.
2016, 51, 235–248.

149. Shu, Y.C.; Lien, I.C.; Wu, W.J. An improved analysis of the SSHI interface in piezoelectric
energy harvesting. Smart Mater. Struct.

2007, 16, 2253. [