Instant Access to Cd Te and Related Compounds Physics Defects Hetero and Nano structures Crystal Growth Surfaces and Applications Physics Cd Te based Nanostructures Cd Te based Semimagnetic Semiconductors Defects 1st Edition Edited By ebook Full Chapters
Instant Access to Cd Te and Related Compounds Physics Defects Hetero and Nano structures Crystal Growth Surfaces and Applications Physics Cd Te based Nanostructures Cd Te based Semimagnetic Semiconductors Defects 1st Edition Edited By ebook Full Chapters
com
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
https://ebookname.com/product/te-auahatanga-me-te-ara-auaha-
creativity-and-creative-process-2nd-edition-edition-debbie-
bright/
https://ebookname.com/product/conversation-and-cognition-1st-
edition-hedwig-te-molder/
https://ebookname.com/product/tao-te-ching-stephen-mitchell/
https://ebookname.com/product/libya-since-independence-oil-and-
state-building-1998-1st-ed-1998-edition-dirk-vandewalle/
Des e le ments aux traces elements and traces Ruyter
https://ebookname.com/product/des-e-le-ments-aux-traces-elements-
and-traces-ruyter/
https://ebookname.com/product/hollinshead-s-functional-anatomy-
of-the-limbs-and-back-9e-9th-edition-david-b-jenkins/
https://ebookname.com/product/programming-computer-vision-with-
python-tools-and-algorithms-for-analyzing-images-1st-edition-jan-
erik-solem/
https://ebookname.com/product/physics-pharmacology-and-
physiology-for-anaesthetists-key-concepts-for-the-frca-1st-
edition-matthew-e-cross/
https://ebookname.com/product/the-submerged-plot-and-the-mother-
s-pleasure-from-jane-austen-to-arundhati-roy-1st-edition-kelly-a-
marsh/
Jimmy Stewart Bomber Pilot 1st Edition Starr Smith
https://ebookname.com/product/jimmy-stewart-bomber-pilot-1st-
edition-starr-smith/
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK
Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights
Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (þ44) (0) 1865 853333;
email: [email protected]. Alternatively you can submit your request
online by visiting the Elsevier web site at http://elsevier.com/locate/permis-
sions, and selecting Obtaining permission to use Elsevier material.
Notice
No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to
persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or
from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas
contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical
sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages
should be made.
ISBN: 978-0-08-046409-1
Thirty years after the remarkable monography of K. Zanio and the numer-
ous conferences and papers dedicated since that time to CdTe and
CdZnTe, after all the significant progresses in that field and the increasing
interest in these materials for their extremely attractive fundamental
properties and industrial applications, the editors have thought timely
to edit a book on CdTe and CdZnTe, covering all their most prominent,
modern, and fundamental aspects. The subject has become so wide and
enriched during these 30 years that we have decided to call in well-known
specialists and experts of the field. The editors would like to thank them
deeply for their valuable contributions, with special acknowledgments to
Dr Henri Mariette for his pertinent recommendations and his continued
help and support.
This part covers the topics Physics, CdTe-Based Nanostructures,
Semimagnetic Semiconductors, and Defects. The topics Crystal Growth,
Surfaces, and Applications will be covered in Part II.
R. Triboulet
P. Siffert
xi
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
C.R. Becker
Experimentelle Physik III, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074
Würzburg, Germany.
M.A. Berding
SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
V. Consonni
CEA-LETI, Minatec, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
K. Durose
Science Laboratories, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1
3LE, UK.
P. Fochuk
Chernivtsi National University, 2 vul. Kotsiubinskoho, Chernivtsi 58012,
Ukraine.
R.R. Galazka
Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotnikow 32/46,
02-668 Warszawa, Poland.
K.A. Jones
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State
University, P.O. Box 642920, Pullman, WA, USA.
K. Lynn
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State
University, P.O. Box 642920, Pullman, WA, USA.
Y. Marfaing
Retired from Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS),
Groupe d’Etude de la Matière Condensée (GEMaC), 1 Place A. Briand,
92195 Meudon Cedex, France.
H. Mariette
CEA-CNRS-UJF, Laboratoire de Spectrométrie Physique, UMR 5588
CNRS/Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, Equipe CEA-CNRS-UJF
“Nanophysique et Semi-Conducteurs”, 140 Avenue de la Physique,
BP 87, 38402 Saint Martin d’Hères, France.
ix
x List of Contributors
B.N. Mavrin
Institute of Spectroscopy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142190 Troitsk,
Moscow, Russia.
