UNO MINDA LTD.

Issue Deptt. Prepared Verified Approved

Vendor Quality System Assessment Report
Date of Report Released NA DW DW

Copy to Supplier name with full address 18.06.2024

1 M/S Sharp Auto Pvt Ltd Audit Date

Bhosari MIDC,Pune Supplier Attendant Name with Designation
12.06.2024
1) Avinash pokharkar
2) Ajit Ankushe - QA Head
3) Sandeep KC - Marketing & Developement Head
4)Yuraj - PPC Head Auditor's Name & Designation
5) Ashish-Moulding Head
Mr. Narendra Arya
(Business Quality)
(Audit Score)

Achieved Score： 87
×１００ = 56
Total Score： 156
Total GYR Category YELLOW

Part Number： 57070-01 Process category/Commodity

Subject: Vendor System Assessment
Part Name: NPL HOUSING Molding & Stamping

Description :

Name of the Customers and their dependence Jbm auto Ltd,tata toyo radiator ltd,tata ficosa,ASAL,Air intl ttr

49.90 Cr&2.25 Cr
Last Year T/O and Financial Investment
Small
MSME Category
Stamping,Molding
Product Category
Home Grown
TA/JV/Home grown
Domestic 100%
Domestic/Export
Quaterly
Top Management Review
1.4M Change system not implement effectively
2.Skill evaluation not done effectively
3.Breakdown analysis needs improvement
4.1S & 2S found poor
5.Team Understanding found poor
Key Observation 6.Concern Analysis not effective.
7.Abnormal Handeling to be improvment

Assessment Audit Scoring Criteria :-

1. Overall score ≥ 70%, Individual Critical Clauses ≥ 40% = Dark Green Category
2. Overall score < 70% - ≥ 60% , Individual Critical Clauses ≥ 40% = Green Category
3. Overall score < 60% - ≥ 50% ,Individual Critical Clauses <40 ≥ 20% = Yellow Category
4. Overall score < 50% or Individual Critical Clauses < 20% = Red Category
Audit Assessment Criteria
Note:-Clause Ref. No-: 3,5,8,10 &18 are critical Clauses & Denoted as Star (*)

Detail report is enclosed for your kind consideration & improvement actions -
Total
0 1 2
Achieved
1.Production
1 2/ 8 2 2 0 19. preparation 2.Regulation for initial
Legal Compliance & Environment production control
2 4/ 6 0 2 1
100
50% 3 5/ 10 1 3 1 18. Safety * 3.Changing management *

4 4/ 8 1 2 1
4.Standards
50% 5 3/ 6 0 3 0 17. Scale and Top Management bandwidth management

6 9/ 12 1 0 2 50
7 1/ 4 0 1 0
16. Process Audit 5.Education and training *
57% 8 8/ 14 0 6 1

9 4/ 10 1 4 0
0
58% 10 7/ 12 0 5 1
15. Adequate testing facility 6.Quality audit and process verification
11 5/ 10 1 3 1
12 7/ 12 0 5 1
13 2/ 4 1 0 1
14.Critical parts Management 7.Supplier control
14 NA / NA 0 0 0
15 4/ 6 0 2 1
16 1/ 4 1 1 0 13.Handling Management 8.Handling abnormality
in quality *
17 11 / 12 1 1 0
40% 18 4/ 10 1 1 0 12.Products 9.5S management
management
19 6/ 8 1 1 0 11.Implementation 10.Equipment/
of standards Inspection
equipment's
40% Total 87 / 156 9 39 11 management *

56 Improvement Submission Date Last Audit Rating

YELLOW
Format No:SOP0713/F02a Revision No:-05 Revision Date:-20.12.21
 UNO MINDA VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FOLLOW UP REPORT
VENDOR ATTENDEES : 12.06.2024

Supplier Name
M/S Sharp Auto Pvt Ltd Auditors:
Bhosari MIDC,Pune
1) Avinash pokharkar
2) Ajit Ankushe - QA Head
3) Sandeep KC - Marketing & Developement Head Mr. Narendra Arya
4)Yuraj - PPC Head (Business Quality)
5) Ashish-Moulding Head
Part Name NPL HOUSING

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Clause Requirements Check Points Judgment Remarks/ Follow Up
1. Procedure for product development from receipt of order to SOP at customer end (preferably as per APQP guidelines)
to be available and the team should understand it
2. APQP matrix for deciding development activities based on categorisation of parts (for new and modifications) - Procedure SAPL/OP/28 available. Rev.1 Dt.01.03.2018 Revision history not
3. Team feasibility study (especially for skilled manpower & training requirements, if not capable) reflected on document
4. Check whether Roles and Responsibilities are defined or not? - Matrix SAPL/E&D/005 available Rev.0 Dt.01.03.2018
Do you define the procedure for Product Procedure for Product development including But not available date and month and actual no review and signed by concern
Regarding 5. Procedure to be controlled with latest revision number Head.
development including the following ? - scope of parts, responsibility of each
implementation rule of 1 0 J1H Cap Redius Tool- tool matrix plan not available
1 scope of parts, responsibility of each department, control contents / items as per
production preparation
department, control contents / items? APQP guidelines. - Applicable category should be match with procedure
-RFQ Register available.SAPL/MKT/01 Rev No.-00 date -15-05-2023
Micro plan not available of metal insert and
Groomet microplan available but plan /actua-not match with actuall

1. Timing plan approved by top management

2. Customer milestones (sample submission, trial dates, SOP at customer end) and vendor's events (sample submission,
pilot lot submission, SOP) to be mentioned in timing plan
3. Activities should match with procedure and APQP matrix
4. Review frequency of project leader and top management review evidence - MicroTiming plan is not available
Regarding management - Development Time plan (Master and Micro
5. Evidence of review by project leader and top management in the timing plan - MOM or review records -Customer milestones are mentioned.
/ implementation by Do you implement follow-up to control level)
7. Micro timing plan matching with MACO plan (wrt timing) - Activities not match with procedure & matrix
production preparation 1 the schedule and progress of production - Review frequency and evidence 1
2
8. Capturing delays in plan v/s actual in timing plans, Reason for delay & action (s) - APQP timing chart capture delay Reason & action
plan / report (master preparation items? Incl top management - Reason of delay and action
-Review frequency is phasewise. MOM available without share the
1. Production plan) - Evidence of review by Top management.
team and sign evident
preparation / New
Product
Development

1. Procedure for FMEA with CFT approach

2. List of problems reported in past at customer end and in-house (lessons learnt from past experience/kakotora sheet)
3. List of problems expected - SAPL/OP/22 Rev-00 Date-01/03/2018 are available
4. List of problems which can't be captured at customer end (warranty related problems) - Detection rating is as per AIAG Manual
Do you consider following items and
5. List of problems difficult to repair - Housing
implement corrective and preventive
6. Rating of FMEA as per AIAG guidelines and having back up data for rating. Allocation of severity, occurrence & -Occurance rating back up not evident
action to the processes and standards
Defect prevention on - FMEA Procedure detection as per AIAG manual - List of problem expected, warranty related & difficult to repair not
before regular production?
the stage of process - FMEA / QA matrix. 7. Cut off criteria for taking action as per latest AIAG manual (actions to be taken for top 3 RPN processes) available
1 -Troubles in the past; -Defect items 0
3 design by using - Past defect history and Potential defect 8. FMEA review plan, Plan Vs Actual status - FMEA review Plan vs Actual: Not available
expected;
FMEA/Matrix diagram included in FMEA. BL Colimeter- PFMEAupdated but are not controlld with rev and
-Defect items unable to capture at
trangle
customer;
PTDB date and history data are mismatch.No-SAPL/E 7D/38
-Defect items difficult to repair;
&SAPL/E&D /42

