Full Download Complex Surveys Analysis of Categorical Data 1st Edition Parimal Mukhopadhyay (Auth.) PDF
Full Download Complex Surveys Analysis of Categorical Data 1st Edition Parimal Mukhopadhyay (Auth.) PDF
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/complex-surveys-
analysis-of-categorical-data-1st-edition-parimal-
mukhopadhyay-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/categorical-and-nonparametric-data-
analysis-e-michael-nussbaum/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-course-in-categorical-data-
analysis-first-edition-leonard/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/analysis-of-large-and-complex-
data-1st-edition-adalbert-f-x-wilhelm/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/magic-for-liars-a-novel-1st-edition-
sarah-gailey/
textbookfull.com
Inventology how we dream up things that change the world
First Mariner Books Edition Kennedy
https://textbookfull.com/product/inventology-how-we-dream-up-things-
that-change-the-world-first-mariner-books-edition-kennedy/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/riemannian-geometry-and-geometric-
analysis-7th-edition-jurgen-jost-auth/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/endophytes-biology-and-biotechnology-
volume-1-1st-edition-dinesh-k-maheshwari-eds/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-qualitative-health-
research-for-evidence-based-practice-1st-edition-karin-olson/
textbookfull.com
Political Party Membership in New Democracies: Electoral
Rules in Central and East Europe Alison F. Smith
https://textbookfull.com/product/political-party-membership-in-new-
democracies-electoral-rules-in-central-and-east-europe-alison-f-smith/
textbookfull.com
Parimal Mukhopadhyay
Complex
Surveys
Analysis of Categorical Data
Complex Surveys
Parimal Mukhopadhyay
Complex Surveys
Analysis of Categorical Data
123
Parimal Mukhopadhyay
Indian Statistical Institute
Kolkata, West Bengal
India
Most of the data a statistician uses is categorical in nature. In the realms of bio-
medicine and social sciences, ecology and demography, voting pattern and mar-
keting, to name a few, categorical data dominate. They are the major raw materials
for analysis for testing different hypotheses relating to the populations which
generate such data. Such data are generally obtained from surveys carried under a
complex survey design, generally a stratified multistage design. In analysis of data
collected through sample surveys, standard statistical techniques are often routinely
employed.
We recall the well-recited phrase which we chanted in our undergraduate days:
Let x1,…, xn be a random sample of size n drawn from a population with probability
density function f(x) or probability mass function pM(x), etc. This means that the
sampled units whose observations are x1, x2,…, xn, are drawn by simple random
sampling with replacement (srswr). This also implies that observed variables x1,…,
xn are independently and identically distributed (IID). In fact, most of the results in
theoretical statistics, including those in usual analysis of categorical data, are based
on these assumptions.
However, survey populations are often complex with different cell probabilities
in different subgroups of the population, and this implies a situation different from
the IID setup. Longitudinal surveys—where sample subjects are observed over two
or more time points—typically lead to dependent observations over time.
Moreover, longitudinal surveys often have complex survey designs that involve
clustering which results in cross-sectional dependence among samples.
In view of these facts, it is, therefore, necessary to modify the usual tests of
goodness of fit, like Pearsonian chi-square, likelihood ratio and Wald statistic to
make them suitable for use in the context of data from complex surveys. A host of
ardent researchers have developed a number of such tests for this purpose over
more than last four decades.
There are already a myriad number of textbooks and research monographs on
analysis of categorical data. Then why is another book in the area required?
My humble answer is that all those treatise provide excellent description of the
vii
viii Preface
categorical data analysis under the classical setup (usual srswr or IID assumption),
but none addresses the problem when the data are obtained through complex
sample survey designs, which more often than not fail to satisfy the usual
assumptions. The present endeavor tries to fill in the gap in the area.
