Chapter - 08 Number and Proof
Chapter - 08 Number and Proof
Solutions to Exercise 8A
1 a As m and n are even, m = 2p and is divisible by 21.
n = 2q where p, q ∈ Z. Therefore,
b If m is divisible by 3 and n is divis-
m + n = 2p + 2q
ible by 7, then m = 3p and n = 7q
= 2(p + q), where p, q ∈ Z. Therefore,
s
is an even number.
m2 n = (3p)2 (7q)
f
b As m and n are even, m = 2p and
oo
= 9p2 (7q)
n = 2q where p, q ∈ Z. Therefore,
= 63p2 q
mn = (2p)(2q)
= 4pq is divisible by 63.
pr
= 2(2pq),
is an even number. 5 If m and n are perfect squares then
m = a2 and n = b2 for some a, b ∈ Z.
ed
Therefore,
2 As m and n are odd, m = 2p + 1 and
n = 2q + 1 where p, q ∈ Z. Therefore, mn = (a2 )(b2 ) = (ab)2 ,
m + n = (2p + 1) + (2q + 1)
ct
is also a perfect square.
= 2p + 2q + 2
= 2(p + q + 1),
re
mn = 2p(2q + 1) =4mn,
un
= 2(2pq + p),
which is divisible by 4.
is an even number.
293
where k ∈ Z. Then Therefore,
n2 − 6n + 5 = (2k)2 − 6(2k) + 5
x4 − y4
= 4k2 − 12k + 5
=(x2 − y2 )(x2 + y2 )
= 4k2 − 12k + 4 + 1
=(x − y)(x + y)(x2 + y2 )
= 2(2k2 − 6k + 2) + 1, =
positive positive positive
z }| { z }| { z }| {
is odd. = (x − y) (x + y) (x2 + y2 )
s
>0.
f
2
oo
8 (Method 1) If n is odd then n is odd and
8n is even. Therefore the expression is
of the form Therefore, x4 > y4 .
pr
odd + even + odd = even.
11 We have,
(Method 2) If n is odd then n = 2k + 1
where k ∈ Z. Then x2 + y2 − 2xy
ed
n2 + 8n + 5 = (2k + 1)2 + 8(2k + 1) + 3 =x2 − 2xy + y2
= 4k2 + 4k + 1 + 16k + 8 + 3 =(x − y)2
ct
= 4k2 + 20k + 12 ≥2xy.
= 2(2k2 + 10k + 6),
re
Therefore, x2 + y2 ≥ 2xy.
is even.
10 Firstly, if x > y then x − y > 0. Secondly, b We prove that Alice is a knave, and
since x and y are positive, x + y > 0. Bob is a knight.
294
Suppose Alice is a knight
⇒ Alice is telling the truth
⇒ They are both of the same kind
⇒ Bob is a knight
⇒ Bob is lying
⇒ Bob is a knave
⇒ Bob is a knight and a knave.
This is impossible.
b Every odd number is of the form
s
⇒ Alice is a knave
2k + 1 for some k ∈ Z. Moreover,
⇒ Alice is not telling the truth
f
⇒ Alice and Bob are of a different kind (k + 1)2 − k2 = k2 + 2k + 1 − k2
oo
⇒ Bob is a knight = 2k + 1,
⇒ Alice is a knave, and Bob is a knight so that every odd number can be
written as the difference of two
c We will prove that Alice
pr
squares.
is a knight, and Bob is a knave.
Suppose Alice is a knave
c Since 101 = 2 × 50 + 1, we have,
⇒ Alice is not telling the truth
512 − 502 = 101.
⇒ Bob is a knight
ed
⇒ Bob is telling the truth
⇒ Neither of them are knaves 14 a Since
⇒ Both of them are knights 9 99 10 100
= and = ,
ct
⇒ Alice is a knight and a knave 10 110 11 110
This is impossible. it is clear that
10 9
⇒ Alice is a knight > .
re
11 10
⇒ Alice is telling the truth
⇒ Bob is a knave b We have,
n n−1
or
⇒ Bob is lying −
⇒ At least one of them is a knave n+1 n
2
n n(n − 1)
⇒ Bob is a knave = −
n(n + 1) n(n + 1)
c
n(n + 1)
13 a In the diagram below, there are 11
n − n2 + n
2
yellow tiles. We can also count =
the yellow tiles by subtracting the n(n + 1)
number of red tiles, 52 , from the 1
=
total number of tiles, 62 . Therefore n(n + 1)
11 = 62 − 52 . >0
since n(n + 1) > 0. Therefore,
n n−1
> .
n+1 n
295
15 a We have, 17 a Expanding gives,
1 1
−
10 11
(x − y)(x2 + xy + y2 )
11 10
= − =x3 + x2 y + xy2 − x2 y − xy2 − y3
110 110
=
1 =x3 − y3 ,
110
1
< ,
s
100 which is the difference of two cubes.
f
since 110 > 100.
b Completing the square by treating y
oo
b We have, as a constant gives,
1 1 n+1 n
− = −
n n + 1 n(n + 1) n(n + 1) x2 + yx + y2
pr
n+1−n
= y2 y2
n(n + 1) =x2 + yx + − + y2
4 4
1 2
= , 3y2
!
y
n(n + 1) = x2 + yx + +
ed
4 4
1
= 2 , y 2 3y2
n +n = x+ +
1 2 4
< 2,
ct
n ≥0
Therefore,
16 We have,
or
!2
a2 + b2 a+b
− x3 − y3
2 2
a2 + b2 (a + b)2 ≥0 ≥0
c
= − z }| { z }| {
2 4 = (x − y) (x2 + xy + y2 )
un
2a + 2b
2 2
a2 + 2ab + b2 ≥0.
= −
4 4
2a + 2b − a − 2ab − b2
2 2 2
=
4 Therefore, x3 > y3 .
a − 2ab + b2
2
=
4
18 a Let D be the distance to and from
(a − b)2
= work. The time taken to get to work
4
is D/12 and the time taken to get
≥0. home from work is D/24. The total
296
distance is 2D and the total time is The average speed will then be
D D
+ distance ÷ time
12 24
2D D (a + b)D
= + =2D ÷
24 24 ab
3D ab
= =2D ×
24 (a + b)D
D 2ab
= = km/hour.
8 a+b
s
The average speed will then be
c We first note that a + b > 0. Secondly,
f
distance ÷ time
a+b
oo
D 2ab
=2D ÷ −
8 2 a+b
8 (a + b) 2
4ab
=2D × = −
D 2(a + b) 2(a + b)
pr
=16 km/hour. (a + b)2 − 4ab
=
2(a + b)
b Let D be the distance to and from a2 + 2ab + b2 − 4ab
work. The time taken to get to work =
ed
2(a + b)
is D/a and the time taken to get home
a2 − 2ab + b2
from work is D/b. The total distance =
2(a + b)
is 2D and the total time is
(a − b)2
ct
D D =
+ 2(a + b)
a b
bD aD ≥0
= +
re
ab ab
aD + bD since (a − b) ≥ 0 and a + b > 0.
= Therefore,
ab
or
297
Solutions to Exercise 8B
1 a P : 1 > 0 (true) Suppose Alice is a knight
not P : 1 ≤ 0 (false) ⇒ Alice is telling the truth
⇒ Alice is a knave
b P : 4 is divisible by 8 (false) ⇒ Alice is a knight and a knave
not P : 4 is not divisible by 8 (true) This is impossible.