1. Complete analysis of problems reported during development

Product/process 2. Summary in PDCA sheet Document Control Procedure- QMS/QM/04 Rev.01 Dt.01.01.2020
Do you prevent defects by quality - List of Quality issues / defect faced In-house
evaluation at the quality Review system available.
1 improving activities of cross-function and Customer end during trials. 1
4 evaluation meeting in Document change request not available
team to evaluate quality performance? - Their complete analysis in the form of PDCA.
each trial Issue register not available
1. Procedure and checklist for handover from development to production
2. Initial Production Control procedure having following:
- Scope (for new parts and modifications)
- Special controls (increased inspection, increased sample size etc. at all stages - incoming, in-process & final)
- Initial production control start date (from SOP at vendor's end) and end date (after completion of period after SOP at
customer end)
- Initial production control period
Do you define following items related to - Minimum quantity to be produced during IPC period
Initial Supply Control Procedure including
initial production control by standards ? - Persons responsible for start/end
- Initial Supply Control period (3month for new - SAPL/OP/29 Rev -01 Date -01/03/2018 available
-controlled parts; -controlled items; - - Termination conditions (including following):
parts) - Inspection control mentioned
inspection method; - Targets of customer complaints, rejection at customer end, in-house rejection, supplier parts rejection, process
- person responsible to announce start/end of - Termination condition defined but not control as per define system
-initial production control period; capability, defect rate, effectiveness of countermeasures taken for problems reported during development and
1 initial supply control 1 - Sign off sheet not available
-a person who announce start/end of effectiveness of countermeasures taken for problems reported during initial production control.
- Control items & inspection method (check termination target are defined.
initial production control; -finish - Meeting above targets for 3 consecutive months and results should have in improving trend
method) and criteria for selection of control item Inhouse rejection 450 ppm as per budget 500 ppm,but no action of
condition; - Action to be taken in case targets are not met(to be extended)
- Criteria for termination of initial supply control outer bezal
period 3. Communication of initial production control information to other departments (by mail/meetings/display boards)
4. Procedure to be controlled

Regulation for
1 initial production
control
２．
Regulation for 1. Evidence of implementation of special controls as defined in the IPC procedure:
initial production - Increased sample size and/or inspection frequency (special control plan for IPC)
control - Frequent Process Capability Study (Cpk > 1.33)
Stricter Control during Initial Supply Control - Change in Inspection Method (checking dimns instead of gauging)
period: - Process audit for verification of Standards, operation standards, facility etc.
- Increase sample size or frequency - Stricter visual inspection (200% inspection) Process capability study evident. But done in intial month only
- Frequent Process Capability Study (Cpk > 2. Stricter targets during IPC period and evidence of monthly monitoring
How do you define items required 200% inspection records not available
1.33) 3. Analysis of quality problems reported during IPC and their summary in PDCA sheet
special control during initial production IPC lot monitoring available. Refelector. SAPL/END/33 Rev.00
2 - Fast removal of problems / analysis 4. Special colour tags on the packing/bin/trolley on the parts produced during initial production control period 1
control? Do you set stricter inspection 18.8.2019
- Change in Inspection Method
methods than the ordinary inspection? Process audit records not evident
- Verification of Standards, operation standards,
Special color tags available
facility etc.(Process audit)
- Stricter visual inspection (100% inspection/
200% inspection)

1. Identification of CTQ parameters for which process capability study and defect rate monitoring carries out,
Evidence of Process capability study / defect 3. Process capability study reports with target for Cpk
rate (rejection % or ppm) monitoring and action if 4. Training records of person responsible for process capability Process capability study done. Cpk=1.77 of JG LPL PLATE 34.0+/-
Do you control process capability and
not meeting the target as decided for product 5. Defect rate monitoring record (for critical non-measureable defects) 0.3
Implementation of initial 1 defect rate during initial production 2
2 and critical parameters as mentioned in spec. 6. Action plan to improve Cpk and reduce defect rate, in-case not meeting target Trained person available-Avinash Sirse
production control control? ∗∗∗
meeting or Critical parameters decided by Defect rate monitoring available
supplier

1. 4M change procedure defining following:

- Definition of changes
- Categorisation of changes into planned/unplanned changes
- Actions to be taken at change point - 4M change Procedure available SAPL/OP/31
Procedure / WI for expected change (4M : - Display of definition of changes in shop floor - 4M Matrix SAPL/WI/43 Rev.01 Dt.18.5.22
Operator, machine & jig/die, material and - Visual control of changes (4M change indication) - Operator join after long leave & Machine run after long gap need to add
Do you define unexpected change method change) and unexpected changes (Tool - Awareness of change management among the shop floor personnel - Display of changes on shopfloor
1 1 - Visual indicators
(unusual) and planned change clearly? breakage, power failure, machine breakdown, - Record of changes (4M change record)
inspection equipment failure etc.). - Check record of parts produced after change - Retroactive applicability matrix SAPL/WI/48 Rev.00 Dt.02.08.2021
- 4M change records are availablebut fake report, as per report sandeep/patel
- Retroactive check record in case of unplanned (unexpected) changes prasent at 29.05.24 but showing absent in document of change point

Definition and
implementation of 1. Actions to be taken in case of changes (as defined in the procedure)
1
changing management 2. Awareness of operators about 4M changes and the actions to be required by them Operator on sudden leave. H105 NPL Housing Operator details are available
Rules to be defined from sharing information to 3. Evidence of implementation of actions but not effective
Do you define procedure(rules applied 4. Display of changes in 4M change management board New joinee,Tool PM not considered
the concerned person / Deptt up to the result
2 from sharing information to result 1 Preventive maintenance- 90T NPL housing . Inspection records are
３． confirmation of product produced before and available.Set up approval records available.but not correct method
confirmation) at change occurrence?
*Changing after the change.
management

1. Check record of parts produced after change

2. Retroactive check record in case of unplanned (unexpected) changes
Do you record product quality check Recording of product quality check with product
3 results to ensure traceability? Incl details like Lot no, quantity and marking on 0 'Breakdown not monitored of moulding but available at press shop
retroactive checks products etc.

1. Definition of initial part (pilot lot)

- Definition of initial part. 2. Initial part control , separate locked area
Do you define and control initial part - Definition is available
1 - Control method/ system in procedure. 1 - Lock & key arrangement is necessary for storage of initial part
clearly?
- Identification tag

Definition and control 1. Separate tags to identify initial parts (pilot lot parts)
2 method for initial part Do you control initial parts separately - Inspection & test record of initial parts / lots (All 2. Inspection report of initial parts (pilot lots)
and make quality records about them? developments lot including pilot lot). Separate tags available
2 2 Inspection report available for pilot lots. 99238 Reflector. 08.10.22
(both internal and outsourced process - Inspection / test reports of sub vendor's
are included) required in case part produced by sub vendor.

1. Availability of control plan for all parts being manufactured by the vendor
2. Procedure for preparation and control of documents defining following:
- Responsibility for preparation;
- Authorised person for approval; Document Control Procedure- QMS/QM/04 Rev.01 Dt.01.01.2020
Do you make and review process control - Process control std, control Plan, Inspection - Review mechanism; Review system available.
standards, Inspection specifications, standard and operation Instruction of all parts. - timing to submit to customer; Document change request note available
1 1 Issue register not available
Operation instructions for all products - Review system and records of updated std - revision rule;
which is shipped to SMC / MSIL / Tier 1 ? against a change. control plan document no SAPL/E&D/24 Rev no-00 Date01/03/2018
- retention period; control plan available SAPL/IM/CP/57070 NPL Housing
Procedure to make - Obsolete documents handling guideline like. Drg. CP, std. etc.
process control 3.System for review and control revisions
1 standards(QA process
charts) 1.Master copies of the controlled documents
Procedure for maintaining and 2.Avaibility of documents (control plans, operation standard, inspection standards) for all active parts which are being Master copies are available.
2 distributing drawings, Std. & Controls of documents and revisions numbers supplied 2 Availability of documents- Found Ok
４． Specifications ∗∗∗
Standards
management 1.Master list of documents (control plans, operation standard, inspection standards) with latest revision no's
Master list for current procedures or
3 work instructions and their latest Master list of documents 0 Master list not available for control plan,operation standard,inspection standard
revisions? ∗∗∗
1. All Product and process parameters to be defined in the control plans
Procedure to control 2. Reference of WI or other standards, sample size, checking frequency, checking method, boundary samples & Poka
standards Yoke to be defined in the control plans
3. Consistency among documents (process control standards/control plans, operation standards, inspection standards Product & process paramtere defined in control plan
Do you have consistency to keep and customer inspection standards) Reference of WI or other standards, sample size, checking frequency, checking
・Process control Coherence between all documents like PCS /
process control standard, inspection method, boundary samples & Poka Yoke to be defined in the control
standards 1 Control plan, inspection standard, operation 1 plans.57013.01 RR Lens RH
2 specification, operation inspection and
・Inspection standard and MIS -P. Coherence review plan not available
parameter chart?
specifications
・Operation
instructions