The idea of writing this book is, therefore, to make a review of some of the ideas
that have blown out in the field of analysis of categorical data from complex
surveys. In doing so, I have tried to systematically arrange the results and provide
relevant examples to illuminate the ideas. This research monograph is a review
of the works already done in the area and does not offer any new investigation. As
such I have unhesitatingly used a host of brilliant publications in this area. A brief
outline of different chapters is indicated as under:
(1) Chapter 1: Basic ideas of sampling; finite population; sampling design; esti-
mator; different sampling strategies; design-based method of making infer-
ence; superpopulation model; model-based inference
(2) Chapter 2: Effects of a true complex design on the variance of an estimator
with reference to a srswr design or an IID-model setup; design effects; mis-
specification effects; multivariate design effect; nonparametric variance
estimation
(3) Chapter 3: Review of classical models of categorial data; tests of hypotheses
for goodness of fit; log-linear model; logistic regression model
(4) Analysis of categorical data from complex surveys under full or saturated
models; different goodness-of-fit tests and their modifications
(5) Analysis of categorical data from complex surveys under log-linear model;
different goodness-of-fit tests and their modifications
(6) Analysis of categorical data from complex surveys under binomial and
polytomous logistic regression model; different goodness-of-fit tests and their
modifications
(7) Analysis of categorical data from complex surveys when misclassification
errors are present; different goodness-of-fit tests and their modifications
(8) Some procedures for obtaining approximate maximum likelihood estimators;
pseudo-likelihood approach for estimation of finite population parameters;
design-adjusted estimators; mixed model framework; principal component
analysis
(9) Appendix: Asymptotic properties of multinomial distribution; asymptotic
distribution of different goodness-of-fit tests; Neyman’s (1949) and Wald’s
(1943) procedures for testing general hypotheses relating to population
proportions
I gratefully acknowledge my indebtedness to the authorities of PHI Learning,
New Delhi, India, for kindly allowing me to use a part of my book, Theory and
Methods of Survey Sampling, 2nd ed., 2009, in Chap. 2 of the present book. I am
thankful to Mr. Shamin Ahmad, Senior Editor for Mathematical Sciences at
Preface ix
Springer, New Delhi, for his kind encouragement. The book was prepared at the
Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, to the authorities of which I acknowledge my
thankfulness. And last but not the least, I must acknowledge my indebtedness to my
family for their silent encouragement and support throughout this project.
1 Preliminaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 The Fixed Population Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Different Types of Sampling Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.4 The Estimators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.4.1 A Class of Estimators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.5 Model-Based Approach to Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.5.1 Uses of Design and Model in Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1.6 Plan of the Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2 The Design Effects and Misspecification Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
2.2 Effect of a Complex Design on the Variance of an Estimator . . . . 30
2.3 Effect of a Complex Design on Confidence Interval for θ . . . . . . . 37
2.4 Multivariate Design Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2.5 Nonparametric Methods of Variance Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
2.5.1 A Simple Method of Estimation of Variance
of a Linear Statistic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 41
2.5.2 Linearization Method for Variance Estimation
of a Nonlinear Estimator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
2.5.3 Random Group Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
2.5.4 Balanced Repeated Replications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2.5.5 The Jackknife Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
2.5.6 The Jackknife Repeated Replication (JRR) . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
2.5.7 The Bootstrap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
2.6 Effect of Survey Design on Inference About
Covariance Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 64
2.7 Exercises and Complements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 65
xi
xii Contents
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
About the Author
xv
Chapter 1
Preliminaries
1.1 Introduction
The book has two foci: one is sample survey and the other is analysis of categorical
data. The book is primarily meant for sample survey statisticians, both theoreticians
and practitioners, but nevertheless is meant for data analysts also. As such, in this
chapter we shall make a brief review of basic notions in sample survey techniques,
while a cursory view of classical models for analysis of categorical data will be
postponed till the third chapter.
Sample survey, finite population sampling, or survey sampling is a method of
drawing inference about the characteristic of a finite population by observing only a
part of the population. Different statistical techniques have been developed to achieve
this end during the past few decades.
In what follows we review some basic results in problems of estimating a finite
population parameter (like, its total or mean, variance) through a sample survey. We
assume throughout most of this chapter that the finite population values are fixed
quantities and are not realizations of random variables. The concepts will be clear
subsequently.