⇒ Alice is a knave
c P : Each pair of primes has an even
⇒ Alice is not telling the truth
s
sum (false)
⇒ Alice is a knight OR Bob is a knave
f
not P : Some pair of primes does not
⇒ Bob is a knave, as Alice is not a knight
oo
have an even sum (true)
⇒ Alice and Bob are both knaves.
d P : Some rectangle has 4 sides of
equal length (true) 4 a If there are no clouds in the sky, then
pr
not P : No rectangle has 4 sides of it is not raining.
equal length (false)
b If you are not happy, then you are not
smiling.
ed
2 a P : 14 is divisible by 7 and 2 (true)
not P : 14 is not divisible by 7 or 14 c If 2x , 2, then x , 1.
is not divisible by 2 (false)
d If x5 ≤ y5 , then x ≤ y.
ct
b P : 12 is divisible by 3 or 4 (true)
not P : 12 is not divisible by 4 and 12 e Option 1: If n is not odd, then n2 is
is not divisible by 3 (false) not odd.
re
298
n = 2k, for some k ∈ Z. Therefore, e Contrapositive: If n is even, then
n3 + 1 is odd.
3n + 5 = 3(2k) + 5
Proof: Suppose n is even. Then
= 6k + 5 n = 2k, for some k ∈ Z. Therefore,
= 6k + 4 + 1 n3 + 1 = (2k)3 + 1
= 2(3k + 2) + 1 = 8k3 + 1
is odd. = 2(4k3 ) + 1
s
b Contrapositive: If n is even, then n2 is is odd.
f
even.
f Contrapositive: If m or n are divisible
oo
Proof: Suppose n is even. Then
by 3, then mn is divisible by 3.
n = 2k, for some k ∈ Z. Therefore,
Proof: If m or n is divisible by 3 then
n2 = (2k)2 we can assume that m is divisible
pr
= 4k2 by 3. Then, m = 3k, for some k ∈ Z.
Therefore,
= 2(2k2 )
mn = (3k)n
is even.
= 3(kn)
ed
c Contrapositive: If n is even, then is divisible by 3.
n2 − 8n + 3 is odd.
Proof: Suppose n is even. Then g Contrapositive: If m = n, then m + n
ct
n = 2k, for some k ∈ Z. Therefore, is even.
Proof: Suppose that m = n. Then
n2 − 8n + 3 = (2k)2 − 8(2k) + 3
re
m+n=n+n
= 4k2 − 16k + 3
= 2n
= 4k2 − 16k + 2 + 1
or
is even.
= 2(2k2 − 8k + 1) + 1
is odd. 6 a Contrapositive: If x ≥ 0, then
c
x2 + 3x ≥ 0.
d Contrapositive: If n is divisible by 3,
un
299
c Contrapositive: If x < 1 and y < 1, give,
then x + y < 2. x−y
√ √
Proof: If x < 1 and y < 1 then, x+ y
√ √
x + y < 1 + 1 = 2, x−y x− y
=√ √ √ √
as required. x+ y x− y
√ √
(x − y) x − y
d Contrapositive: If x < 3 and y < 2, = √ √ √ √
then 2x + 3y < 12. x+ y x− y
s
√
Proof: If x < 3 and y < 2 then, (x − y) x − y
√
f
2x + 3y < 2 × 3 + 3 × 2 = 6 + 6 = 12, =
(x − y)
oo
√ √
as required. = x − y.
pr
the above equality, we see that,
odd, then mn is odd or m + n is odd. √ √ x−y
x− y= √ √ > 0,
b Proof: x+ y
(Case 1) Suppose m is odd and n is since the numerator and denomi-
ed
odd. Then clearly mn is odd. nator are both positive. Therefore,
√ √
(Case 2) Suppose m is odd and n is x > y.
even. Then clearly m + n will be odd. √ √
c Contrapositive: If x ≤ y, then
ct
It is likewise, if m is even and n is
x ≤ y.
odd. √ √
Proof: If x ≤ y then, since both
re
300
Solutions to Exercise 8C
1 If all three angles are less than 60◦ , This gives a contradiction, so x is not
then the sum of interior angles of the rational.
triangle would be less than 180◦ . This
is a contradiction as the sum of interior
5 Suppose that log2 5 is rational so that
angles is exactly 180◦ . p
log2 5 = where p, q ∈ Z. Then,
q
s
p
2 Suppose there is some least positive 2 q =5
p
f
rational number . Then since, p
q ⇒ 2q =5
oo
p p p !q
< , ⇒ 2q = 5q
2q q
there is some lesser positive rational ⇒ 2 p = 5q
pr
number, which is a contradiction.
Therefore, there is no least positive The left hand side of this equation is
rational number. odd, and the right hand side is even.
This gives a contradiction, so x is not
ed
√ rational.
3 Suppose that p is an integer. Then
√
p = n, √
6 Suppose the contrary, so that x is
ct
for some n ∈ Z. Squaring both sides rational. Then
gives √ p
x= ,
p = n2 . q
re
p
4 Suppose that x is rational so that x = rational, which is a contradiction.
q
un
where p, q ∈ Z. Then,
3x = 2 7 Suppose, on the contrary that a + b is
p rational. Then
⇒ 3 q =2
p !q rational rational
⇒ 3q = 2q z }| { z}|{
b = (a + b) − b.
⇒ 3 p = 2q
Therefore, b is the difference of two
The left hand side of this equation is rational numbers, which is rational. This
odd, and the right hand side is even. is a contradiction.
301
8 Suppose b and c are both natural This implies that 1 is divisible by 7,
numbers. Then which is a contradiction since the
c2 − b2 = 4 only factor of 1 is 1.
s
Adding these two equations gives 2c = 5
2 3(5a + 7b) = 2.
f
so that c = , which is not a whole
5
oo
number. This implies that 2 is divisible by 3,
which is a contradiction since the
only factors of 2 are 1 and 2.
9 Suppose that there are two different
pr
solutions, x1 and x2 . Then,
ax1 + b = c and ax2 + b = c. 12 a Contrapositive: If n is not divisible by
3, then n2 is not divisible by 3.
Equating these two equations gives,
Proof: If n is not divisible by 3 then
ed
ax1 + b = ax2 + b either n = 3k + 1 or n = 3k + 2.
ax1 = ax2 (Case 1) If n = 3k + 1 then,
x1 = x2 , (since a , 0)
n2 = (3k + 1)2
ct
which is a contradiction since the two
= 9k2 + 6k + 1
solutions were assumed to be different.
= 3(3k2 + 2k) + 1
re
by 2.
n2 = (3k + 2)2
b Suppose there are two primes p and p
= 9k2 + 12k + 4
c
302
be cancelled). Then, be cancelled). Then,
p3 = 2q3 (1)
⇒ p2 is divisible by 3 ⇒ p is divisible by 2
s
⇒ (3k)2 = 3q2 (substitituting into (1))
⇒ q3 = 4k3
f
⇒ 3q2 = 9k2
oo
⇒ q2 = 3k2 ⇒ q3 is divisible by 2
⇒ q2 is divisible by 3 ⇒ q is divisible by 2.
pr
which contradicts the fact that they
have no factors in common.
So p and q are both divisible by 3,
which contradicts the fact that they
ed
14 This will be a proof by contradiction, so
have no factors in common.
we suppose there is some a, b ∈ Z such
that
13 a Contrapositive: If n is odd, then n3 is a2 − 4b − 2 = 0
ct
odd.
⇒ a2 = 4b + 2
Proof: If n is odd then n = 2k + 1 for
⇒ a2 = 2(2b + 1) (1)
re
some k ∈ Z. Therefore,
which means that a2 is even. However,
this implies that a is even, so that
n3 = (2k + 1)3 a = 2k, for some k ∈ Z. Substituting this
or
4k2 = 2(2b + 1)
un
303
√
and b > n. Then (r = 3) We have,
√ √
ab > n n = n,
m2 = (4n + 3)2
which is a contradiction since ab = n. = 16n2 + 24n + 9
b If 97 were not prime then we could = 16n2 + 24n + 8 + 1
write 97 = ab where 1 < a < b < n. = 4(4n2 + 6n + 2) + 1
By the previous question, we know
s
that has a remainder of 1.