Training procedure / WI including person

- SAPL/OP/03 Rev-05 date-18/06/2023 - Training Procedure
responsible for Training related to Quality (QS,
available
Process Audit, Inspection, Using inspection &
- Induction Program details with no. of days, OJT sheet, OJT
testing instruments / equipment's etc.), Training 1- Procedure of Training
Content, Practical Test etc…. Must be mention in Procedure
need identification and effectiveness check 2-Training Need Identification
Do you clarify the department in charge Skill evaluation details mentioned.
system. 3-Training Plan vs Actual Status
of promoting quality education, -New operator
- Training Calendar for all Operators, Supervisor 4-Training Contents to match with TNI
1 implement education based on annual 1 - Training need identification tracking sheet need to make to check
and Managers 5-Training Plan of new operator and Records
plan? each employee training
- Training systems and record for New Joinee 6-Evidence of Training Given (Attendance Sheet)
Are records of education kept? TNI defined. Training plan available for staff. Training faculty not
(Staff / operator) 7-Evidence of Checking of Trainings
mentioned
- Training Plan v/s Actual records 8-Employee History Card for Training.(For Regular Employees)
Attendance record available. Ref. Review of risk management.
Education/ training - Effectiveness check records
Training content match with TNI
1 procedure History card available. Mr. Ashish
５．
*Education and
training 1. For each operator, skill evaluation is done: Y/N
2. For each skill level (egg defining a operator at Level 1,2,3,4), specific criteria is made and followed. - Skill matrix available but need to improve Level 1,2,3,4 Definition
Do you define and implement the skill (implementation check) Skill level criteria required
evaluation of operator to determine 3. Minimum skill level to perform any operation : defined and followed -Y/N - No Multiskilling define anywhere in the system/procedure
whether operator can work without WI for Skill evaluation criteria level wise, -level-wise test paper for upgrading the skill. but process wise
2 1
surveillance?(e.g. acceptable evaluation frequency and method. required
revel/evaluation frequency/evaluation Test paper conducted. Dt.Oct.22 & April 23 Level 3 & Level 4
method) Dattatray
Minimum skill level defined

1.Skill evaluation frequency using criteria followed above (clause no 5.1.2) : Quarterly/half yearly
Cross checking of operator's skill periodically (skill evaluation must be done at least 2 time/year)
Education for Do you periodically monitor the skill of against a decided parameter and by simulating 2. for QA inspector, Poisson test done: Y/N - Plan made. SAPL/QA/09/00. Adherance found poor
2 managers/Inspectors/ 1 certificated operators and follow up to defect. 3. Skill upgradation plan for Operators 1 Poison test conducted. Komal
Special operators improve their skill? Evidence of retraining plan and effectiveness - Training record evident in case of failed inspector
check.

The Unit have any ISO/ IATF 1.Evidence for third party audit and valid certificate
IATF certified. IATF no. 0448206
1 certification.∗∗∗ ISO/ IATF 16949 certificate 2
issue dt. 14.04.2022 Valid 13.04.2025
(Covered on next page)
1.Evidence for third party audit and valid certificate
Surveillance Audit conducted and all Re certification audit done. 12 to 13 Jan 2024. 3 Nc reported.
2 Surveillance Audit closure report 2
NC's are closed Closure evident
 Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Clause Requirements Check Points Judgment Remarks/ Follow Up
For Selection of New Supplier :
(i) Zero defect at Customer End
(ii) Customer PPM within Target given by Customer or 30% Reduction from Last Year actual whichever is Lower
(iii) In-house PPM must be 30% reduction from Last Year or technology-wise Industry benchmarking Target like Plastic
Moulding : 500 PPM, Sheet Metal : 100 PPM, Rubber :1000 PPM, Die-Casting : 10000 PPM, Electronics : 20 PPM & NA
Quality Systems others : 200 PPM
1
(iv) Line stoppage at Customer end should be Zero

3 Quality & Delivery Performance Meet the Delivery and Quality targets
For Regular Supplier :
(i) Zero defect at Customer End or if not concrete action plan for the Raised QPR.
(ii) Customer PPM within Target given by Customer or 30% Reduction from Last Year actual whichever is Lower if not
concrete action plan for the Raised QPR.
PPM tagets are defined But not match with CSR Report. &
(iii) In-house PPM must be 30% reduction from Last Year or technology-wise Industry benchmarking Target like Plastic 1
Monitoring not available
Moulding : 500 PPM, Sheet Metal : 100 PPM, Rubber :1000 PPM, Die-Casting : 10000 PPM, Electronics : 20 PPM &
others : 200 PPM
６． (iv) Line stoppage at Customer end should be Zero
Quality audit and
process 1. Internal audit, process audit and product audit procedure defining audit method, audit frequency & check sheet to be
verification used for audit
2.Plan for internal audit,
3. Plan for product audit (for all the parts under production 1. Internal audit, process audit and product audit procedure defining audit
4. Plan for process audit covering all manufacturing processes and all working shifts method, audit frequency & check sheet - SAPL/OP/17A Rev.01 Dt.01.01.2020
5. Evidence of conducting audits as per plan (check sheet records) 2.Plan for internal audit,- Available. Dt.12.01.24 3 Nc closure evident
Plan and evidence of conducting Internal Quality 6. Evidence of communicating NC's to CFT and top management 3. Plan for product audit - Plan Available & record available.55086-01 and 02
Activity to Do you conduct quality audit to identify system Audit. 7. Evidence of improvement in case of issues identified (NC's reported) Collimeter date:-30.05.24
2 1 2 4. Plan for process audit covering all manufacturing processes and all working
keep/improve issues and properly improve them? Action taken for improvement against the Quality 8. NC summary report (for internal audits)
production quality Issues observed during audit. shifts- Plan available. Molding Boxer HL housing
5. Evidence of conducting audits as per plan (check sheet records)- Available
Molding & Shearing
6. NC summary report -Available

1. Evidence of conducting audit as per control plan during process audit.

Do you confirm consistency between Process audit based on work instructions / PCS 2. Evidence of checking actual working of operator as per operation standard during process audit Audit conducted as per control plan
1 2 Operator checking evident
actual operation and standard? and actual working.
3
Content of process
review 1.Evidence of checking effectiveness of countermeasures during process audit.
Do you confirm if countermeasures are
Countermeasure effectiveness check at shop - No check point in any audit check sheet to verify previous NC's
2 taken properly to prevent reoccurring of 0
floor during process audit. audit verification
quality failure?

New Supplier selection procedure indicating 1. Procedure for new supplier selection: Y/N - Suppliers selection procedure SAPL/OP/08 available Rev.01
７． Evaluation method for Do you define criteria to certificate new supplier audit check sheet & min qualifying 2.Acceptance criteria (Individual section e.g. Quality, top management) for new supplier selection based on system audit Dt.12.02.2023
1 1 1
Supplier control new suppliers suppliers and implement them? criteria especially for quality. available: Y/N but no mention Rev no content
Evidence of audit done and supplier list 3.One example for above procedure: - Acceptance criteria defined. Critical clauses defined

Where the Tier-2 supplier depends upon their

suppliers (Tier-3 suppliers) for critical processes
- Supplier audit report available for M/S/PARAS
Do you define criteria for special such as heat treatment, surface coating, welding, 1. Check sheet for special processes i.e. Heat Treatment, Welding, Powder coating, Plating etc.
2 Special Process Control 1 0 INDUSTRIES 14.09.2023 But action plan submit 14.04.2023
process control finish machining, etc., then the evaluation has 2. Process Audit Plan Vs Actual & Evidence of conducting audit as per plan
which are mismatch
included a visit to, and evaluation of, such Tier-3
suppliers as well
1. Definition of abnormal situations
Do you define clearly what is abnormal 2. Display of abnormal situations in shop floor - Abnormal condition defined SAPL/WI/47. Need to revise as per
Definition of abnormal situation and Operator's
1 situation and make operators know the 3. Awareness of abnormal situations among the shop floor personnel 1 Sharp auto requirement
awareness about the abnormal situations.
definition? Displayed at shopfloor but understanding of operator found poor