S = i1 , . . . , in , 1 ≤ it ≤ N (1.2.1)
where i t denotes the label of the unit selected at the tth draw and is not necessarily
unequal to i t for t = t (= 1, . . . , n). For a without replacement (wor)-sampling
1.2 The Fixed Population Model 3
procedure, a sample may also written as a sequence S, with i t denoting the label of
the unit selected at the tth draw. Thus, here,
S = {i 1 , . . . , i n }, 1 ≤ i t ≤ N , i t = i t for t = t (= 1, . . . , N ) (1.2.2)
In estimating a finite population parameter θ(y) through sample surveys, one of the
main tasks of the survey statistician is to find a suitable p(s) or p(S). The collection
(S, p) is called a sampling design (s.d.), often denoted as D(S, p) or simply p. The
triplet (S, A, p) is the probability space for the model of the finite population.
The expected effective sample size of a s.d. p is, therefore,
N
E{ν(S)} = ν(S) p(S) = μP[ν(S) = μ] = ν. (1.2.6)
S∈S μ=1
We shall denote by ρν the class of all fixed effective size [FS(ν)] designs, i.e.,
A s.d. p is said to be noninformative if p(s)[ p(S)] does not depend on the y-values.
In this treatise, unless otherwise stated, we shall consider noninformative designs
only.
Basu (1958) and Basu and Ghosh (1967) proved that all the information relevant
to making inference about the population characteristic is contained within the set
sample s and the corresponding y-values. For this reason we shall mostly confine
ourselves to the set sample s.
The quantities
πi = p(s), πi j = p(s)
s i s i, j
πi1 ,...,ik = p(s) (1.2.8)
s i 1 ,...,i k
are, respectively, the first order, second order, . . . , kth order inclusion probabilities
of units in a s.d. p. The following lemma states some relations among inclusion
probabilities and expected effective sample size of a s.d.
If p ∈ ρν ,
N
(iv) πi j = (ν − 1)πi ,
Nj (=i)=1
(v) i= j=1 πi j = ν(ν − 1).
1.2 The Fixed Population Model 5
Mukhopadhyay (1975) gave a s.d. with fixed nominal sample size n[ p(S) > 0 ⇒
n(S) = n∀S] such that V {ν(S)} = θ(1 − θ)/(n − [ν]), which is very close to the
lower bound in (1.2.9).
It is seen, therefore, that a s.d. gives the probability p(s) [or p(S)] of selecting a
sample s (or S), which, of course, belongs to the sample space. In general, it will be
a formidable task to select a sample using only the contents of a s.d., because one
has to enumerate all the possible samples in some order, calculate the cumulative
probabilities of selection, draw a random number in [0, 1], and select the sample
corresponding to the number so selected. It will be, however, of great advantages if
one knows the conditional probabilities of selection of units at different draws.
We shall denote by
pr (i) = probability of selecting i at the r th draw, r = 1, . . . , n;
pr (ir |i 1 , . . . , ir −1 ) = conditional probability of drawing ir at the r th draw given
that i 1 , . . . , ir −1 were drawn at the first, . . . , (r − 1)th draw, respectively;
p(i 1 , . . . , ir ) = the joint probability that (i 1 , . . . , ir ) are selected at the first,
. . . , r th draw, respectively.
All these probabilities must be nonnegative and we must have
N
pr (i) = 1, r = 1, . . . , n;
i=1
N
pr (ir |i 1 , . . . , ir −1 ) = 1.
ir =1
Definition 1.2.6 A sampling scheme (s.s.) gives the conditional probability of draw-
ing a unit at any particular draw given the results of the earlier draws.
A s.s., therefore, specifies the conditional probabilities pr (ir |i 1 , . . . , ir −1 ), i.e.,
it specifies the values p1 (i)(i = 1, . . . , N ), pr (ir |i 1 , . . . ir −1 ), ir = 1, . . . , N ; r =
2, . . . , n.
The following theorem shows that any sampling design can be attained through
a draw-by-draw mechanism.
Theorem 1.2.1 (Hanurav 1962; Mukhopadhyay 1972) For any given sampling
design, there exists at least one sampling scheme which realizes this design.
6 1 Preliminaries
chosen in the light of the superpopulation model used to describe the population.
Use of superpopulation model in sampling has been indicated in Sect. 1.5.
