Scribd
Upload
6 views

CLO2

Uploaded by

samaira zahoor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views

CLO2

Uploaded by

samaira zahoor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Sharif College of Engineering and Technology, Lahore

Department of Electrical Engineering

Power System Protection


Assignment for CLO2 Attainment
Fall 2023
Instructor: Engr. Samaira Zahoor

CLO2: Analyze the ratings of instrument transformers to ensure reliable operation of


protection system.
Problem Statement: For the distribution transformer, unit-connected generator shown in
Figure determine the value of the secondary resistor that will protect 85% of the winding. You
may assume that a part winding voltage and leakage reactance is proportional to its length.
Consider the system shown in Figure. The distributed generator capacitance
to ground = 0.22 μF/phase; the distributed leads and transformer capacitance to
ground = 0.10 μF/phase; and the surge arrester capacitance = 0.25 μF/phase. Therefore,
the total capacitance = 0.57 μF/phase.

Figure 1: Generator with Transformer Ground

Rubrics for Assessment of Assignment


Mark

Excellent
Criteria Poor Not developed Developing Competent Score
s

Introduction Task not Very little relevant A few background All concepts and All concepts and
performed background concepts and underlying theories are underlying theories
concepts and underlying theories are provided with are properly stated
10 underlying theories provided with some occasional irrelevant with accuracy and
relevance material relevance
0 4 6 8 10
Analysis of Task not Analysis is missing Analysis is vague, Analysis includes most Analysis includes all
problem performed or lacks essential sequence of steps is of the essential details experimental details
details. incorrect and correct and uses relevant in numbered steps and
20 terminology is not terminology with uses correct
used. occasional mistakes terminology
0 5 10 15 20
Results and Task not Results are not Results are shown in Results are shown well Results are clearly
Discussion performed shown in the the required format of in the required format of presented in the
required format of tables, graphs or tables, graphs or figures required format of
tables, graphs or figures but not and an acceptable labeled tables, graphs
figures neither properly interpreted. interpretation is or figures and well
interpreted. Discussion of the provided. Discussion of interpreted.
20
Discussion of the results is not properly the results is well done Discussion of the
results is not done to arrive at to arrive at reasonable results is done
included in the reasonable conclusions. considering all
report. conclusions. aspects to arrive at
valid conclusions.
0 5 10 15 20

You might also like