1. Procedure for handling customer complaints, in-process failure and supplier defects Procedure evident. SAPL/OP/21 Rev.2 Dt.25.12.2022
2. Criteria for raising QPCR's Criteria defined
Do you clarify and standardize the 3. Customer complaint register
Procedure for customer complaint handling, in- Customer compliant register available
Handling when handling rules/routes for customer 4. QPCR control registers (for in-house and supplier defects)
2 process failures (defect/rejection/rework) and 1 Supplier defect register available
abnormal situation claims, in process failure and supplier
1 supplier failures In house analysis done for top quantity defect but not match with
occurs failure?
procedure criteria

1. Criteria to estimate suspected quantity produced during abnormal situations and system to trace suspected lot
Do you have criteria to estimate the produced based upon the criteria
Procedure for handling suspected parts at the
scope of suspected lot for abnormal 2. Check record of parts produced during abnormal situations for traceability Procedure available. SAPL/OP/30
time of abnormal situation including criteria for
3 situation? When abnormal situation 1 No records
estimating suspected parts (quantity produced
occurs, do you trace suspected lot
before abnormal situation)
based upon the criteria?
1. Analysis sheet for customer complaints, in-house defects and supplier defects
2. Quality of analysis
Do you prevent recurrence of issues by 5 Why Analysis/Root Cause Analysis to be done Customer complaint analysis available. PBL Cover. Dent mark.
８． analysing cause of occurring defect for the defects Complaint occurred due to 4M change
*Handling 1 1
based on process investigation result Criteria for raising A-3 sheet/DAR for internal Inhouse analysis available. Blank cut & Hole piercing shift.
abnormality in such as 5-why analysis? and supplier issue Pareto analysis done. But why why analysis not carried out.
quality

1.Countermeasures detail & evidence of standardisation (revision/updating of PFMEA, Control Plan, WI/OS Inspection
standard, check sheets etc.) PFMEA SAPL/IM/5442 6891 6333 Rev.02 dt.29.01.23
Do you reflect corrective action to Standardization (Review of standards) of Control plan SAPL/IM/CP/5442 6891 6333 Rev.02 Dt.29.01.23
2 improvement of process control and countermeasures as decided in Defect Analysis 1 SOP Updated for corrective action
Prevention of
review of standards? Sheet Inspection check sheet not updated
recurrence
Document not updated after inhouse analysis
2 ・Customer claims
・In process failure Onsite check up of countermeasure at regular 1. Evidence of onsite verification of countermeasures
・Suppliers failure After corrective action are taken, do you 2. Horizontal deployment of countermeasures
interval
conduct on-site check up and evaluate Onsite verification available
3 2
the effectiveness? And horizontal Horizontal deployment records available. Member Support LH & RH
Evidences of horizontal Deployment of
deployment.
countermeasures
1.Data collection records
2.Data analysis records
Cost of poor quality data (scrap, rework, 3.Planned improvement activity records
customer returns, etc.) collected, analysed and
Quality data collection methods and
4 shared throughout the organization to drive 1 - Data maintained but action not evident to reduce COPQ.
process improvement and part variability communication method within the organization
reduction activities? ∗∗∗

1.Materials to be kept in covered condition always from dust, rust, scratches ( RM, WIP, FG) -
Do you keep store material, work-in-
process, finished products, inventory Storage of RM, BOP, WIP, FG and bins/trolleys
1 and container at appropriate storage to prevent from dust, rust, scratch, deformation 1 Dust observed in RM & WIP store
prevented from dust, rust, scratch, and rainwater (Shop floor audit)
deformation and rainwater?

1.Designated area for RM/BOP, WIP, FG material storage

Do you control material, work-in-process Identification not available in RM store
and finished product by designated Storage of RM, BOP, WIP & FG parts at RM not stored on specified location
Location of production 2 0 WIP area not defined
location, volume and standard using designated location with tag for visual control
1 site visual control? no identification in FG store

Inspection or critical operation under properly Environment of inspection area for incoming, WIP and FG material meeting:
controlled environment: 1. Lux value: as per IS Standard
Do you implement inspection or critical 2. Noise level/vibration
- temperature
９． operation under the properly controlled 3. inspection on working table Lux value checking evident. But lux meter not used
- humidity
5S management 3 environment luminance 1 Inspection done on working table
- noise Noise level monitoring not available
/temperature/humidity/vibration/noise/w
- Proper layout/ arrangements on work and
ork table, etc.)?
inspection table
- lux level etc.
General condition of tool/machine such as
Physical condition of production equipment's, jigs 1. Condition of wiring of machine - Loose wiring & moving parts of machines is in open condition
Do you keep condition of production and tools 2. Oil leakages around machines Oil leakage observed near molding machine
1 1 Tool storage in molding area found satisfactory
equipment's, jigs and tools properly? Evidence of daily/ regular check 3. Tool stored in racks
Storage arrangements with identification But press tool storage found poor. No identification on racks

Production equipment's
2 management 1.Storage of inspection Equipment's when not in use: in boxes or in open
Physical condition of inspection equipment's 2.Damages of instruments
Do you keep condition of inspection properly to maintain accuracy
Storage found not ok
2 equipment's properly to ensure Evidence of daily/ regular check (Validation 1 No damages observed
accuracy? report)
Proper storage arrangements

1.Daily maintenance check sheet filled by operator: Y/N

2.Cross checking of above check sheet by supervisor: Y/N
3.PM of machine: frequency, plan, plan vs actual, history card, check sheet filled or not, break down points covered in PM Procedure available but maintenance frequency & breakdown analysis criteria
check sheet or not, Spares (list and availability) not defined. QMS/PM/25
4.PM of Tool: frequency, plan, plan vs actual, history card, check sheet filled or not, break down points covered in PM Daily maintenance sheet available
check sheet or not, Spares (list and availability) Cross checked by supervisor. Need to implement effectively
Tool PM done as per shots. Check sheet available
Do you conduct daily/regularly check of Daily and preventive maintenance of production History card available.Boxer Housing
1 production equipment's, dies and jigs? equipment's, dies and jigs 1 Critical spare list available but actual monitoring not done
Are records of maintenance kept? Machine/ tool history card and PM check sheet Breakdown points are not covered
Machine PM Plan & record available . Machine no.IIM 5 Check sheet
available.break down points not covered
History card available. Critical spare list
Die PM Plan vs Actual- ok. Check sheet available. IP mounting side uppar
bracket & 307 HL Bracket

1.List of poka-yoke available: Y/N

Do you confirm regularly the function of 2.Poka Yoke verification sheet -: Y/N
Regular check of Pokayoke and their record 3.Analysis of breakdowns - Poka yoke list available. Monitoring available
2 Pokayoke, automated stop and alarm? 1 - Breakdown analysis not effective
List of Poka Yoke
Are records of maintenance kept?∗∗∗
Maintenance of
1 equipment's , jigs and Life of various consumables/tools monitored: Y/N
tools 1. Press: trimming, blanking punches, springs
2. Moulding: springs, deflashing cutter, ejector pin and other consumable, etching frequency
3. Heat treatment: thermocouple, quenching oil cooling curve checking
１０． 4. Machining: cutting tool
*Equipment/ 5. Polishing frequency
Inspection Do you standardize frequency of
polishing and replacement for Frequency of polishing and replacement for (above will change based on type of industry) Tool life monitoring available
equipment's 3 6.Tool life 1
consumable tools(blade/electrode/rub consumable tools and change records Deflashing cutter life monitoring not available available
management
stone, etc.)?