Strata: Sometimes, it may be necessary or desirable to divide the population into
several subpopulations or strata to estimate population parameters like population
mean and population total through a sample survey. The necessity of stratification
is often dictated by administrative requirements or convenience. For a statewide
survey, for instance, it is often convenient to draw samples independently from
each county and carry out survey operations for each county separately. In practice,
the population often consists of heterogeneous units (with respect to the character
under study). It is known that by stratifying the population such that the units
which are approximately homogeneous (with respect to ‘y ), a better estimator of
population total, mean, etc. can be achieved.
We shall often denote by yhi the value of y on the ith unit in the hth stra-
tum (i = 1, . . . , Nh ; h = 1, . . . , H ), h Nh = N , the population size; Ȳh =
Nh Nh
i=1 Yhi /Nh , Sh = i=1 (Yhi − Ȳh ) /(Nh − 1), stratum population mean and
2 2
variance, respectively;
H Wh = Nh /N , stratum proportion. The population mean is
then Ȳ = h=1 Wh Ȳh .
Cluster: Sometimes, it is not possible to have a list of all the units of study in the
population so that drawing a sample of such study units is not possible. However,
a list of some bigger units each consisting of several smaller units (study units)
may be available from which a sample may be drawn. Thus, for instance, in a
socioeconomic survey, our main interest often lies in the households (which are
now study units or elementary units or units of our ultimate interest). However, a
list of households is not generally available, whereas a list of residential houses
each accommodating a number of households should be available with appropriate
authorities. In such cases, samples of houses may be selected and all the households
in the sampled houses may be studied. Here, a house is a ‘cluster.’ A cluster consists
of a number of ultimate units or study units. Obviously, the clusters may be of
varying sizes. Generally, all the study units in a cluster are of the same or similar
character. In cluster sampling a sample of clusters is selected by some sampling
procedure and data are collected from all the elementary units belonging to the
selected clusters.
Domain: A domain is a part of the population. In a statewide survey, a district
may be considered as a domain; in the survey of a city a group of blocks may
form a domain, etc. After sampling has been done from the population as a whole
and the field survey has been completed, one may be interested in estimating
the mean or total relating to some part of the population. For instance, after a
survey of industries has been completed, one may be interested in estimating the
characteristic of the units manufacturing cycle tires and tubes. These units in the
population will then form a domain. Clearly, sample size in a domain will be a
random variable. Again, the domain size may or may not be known.
Visit https://textbookfull.com
now to explore a rich
collection of eBooks, textbook
and enjoy exciting offers!
8 1 Preliminaries
(a) Simple random sampling with replacement (srswr): Under this scheme units
are selected one by one at random in n (a preassigned number) draws from
the list of all available units such that a unit once selected is returned to the
population before the next draw. As stated before, the sample space here consists
of N n sequences S{i 1 , . . . , i n } and the probability of selecting any such sequence
(sample) is 1/N n .
(b) Simple random sampling without replacement (srswor): Here units are selected
in n draws at random from the list of all available units such that a unit once
selected is removed from the population before the next draw. Here again, as
stated before the sample space consists of (N )n sequences S and Nn sets s and
the s.d. design allots to each of them equal probability of selection.
(c) Probability proportional to size with replacement (ppswr) sampling: a unit i is
selected with probability pi at the r th draw and a unit once selected is returned
to the population before the next draw (i = 1, . . . , N ; r = 1, 2, . . . , n). The
quantity pi is a measure of size of the unit i. This s.d. is a generalization of srswr
s.d. where pi = 1/N ∀ i.
(d) Probability proportional to size without replacement (ppswor): a unit i is selected
at the r th draw with probability proportional to its normed measure of size and
a unit once selected is removed from the population before the next draw. Here,
p1 (i 1 ) = pi1
1 1
N
pk
πi j = pi p j + , where A = .
1 − pi 1 − pj k=1
1 − pk
p1 (i) = pi(1)
pi(rr )
pr (ir |i 1 , . . . , ir −1 ) = , r = 2, . . . , n. (1.3.1)
1 − pi(r1 ) − pi(r2 ) − · · · pi(rr −1)
The quantities { pi(r ) } are generally functions of pi and p-values of the units
already selected. In particular, ppswor sampling scheme described in item (d)
above is a special case of this scheme, where pi(r ) = pi , r = 1, . . . , n. The
sampling design may also be attained by a inverse sampling procedure where
units are drawn wr, with probability pi(r ) at the r th draw, until for the first time
n distinct units occur. The n distinct units each taken only once constitute the
sample.
