Phishing Detection and Automated Response System using

Machine Learning Algorithm (Supervised learning model)

COORDINATORS: BY:
• Mr.G Senthilvelan • Mr.V.T Vishnu sah
• Dr.G Soniya Priyadharshini • Mr.B.Tarun Vikash
• Mr.M.Vetrivel
CONTENTS

• OBJECTIVE

• ABSTRACT

• LITERATURE SURVEY

• CONCLUSION

• REFERENCE
 OBJECTIVES

Safeguard against cyber threats by detecting and responding to phishing attacks.

Utilize data analytics and machine learning to continuously improve detection

algorithms and response strategies based on real-time phishing trends and incident
analysis.

Create automated response mechanisms to swiftly isolate compromised accounts,

revoke access, and contain the impact of phishing attacks.
 ABSTRACT

Phishing attacks pose a significant threat to individuals and organizations, leading to substantial
financial losses and compromising sensitive information. As these attacks become increasingly
sophisticated, traditional detection methods often fall short. This paper presents an "Advanced
Phishing Detection and Response System" designed to enhance cybersecurity defenses. The system
leverages machine learning algorithms, natural language processing, and real-time monitoring to
identify and mitigate phishing threats effectively. By analyzing email content, URL patterns, and
user behavior, the system can detect suspicious activities with high accuracy. Additionally, it
incorporates automated response mechanisms to neutralize threats and provide timely alerts to
users and administrators. The proposed solution aims to provide a comprehensive and proactive
approach to safeguarding against phishing attacks, ensuring a more secure digital environment.
 EXISTING SYSTEM

Phishing detection systems use machine learning and other techniques to identify and mitigate
threats. Notable examples include PhishTank, a community-driven platform for reporting phishing
URLs, and Google Safe Browsing, which provides URL blacklists to browsers like Chrome and Firefox.
Microsoft SmartScreen offers cloud-based protection integrated into Microsoft products, while
OpenPhish delivers real-time phishing intelligence using automated detection. Research projects like
"PhishZoo" and frameworks utilizing URL and content features contribute to the field. Commercial
solutions, such as Symantec Email Security and Proofpoint, combine various methods for
comprehensive protection. Real-time systems integrate these technologies into browsers and email
clients, enhancing defense against evolving phishing tactics.
 PROPOSED SYSTEM

The proposed phishing detection system provides real-time protection using

advanced machine learning, specifically a Random Forest classifier trained on
features extracted from URLs. The system architecture involves collecting and
preprocessing data from sources like PhishTank and OpenPhish, extracting features
such as URL length and the presence of 'https', and training the classifier to
distinguish between legitimate and phishing URLs. Integrated into web browsers and
email clients, the system scores incoming URLs and blocks suspicious ones, alerting
users. It continuously updates with new data and user feedback to adapt to evolving
phishing tactics, offering robust and scalable protection that enhances cybersecurity
posture.
 LITERATURE SURVEY
JOURNAL
S.NO TITLE OF PAPER AUTHOR/YEAR DESCRIPTION
NAME
The research proposes an architecture for detecting
IoT-Driven Phishing
and responding to phishing attacks in IoT IEEE Internet
Detection and Response Michael Brown,
1 environments, considering unique challenges such of Things
System: Architecture Emily Lee-2024
as resource constraints and diverse communication Journal
and Implementation
protocols.
Explainable AI Models
This study evaluates the effectiveness of explainable Journal of
for Phishing Detection: David Johnson,
2 AI techniques in phishing detection, focusing on Computer
Interpretability and Sarah Clark-2023
model interpretability and performance metrics. Security
Performance Evaluation
Real-Time Phishing The paper introduces a real-time phishing response ACM
Response System Using Alex Wang, Lisa system that leverages stream processing techniques Transactions on
3
Stream Processing and Chen-2024 and machine learning algorithms to quickly identify Internet
Machine Learning and mitigate phishing threats. Technology
This research presents case studies and analyses on
Behavioral Biometrics International
Mohammad the effectiveness of behavioral biometrics in
for Phishing Detection Journal of
4 Khan, Anna detecting phishing attacks targeting mobile device
in Mobile Devices: Case Information
Garcia-2023 users, highlighting challenges and mitigation
Studies and Analysis Security
strategies.
CONT.
S.NO TITLE OF PAPER AUTHOR/YEAR DESCRIPTION JOURNAL NAME
A Comprehensive
Review on Phishing Kavya Swarup, The review paper discusses various
International Journal
Detection Techniques Aastha Puri, techniques employing machine learning and
5 of Computer
Using Machine Nandini Vijay- NLP for detecting phishing attacks across
Applications
Learning and Natural 2022 different platforms.
Language Processing

Enhancing Phishing This paper explores the effectiveness of

Vijayakumar V, International Journal
Detection Using ensemble machine learning techniques in
6 Ramkumar R- of Scientific &
Ensemble Machine improving the accuracy of phishing detection
2020 Technology Research
Learning Techniques systems.