1.Preventive maintenance plan of customer owned tools (If any)

Customer-owned equipment's are permanently
2.Identification of customer owned tooling and equipment
marked in a visible location,
Management of customer owned Preventive maintenance of customer owned - Tool PM & B/D analysis is not maintained.
4 production tooling and test, inspection equipment's 1 Customer owned tool identification available. But no proper arrangement in
tooling and equipment If any customer property is lost, damaged or press area
otherwise found to be unsuitable for use, this is
reported to the customer
1.Calibration plan
Do you calibrate regularly inspection Calibration record of inspection equipment's 2.Plan vs actual Thread Plugh gauge SAPL/TPG/M8/02 Due dt. 07.12.2024 Certification No.-
3.Delayed calibration QT/2023/12/0569
1 equipment's and put the expire date on Calibration status on inspection equipment's 2 Bevel Prptectpor SAPL/BP/01 Due dt.02.11.2024 QT/2023/11/0051
them?∗∗∗ (Calibration date & due date) 4.In case of in-house: procedure, soaking: Y/N, frequency, master calibration
Acceptance criteria available
Maintenance of
2 inspection equipment's 1.Limit sample availability
Do you control deterioration (expire 2.expiry date of limit sample
date) of boundary samples for objective Expiry date on limit samples (for objective 3.visual display of OK and NG process/part at WIP/FG stage Master sample not available with revalidate date
2 1 Limit sample not available.
judgments such as appearance judgments such as appearance inspection)
inspection?

1.Visualizer or alarm at critical operations for confirmation of completion of work

Do you use easy expression (visualizer, Visual confirmation of work done (glowing of
onomatopoeia ,etc.) for operation green/yellow/red light indicating completion or Visualizer system available in press area. But not available on molding
1 1 machine(WI) LENS and collimeter
instructions? So that operator can easily incompletion of work)
understand process and critical points.

1. Display of Work Instructions- Easily accessible and readable.

2. WI displayed in local language.
Do you have displayed operation Work Instructions to be made in Local Language
instructions on the accessible place and
post important quality points and critical Display of WI's, Quality Check points & Work instruction available in local language. But not readable. Understandig
2 1 found poor. Molding area
operation points on the place where instructions related to critical operations at easy
operators can see it easily?∗∗∗ accessible location (so that operator can read
and take out them easily for reference)

1. Operator wise monitoring plan for all production areas

2. Check record of operator monitoring as per check sheet covering all the activities to be done by operator during
Do you regularly monitored that each Periodic records of operator observance audit to working time
3 operator operates according to the check operator working as per various standard 3. Training plan for operators for weak areas 0 - No Operator observance available
operation instructions？ such as WI, PCS, Daily check etc.
１１．
Implementation of
Implementation of 1 standards
standards
１１．
Implementation of
Category of
Implementation Audit Area Concerning regulation Clause Requirements Check Points Judgment Remarks/ Follow Up
1 standards
standards
1.Judgment criteria should be mentioned on recording check sheet for product and process parameters (e.g.- Upper/
Lower tolerance)
- Check sheet being filled and verified by authorized person
Is it possible to judge OK/NG specifically
Judgment criteria should be mentioned on each
by each check sheet (of daily equipment - Check sheet does not cover inspection method & judgement criteria on
4 check sheet (e.g..- Upper/ Lower tolerance, 1 various Daily & PM check sheets.
check, quality control report, etc.) you
check method and criteria )
use?

1.Product and process parameter recording sheet

2.Statistical tool evidence and criteria for acceptance
Product and process characteristics
clearly defined for each
product/Process, and are they effectively
Critical and significant characteristics
monitored during production to ensure Product paramter monitoring available
5 identification process and record to control them 2 Process parameter monitoring available. Ref. RR Housing
that specified requirements are met? Are
with statistical tools
any statistical process controls being
used that would contribute to final
product acceptance? ∗∗∗

1.FIFO followed for incoming, WIP, FG material

Do you keep first-in first-out of finished 2.Evidence of FIFO to be checked
Incoming Material / WIP / Finish Goods to be
products and work-in-process (material, Sample from line also need to check - FIFO seems to be difficult to maintain at RM storage considering flow.
1 maintained with Identification Tags and storage 1 - FIFO seems difficult to maintain at sheet metal WIP
reserve parts） by using identification
location at each stage.
tag or lot indication?

management of parts 1.Tags on RM, WIP, FG material with details such as production date, volume
Do you control follows production
1 flow
history by product lot numbers? Production Date/ Lot/ Sty/ dispatch date to be
2 1 TAG not available in WIP . Tag available in RM store & FG bins
-production date; -production volume; - recorded for traceability purpose.
shipping date

Do you control identification of similar Similar parts control by different colour bin / 1.Similar part management in WIP, FG and dispatch area
3 2 Thru marking on parts LH/RH
parts separately? tags/packing material
1. NG part identification should be defined and evident. NG & On hold parts must be identified with proper Tag.
2. Colour of bin for keeping NG parts to be identified and bin should be accessible & near to station.
3. Check for NC parts handling system.
１２． Do you control identification of non- Separate area/ red bin for storing NC part with 4. NG part analysis report to be checked.
Products 1 confirming parts and parts on hold. Do tag 5. Decision for scrap, rework or salvage of part should be done by QA. 1
- Red bin not available at all Machines/process
management - Red bin analysis not carried out.
you store them separately? Reason marking on NC part

1. Check for the rework procedure is defined or not.

Non-confirming parts 2. Record for NG parts repair or salvaged should be available.
2 management Regarding repaired non-conforming - Rework procedure/WI 3. Traceability of person doing rework and person approving the part after rework should be available in the rework
parts and parts on hold to re-use, do you - Responsibility for Rework and area/table for records. - Rework WI must have criteria, dedicated rework MP & Rework area &
2 1
define responsibility to implement? Are rework 4. Skilled and trained person should be authorized for rework - Check Skill matrix & Training reports accordingly records available.
repair record kept? ∗∗∗ - Inspection record of rework material
- Traceability (Lot detail) of Reworked Material

1.Past trouble data recording sheet

Log, database or other system used for 2.Corrective action recording and monitoring sheet
3 trending and/or history of corrective Record for past trouble data 1 - Record maintained but Trending monitoring is not evident
actions? ∗∗∗
 Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Clause Requirements Check Points Judgment Remarks/ Follow Up
1.Approved packing norms with customer
2.Evidence of above
Do you make arrangements with
- transportation method to avoid damage during transit
customers about the packing style &
1 transportation system to prevent Packing standard and transpiration mode 2 Packing standard available
13. damage during handling of finished
Bins/ Trolley products & perform accordingly.
Handling 1
Management
Management
WI to maintain Bins/Trolleys ( WIP & FG) in good 1.Condition of packing (bin/trolley) used in WIP and FG material
2.Guidelines for repairing of bins/trolley - WI for bin cleaning. But maintenance not included
Do you have system to maintain Bins condition
2 0 - No check sheet to maintain its check points
/Trolleys in Good Condition. Cleaning and repairing area and check points of - Dust observed on bins
good bin/trolleys
1.Identification of Maru A check points in WI at Maru A station and in final inspection of Maru A parts
Do you have Special checks/Inspection Special check points for Safety Critical parts in
1 for Maru A parameters of Maru A part are Inspection standards (in-process & final) as per NA
available . inspection standard/drawing

1.Identification of Maru A/Critical process

Identification of Safety Critical (Maru A, HS etc.) 2. Display of Authorized skilled person at Maru A/ Critical station
14. Safety Critical (Maru A Do you have Identification of Maru A processes by displaying Safety Critical (Maru A, 3. Is there any special symbol for critical stations and operators as well?
Critical parts 1 & HS etc. Parts) 2 NA
Process/Operator on Shop Floor. HS etc.) symbol on work stations, operator and
Management Management machine/line

1. Rework instruction for Maru A parts

2. Display of Authorized skilled person at Maru A/ Critical station
Do you keep the repair history when Record of Rework/Repair history of Safety 3. Rework record of Maru A parts
3 NA
repairing & using Maru A items Critical (Maru A, HS etc.) parts 4. Traceability of person doing rework and approving the reworked parts.

1.Availability of inspection instruments as per drg/control plan/inspection standards.