(g) Generalized rejective sampling: Draws are made wr and with probability { pi(r ) }
at the r th draw. If all the units turn out distinct, the solution is taken as a sample;
otherwise, the whole sample is rejected and fresh draws are made. The scheme
reduces to the scheme at (e) above, if pi(r ) = pi ∀i.
(h) Systematic sampling with varying probability (including unequal probability).
(k) Sampling from groups: The population is divided into L groups either at random
or following some suitable procedure and a sample of size n h is drawn from the
hth group using any of the above-mentioned sampling designs such that the
desired sample size n = h n h is attained. Examples are stratified sampling
procedure and Rao–Hartley–Cochran (1962) (RHC) sampling procedure. Thus
in stratified random sampling the population is divided into H strata of sizes
N1 , . . . , N H and a sample of size n h is selected at random from the hth stratum
(h = 1, . . . , H ). The quantities n h and n = h n h are suitably determined.
RHC procedure has been discussed in the next section.
Based on the above methods, there are many unistage or multistage stratified
sampling procedures. In a multistage procedure sampling is carried out in many
stages. Units in a two-stage population consist of N first-stage units (fsu’s) of sizes
M1 , . . . , M N , with the bth second stage unit (ssu) in the ath fsu being denoted ab
for a = 1, . . . , N ; b = 1, . . . , Ma , with its associated y values being denoted yab .
For a three-stage population the cth third stage unit (tsu) in the bth ssu in the ath
fsu is labeled abc for a = 1, . . . , N ; b = 1, . . . , Ma ; c = 1, . . . , K ab . In a three-
stage sampling a sample of n fsu’s is selected out of N fsu’s and from each of the ath
selected fsu’s, a sample of m a ssu’s is selected out of Ma fsu’s in the selected fsu (a =
1, . . . , n). At the third stage from each of the selected ab ssu’s, containing K ab tsu’s
a sample of kab tsu’s is selected (a = 1, . . . , n; b = 1, . . . , m a ; c = 1, . . . , kab ). The
associated y-value is denoted as yabc , c = 1, . . . , kab ; b = 1, . . . , m a ; a = 1, . . . , n.
10 1 Preliminaries
The sampling procedure at each stage may be srswr, srswor, ppswr, upwor, sys-
tematic sampling, Rao–Hartley–Cochran sampling or any other suitable sampling
procedure. The process may be continued to any number of stages. Moreover, the
population may be initially divided into a number H of well-defined strata before
undertaking the stage-wise sampling procedures. For stratified multistage population
the label h is added to the above notation (h = 1, . . . , H ). Thus here the unit in the
hth stratum, ath fsu, bth ssu, and cth tsu is labeled habc and the associated y value
as yhabc .
As is evident, samples for all the sampling designs may be selected by a whole
sample procedure or mass-draw procedure in which a sample s is selected with
probability p(s).
A F.S.(n)-s.d. with πi proportional to pi = xi / X , where N xi is the value of a
closely related (to y) auxiliary variable on unit i and X = k=1 xk , is often used for
estimating a population total. This is, because an important estimator, the Horvitz–
Thompson estimator (HTE) has very small variance if yi is nearly proportional to pi .
(This fact will be clear in the next section.) Such a design is called a πps design or
I P P S (inclusion probability proportional to size) design. Since πi ≤ 1, it is required
that xi ≤ X/n for such a design.
Many (exceeding seventy) unequal probabilities without replacement sampling
designs have been suggested in the literature, mostly for use along with the HTE.
Many of these designs attain the π ps property exactly, some approximately. For
some of these designs, such as the one arising out of Poisson sampling, sample
size is a variable. Again, some of these sampling designs are sequential in nature
(e.g., Chao 1982; Sunter 1977). Mukhopadhyay (1972), Sinha (1973), and Herzel
(1986) considered the problem of realizing a sampling design with preassigned sets
of inclusion probabilities of first two orders.