√ √
f
a ≤ 97 < 100 = 10. Therefore, the square of every integer
oo
is divisible by 4 or leaves a remainder
Therefore a is one of
of 1.
{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}.
b Suppose the contrary, so that both
pr
However 97 is not divisible by a and b are odd. Then a = 2k + 1
any of these numbers, which is a and b = 2m + 1 for some k, m ∈ Z.
contradiction. Therefore, 97 is a Therefore,
prime number.
ed
c2 = a2 + b2
16 a Let m = 4n + r where r = 0, 1, 2, 3. = (2k + 1)2 + (2m + 1)2
(r = 0) We have,
= 4k2 + 4k + 1 + 4m2 = 4m + 1
ct
m2 = (4n)2 = 4(k2 + m2 + k + m) + 2.
= 16n2
re
(r = 1) We have,
= 4(4n2 + 2n) + 1
√ √
has a remainder of 1. a+b 2=c+d 2
(r = 2) We have, √
(b − d) 2 = c − a
m2 = (4n + 2)2 √ c−a
2=
b−d
= 16n2 + 16n + 4
= 4(4n2 + 4n + 1) c−a
Since ∈ Q, this contradicts the
b−d √
is divisible by 4. irrationality of 2.
304
b Squaring both sides gives, Equation (1) then becomes
√ √ 2
ax2 + bx + c = 0
3+2 2= c+d 2
√ √ !2 !
3 + 2 2 = c2 + 2cd 2 + 2d2 p p
a +b +c=0
√ √ q q
3 + 2 2 = c2 + 2d2 + 2cd 2
ap2 + bpq + cq2 = 0 (2)
Therefore
Since p and q cannot both be even, we
c2 + 2d2 = 3 (1) need only consider three cases.
s
cd = 1 (2) (Case 1) If p is odd and q is odd then
f
equation (2) is of the form
Since c and d are integers, this
oo
implies that c = d = 1. odd + odd + odd = odd = 0.
This is not possible since 0 is even.
18 There are many ways to prove this (Case 2) If p is odd and q is even then
pr
result. We will take the most elementary equation (2) is of the form
approach (but not the most elegant). odd + even + even = odd = 0.
Suppose that This is not possible since 0 is even.
ax + bx + c = 0
2
ed
(1) (Case 3) If p is even and q is odd then
p equation (2) is of the form
has a rational solution, x = . We can
q
assume that p and q have no factors even + even + odd = odd = 0.
ct
in common (or else we could cancel). This is not possible since 0 is even.
re
c or
un
305
Solutions to Exercise 8D
1 a Converse: If x = 1, then 2x + 3 = 5. b This statement is not true. For
Proof: If x = 1 then instance, 4 × 1 is a multiple of 4, and
2x + 3 = 2 × 1 + 3 = 5. yet 1 is clearly not even.
s
she is in Asia, since Asia is a country
for some k ∈ Z. Therefore,
f
in China.
n = 2k + 3 = 2k + 2 + 1 = 2(k + 1) + 1
oo
(Q ; P) If Vivian is in Asia, she
is odd. is not necessarily in China. For
example, she could be in Japan.
c Converse: If m is odd, then
pr
m2 + 2m + 1 is even. b These statements are equivalent.
Proof 1: If m is odd then the (P ⇒ Q) If 2x = 4, then dividing both
expression m2 + 2m + 1 is of the form, sides by 2 gives x = 2.
(Q ⇒ P) If x = 2, then multiplying
odd + even + odd = even.
ed
both sides by 2 gives 2x = 4.
Proof 2: If m is odd then m = 2k + 1
for some k ∈ Z. Therefore, c These statements are not equivalent.
m2 + 2m + 1 (P ⇒ Q) If x > 0 and y > 0 then
ct
xy > 0 since the product of two
= (2k + 1)2 + 2(k + 1) + 1 positive numbers is positive.
= 4k2 + 4k + 1 + 2k + 2 + 1 (Q ; P) If xy > 0, then it may not
re
−1 < 0.
= 2(2k2 + 3k + 1) + 1,
d These statements are equivalent.
is clearly odd.
c
306
(⇐) If n is even then n = 2k. Therefore,
n + 2 = 2k + 2 n3 = (2k)3
= 2(k + 1), = 8k3
so that n + 2 is even. = 2(4k3 )
(⇐) If n + 2 is even then, n + 2 = 2k,
where k ∈ Z. Therefore, is even.
s
7 (⇒) Suppose that n is odd. Then
f
n + 1 = 2k − 1
n = 2m + 1, for some m ∈ Z. Now either
oo
= 2k − 2 + 1 m is even or m is odd. If m is even, then
= 2(k − 1) + 1 m = 2k so that
pr
so that n + 1 is odd. n = 2m + 1
= 2(2k) + 1
5 (⇒) Suppose that n2 − 4 is prime. Since = 4k + 1.
ed
as required. If m is odd then m = 2q + 1
n2 − 4 = (n − 2)(n + 2)
so that
ct
n = 2m + 1
expresses n2 − 4 as the product of two
numbers, either n − 2 = 1 or n + 2 = 1. = 2(2q + 1) + 1
re
= 4(q + 1) − 1
n −4=3 −4=5
2 2
= 4k − 1, where k = q + 1,
is prime.
c
as required.
(⇐) If n = 4k ± 1 then either n = 4k + 1
un
307
n = 4k − 1, then b (⇐) We will prove this in the
n = 4k − 1 contrapositive. Suppose that m − n
were odd. Then either m is odd and n
= 4k − 2 + 1
is even or visa versa.
= 2(2k − 1) + 1 Case 1 - If m is odd and n is even
= 2m + 1, where m = 2k − 1, The expression m2 + mn + n2 is of the
form,
odd + even + even = odd.
s
is odd, as required.
Case 2 - m is even and n is odd
f
The expression m2 + mn + n2 is of the
oo
8 (⇒) Suppose that,
form,
(x + y)2 = x2 + y2
even + even + odd = odd.
x2 + 2xy + y2 = x2 + y2
In both instances, the expression
pr
2xy = 0
m2 + mn + n2 is odd. Therefore,
xy = 0
m3 − n3 = (m − n)(m2 + mn + n2 )
Therefore, x = 0 or y = 0.
ed is the product of two odd numbers,
(⇐) Suppose that x = 0 or y = 0. We
can assume that x = 0. Then and will therefore be odd.
(x + y)2 = (0 + y)2
ct
10 We first note that any integer n can be
= y2
written in the form n = 100x + y where
= 02 + y2 x, y ∈ Z and y is the number formed
re
=m3 − n3 . ⇔y is divisible by 4.
308
Solutions to Exercise 8E
1 a If we let n = 31 it is clear that and since each factor is greater than
2n2 − 4n + 31 = 2 × 312 − 4 × 31 + 31 1, the number 9n2 + 5n + 6 is not a
prime number.
is divisible by 31 and so cannot be
prime. c Negation: For all x ∈ R, we have
2 + x2 , 1 − x2
b Let x = 1 and y = −1 so that
Proof: Suppose that 2 + x2 = 1 − x2 .
s
(x + y)2 = (1 + (−1))2 = 0, Rearranging the equation gives,
f
while, 2 + x2 = 1 − x2
oo
x2 + y2 = 12 + (−1)2 = 1 + 1 = 2, 2x2 = −1
1 1
c If x = , then, x2 = − ,
2 2
pr
1 1 which is impossible since x2 ≥ 0.
x2 = < = x.