J.C. Moosbrugger
Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Center for
Advanced Materials Processing, Clarkson University, Potsdam,
NY 13699-5725, USA.
J.B. Mullin
EMC-HooTwo, 22 Branksome Towers, Westminster Road, Poole, Dorset
BH13 6JT, UK.
J.-O. Ndap
II-VI Inc., eV Products, 373 Saxonburg Blvd., Saxonburg, PA 16056, USA.
O. Panchuk
Chernivtsi National University, 2 vul. Kotsiubinskoho, Chernivtsi 58012,
Ukraine.
A. Sher
Sher Consulting, San Carlos Hills, CA 94070, USA.
E.A. Vinogradov
Institute of Spectroscopy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142190 Troitsk,
Moscow, Russia.
T. Wojtowicz
Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotnikow 32/46,
02-668 Warsaw, Poland.
CHAPTER I
Introduction
J.B. Mullina,b,c
CdTe and CdZnTe are iconic examples of II–VI compounds. They epito-
mise the difficulties that need to be surmounted for successful device
exploitation in this class of semiconductors. How can this exploitation be
achieved? Put simply it can be achieved only by dominating the materials
technology. Or, as Dr Sekimoto an eminent Japanese businessman and
scientist so elegantly put it “Who dominates materials dominates technol-
ogy”. This book is about materials domination and the resulting device
exploitation. It concerns the knowledge, the abundant practical experi-
ence and the valuable device technologies that have emerged in
the development of CdTe and its close relative CdZnTe as a result of the
impressive research efforts of countless dedicated scientists.
The II–VIs have a long evolutionary history; indeed some II–VIs have
had applications from the dawn of antiquity. But our interest is their role
as semiconductors. The advent of the semiconductor era (circa 1948)
created a new standard in materials science – the need for semiconductor
quality. This standard ideally required material that was completely
single crystal and essentially defect-free and whose significant impurity
content had been reduced to the ppb level. What then is the status of CdTe
and its related alloys with respect to this goal?
The achievement of this goal for CdTe can be seen as a much more
demanding and problematic process when compared with the group IV
elements and the III–V compounds. The initial stage of semiconductor
quality was reproducibly met for germanium in about a decade and
within the next decade silicon had assumed a role as the dominant
semiconductor. In the case of the III–Vs comparable development
a
Electronic Materials Consultancy, 22 Branksome Towers, Poole BH13 6JT, UK
b
Editor in Chief, Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials
c
Associate Editor, Journal of Crystal Growth
1
2 J.B. Mullin
Contents IIa. Zinc Blende Alloy Materials: Band Structures and Binding
Properties
1. Introduction 7
2. Survey of First Principles Status 8
3. Crystal Structures, Binding, and Elastic Constants 9
3.1. Crystal structures 9
3.2. Insights from the bond orbital approximation 11
4. Concentration Fluctuations 15
4.1. Introduction 15
4.2. General statistical theory 17
4.3. Examples 18
5. Conclusions 19
Acknowledgments 20
References 20
IIb. Optical Phonon Spectra in CdTe Crystals and Ternary
Alloys of CdTe Compounds
1. Introduction 22
2. Phonon Spectra of CdTe 22
2.1. Bulk crystal 22
2.2. Films 25
2.3. Nanostructures 25
3. Localized Modes of Impurities in CdTe 27
4. Ternary Alloys of the CdTe Compounds 29
References 36
IIc. Band Structure
1. Basic Parameters at 300 K and Lower Temperatures 38
1.1. Band structure 38
1.2. Complex loss function 42
1.3. The CdTe(001) surface 44
1.4. Donors and acceptors 47
2. Electrical Properties 50
2.1. Carrier concentration limits 51
2.2. Mobilities 55
2.3. Carrier diffusion lengths and lifetimes 55
References 56
5
6 Chapter II
1. INTRODUCTION
SRI International and Stanford University, Stanford, (Consulting Professor). CA, USA
1
Retired.