Again, in a sample survey, all the possible samples are not generally equally
preferable from the point of view of practical advantages. In agricultural surveys,
for example, the investigators tend to avoid grids which are located further away
from the cell camps, which are located in marshy land, inaccessible places, etc.
In such cases, the sampler would like to use only a fraction of the totality of all
possible samples, allotting only a very mall probability to the non-preferred units.
Such sampling designs are called Controlled Sampling Designs.
Chakraborty (1963) used a balanced incomplete block (BIB) design to obtain
a controlled sampling design replacing a srswor design. For unequal probability
sampling BIB designs and t designs have been considered by several authors (e.g.,
Srivastava and Saleh 1985; Rao and Nigam 1990; Mukhopadhyay and Vijayan 1996).
For a review of different unequal probability sampling designs the reader may
refer to Brewer and Hanif (1983), Chaudhuri and Vos (1988), Mukhopadhyay (1996,
1998b), among others.
1.4 The Estimators 11
After the sample has been selected, the statistician collects data from the field. Here,
again the data may be collected with respect to a sequence sample or set sample.
It is known that data given in (1.4.2) are sufficient for making inference about θ,
whether the sample is a sequence S or a set s (Basu and Ghosh 1967). Data are
said to be unlabeled if after the collection of data its label part is ignored. Unlabeled
data may be represented by a sequence or a set of the observed values without any
reference to the labels.
It may not be possible, however, to collect the data from the sampled units cor-
rectly and completely. If the information is collected from a human population, the
respondent may not be ‘at home’ during the time of collection of data or may refuse
to answer or may give incorrect information, e.g., in stating income, age, etc. The
investigators in the field may also fail to register correct information due to their own
lapses.
We assume throughout that our data are free from such types of errors due to
non-response and errors of measurement and it is possible to collect the information
correctly and completely.
i.e.,
e(s, y) p(s) = T ∀y ∈ R N
s∈S
M(e) = E(e − T )2
(1.4.4)
= V (e) + (B(e))2
where B(e) denotes the design bias, E(e) − T . If e is unbiased for T, B(e) vanishes
and (1.4.4) gives the variance of e, V (e).
V {H ( p, e)} ≤ V {H ( p, e )} ∀y ∈ R N (1.4.5)
I stood with my head up until the boat had whisked Brack out of
sight, then slumped down in despair upon a convenient boulder. I
was horrified and frightened. My thoughts had cleared by now and
the full significance of what I had seen, heard, and undergone came
to me. Brutal robbery, probably murder; such was the sum and
substance of Brack’s plans. The expedition and the Wanderer turned
in the tools of a piracy which would have been unbelievable with any
other man than the captain! And Miss Baldwin back there on the
yacht, ignorant of the morning’s happenings, unsuspecting of Brack’s
true character, and I helpless to warn her or be of any assistance.
Brack would keep up the pretense. He would be the smooth-
talking captain this morning as if nothing untoward had happened,
or was going to happen. He would maintain this pose until he had
accomplished the robbery, until it pleased him to drop it. And after
this morning I knew that he would go to any lengths to fulfil his will.
“Cold?” sneered Barry as I shivered. “Well, don’t worry, sissy,
Cap’ll make it warm enough for you when he gets ready to ’tend to
you.”
I turned to plead with him, and he laughed delightedly at the fear
and wretchedness in my face. For I was afraid. This was no place for
me. It was all too strange, too harsh. I was literally sick at my
stomach; and yet I knew all the time that I was going to try to warn
those unsuspecting miners whom Captain Brack planned to catch in
their mine like rats in a pit. Heaven knows I did not wish to do it! In
my heart I protested against the Fate that had placed such a task to
my lot. I was unfit for it. Somebody else, more used to such things,
should have had the job.
I would have pleaded with Barry, have sought to bribe him, but
the expression on his vicious countenance made me hold my tongue.
What could I do? This sort of thing was new to me; how did one go
about it?
I thought of the two miners delving away in their shafts, of them
suddenly looking up to find Brack grinning down at them. The
unfairness of the thing was revolting. Did men do such things to
their fellows in this day and age?