4 2
√ √
d If n = 3 then, 3 a Let a = 2 and b = 2. Then
ed
n3 − n = 27 − 3 = 24 clearly each of a and b are irrational,
although ab = 2 is not.
is even, although 3 is not.
√ √
b Let a = 2 and b = − 2. Then
e If m = n = 1 then m + n = 2 while
ct
clearly each of a and b are irrational,
mn = 1.
although a + b = 0 is not.
f Since 6 divides 2 × 3 = 6 but 6 does
re
√ √
c Let a = 2 and b = 2. Then
not divide 2 or 3, the statement is
clearly each of a and b are irrational,
false. a
although = 1 is not.
or
b
2 a Negation: For all n ∈ N, the number
9n2 − 1 is not a prime number. 4 a If a is divisible by 4 then a = 4k for
c
309
a − b = 3k for some k ∈ Z. Therefore, 16 + 9 = 25, 15 + 10 = 25
14 + 11 = 25, 13 + 12 = 25
a2 − b2 = (a − b)(a + b) = 3k(a + b)
1 + 8 = 9, 2 + 7 = 9,
is divisible by 3. 4 + 5 = 9, 3 + 6 = 9.
s
2 − 1 = 1 is not. 11 5
f
10 6
oo
9 7
6 a This statement is not true since for all 8 1
a, b ∈ R, 7 2, 9
6 3, 10
pr
a2 − 2ab + b2 = (a − b)2 ≥ 0 > −1.
5 4
b This statement is not true since for all 4 5
x ∈ R, we have, 3 1, 6
ed 2 7
x2 − 4x + 5 1 3, 8
=x2 − 4x + 4 − 4 + 5 Notice that the numbers 2 and 9
must be paired with 7. Therefore,
=(x − 2)2 + 1
ct
one cannot pair all numbers in the
≥1 required fashion.
3
re
> .
4
8 If we let x = c, then
f (c) = ac2 + bc + c = c(ac + b + 1)
or
310
Solutions to Exercise 8F
1 a P(n) If n = 1 then
n(n + 1)
1 + 2 + ··· + n = LHS = 1 + x
2
P(1) and
If n = 1 then (1 − x2 ) (1 − x)(1 + x)
RHS = = = 1 + x.
LHS = 1 1−x 1−x
s
Therefore P(1) is true.
and
f
1(1 + 1) P(k)
RHS = = 1.
oo
2 Assume that P(k) is true so that
Therefore P(1) is true.
1 − xk+1
P(k) 1 + x + x2 + · · · + xk = . (1)
1−x
pr
Assume that P(k) is true so that
P(k + 1)
k(k + 1)
1 + 2 + ··· + k = . (1)
2 LHS of P(k + 1)
P(k + 1) =1 + x + x2 + · · · + xk + xk+1
ed
LHS of P(k + 1) 1 − xk+1
= + xk+1 (by (1))
=1 + 2 + · · · + k + (k + 1) 1−x
1 − xk+1 xk+1 (1 − x)
k(k + 1) = +
ct
= + (k + 1) (by (1)) 1−x 1−x
2
k(k + 1) 2(k + 1) 1 − x + x (1 − x)
k+1 k+1
= + =
re
2 2 1−x
k(k + 1) + 2(k + 1) 1 − x + xk+1 − xk+2
k+1
= =
2 1−x
(k + 1)(k + 2)
or
k+2
1−x
= =
2 1−x
(k + 1)((k + 1) + 1) 1 − x(k+1)+1
= =
c
2 1−x
=RHS of P(k + 1) =RHS of P(k + 1)
un
b P(n) c P(n)
1 − xn+1 n(n + 1)(2n + 1)
1 + x + x2 + · · · + xn = 12 + 22 + · · · + n2 =
1−x 6
P(1) P(1)
311
If n = 1 then If n = 1 then
LHS = 12 − 1 LHS = 1 × 2 = 2
and and
1(1 + 1)(2 + 1) 1×2×3
RHS = = 1. RHS = = 2.
6 3
Therefore P(1) is true. Therefore P(1) is true.
P(k) P(k)
Assume that P(k) is true so that Assume that P(k) is true so that
s
k(k + 1)(k + 2)
k(k + 1)(2k + 1) 1 · 2 + · · · + k · (k + 1) = . (1)
12 + 22 + · · · + k2 = .
f
(1) 3
6
P(k + 1)
oo
P(k + 1)
LHS of P(k + 1)
LHS of P(k + 1)
=1 · 2 + · · · + k · (k + 1) + (k + 1) · (k + 2)
=12 + 22 + · · · + k2 + (k + 1)2
pr
k(k + 1)(k + 2)
k(k + 1)(2k + 1) = + (k + 1)(k + 2) (by (1))
= + (k + 1)2 (by (1)) 3
6
k(k + 1)(k + 2) 3(k + 1)(k + 2)
k(k + 1)(2k + 1) 6(k + 1)2 = +
= + 3 3
ed
6 6 k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 3(k + 1)(k + 2)
k(k + 1)(2k + 1) + 6(k + 1)2 =
= 3
6 (k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3)
(k + 1)(k(2k + 1) + 6(k + 1)) =
ct
= 3
6 (k + 1)((k + 1) + 1)((k + 1) + 2)
(k + 1)(2k + k + 6k + 6)
2 =
= 3
re
6 =RHS of P(k + 1)
(k + 1)(2k + 7k + 6)
2
Therefore P(k + 1) is true.
=
6
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N
or
(k + 1)(k + 2)(2k + 3)
= by the principle of mathematical
6
induction.
(k + 1)((k + 1) + 1)(2(k + 1) + 1)
=
c
6 e P(n)
=RHS of P(k + 1)
un
1 1
Therefore P(k + 1) is true. + ··· + =
1·3 (2n − 1)(2n + 1)
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N n
by the principle of mathematical 2n + 1
induction. P(1)
If n = 1 then
d P(n) 1 1
LHS = =
n(n + 1)(n + 2) 1×3 3
1 · 2 + · · · + n · (n + 1) = and
3 1 1
P(1) RHS = = .
2×1+1 3
312
Therefore P(1) is true. and
2+1 3
P(k) RHS = = .
2×2 4
Assume that P(k) is true so that Therefore P(2) is true.
1 1 k P(k)
+· · ·+ = . (1)
1·3 (2k − 1)(2k + 1) 2k + 1 Assume that P(k) is true so that
k+1
! !
P(k + 1) 1 1
1 − 2 ··· 1 − 2 =
2 k 2k
LHS of P(k + 1)
s
P(k + 1)
1 1
f
= + + ··· LHS of P(k + 1)
1·3 3·5
oo
1 1 1
!
1
!
1
!
+ + = 1 − 2 ··· 1 − 2 1 −
(2k − 1)(2k + 1) (2k + 1)(2k + 3) 2 k (k + 1)2
k 1 k+1
!
= + (by (1)) =
1
2k + 1 (2k + 1)(2k + 3)
pr
1− (by (1))
2k (k + 1)2
k(2k + 3) 1
= + k + 1 (k + 1)2
!
1
(2k + 1)(2k + 3) (2k + 1)(2k + 3) = −
2k (k + 1)2 (k + 1)2
k(2k + 3) + 1
= k + 1 (k + 1)2 − 1
ed !