Phishing Detection Shivam Journal of

The paper introduces a neural network-based
Using Neural Networks Bhardwaj, Information
7 approach with dynamic feature selection for
with Dynamic Feature Mayank Singh, Assurance and
effective phishing detection.
Selection Jyoti Singh-2021 Security

Phishing Websites Bassam A. Al- The paper proposes a supervised machine Journal of King Saud
Detection Using Mahadeen, learning approach for detecting phishing University -
8
Supervised Machine Fatima M. A. Abu websites based on URL features and content Computer and
Learning Algorithms Salem-2020 analysis. Information Sciences
CONT.
S.NO TITLE OF PAPER AUTHOR/YEAR DESCRIPTION JOURNAL NAME

This study compares four machine

learning models—artificial neural networks
(ANNs), support vector machines (SVMs),
decision trees (DTs), and random forests
Detecting Phishing Shouq Alnemari,
(RF)—for detecting phishing domains.
9 Domains Using Majid Applied Sciences
Using the UCI phishing domains dataset,
Machine Learning Alshammari-2023
the research found that the random forest
model was the most accurate,
outperforming other techniques in the
literature..
This comparative study evaluates the
performance of various machine learning International
Phishing Website
H. U. Nawab, S. algorithms in detecting phishing websites. Journal of
Detection using
M. Shariff, M. The authors analyze different feature sets Advanced
10 Machine Learning:
Shafiq, M. J. and classifiers, including decision trees, Computer Science
A Comparative
Khan-2021 random forests, and support vector and Applications
Study
machines, to determine the most effective (IJACSA)
approach for phishing detection.
 CONCLUSION

A robust phishing detection and response system is crucial for safeguarding against
cyber threats. By integrating advanced machine learning algorithms and real-time
monitoring, suspicious activities can be swiftly identified and mitigated. Continuous
user education and awareness are essential components, enhancing overall
resilience. Automated incident response capabilities streamline reaction times,
minimizing potential damage and ensuring swift recovery. Together, these measures
create a proactive defense strategy against evolving phishing tactics.
 Reference
[1] Difference Between Static Malware Analysis and [5] S. H. Ahammad et al., “Phishing URL detection
Dynamic Malware Analysis | Difference Between using machine learning methods,” Advances in
| Static Malware Analysis vs Dynamic Malware Engineering Software, vol. 173, p. 103288, Nov.
Analysis. (2018). 2022.
[2] R. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Tan, and B. Zhou, “Detection [6] R. S. Rao, • Alwyn, and R. Pais, “Detection of
of malicious web pages based on hybrid analysis,” phishing websites using an efficient feature-
J. Inf. Secur. Appl., vol. 35, 2017. based machine learning framework,” Neural
Computing and Applications, Mar 2021.
[3] M. F. Ansari, P. K. Sharma, and B. Dash,
“Prevention of phishing attacks using AI-based [7] J. Shad and S. Sharma, A Novel Machine
Cybersecurity Awareness Training,” International Learning Approach to Detect Phishing Websites
Journal of Smart Sensor and Adhoc Network., Jaypee Institute of Information
Mar. 2022. Technology, 2018.
[4] F. Çolhak, M. İ. Ecevit, B. E. Uçar, R. Creutzburg, [8] M. Somesha, A. R. Pais, R. S. Rao, and V. S.
and H. Dağ, arXiv “Phishing Website Detection Rathour, ‘‘Efficient deep learning techniques for
through Multi-Model Analysis of HTML Content,” the detection of phishing websites,’’ Sadhan ¯ a¯,
Aug 2022. vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Dec. 2020.
[9] B. B. Gupta, K. Yadav, I. Razzak, K. Psannis, A. [13] M. Al-Sarem, F. Saeed, Z. G. Al-Mekhlafi, B.
Castiglione, and X. Chang, ‘‘A novel approach A. Mohammed, T. Al-Hadhrami, M. T.
for phishing URLs detection using lexical Alshammari, A. Alreshidi, and T. S.
based machine learning in a real-time Alshammari, ‘‘An optimized stacking
environment,’’ Jul. 2021. ensemble model for phishing websites
detection,’’ Electronics, vol. 10, no. 11, May
[10] Y. Li, Z. Yang, X. Chen, H. Yuan, and W. Liu, 2021, Art. no. 1285.
‘‘A stacking model using URL and HTML
features for phishing webpage detection,’’ [14] M. Sameen, K. Han, and S. O. Hwang,
Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 94, pp. 27– ‘‘PhishHaven—An efficient real-time AI
39, May 2019. phishing URL, 2022.IEEE Access.
[11] S. C. H. Hoi, D. Sahoo, J. Lu, and P. Zhao, [15] A. S. Bozkir and M. Aydos, ‘‘LogoSENSE: A
‘‘Online learning: A compre hensive survey,’’ companion HOG based logo detection
Neurocomputing, vol. 459, pp. 249–289, Oct. scheme for phishing web page and E-mail
2021. brand recogni tion,’’ Comput. Secur., vol. 95,
Aug. 2020, Art. no. 101855.
[12] I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville,
Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT
Press, 2016.