C1 Reading Comphension 7
C1 Reading Comphension 7
TASK 2: Choose the best option (A, B, C or D) for each question.The first one, number
zero, is an example. You will get 1 point per correct answer.
After decades of selling young girls damsels in distress, Disney has finally made a run of
films with strong female roles. It’s just a shame it took them so long.
A lot of the talk surrounding Alice Through the Looking Glass, the sequel to the 2010 hit Alice in Wonderland,
is centring on whether the film can survive the departure of Tim Burton from the director’s chair, whether
Sacha Baron Cohen can pull off another attempt at an orthodox acting role, or whether the project can
overcome the near wholesale jettisoning of the delicate charm of the Lewis Carroll original. Much less
attention has been paid to something equally significant: its contribution to Disney’s ongoing project to
empower and enable its pre-teen and early-teen girl audience.
If you asked anyone a decade ago who would be leading the charge to engineer this kind of feminist social
change – specifically, through influencing the narratives of mass-market blockbuster films – Disney would
arguably be the bottom of the list. If anything, it was considered the most conservative of the major studios,
with its series of fairytale cartoons playing a significant part in schooling generations of girls in the arts of
home-making, dressing nicely and meeting Prince Charmings. Its live-action fare, likewise, conformed to
a family-friendly model that relied on the likes of Pirates of the Caribbean, The Princess Diaries and The
Chronicles of Narnia.
Writer and activist Melissa Silverstein is arguably the most influential critic of gender issues in
contemporary cinema. Is she on board with what Disney – in what is, admittedly, only a sliver of the
company’s total output – is trying to do?
“Disney has been giving us characters for decades that we, as a culture, can relate to,” she says. “With
Brave, and Frozen, and the Alice movies, feminist women are behind those things. That makes a difference.
Disney makes other kinds of movies that don’t necessarily fit into this category – so it’s hard for me to say
something extraordinary is happening across the board”
“We have to interrupt the cycle that starts very young,” she says. “It’s the power dynamic, that girls have to
be saved. We want girls to be the heroes of the stories; they don’t have to be saved. Girl characters need
to be as fully fleshed out as male characters; they can’t only be striving for romance.
Phone Box Inglés C1 Material gratuito para uso educativo
What Silverstein is alluding to, of course, is the studio’s history with Disney Princesses; a branded concept
that actually only dates from 2000, despite mining the company’s eight-decade back catalogue. Disney
Princesses – which encompasses toys, games, figurines and multiple fashion accessories – has been a
huge money-spinner for the company, with an estimated revenue of more than $5.5bn, but the studio
seems to be in retreat from the values it defined. Silverstein calls it “the princess-industrial complex” and
describes it as “almost the downfall of civilisation”. “This is what we’ve been teaching girls: wear pink, look
pretty, wear makeup. I want that to go away. That is not stuff that helps girls become empowered young
women. This is stuff people use to keep women docile.”
According to a report by Bloomberg Business Week writer Claire Suddath, about Disney’s decision to
switch its doll licence from Mattel to Hasbro, one of the key factors behind Disney’s change of direction
was the continued criticism from influential feminist writers: specifically Peggy Orenstein’s 2006 article in
the New York Times magazine,“What’s Wrong with Cinderella?”, which detailed her disgust, as a mother, for
the “princess craze and the girlie-girl culture” that appeared to be swamping her daughter. But it seems
Disney had been heading – slowly – in the desired direction for some time.
The process is neatly summarised in Kaitlin Ebersol’s 2014 essay How Fourth-Wave Feminism is Changing
Disney’s Princesses: the latest tranche of which, via Brave and Frozen “completely cast off the patriarchal
clichés of their predecessors by focusing heavily on the relationships between women and treating
romance as a secondary consideration”. The same is true of the Alice movies, and of the 2014 Sleeping
Beauty reboot Maleficent (which shares a scriptwriter, Linda Woolverton, with Alice). The Cinderella remake,
however, followed a more traditional, princessy route. No one is sure yet which way the new Beauty and
the Beast will go, though the interest is certainly there (a recently released trailer broke internet records);
but the participation of Emma Watson, whose plan to spend a year studying feminism has made headlines,
does hint at the possibilities.
Suzanne Todd, producer of both Alice films (along with her sister, Jennifer) says that making a “female
empowerment piece” was “the driving force, right from the beginning”. Woolverton, she says, was a key
figure in the project. Belle, a character created by Woolverton for the 1991 Beauty and the Beast cartoon,
took “a stand for what she believes in, and is her own person” and now “it’s only become more important
that we create characters that we’re proud of, and that our own [daughters] can look up to and emulate”.
Phone Box Inglés C1 Material gratuito para uso educativo
0. One of the comments about the film, which is in the spotlight, is that…
a. …it contributes to appeal to a teenage audience.
b. …its cast differ from the original masterpiece.
c. …it is unlikely that the equality project takes form in a near future.
d. …its success is called into question by the audience.
b. …need to be empowered.
5. Peggy Orenstein’s 2006 article claims her disgust because her daughter…