(2k + 1)(2k + 3) =
2k (k + 1)2
2k2 + 3k + 1
= (k + 1)(k2 + 2k)
(2k + 1)(2k + 3) =
(2k + 1)(k + 1) 2k(k + 1)2
ct
= k(k + 1)(k + 2)
(2k + 1)(2k + 3) =
k+1 2k(k + 1)2
=
re
(2k + 3) (k + 2)
=
k+1 2(k + 1)
= (k + 1) + 1
(2(k + 1) + 1) =
or
2(k + 1)
=RHS of P(k + 1)
Therefore P(k + 1) is true. =RHS of P(k + 1)
Therefore P(k + 1) is true.
c
313
is divisible by 10. Therefore P(1) is 32(k+1) + 7 = 32k+2 + 7
true. = 32k × 32 + 7
P(k)
= (8m − 7) × 9 + 7 (by (1))
Assume that P(k) is true so that
= 72m − 63 + 7
s
for some k ∈ Z.
is true.
P(k + 1)
f
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N
oo
11k+1 − 1 = 11 × 11k − 1
by the principle of mathematical
= 11 × (10m + 1) − 1 (by (1)) induction.
= 110m + 11 − 1
c P(n)
pr
= 110m + 10
7 − 3n is divisible by 4
n
= 10(11m + 1) P(1)
is divisible by 10. Therefore P(k + 1)
If n = 1 then
ed
is true.
71 − 31 = 7 − 3 = 4
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N
by the principle of mathematical is divisible by 4. Therefore P(1) is
induction. true.
ct
P(k)
b P(n) Assume that P(k) is true so that
re
3 + 7 is divisible by 8
2n
7k − 3k = 4m (1)
P(1)
for some m ∈ Z.
If n = 1 then
or
P(k + 1)
7k+1 − 3k+1
32×1 + 7 = 9 + 7 = 16 = 2 × 8
=7 × 7k − 3k+1
c
true. =28m + 7 × 3k − 3 × 3k
P(k) =28m + 4 × 3k
Assume that P(k) is true so that
=4(7m + 3k )
is divisible by 4. Therefore P(k + 1)
32k + 7 = 8m (1) is true.
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N
for some k ∈ Z. by the principle of mathematical
P(k + 1) induction.
314
d P(n) We have to show that
5n + 6 × 7n + 1 is divisible by 4 4k+1 > 10 × 2k+1 .
P(1) LHS of P(k + 1) = 4k+1
If n = 1 then = 4 × 4k
51 + 6 × 71 + 1 = 48 = 4 × 12 > 4 × 10 × 2k (by (1))
is divisible by 4. Therefore P(1) is = 40 × 2k (as 10 > 2)
true.
= 20 × 2k+1
s
P(k)
> 10 × 2k+1
f
Assume that P(k) is true so that
oo
5k + 6 × 7k + 1 = 4m (1) = RHS of P(k + 1)
Therefore P(k + 1) is true.
for some k ∈ Z.
Since P(5) is true and P(k + 1) is true
P(k + 1)
whenever P(k) is true, P(n) is true for
pr
5k+1 + 6 × 7k+1 + 1 all integers n ≥ 4 by the principle of
=5 × 5k + 6 × 7 × 7k + 1 mathematical induction.
=5 × (4m − 6 × 7k − 1) + 42 × 7k+1 b P(n)
ed
=20m − 30 × 7 − 5 + 42 × 7 + 1
k k
3n > 5 × 2n where n ≥ 5
=20m + 12 × 7k − 4 P(5)
=4(5m + 3 × 7k − 1) If n = 5 then
ct
is divisible by 4. Therefore P(k + 1) LHS = 35 = 243 and RHS = 5 × 25 = 160.
is true. Since LHS > RHS, P(5) is true.
re
P(4)
LHS of P(k + 1) = 3k+1
If n = 4 then
LHS = 44 = 256 and RHS = 10 × 24 = 160. = 3 × 3k
315
Therefore P(k + 1) is true. If n = 4 then
Since P(5) is true and P(k + 1) is true LHS = 4! = 24 and RHS = 24 = 16.
whenever P(k) is true, P(n) is true for
all integers n ≥ 5 by the principle of Since LHS > RHS, P(4) is true.
mathematical induction. P(k)
Assume that P(k) is true so that
c P(n)
k! > 2k where k ≥ 4. (1)
2n > 2n where n ≥ 3
s
P(3) P(k + 1)
f
If n = 3 then We have to show that
oo
LHS = 23 = 8 and RHS = 2 × 3 = 6. (k + 1)! > 2k+1 .
pr
P(k)
Assume that P(k) is true so that > (k + 1) × 2k (by (1))
an = 2n + 1
= 2k + 2k
P(1)
≥ 2k + 2 (as 2k ≥ 2) If n = 1 then
c
= RHS of P(k + 1)
Since LHS = RHS, P(1) is true.
Therefore P(k + 1) is true.
P(k)
Therefore P(n) is true for all
Assume that P(k) is true so that
integers n ≥ 3 by the principle of
mathematical induction. ak = 2k + 1. (1)
d P(n) P(k + 1)
n! > 2n where n ≥ 4 We have to show that
P(4) ak+1 = 2k+1 + 1.
316
LHS of P(k + 1) = ak+1 an = 2n + n
= 2ak − 1 (by definition) P(1)
= 2(2k + 1) − 1 (by (1)) If n = 1 then
s
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N ak = 2k + k. (1)
f
by the principle of mathematical P(k + 1)
oo
induction.
We have to show that
b P(n) ak+1 = 2k+1 + k + 1.
an = 5n − 1
pr
LHS of P(k + 1) = ak+1
P(1) = 2ak − k + 1 (by definition)
If n = 1 then
= 2(2k + k) − k + 1 (by (1))
LHS = a1 = 4 and RHS = 5 − 1 = 4.
1
ed
= 2k+1 + 2k − k + 1
Since LHS = RHS, P(1) is true.
= 2k+1 + k + 1
P(k)
= RHS of P(k + 1)
ct
Assume that P(k) is true so that
Therefore P(k + 1) is true.
ak = 5k − 4. (1)
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N
P(k + 1)
re
= 5k+1 − 5 + 4
= 5k+1 − 1 31 = 3
317
3k+1 = 3 × 3k As this is the product of two consec-
= 3 × (2m + 1) (by (1)) utive numbers, one of them must be
even, so that the product will also be
= 6m + 3 even.
= 6m + 2 + 1
= 2(3m + 1) + 1 7 a P(n)
is odd, so that P(k + 1) is true. n3 − n is divisible by 3, where n ∈ N.
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N by
s
P(1)
the principle of mathematical induction.
If n = 1 then
f
oo
13 − 1 = 0
6 a P(n)
is divisible by 3. Therefore, P(1) is
n2 − n is even, where n ∈ N. true.
P(1)
pr
P(k)
If n = 1 then Assume that P(k) is true so that k3 − k
12 − ×1 = 0 is divisible by 3. Therefore,
is even. Therefore, P(1) is true. k3 − k = 3m (1)
ed
P(k) for some m ∈ Z.
Assume that P(k) is true so that k2 − k P(k + 1)
is even. Therefore, We have to show that (k + 1)3 − (k + 1)
ct
k2 − k = 2m (1) is divisible by 3.
(k + 1)3 − (k + 1)
for some m ∈ Z.
re
=k3 + 3k2 + 3k + 1 − k − 1
P(k + 1)
=k3 − k + 3k2 + 3k
(k + 1)2 − (k + 1)
or
=(k3 − k) + 3k2 + 3k
=k2 + 2k + 1 − k − 1
=3m + 3k2 + 3k (by (1))
=k2 + k
=3(m + k2 + k)
c
=(k2 − k) + 2k
Since this is divisible by 3, P(k + 1) is
un
318
must be divisible by 3, so that the f1 + f2 + · · · + fn = fn+2 − 1
product will also be divisible by 3. P(1)
If n = 1 then
n 1 2 3 4 5 LHS = f1 = 1
8 a
an 9 99 999 9999 99999
and
b We claim that an = 10 − 1. n
RHS = f3 − 1 = 2 − 1 = 1.