I glanced at Barry and his rifle and knew that they did. Craft and
brutality, those were the laws governing this situation. And craft and
brutality soon began to enter my thoughts as readily as they might
enter those of Brack, Garvin, or the lout who was guarding me.
At my feet lay several stones the size of a man’s fist. Presently I
feigned sleepiness, nodded, and slipped from the boulder to a seat
on the sand.
“Sleepy, eh?” Barry sneered. “You’re a fine piece o’ cheese.”
“I’m sick,” I muttered. “My head aches.”
“Oh, you poor thing!” He prodded me carelessly with the butt of
his rifle. “For two cents I’d give you a clout that’d take the ache out
of that head for good.”
The minutes went by in silence. Half an hour later, perhaps, I saw
Barry’s vigilance begin to relax.
My right hand dropped languidly at my side and found a round
stone, slightly larger than a baseball. Barry did not see.
More time passed. At last Barry, catching himself nodding,
straightened up and again prodded me with the butt.
“Don’t do that again,” I whined. “Please don’t.”
“‘Please don’t!’” mocked Barry.
In his estimation I was such a weakling that he had no need to be
cautious. The rifle-butt again touched my side. I grasped it suddenly
with my left hand, the fingers fastening themselves around the
trigger-guard, and sprang up, the stone in my right hand. Barry
jerked at the rifle, drawing me close, and I felled him to the ground
with a blow from the stone on the temple.
I had the rifle now, and as he strove to rise I struck him on the
head with the heavy barrel and he lay still. I stood over him, ready
to strike again, but he did not move and with the rifle in my hand I
ran through the green-leaved brush which fringed the fiord and
started to climb the rocky hills that walled it in.
What I had to do I knew must be done in a hurry, before Brack or
Madigan were in a position to keep a watch on the lake, and I ran
on, regardless of the fissures and gaps with which the hill was
pitted. In my haste I paid little attention to my path, and near the
top I plunged suddenly through a tangle of brush and fell into what
proved to be the mouth of a cave-like opening in the rocky portion
of the hill.
The cave was so well hidden by the spring foliage that I had
literally to walk into it before suspecting its existence. I hid the rifle
there, clambered out and went on. If my senses of direction and
distance were right the lake should be straight north and about a
mile and a half away.
Though I ran and walked as rapidly as possible, it was half an
hour before I struck the ridge which shut out the lake from sight of
the bay. Then I knew that in spite of my ignorance of the woods, I
had gone straight to my goal. I went down the farther side at once,
keeping myself hidden in the brush as much as possible in case
Madigan’s crew should be on the lookout, and finding the trail along
the river I went straight up toward the miners’ camp.
A man was waiting for me as I stepped from the alder-brush into
the clearing about the mine. My clumsy traveling had warned of my
approach and he lay behind a pile of dirt before a shaft, a large blue
pistol pointing straight down the trail where I emerged.
“Don’t shoot!” I cried running toward him, with my hands in the
air. “I’m a friend. I’ve come to warn you that a man named Brack
with a crew of cutthroats is on his way to raid your camp.”
The mention of Brack’s name had a pitiful effect upon the man.
He leaped back, his eyes shifty with fright, and made as if to run
back to the cabins. He caught himself, however, and swung his pistol
steadily on the trail behind me.
He was an old man with a patriarchal beard and a gentle face.
When he saw that no one was following me he said—
“Come with me, stranger; we’ll get Bill.”
He retreated, walking backward, covering me and the trail with
his weapon, while I followed. Arriving at the first shaft, still keeping
his eyes on me, he called—
“Oh, Bill!”
A tall, laughing youth, with a soft, curly beard, came clambering
out of the mine in response to his summons. At the sight of me his
hand flashed to the pistol on his hip.
“Tell it to Bill, stranger,” said the patriarch. “Bill, the Laughing
Devil’s back and this gentleman says he’s layin’ to come an’ clean us
pronto.”
“Brack?” gasped the youth, with a frightened glance down the
trail. “Foxy Brack?”
“Yes,” I said. “He’s here to rob you. He’s sent one of his
lieutenants around the ridge to cut off your back trail. He has ten of
the worst men in Christendom with him.”
