Resource Allocation in Different Economic Systems
Resource Allocation in Different Economic Systems
PLANNED/COMMAND ECONOMY
An economic system where resources are owned collectively by the state and allocated by the
government is the economy.
Key Features of the Command Economy
Ownership All factors of production are owned and therefore allocated by the
state/government.
Motivation The government's key motivation is maximization of social welfare.
Decision making Centralized decision making where government is the sole decision
maker in terms of what, how and for whom to produce.
Price Prices are determined through the planning system.
Determination
Allocation of There is no price mechanism, as government plans the distribution of
resources resources through the planning mechanism.
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF COMMAND
ECONOMY
Advantages of Command Disadvantages of Command
Economy Economy
The government could take an overall view of The larger and more complex the economy,
the economy and direct resources in the greater the task of collecting the
accordance with specific national goals. information
essential to planning, and the more complex
the plan.
National income could be distributed more If there is no system of prices, planning is
equally. likely to involve inefficient use of resources.
Shortages will occur if consumers decide to
buy more and surpluses will occur if they
decide to buy less.
Unemployment could be avoided if the It is difficult to devise appropriate incentives
government carefully planned the allocation of for workers and managers to be more
resources. productive without a reduction in quality.
The social effects of production and Complete state control over resource
consumption can be taken into account and allocation would involve a considerable loss of
avoided by the government. individual liberty of consumers, producers and
workers.
Government might enforce its plans even if
they were unpopular.
MIXED ECONOMY
In a mixed economy, both the private sector and public sector have a part to play in the
allocation of resources.
Decisions involve an interaction between firms, labour and the government mainly
through the market mechanism.
There is private ownership of most productive resources although there is some public
ownership.
Mixed Economy is an economic system that takes into account the advantages of both,
free market and command economy.
In a mixed economy a government can intervene in markets to correct market failures.
It can organize resources to provide goods and services and can also introduce laws and
a legal system to control harmful activities.
To finance public sector activities, governments levy taxes
PROBLEMS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION
High taxes on profits may reduce enterprise and high taxes on wages can reduce
people’s incentives to work.
Regulations can impose significant costs on firms and as a result they will produce less
goods and services, increase their prices or lower the wages of their workers.
Public sector provision may be inefficient and produce poor quality goods and services
because public sector organizations are not motivated to make profits.
Government spending may be politically motivated instead of aiming to correcting
market failures and improving economic welfare.
Non-rejectable means that the consumer does not have a choice of whether to consume the
commodity or not. An availability of public goods to one person does not infringe upon the right
of others to consume the same product.
Public goods are non-rival and non-excludable.
Non-rival means that consumption of a good or service does not prevent another person from
consuming that good. For example, streetlight is non-rival because if one person uses the light
provided by it, it does not prevent another person from also benefitting.
Non-excludable means that once a good is provided it is impossible to exclude payers from
non-payers of the goods.
Few examples of pure public goods exist. A lighthouse, national defense and traffic lights are
typical examples. If a lighthouse is built and maintained on some island no fisherman can be
excluded from its benefits. If the lighthouse is ‘used’ by one boat the amount of its service
available to other boats is the same (the marginal cost of one more boat using the service is
zero).
A different example of a pure public good is broadcast television and radio. Both public good
properties are satisfied. A broadcast television program is normally available to any household
with a television (a private, separate good). Also, if one person watches the program there is no
less of it available for others to watch.
Interestingly, television and radio broadcasting, despite its public good features, is produced
and offered by private, for-profit companies. This is possible because broadcasters are not
selling the programs but the advertising time, which is both excludable and rival. If the
provision of public goods were left to the market mechanism, there would be a market failure;
this is because of the free rider problem, as these goods are non-rival and non-excludable,
making people to have no incentive to pay for it. The only way these goods are provided, is
through direct provision by the government which is funded through raising tax revenue.
Quasi-public goods
Some goods are purely public (e.g. lighthouse or national defence) and other are to certain
extent also known as quasi-public goods (e.g. public beach or public park). These are the goods
that have some but not all of the characteristics of public goods.
A good example might be a sandy seaside beach. Such a beach is available to all those who
wish to use it. It appears non-excludable. However, it is possible to think of ways of excluding
consumers. Privately owned beaches do this. Equally, the beach is non-rival up to a point. If you
are the first person on a pleasant beach on a warn sunny day, it does very little to diminish your
enjoyment of that beach as a few more people arrive to enjoy the benefits themselves.
However, there may well come a point at which that is no longer the case. As the beach
becomes crowded, space limited and other people’s conversations and music become ever
more audible, enjoyment may perceptibly reduce. Thus, the each has something of the
characteristic of non-rivalry, but not the full characteristic. It is a quasi-public good.
Merit and Demerit Goods
Merit good
Merit goods are a special class of goods that are defined in terms of [external benefits] positive
externalities generated and in terms of information failures involved. If the consumption of a
good creates very significant [External benefits] positive externalities then it is referred to as a
merit good. As a result, it is under provided by the market mechanism. Education and health
care are prime examples which not only have positive effect on people who consume them but
they can benefit others.
Also, individuals may not be aware of the benefits arising from the consumption of the good
because of lack of information as costs occur today but the benefits received come only in the
future (time lags). Government would like all members of society to consume in adequate
quantities independently of their income or even their preferences.
Demerit good
Demerit goods are a special class of goods that are defined in terms of negative externalities
[External cost] generated and in terms of informational failures involved. If the consumption
of a good creates very significant [External cost] negative externalities then the product is
referred to as a demerit good. Alcoholic drinks and tobacco products are good examples.
Not only do they have a negative effect on people who consume them in excessive amounts
but they can also harm others, for example, through passive smoking. Also, individuals may not
be aware of the costs arising from the consumption of the good because of lack of information.
They are unable to stop consuming them because these goods are addictive. It can therefore be
said that consumers of these goods are not the best judges of their own interest. Hence,
governments would like to limit consumption.