Does the supplier has all inspection
1 instruments required as per drawing Inspection instruments list. 2 Available
requirements

1.Availability of Test equipment's as per drg/control plan/inspection standards

15. Adequate Does the supplier has all Testing
1 Testing Facility 2 Equipment/Rigs required as per drawing Testing equipment's list and arrangements. 1 In house lab not available. 3rd part testing carried out
testing facility requirements

1.Availability of trained manpower to operate the inspection instruments and test equipment's (Required vs Actual)
Does the Supplier has trained manpower
Lab person and inspectors training records and
3 to operate these inspection and testing 1 - Inspector skill evaluation is not done
experience.
instruments

1.Plan Vs Actual reports of process audit 1 Process verified. NPL Housing but production board not filled
Conduct process audit as per process Plan and actual evidence of Process audit. NC 2. NC sharing system to all concern deptt.
1 0 2)work instruction not displayed at inspection area.
control standard list.
16. Process Audit 1 As per PCS
1.Closure of observations of previous audit
2 Closure of all the observations∗∗∗ Closure evidence of observations. 1 clouser close but not effectivelly

1.Record for organisation structure

Basis organisation structure 2.Roles & responsibility assigned and communicated
Responsibilities and authorities for relevant roles
Do you have adequate organisation
are assigned, communicated and understood
Management Bandwidth structure and defined roles/ Organisation structure available
within the organisation.
1 & Organization 1 responsibilities for key areas such as 2 Role & responsibility defined & communicated
Assign responsibility and authority for ensuring
Structure Plant Head, Quality, Production and
QMS confirms to requirements, processes
Maintenance?
delivering intended outputs.

1.Management review meeting records

How frequently Top management visits 2.Record of MOM shall include performance at customer end and in-house
Management review frequency 3. Evidence of Contingency plan and review mechanism (such as labour shortage, equipment breakdown, utility
the shop floor?
Methods for management reviews interruptions, IT, transportation and communication failures,natural disaster etc.).
How frequently Top Management
Customer feedback & satisfaction monitoring - MRM is done once in 6 month which is against standard practise to involve
monitors key performances
management for resolving bottle neck issues.SAPL/QMS/10 01.03.2018.REVIEW
2 Review Mechanism 1 (Performance at customer end, in-house 1 DATE-20.12.2023
quality, productivity, maintenance, - Contigency plan available, SAPL/PRD/02 Review done on 02.01.23
safety etc.)? ∗∗∗
17. Scale and Top How frequently Top management review
Management the contingency plan and risk mitigation
bandwidth
1.Records for plant and group sale turnover 2019-20: 865.48 Lac
Plant Sales Turnover for the auditee 2020-21: 1273.61 Lac
3 Plant Sales Turnover* 1 plant. Records for plant and group sale turnover 2 2021-22: 2295.81 Lac
Group Turnover 2022-23-4940 Lacs
2023-24-4990 Lacs
1.After tax profit margin records 2019-20: 23.19 Lac
PAT/Sales* PAT/Sales After tax profit margin records GST Credential Report 2020-21: 34.61 Lac
4 1 2 2021-22: 75.39 Lac
(Profit After Tax) GST Credential Report 2022-23-97 Lacs
2023-24-98 Lacs(Provisional)
1.Records for balance sheet and debt to equity ratios. 2019-20: 1.60:1
2020-21: 1.55:1
D/E ratio Records for balance sheet and debt to equity
5 D/E Ratios* 1 2 2021-22: 1.37:1
ratios. 2022-23:-2.08:1
2023-24:-1.56:1
1.Records for return on capital employed that determines a company's profitability and the efficiency the capital is applied 2019-20: 0.39%
ROCE Records for return on capital employed that 2020-21: 0.43%
ROCE*
6 1 ( Return on Capital Employed) determines a company's profitability and the 2 2021-22: 0.48%
efficiency the capital is applied 2022-23:0.28%
2023-24:0.37%
Identify, assess and effectively manage key risks 1.Records for monitoring
Is shop floor temperature, noise level, air to prevent harm. Adequate steps shall be taken 2.Escape route shall be displayed and communicated within the organization
quality (fumes) ok? to prevent work-related injuries and illnesses. 3.Evidence for hygienic work environment
Is layout and escape route on shop floor hygienic working environment with adequate - Record not available for temp., noise level
Ok ? lighting, ambient - Escape route defined
1 Working Conditions 1 temperature, ventilation, sanitation, potable 1
Is Rest Area/Toilets Available? toilets available
Is area/machine sufficient enough to drinking water to respect human right sufficient area available near machine

allow easy movement of machines and to water, sanitary facilities

tools.

Provide workers with appropriate and recorded 1.Records for safety training and mock drills
safety & health training prior to starting work and 2.Evidence for PPEs
on a regular basis thereafter. Such training 3.Evidence for safety standard and requirements
includes the awareness of the risks and working
Are Safety Standards made (as per procedures related to the task, adequate usage
process requirement) and taught to all of work related tools, machines, stations and 1) Safety Training and Mock drill done once In Year but opertor left
1 operators? Personal Protective 1 2) PPE use all Worker
Are PPEs available as per the standards Equipment. 3) PPE matrix defined
18. or not?∗∗∗
*Safety PPE's availability and adherence at shop floor

Human and Machine

2
Safety
Machine Safety system (Door sensors Production and utilities equipment with machine 1.Records for safety system availability and validation for its working
etc. ) available or not? guards and emergency stops and ensure routine 2.Records of preventive maintenance related to safety system Safety Guards not Provided all Mechanical press machine no (PS/09)
2 1 Safety audit record available
Is Safety in material movement and tools preventive maintenance. 3.Gaurds or protective covers on moving parts etc.
Safety checkpoint not available in check sheet
ensured or not?
Analyse all work-related injuries and illnesses 1.Near miss and accident reporting evidence
and ensure corrective and 2.Records for countermeasures against accidents and their verification
Accident reporting mechanism defined ? preventive actions are implemented to prevent - Near miss KPI started
3.Monitoring of PPEs uses - first aid cases need to monitor
3 Countermeasures against accidents recurrence. Any work-related 1 - PPE monitoring available
taken and periodic verification being fatality shall be notified
done ?

1.Record for audit observation sheet, on conformities and corrective actions

Audit Conducted by reputed 3rd party on safety audit conducted by government. Dt.04.09.21
3 Fire Safety* 1 Refer MSIL Checklist 0
MSIL defined check sheet?

Obtain Consent to Operate (CTO) from 1.Availability of CTO from State pollution Control Board
respective State pollution Control Board prior to
Consent to operate (Valid as on date) commencement of the production activities
1 Consent to Operate 1 2 White category(07.03.2016)
available or not?

Management focus on ESI & PF review 1.Records for management review

management shall ensure that all operators 2.Records for operators vs ESI/PF payments
Are all operators enrolled for ESI and enrolled for ESI and PF
PF?
Management reviews the status of PF
2 ESI & PF 1 contributions /ESI payment? 2 Yes all employee PF ESI record Available(96 contractor in April 2023)
If ESI& PF managed by Contractor, then
does management reviews and checks
the ESI enrolment/ payments?

Process for waste identification, handling and 1.Evidence for different waste collection w.r.t procedures
19. Legal
Are different type of wastes identified on disposal and it should include the listing 2.Evidence for storage and disposal as per consent and periodic confirmation
Compliance and hazardous waste and methods for segregating
shop floor and standards/ Procedures
Environment and disposal,
made?
Hazardous Waste Is Segregation done at source for Hazardous waste procedure defined
3 1 1
Management different type of wastes? Storage & disposal not evident as per consent
Storage and disposal being done as per
consent and periodic confirmation at
disposal stage? ∗∗∗
 Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Clause Requirements Check Points Judgment Remarks/ Follow Up

Use of Hazardous Materials - Is it Comply or not i.e. ROHs , REACH & IMDS
Management of Prohibited Substances Prohibted Substance-Free Declaration etc. by
4 SOC Management 1 Use of Rare Earth elements ( which includes yttrium, scandium , lanthanum ) / Restricted material like Antinomy, cobalt, 1 IMDS submitted. ROHS certificate not available
and Substances of Concern Tier-II
magnesium and tungsten

Judgment 0 NO SYSTEM DEFINED QMS Achieved Score 87

SYSTEM DEFINED BUT POOR
Judgment 1 ADHERENCE & NEED
IMPROVEMENT
QMS Maximum Score 156