Since LHS = RHS, P(1) is true.
s
c P(n)
an = 10n − 1 P(k)
f
Assume that P(k) is true so that
oo
P(1)
If n = 1, then f1 + f2 + · · · + fk = fk+2 − 1. (1)
pr
Since LHS = RHS, P(1) is true.
P(k) = fk+2 − 1 + fk+1 (by (1))
Assume that P(k) is true so that = fk+1 + fk+2 − 1
= fk+3 − 1
ed
ak = 10k − 1. (1) (by definition)
P(k + 1) = f(k+1)+2 − 1
We have to show that = RHS of P(k + 1)
ct
ak+1 = 10k+1 − 1. Therefore P(k + 1) is true.
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N
LHS = ak+1
by the principle of mathematical
re
= 10k+1 − 10 + 9
f1 + f3 = 1 + 2 = 3
= 10k+1 − 1 f1 + f3 + f5 = 3 + 5 = 8
= RHS f1 + f3 + f5 + f7 = 8 + 13 = 21
c
319
and f3(k+1) = f3k+3
= f3k+2 + f3k+1 (by definition)
RHS = f2 − 1 = 2 − 1 = 1.
= f3k+1 + f3k + f3k+1
s
f1 + f3 + · · · + f2k−1 = f2k . (1) Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N
f
by the principle of mathematical
oo
P(k + 1) induction.
LHS = f1 + f3 + · · · + f2k−1 + f2k+1
= f2k + f2k+1 (by (1)) 10 P(n)
pr
= f2k+2 (by definition) Since we’re only interested in odd
numbers our proposition is:
= f2(k+1)
42n−1 + 52n−1 is divisible by 9, where
= RHS
ed
n ∈ N.
Therefore P(k + 1) is true. P(1)
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N If n = 1 then
by the principle of mathematical
ct
induction.
41 + 51 = 9
f P(n)
re
f3 = 2
42k−1 + 52k−1 = 9m (1)
c
un
320
42k+1 + 52k+1 and n enemies (in any order) without
=42 × 42k−1 + 52 × 52k−1 going into debt.
P(1)
=16 × (9m − 52k−1 ) + 25 × 52k−1 (by (1))
If n = 1, there is one friend and one
=144m − 16 × 52k−1 + 25 × 52k−1
enemy on the circumference of a circle.
=144m + 9 × 52k−1 Start your journey at the friend, receive
=9(16 + 52k−1 ) $1, then walk around to the enemy and
Since this is divisible by 9, we’ve shown lose $1. At no point will you be in debt,
s
that P(k + 1) is true. so P(1) is true.
f
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N by P(k)
oo
the principle of mathematical induction. Assume that P(k) is true. This means
that it is possible to walk around a circle
with k friends and k enemies (in any
11 P(n)
pr
order) without going into debt, provided
A set of numbers S with n numbers has you start at the correct point.
a largest element.
P(k + 1)
P(1)
Suppose there are k + 1 friends and k + 1
ed
If n = 1, then set S has just one element. enemies located on the circumference of
This single element is clearly the largest the circle, in any order. Select a friend
element in the set. whose next neighbour is an enemy
ct
P(k) (going clockwise), and remove these
Assume that P(k) is true. This means two people. As there are now k friends
that a set of numbers S with k numbers and k enemies, it is possible to walk
re
13 P(n)
12 P(n)
Every integer j such that 2 ≤ j ≤ n is
It is possible to walk around a circle
divisible by some prime.
whose circumference includes n friends
321
P(2) P(k)
If n = 2, then j = 2 is clearly divisible Assume that P(k) is true. This means
by a prime, namely itself. Therefore that we can obtain a satisfactory
P(2) is true. colouring if there are k lines drawn.
P(k) P(k + 1)
Assume that P(k) is true. Therefore, Now suppose that there are k + 1 lines
every integer j such that 2 ≤ j ≤ k is drawn. Select one of the lines, and
divisible by some prime. remove it. There are now k lines, and
s
P(k + 1) the resulting regions have a satisfactory
f
We need to show that integer j such colouring since we assumed P(k) is true.
oo
that 2 ≤ j ≤ k + 1 is divisible by some Now add the removed line. This will
prime. By the induction assumption, we divide some regions into into two new
already know that every j with 2 ≤ j ≤ k regions with the same colour, so this is
is divisible by some prime. We need not a satisfactory colouring.
pr
only prove that k + 1 is divisible by a
prime. If k + 1 is a prime number, then
we are finished. Otherwise we can find
integers a and b such that k + 1 = ab
ed
and 2 ≤ a ≤ k and 2 ≤ b ≤ k. By the
induction assumption, the number a
will be divisible by some prime number.
ct
Therefore k + 1 is divisible by some
However, if we switch each colour
prime number.
on one side of the line we obtain a
re
P(n)
un
322
Solutions to Technology-free questions
√3 p
1 a Let the 3 consecutive integers be that 6= where p, q ∈ Z. We
q
n, n + 1 and n + 2. Then, can assume that p and q have no
n + (n + 1) + (n + 2) = 3n + 3 common factors (or else they could
= 3(n + 1) be cancelled). Then,
p3 = 6q3 (1)
⇒ p3 is divisible by 2
s
is divisible by 3.
f
⇒ p is divisible by 2
b This statement is not true. For
oo
example, 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10 is not ⇒ p = 2k for some k ∈ N
divisible by 4 ⇒ (2k)3 = 6q3 (substitituting into (1))
⇒ 8k3 = 6q3
pr
2 (Method 1) If n is even then n = 2k, for ⇒ 4k2 = 3q2
some k ∈ Z. Therefore,
⇒ q2 is divisible by 2
n − 3n + 1 = (2k) − 2(2k) + 1
2 2
⇒ q is divisible by 2.
= 4k2 − 4k + 1
ed
So p and q are both divisible by 2,
= 2(2k2 − 2k) + 1
which contradicts the fact that they
have no factors in common.
ct
is odd.
(Method 2) If n is even then n2 − 3n + 1
4 a Suppose n is the first of three
is of the form
re
n + 1 = 3k + 2
b If n is odd then n = 2k + 1, for some n + 2 = 3k + 3 = 3(k + 1)
un
k ∈ Z. Therefore,
so that the third number is divisible
n3 = (2k + 1)3 by 3. In the second case,
= 8k3 + 12k2 + 6k + 1 n = 3k + 2
= 2(4k + 6k + 3k) + 1
3 2
n + 1 = 3k + 3 = 3(k + 1)
is odd. n + 2 = 3k + 4
c This will be a proof
√3 by contradic- so that the second number is divisible
tion. Suppose 6 is rational so by 3.
323
b The expression can be readily b (⇒)
factorised so that √ √ √
[t] x + y = x + y
√
n3 + 3n2 + 2n = n(n2 + 3n + 2) ⇒ x+y= x+ y
√ 2
= n(n + 1)(n + 2) √
⇒ x + y = x + xy + y
s
must be divisible by 3, the product
⇒ x = 0 or y = 0
f
must also be divisible by 3.
oo
(⇐) Suppose that x = 0 or y = 0. We
5 a if m and n are divisible by d then can assume that x = 0. Then
m = pd and n = qd for some p, q ∈ Z. √
x+y= y+0
p
pr
Therefore, √
= y
√ √
m − n = pd − qd = y+ 0
√ √
= d(p − q) = y + x,
ed
is divisible by d. as required.
is of the form
c We know that any factor of 1002 and
999 must also divide 1002 − 999 = 3. odd + odd + even = even.
c
324
Therefore, is divisible by 10. Therefore P(k + 1)
a+c a is true.