“Oh, my God!” groaned the young man. Steadying himself he
said, “Who are you, stranger?”
I told about the Wanderer and its party, and about the morning’s
happenings as swiftly as possible.
“Why did you run the risk of coming here and telling us this?”
asked the youth when I concluded. “And how do we know you’re
telling the truth?”
“Bill!” said the old man reprovingly. “Can’t you see? Stranger, we
take this right neighborly of you. My name’s Slade, and this is my
partner, young Bill Harris. Pitt, you said your name was? Well, Mr.
Pitt, you’re a man. This Brack, now, he’s a devil. Bill and me saved
his life when he come ashore up at Omkutsk, and he spoke us fine
and friendly, and acted like a man, and we took him in with us on
this gold find.
“Then one day he tried to put us both out of business and we
caught him in the act just in time. It’s hard to kill a man when you
got him helpless, stranger, though we should ’a’ done it then. We
give him a boat with grub, and when the wind was blowing offshore
we sent him out to sea. The devil must ’a’ took care of its own, since
he’s still living; and now he’s come back to clean us out. We been
sort of ’fraid of it all the time.”
“How many d’ you say with him?” queried young Harris. “And all
bad men, too, eh? God! There’s only two of us——”
“Bill,” said Slade patiently, “we can’t stay an’ fight him. You know
what he is.”
“They’re circling round us now?” Harris was looking around wildly.
“We’re cut off.”
“How many went around to cut our trail, neighbor?”
“Five.”
“We may be able to handle five of ’em, Bill,” said Slade. “We
wouldn’t have no chance with ten. We mustn’t let ’em head us off.
Brack ’ud use fire to make us tell where the gold is cached. We’ll
start right away and travel light.”
Harris ran into the large cabin. I started to go back the way I had
come.
“Wha-a-at? You ain’t going back to Brack’s boat, are you?
Neighbor, there’ll be only hell where that devil is.”
“And for that reason I must go back there.”
“Why?”
“There is a girl—a young lady—on the yacht.”
Old Slade shook his head.
“That dirty devil! But we can’t stay and fight ten men and Brack.
Well, Mr. Pitt, I reckon we owe you our lives and everything we got,
but I dunno how we’re goin’ to square it with you.”
My eyes fell on the automatic pistol in his hand.
“You’re —— whistlin’!” cried Slade suddenly as he thrust the
weapon into my hands. I put it inside my shirt. “That don’t square
us. Best I can do, though. Now, Mr. Pitt—” he gripped my hand
—“God bless yoh!”
XXIII
I hurried back down the river-trail until I reached the ridge. Here I
quitted the way I had come and climbed away over the hills toward
the sea. My plan was to step aboard the Wanderer while Brack was
absent, and without being seen by any of his men. Hence, I gave
the cove where I had struck down Barry a wide berth. In fact, I did
not follow the windings of the fiord at all but struck straight across
the rough country toward where I judged the sea to be.
I got lost twice. Once I found myself turning toward the fiord and
once I had circled back toward the lake. It was well into the
afternoon when I found the rough seacoast and following it
southward came to the mouth of the fiord and, from a hilltop looked
down upon the Wanderer at anchor.
I saw now why my first impression of the morning had been that
the yacht was surrounded by mountains. This was nearly so. The
hills, one of which I was lying on, walled the fiord in on both sides,
while across its mouth, shutting it in from the sea and leaving only a
narrow channel on either side, lay a narrow, crescent-shaped island
consisting of a fir-covered hill of equal height to those of the
mainland.
The Hidden Country! It was the inevitable name for the region.
Small wonder that Kalmut Fiord was not on the maps. It lay
behind its crescent-shaped island securely hidden from all the world.
Outside, the dun, gray North Pacific heaved and murmured, a part of
the busy world. Somewhere on its restless water ships were sailing,
men were active in the doings of our day and age. But in the hidden
country behind the island there was no such suggestion.
The fiord lay hill-ringed and calm, a part of the world, and yet not
of it. Its green Spring foliage, delicate, masking gray hills and black
cliffs, its quiet blue water, its virgin beaches, its very air, all were
heavy with the primitive’s eternal calm.