SYSTEM ADHERENCE &

Judgment 2 REVIEW FOUND
SATISFACTORY
QMS Audit Rating 56

Judgment NA NOT APPLICABLE

Format No:SOP0713/F02b Revision No:-05 Revision Date:-20.12.21

 MANAGEMENT & FINANCIAL INFORMATION ( SUPPLIER)
VENDOR ATTENDEES : CEO/MD Name: V.P Tilekar

1) Ajit Ankushe - QA Head

Supplier Name M/s Sharp Auto Pvt Ltd 2) Sandeep KC - Marketing & Devlopement Head Mob No: 9960696777
3) Ranjit Debnath - PPC Head
4) Akash
Email Id: [email protected]

Plant Head Name: Avinash Pokharkar

Mobile No: 9960696781
mail id: [email protected]

Company PAN No: AAMCS1173M

Part Name Company status : Home Grown

Category S No. Topic Details Information Remarks

Background & Qualification B COM MPM

Is there a succession plan for the owners? Yes business plan available

Management information
Ownership (Prop/Partnership/Pvt Ltd/Public ) pvt ltd

Are Quality & Productivity targets available & Monitored by

Yes monitor in kpi
mgmt.?
Is there any system by which management monitors customer
Yes customer CSI rating
rating?
Does the vendor have organization Chart. Are following clear in
Yes orgnisation chart available
the chart:
1.Reporting levels are clear Yes
2.Role clarity at each level Yes
1
3.Adequate quality organization structure. Does company has
department as HR, Production, QA, Engg (development) and Yes'
Maintenance

4.Persons are available as per chart, no shortage of staff No

Organization Structure 5. Is responsibility for check on check available at all levels Yes

People profile 1. No of contract employee (Worker)

2. No of permanent employee (Worker) 1.130 2. 7 3.15
3. No of staff

Recruitment of workers (hiring system at Tier-2) Contractor

What is the Qualification Criteria of Operators selection? 10th pass

Does The Unit have any ISO/ TS certification?. IATF16949

Does the unit review the effectiveness of Quality system ?. Review In MRM

Certificate (ISO or IATF) IATF 16949

2 Quality Systems
Scale of Name of certification body BSI
Organization
Date of issue 14.04.2022

Expiry Date 13.04.2025

2019-20 2019-20 - 865.4

2020-21 2020-21- 12.73 cr
3 Net Sales (Rs Lacs) 2021-22 2021-22- 28.64 Cr
2022-23 2022-23-
2023-24 2023-24-

2019-20
2020-21
4 Net Profit ( Rs Lacs) 2021-22 10%
2022-23
2023-24

6 MSME Category Micro, Small, Medium Small

Any labour issue in last 5 years No

Does Union exists ? No

Does company provide Tea/Snacks to all employees Yes

How are general working conditions (Condition of toilet, Hot,

Good
humid , Noise level etc.)

Does worker safety norms followed Safety ppe followed by workers

7 Industrial Climate By what date, payments to employees is done 10th every Month

How is Salary & PF for contract employees is managed (Directly

Thru Contractor
or Thru contractor)

How often overtime is done & what is overtime rate? Single

Is there a suggestion scheme in the company ? Gift/weak

Are there additional benefits to employees ?( Canteen,

Canteen(out sourse)
Transport, Medical etc.)

Does company provide uniform to its employees? Yes

2022-23 3.50 Cr (new plant)

Investment detail (In last 2 years)
2023-24-2.25 Cr

Future growth /Investment plan yes

What is the D/E ratio ? 1.56:1

Cash Generation (PAT+Dep-Loan)? 0.37%
ROCE?

Capability to
invest for What are the other businesses of the promoter? No
Investment Capability for Future
future 8
Expansion
expansion
Have supplier taken any benefit from govt on MSME category? Yes

Have Tier-1 supplier financed tooling, equipment, testing

facilities at Tier-2?

Payment terms with customers 45 days

Payment terms with Suppliers 60 days

Price updation frequency by major customer half yearly

PP,ABS,PC,PMMA
Types of Raw Material being used.
HR,CR

Capacity utilisation (% age) Molding 65%, Press 75%

Working hours for workers 12

Layout of company (optimum and displayed) displayed

Adequate
Make of Machine SEW, RK,TOSHIBA
Manufacturing 9
capability
PRESS-12 Nos
No. of Machines (Tonnage wise)
Moulding-09 Nos

Tonnage Range 20 T to 300 T

Life of Machine Attached

Machine condition Good

Availability of Auxiliary Equipments Yes

Summary: Based on data provided by supplier as above and shop floor visit following is the overall summary

S No Topic Judgement Remarks

Productivity and quality targets are monitored by management

( half yearly) -
1 Management Outlook needs improvement
Customer rating - Good
Organisational structure: Adequate

Investment done in last 2 years -

2 Financial Capability Good Future investment plan - available
Debt condition - medium

Working conditions -
3 Industrial Relations Good Safety: partially followed
Union exists - no

Layout of plant: material flow proper or not? Optimum

Process - Needs improvement
4 Manufacturing Capability needs improvement
Product range - Good
Any major testing facility available - No

Format No:SOP0713/F02c Revision No:-05 Revision Date:-20.12.21

 Vendor Performance Score Card
Assessment Date 1705/2023

Vendor Name Sharp Auto Vendor Code Location Pune

1 Defects at OE Customers (MSIL, HMSI, TML etc.) 2. SQPR at Uno Minda/Tier-1 Customers 3. Rejection PPM at Uno Minda/Tier-1 Customers
19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23 19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23 19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23
Monthly Avrg 0 0 0.00 0 Monthly Avrg 0.00 0.00 1 1 Cumulative PPM 0 0 263 463

Total (Nos.) 0 0 0 Total (Nos.) 1 1 Total (PPM)

Chart Title Cumulative PPM

Chart Title Target

NA

1 1

1
0.00

0.00

263

463
0.00

0
0

19~20

20~21

21~22

22~23
1

19~20

20~21

21~22

22~23
Monthly Avrg Total (Nos.)

Remarks :- Remarks :- Quality Imp. By (%) Remarks :-

Delivery Imp. By (%)

4. Vendor - Internal Rejection (Total PPM) 5. Line Stopage at Uno Minda/Tier-1 Customers 6. Defect at vendor due to sub-supplier (T3)
19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23 19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23 19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23
Cumulative PPM Nos 0 0 0 0 Nos 2 1 2 2

Cumulative PPM Nos Nos

0

2
19~20

20~21

21~22

22~23

19~20

20~21

21~22

22~23

19~20

20~21

21~22

22~23
a b c a b c

Remarks Remarks :- Remarks :-

Safety Incidents Monitoring

19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23 19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23 19~20 20~21 21~22 22~23

Near Miss Incidents Minor Incidents Major& Fatal Incidents

0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Format No:SOP0713/F02e Revision No:-05 Revision Date:-20.12.21

 COPY TO : VENDOR ASSESSMENT - COUNTERMEASURE REPORT
RECEIVING DATE PLANNED CHECKED

VENDOR NAME Sharp Auto Pvt Ltd

PLANNING

PLANNING

PLANNING
CLUSTER NAME

TOTAL 0

AUDIT DATE 12.06.24

RECEIVING DATE
VERIFICATION

VERIFICATION

VERIFICATION
AUDIT PART NAME NPL Housing

AUDIT PART NO. 57070-01

TOTAL 0

DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF ACTUAL

AUDIT POINT DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF PLAN
RESULT

ITEM NO. SUB ITEM NO. OBSERVATIONS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN-CHARGE DATE RESULT OF VERIFICATION

1) Revision history not reflected on document 1) Revision history monitoring started on Sandeep 20.07.24
2) APQP review not sign by concern head document.
3)Micro plan not available of metal insert and 2) APQP review MOM to be sign off from
Groomet microplan available but plan /actua-not match with concern dept
1 1 actuall 3) Tool Micro plan monitoring started and Review In Internal Audit
check actual status

1) Micro plan not available 1) Tool Micro plan monitoring started and Sandeep 19.07.24
2)MOM available without share the team and sign evident check actual status
1 2 2)Mom sign off and record keeping to be Review In Internal Audit
started

1) fmea Updated controlled with rev. number Ajit 21.07.24

1) BL Colimeter- PFMEA updated but are not controlld with rev 2) PTDB sheet data match as per history
and trangle
1 3 2) PTDB date and history data are mismatch.No-SAPL/E 7D/38 Review In Internal Audit
&SAPL/E&D /42