−
b+d b Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N
b(a + c) a(b + d)
= − by the principle of mathematical
b(b + d) b(b + d)
induction.
b(a + c) − a(b + d)
=
b(b + d) b P(n)
ab + bc − ab − ad 12 + 32 + · · · + (2n − 1)2 =
=
b(b + d) n(2n − 1)(2n + 1)
s
bc − ad 3
f
=
b(b + d) P(1)
oo
>0 If n = 1 then LHS= 12 = 1and
1(2 × 1 − 1)(2 × 1 + 1)
since bc > ad. This implies that RHS = = 1.
3
a+c a Therefore P(1) is true.
pr
> .
b+d b P(k)
Similarly, we can show that
Assume that P(k) is true so that
a+c c
< . k(2k − 1)(2k + 1)
b+d d 12 + 32 + · · · + (2k − 1)2 = . (1)
ed
3
P(k + 1)
9 a P(n)
LHS of P(k + 1)
6n + 4 is divisible by 10
ct
=12 + 32 + · · · + (2k − 1)2 + (2k + 1)2
P(1)
k(2k − 1)(2k + 1)
If n = 1 then = + (2k + 1)2 (by (1))
re
3
61 + 4 = 10 k(2k − 1)(2k + 1) 3(2k + 1)2
= +
is divisible by 10. Therefore P(1) is 3 3
or
3
6k + 4 = 10m (1) (2k + 1)(2k − k + 6k + 3)
2
un
=
for some m ∈ Z. 3
(2k + 1)(2k + 3)(k + 1)
P(k + 1) =
3
6k+1 + 4 = 6 × 6k + 4 (k + 1)(2k + 1)(2k + 3)
=
= 6 × (10m − 4) + 4 (by (1)) 3
(k + 1)(2(k + 1) − 1)(2(k + 1) + 1)
= 60m − 24 + 4 =
3
= 60m − 20 × 3k =RHS of P(k + 1)
= 10(6m − 2) Therefore P(k + 1) is true.
325
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N induction.
by the principle of mathematical
f s
oo
pr
ed
ct
re
or
c
un
326
Solutions to multiple-choice questions
1 E The expression m − 3n is of the form This means that n is divisible by
even − odd = odd. n − 1, which is only possible if n = 2
or n = 0. If n = 0, then m = 0. If
2 E If m is divisible by 6 and n is n = 2, then m = 2. Therefore there
divisible by 15 then m = 6p and are only two solutions, (0, 0) and
n = 15q for p, q ∈ Z. Therefore, (2, 2).
s
m × n = 90pq
6 D The only statement that is true
f
m + n = 6p + 15q = 3(2p + 5q) for all real numbers a, b and
oo
From these two expressions, it c is D. Counterexamples can
should be clear that A,B,C and D be found for each of the other
are true, while E might be false. For expressions, as shown below.
1 1
example, if m = 6 and n = 15 then <
pr
A
3 2
m + n = 21 is not divisible by 15.
1 1
3 C We obtain the contrapositive by B >
2 −1
ed
switching P and Q and negating
both. Therefore, the contrapositive C 3 × −1 < 2 × −1
will be
not Q ⇒ not P E 12 < (−2)2
ct
. 7 D As n is the product of 3 consecutive
integers, one of which will be
re
5 C If m + n = mn then
8 C Each of the statements is true except
un
n = mn − m
the third. In this instance, 1 + 3 is
n = m(n − 1) even, although 1 and 3 are not even.
327
Solutions to extended-response questions
1 a The number of dots can be calculated two ways, either by addition,
(1 + 2 + 3 + 4) + (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)
or by multiplication,
4 × 5.
Equating these two expressions gives,
s
(1 + 2 + 3 + 4) + (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) = 4 × 5
f
2(1 + 2 + 3 + 4) = 4 × 5
oo
4×5
1+2+3+4=
2
The argument obviously generalises to more dots, giving equation (1).
pr
b We have,
99 × 100
1 + 2 · · · + 99 =
2
= 99 × 50,
ed
which is divisible by 99.
c Suppose that m is the first number, so that the n connective numbers are
ct
m, m + 1, . . . , m + n − 1.
Then,
re
m + (m + 1) + (m + 2) + · · · + (m + n − 1)
= n × m + (1 + 2 + · · · (n − 1))
or
(n − 1)n
= nm +
2
!
n−1
=n m+
c
2
n−1
un
Since n is odd, n − 1 is even. This means that is an integer. Therefore, the term
2
in brackets is an integer, which means the expression is divisible by n.
d Since
n(n + 1)
1 + 2 + ··· + n = ,
2
we need to prove the following statement:
P(n)
n2 (n + 1)2
13 + 23 + · · · + n3 =
4
328
P(1)
If n = 1 then
LHS = 13 = 1
and
12 (1 + 1)2
RHS = = 1.
4
Therefore P(1) is true.
P(k)
s
Assume that P(k) is true so that
f
k2 (k + 1)2
13 + 23 + · · · + k3 = .
oo
(1)
4
P(k + 1)
pr
LHS of P(k + 1)
=13 + 23 + · · · + k3 + (k + 1)3
k2 (k + 1)2
= + (k + 1)3 (by (1))
ed
4
k2 (k + 1)2 4(k + 1)3
= +
4 4
k (k + 1) + 4(k + 1)3
ct
2 2
=
4
(k + 1) (k + 4(k + 1))
2 2
=
re
4
(k + 1) (k + 4k + 4)
2 2
=
4
or
(k + 1) (k + 2)2
2
=
4
(k + 1) ((k + 1) + 1)2
2
c
=
4
un
=RHS of P(k + 1)
Therefore P(k + 1) is true.
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N by the principle of mathematical induction.
2 a The first number is divisible by 2, the second by 3, the third by 4 and so on. As each
number has a factor greater than 1, each is a composite number. Therefore this is a
sequence of 9 consecutive composite numbers.
329
b We consider the this sequence of 10 consecutive numbers,
11! + 2, 11! + 3, . . . , 11! + 11.
The first number is divisible by 2, the second by 3 and so on. Therefore as each
number has a factor greater than 1, each is a composite number.
3 a Since (a, b, c) is a Pythagorean triple, we know that a2 + b2 = c2 . Then (na, nb, nc) is
also a Pythagorean triple since,
(na)2 + (nb)2 = n2 a2 + n2 b2
s
= n2 (a2 + b2 )
f
oo
= n2 (c2 )
= (nc)2 ,
as required.
pr
b Suppose that (n, n + 1, n + 2) is a Pythagorean triple. Then
n2 + (n + 1)2 = (n + 2)2
n2 + n2 + 2n + 1 = n2 + 4n + 4
ed
n2 − 2n − 3 = 0
(n − 3)(n + 1) = 0
ct
n = 3, −1.
However, since n > 0, we obtain only one solution, n = 3, which corresponds to the
re
c Suppose some triple (a, b, c) contained the number 1. Then clearly, 1 will be the
smallest number. Therefore, we can suppose that
or
12 + b2 = c2
c2 − b2 = 1
c
(c − b)(c + b) = 1
un
330
suppose that
22 + b2 = c2
c2 − b2 = 4
(c − b)(c + b) = 4
Since the only divisors of 4 are 1, 2 and 4, we must have
c+b=4
c−b=1
f s
3 5
⇒ b = ,c =
oo
2 2
or
c+b=2
c−b=2
pr
⇒ b = 0, c = 2
In both instances, we have a contradiction since b must be a positive integer.
ed
4 a (Case 1) If a = 3k + 1 then
a2 = (3k + 1)2
= 9k2 + 6k + 1
ct
= 3(3k2 + 2k) + 1
leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 3.
re
(Case 2) If a = 3k + 2 then
a2 = (3k + 2)2
or
= 9k2 + 12k + 4
= 9k2 + 12k + 3 + 1
= 3(3k2 + 4k + 1) + 1
c
b Suppose by way of contradiction that neither a nor b are divisible by 3. Then using
the previous question, each of a2 and b2 leave a remainder of 1 when divided by 3.
Therefore a2 = 3k + 1 and b2 = 3m + 1, for some k, m ∈ Z. Therefore,
c2 = a2 + b2
= 3k + 1 + 3m + 1
= 3(k + m) + 2.
This means that c2 leaves a remainder of 2 when divided by 3, which is not possible.
331
5 a P(n)
n2 + n is divisible by 2, where n ∈ Z.
P(1)
If n = 1 then 12 + 1 = 2 is divisible by 2. Therefore P(1) is true.
P(k)
Assume that P(k) is true so that
k2 + k = 2m (1)
s
for some m ∈ Z.
f
P(k + 1)
oo
Letting n = k + 1 we have,
(k + 1)2 + (k + 1)
=k2 + 2k + 1 + k + 1
pr
=k2 + 3k + 2
=(k2 + k) + (2k + 2)
=2m + 2(k + 1) (by (1))
ed
=2(m + k + 1)
is divisible by 2. Therefore P(k + 1) is true.
ct
Therefore P(n) is true for all n ∈ N by the principle of mathematical induction.
b Since
re
n2 + n = n(n + 1)
is the product of two consecutive integers, one of them must be even. Therefore the
product will also be even.
or
= 4k2 + 4k + 1 − 1
un
= 4k2 + 4k
= 4k(k + 1)
= 4 × 2k (since the product of consecutive integers is even)
= 8k
as required.
332
is divisible by 8.
s
b Suppose 101 could be written as the sum of two prime numbers. Then one of these
primes must be 2, since all other pairs of primes have an even sum. Therefore
f
101 = 2 + 99, however 99 is not prime.
oo
c There are many possibilities. For example, 7 + 11 + 83 = 101.
d Consider any odd integer n greater than 5. Then n − 3 will be an even number greater
pr
than 2. If the Goldbach Conjecture is true, then n − 3 is the sum of two primes, say p
and q. Then n = 3 + p + q, as required.
8 a We have,
ed
1 1 n n−1
− = −
n − 1 n n(n − 1) n(n − 1)
n − (n − 1)
=
ct
n(n − 1)
n−n+1
=
n(n − 1)
re
1
= .
n(n − 1)
or
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
= − + − + − + ··· + − + −
un
333
d Since k2 > k(k − 1) for all k ∈ N,
1 1 1 1
2
+ 2 + 2 ··· + 2
1 2 3 n
!
1 1 1 1
= 2 + 2 + 2 ··· + 2
1 2 3 n
!
1 1 1 1
< 2+ + ··· +
1 2×1 3×2 n(n − 1)
1 1
= 2 +1−
s
1 n
f
1
=2 −
oo
n
<2,
as required.
pr
9 a We have,
x+y √ a2 + b2 √ 2 2
− xy = − ab
2 2
a2 + b2
ed
= − ab
2
a2 + b2 2ab
= −
2 2
ct
a − 2ab + b2
2
=
2
(a − b)2
re
=
2
≥ 0.
or
r
1 1
a+ ≥2 a·
un
a a
√
=2 1
= 2.
as required.
334
ii Using the above inequality three times, we obtain,
√ √ √
(a + b)(b + c)(c + a) ≥ 2 ab × 2 bc × 2 ca
√ √ √
= 8( a)2 ( b)2 ( c)2
= 8abc,
as required.
s
a2 b2 b2 c2 a2 c2
! ! !
a +b +c =
2 2 2
+ + + + +
f
2 2 2 2 2 2
oo
a2 + b2 b2 + c2 a2 + c2
= + +
2 2 2
√ √ √
≥ a2 b2 + b2 c2 + a2 c2
pr
= ab + bc + ac,
as required.
c If a rectangle has length x and width y then its perimeter will be 2x + 2y. A square
ed
with the same perimeter will have side length,
2x + 2y x + y
= .
4 2
Therefore,
ct
x + y 2
A(square) = ≥ xy = A(rectangle).
2
re
⇒ This is impossible.
un
case 2
Suppose Kaye is lying
⇒ Jaye is not lying and Elle is not lying
⇒ Kaye is the only liar
case 3
Suppose Elle is lying
⇒ Mina is not lying
⇒ Karl is lying
⇒ There are two liars
⇒ This is impossible.
335
11 First note that the four sentences can be recast as:
s
At most one of these statements can be true, or else we obtain a contradiction. If none
f
of the statements is true, then the last statement is true. This means that at least one
oo
of the statements is true. This also gives a contradiction. Therefore, only one of the
statements is true, that is, the third statement.
pr
1, 2, 4, 8 3, 5, 6, 7
c We first note that if a set can be split then two numbers can’t appear in the same
group as their difference. To see this, if x and y and x − y all belong to the same
or
group then (x − y) + y = x. Let’s now try to split the numbers 1, 2, . . . , 9. Call the
two groups X and Y. We can assume that 1 ∈ X. We now consider four cases for the
groups containing elements 2 and 9.
c
(assumed) 1
(assumed) 2
(assumed) 9
3 (1, 2 ∈ X)
7 (2, 9 ∈ X)
(3, 7 ∈ Y) 4
5 (1, 4 ∈ X)
6 (2, 4 ∈ X)
(5, 6 ∈ Y) 8
336
This doesn’t work, since X is forced to contain the numbers 1, 8 and 9.
(case 2) Suppose 2 ∈ X and 9 ∈ Y
Reason X Y Reason
(assumed) 1
(assumed) 2
9 (assumed)
3 (1, 2 ∈ X)
(3, 9 ∈ Y) 6
s
4 (2, 6 ∈ X)
5 (1, 6 ∈ X)
f
This doesn’t work, since Y is forced to contain the numbers 4, 5 and 9.
oo
(case 3) Suppose 2 ∈ Y and 9 ∈ X
Reason X Y Reason
(assumed) 1
pr
2 (assumed)
(assumed) 9
8 (1, 9 ∈ X)
(2, 8 ∈ Y) 6
ed
3 (6, 8 ∈ X)
(2, 8 ∈ Y) 5 (3, 8 ∈ X)
This doesn’t work, since X is forced to contain the numbers 1, 5 and 6.
(case 4) Suppose 2 ∈ Y and 9 ∈ Y
ct
Reason X Y Reason
(assumed) 1
re
2 (assumed)
9 (assumed)
(2, 9 ∈ Y) 7
or
6 (1, 7 ∈ X)
(2, 8 ∈ Y) 4
3 (4, 7 ∈ X)
c
b Tile E must go into a corner. This is because there are only two other tiles (A and
337
B) that it can go next to. Tile F must also go into a corner. This is because there are
only two other tiles (B and C) that it can go next to.
(Case 1) Tile E and tile F are in different rows
Since tile B must go next to both tiles E and F, this is impossible.
(Case 2) Tile E and tile F are in the same row
Assume tile F is in the top left position.
Then tile E goes in the top right position.
f s
oo
Therefore tile B must go between them.
pr
Tile C must then go beneath tile F and tile A must go beneath tile E. Consequently,
tile D must go beneath tile B. Therefore, there is only one valid orientation of tile D.
ed
ct
This fixes the orientation of tiles A and C.
re
or
Since tile F could have gone into any one of the four corners, there are only four
ways to tile the grid.
c
un
338