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 ITEM NO. SUB ITEM NO. OBSERVATIONS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN-CHARGE DATE RESULT OF VERIFICATION

1)Document change request not available 1) Document change request report to be Ajit 15.07.24
Issue register not available started & register to be maintain
1 4 Review In Internal Audit

1) Termination condition defined but not control as per 1) Termination conditions control a per Sandeep 12.07.24
define system systmen
2) Sign off sheet not available 2) Termination sheet to be sign off
2 1 Review In Internal Audit

1) Process audit records not evident Process audit to be conducted Ajit 12.07.24

2 2 Review In Internal Audit

4M change records are available but fake report, as per 4m change record Monitroring started on Ashish 14.07.24
report sandeep/patel prasent at 29.05.24 but showing actual basis
absent in document of change point Verified by QA head on weekly
3 1
basis

Preventive maintenance- 90T NPL housing . Inspection Set up Approval record maintain as per Ashish 16.07.24
records are available.Set up approval records available.but control process parameter
Verified by QA Head on weekly
3 2 not correct method
basis

Breakdown not monitored of moulding but available at press Machine BD monitoring started in ERP Ashish 15.07.24
shop system
Verified by QA head on weekly
3 3
basis

Lock & key arrangement is necessary for storage of initial Lock and Key area to be provided for intial Avinash Sirse 13.07.24
part parts
3 2 Review In Internal Audit

Document Issue register not Available Document Issue register monitoring to be Ajit 13.07.24
started
4 1 Review In Internal Audit

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 ITEM NO. SUB ITEM NO. OBSERVATIONS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN-CHARGE DATE RESULT OF VERIFICATION

Training need identification tracking sheet need to make to Trainig need identification prepared for each Avinash 18.07.24
check each employee training employee
5 1 Review In Internal Audit

PPM tagets are defined But not match with CSR Report. & CSR report to be verified for all customer Ajit 12.07.24
Monitoring not available and update PPM target as per CSR
Customerwise PPM monitoring started
6 1 Review In Internal Audit

No check point in any audit check sheet to verify previous Checkpoint to be added in Product Avinash Sirse 13.07.24
NC's audit verification audit,Process audit for verify previous NC's
Found Updated Product &
6 3 Review In Internal Audit
Process Audit sheet

Suppliers selection procedure SAPL/OP/08 available Supplier selection Procedure revised and Ajit 13.07.24
Rev.01 Dt.12.02.2023 Mention revision number and containt
but no mention Rev no content
7 1 Review In Internal Audit

Supplier audit report available for M/S/PARAS typho mistake Re- action plan to be Avinash Sirse 12.07.24
INDUSTRIES 14.09.2023 But action plan submit prepared and verified the actions
14.04.2023 Reaction prepared & Ver
7 2 which are mismatch Review In Internal Audit
Action found OK

Abnormal condition defined SAPL/WI/47. Need to revise as Abnormal Condition to be revised and Ajit 14.07.24
per Sharp auto requirement conduct worker training for the same Abnormal conditions awarness
8 1 Displayed at shopfloor but understanding of operator found checkpoint added in process
poor audit

In house analysis done for top quantity defect but not match Inhouse analysis to be match with Procedure Avinash Sirse 12.07.24
with procedure criteria
8 1 Review In Internal Audit

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 ITEM NO. SUB ITEM NO. OBSERVATIONS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN-CHARGE DATE RESULT OF VERIFICATION

Abnormal condition record not monitor Abnormal conditions record monitoring Ajit 15.07.24
started
Abnormal condition record to
8 1
be verified in Process Audit

Inhouse rejection Blank cut & Hole piercing shift. Why-why analysis to be started for inhouse Avinash Sirse 13.07.24
Pareto analysis done. But why why analysis not carried out. rejections
Why Why analysis started
8 2 Review In Process Audit
in CAPA Report

Inspection check sheet not updated Check sheet to be updated Avinash Sirse 12.07.24
Document not updated after inhouse analysis
8 2 Review In Internal Audit

Data maintained but action not evident to reduce COPQ. COPQ action taken on montlhy basis Avinash Sirse 13.07.24

8 3 Review In Internal Audit

Dust observed in RM & WIP store Dust Cleaning done in RM & WIP store Area Ashish & Yuvraj 05.07.24
Cleaning Checksheet to be
9 1
prepared and record Maintain

RM not stored on specified location Identification to be done in R/m WIP & FG Ashish & Yuvraj 15.07.24
WIP area not defined Area
no identification in FG store
9 1 -

Lux value checking evident. But lux meter not used Lux meter to be purchase and monitor the Ajit 30.07.24
lux level Lux level /Noise Monitoring freq
9 1 Noise level monitoring not available to be decided and lux level
/noise level monitor

Instrument storage not ok Cuboard to be provided for instrument Avinash Sirse 11.07.24
storage
Found Cupboard provide
9 2 - Instrument storage in
Cupboard

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 ITEM NO. SUB ITEM NO. OBSERVATIONS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN-CHARGE DATE RESULT OF VERIFICATION

Ashish 18.07.24

Major BD Why why Analysis to be done and

10 2 Breakdown analysis not effective Review In Internal Audit
report maintain

Deflashing cutter life monitoring not available Deflashing cutter monitoring started Ashish 08.07.24

10 3 Review In Process Audit

Visualizer system available in press area. But not available LENS and collimeter WI Prepared & display Avinash Sirse 15.07.24
on molding machine(WI) LENS and collimeter at Molding area
Lens Collimeter WI
11 1 Review In Process Audit prepared & Display in
Molding area

Work instruction available in local language. But not WI location to be change Avinash Sirse 20.07.24
readable. Understandig found poor. Molding area WI Training to be provided in molding area Verify WI Display location
change & Clean for easily
11 2 Review In Process Audit
read & Traning record
found OK

No Operator observance available Operator Observance activity to be started Ajit 25.07.24

11 3 Review In Process Audit

Check sheet does not cover inspection method & Judgement criteria to be added in Daily PM Avinash Sirse 13.07.24
judgement criteria on various Daily & PM check sheets. checksheet
11 4 Review In Process Audit

FIFO seems to be difficult to maintain at RM storage considering New plant setup in planing for extra Storage Dec-25
flow. space and smooth work flow
- FIFO seems difficult to maintain at sheet metal WIP
12 1 Review In MRM MD Sir

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 ITEM NO. SUB ITEM NO. OBSERVATIONS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PREVENTIVE ACTIONS IN-CHARGE DATE RESULT OF VERIFICATION

WI for bin cleaning. But maintenance not included Bin Maintanance added in WI Ashish 15.07.24
- No check sheet to maintain its check points Checksheet to be maintain
- Dust observed on bins Cleaning done
12 2 -

1) Process verified. NPL Housing but production board not 1) Production board to be updated 2) WI to Ashish 05.07.24
filled be display in inspection area
2) work instruction not displayed at inspection area.
16 1 -

Safety Training and Mock drill done once In Year but Safety Training Provided to new operator Avinash 03.07.24
opertor left
Safety training added in
17 1
induction training record

Safety Guards not Provided all Mechanical press machine Pnumetic press 2 hand Operating started Avinash 29.06.24
no (PS/09)
17 2 Monitor in Safety Audit

Storage & disposal not evident as per consent Storage & disposal to be done as per Avinash 01.08.24
consent

19 3 Review in MRM

ROHS certificate not available ROHS certification plan to be provied Ajit Fy 25-26

19 4 Review in MRM

Format No:SOP0713/F02d Revision No:-05 Revision Date:-20.12.21

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 VENDOR ASSESSMENT - COUNTERMEASURE REPORT
APPROVED

RESULT OF VERIFICATION

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 RESULT OF VERIFICATION

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 RESULT OF VERIFICATION

Found Updated Product &

Process Audit sheet

Reaction prepared & Verify

Action found OK

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 RESULT OF VERIFICATION

Why Why analysis started

in CAPA Report

Found Cupboard provide &

Instrument storage in
Cupboard

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 RESULT OF VERIFICATION

Lens Collimeter WI
prepared & Display in
Molding area

Verify WI Display location

change & Clean for easily
read & Traning record
found OK

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

 RESULT OF VERIFICATION

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4