7
8 A. Sher
Starting from the density functional (DF) theory of Kohn and Sham, first
principles methods have advanced to a point where they reliably predict
numerous properties of solids. The local density approximation (LDA)
Zinc Blende Alloy Materials: Band Structures and Binding Properties 9
Z ¼1 Snn0
C 4.09 5.48 5.74 5.77 5.49 0 0.34 5.83
Si 0.46 0.95 1.10 1.09 1.17 0.01 0.06 1.24
Ge 0.13 0.66 0.83 0.83 0.78 0.10 0.05 0.93
GaAs 0.34 1.40 1.70 1.66 1.52 0.11 0.10 1.73
wAIN 4.20 5.83 6.24 6.28 0 0.20 6.48
wGaN 1.88 3.15 3.47 3.45 3.49 0 0.20 3.69
wInN 0.24 0.20 0.33 0.69 0 0.16 0.85
wZnO 0.71 2.51 3.07 2.94 3.44 0 0.16 3.60
ZnS 1.86 3.21 3.57 3.51 3.78 0.03 0.10 3.91
ZnSe 1.05 2.25 2.53 2.55 2.82 0.13 0.09 3.04
ZnTe 1.03 2.23 2.55 2.39 0.30 0.08 2.77
CuBr 0.29 1.56 1.98 1.96 3.1 0.04 0.09 3.23
CdO 0.56 0.10 0.22 0.15 0.84 0.01 0.05 0.90
CaO 3.49 6.02 6.62 6.50 7 0
wCdS 0.93 1.98 2.24 2.50 0.03 0.07 2.60
SrTiO3 1.76 3.83 4.54 3.59 3.3
ScN 0.26 0.95 1.24 0.96 0.9 0.01
NiO 0.45 1.1 1.6 4.3
Cu 2.33 2.35 2.23 2.18 2.78
Cu 2.33 2.85 2.73 2.18 2.78
Gd" 4.6 5.6 6.2 4.1 7.9
Gd# 0.3 0.2 1.8 1.5 4.3
For Gd, QPE corresponds to the position of the majority and minority f levels relative to EF; for Cu, QPE
corresponds to the d level. Low-temperature experimental data were used when available. QPEs in the GW
column are calculated with usual GWA Eqs. (6) and (7). In the Z ¼ 1 column the Z factor is taken to be unity.
In the Snn0 column the off-diagonal parts of S are included in addition to taking Z ¼ 1. k-meshes of 8 8 8k
and 6 6 6 were used for cubic and hexagonal structures, respectively (symbol w indicates the wurtzite
structure). GW calculations leave out spin-orbit coupling and zero-point motion effects. The former is
determined from D/3, where D is the spin splitting of the G15u level (in the zinc blende structure); it is shown in
the D/3 column. Contributions to zero-point motion are estimated from table 2 in Ref. [45] and are shown
in the ZP column. The “adjusted” gap adds these columns to the true gap and is the appropriate quantity
to compare to GW.
Another major energy concept has now entered; it is the polar energy V3,
defined as:
V3 eCh eA
h =2: ð8Þ
This energy tends to transfer electrons from the shallower cation to the
deeper anion hybrid states. (Note: both hybrid energies are negative so V3
is a positive energy.) It is ultimately responsible for the ionic contribution
to the solid’s binding energy.
The last contribution to the binding stems from the interaction cou-
pling each bond to its adjacent bonds. These interactions are called the
“metallization energies” and have been shown by Harrison to be:
V1C ¼ eCs eCp =4
ð9Þ
V1A ¼ eAs ep =4:
A
The second equality in Eq. (12) states that the bond orbital model predicts
that the binding energy of pure covalent materials becomes progressively
stronger as the inverse square of the bond length, while the binding
energy of a pure ionic material is independent of the bond length.
This trend is also found experimentally. Thus one expects the variation
of the group IV compounds to vary fastest with bond length, the some-
what ionic III-V compound variations to be less steep, and the still more
ionic II-IV compounds to be even less steep. Obviously other parameters
besides bond length that impact values of x, and V3, also enter.
A number of different elastic constant models are treated in detail in the
“Semiconductor Alloys” book [2] and a review article [9]. Here once again
because of the insight it lends, the discussion will be confined to the bond
orbital model. The general relation between a displacement vector x in the
unstrained material and x0 in a strained material in component form is:
X
x0a ¼ xa þ ab xb ; ð14Þ
b
where ab are components of a 9 9 strain tensor. Then for small ab
values the energy density U is a quadratic function of the ab components:
1X
U¼ cabmn mn : ð15Þ
2 abmn ab
The last equality for C44 is quite instructive. It says that in the BOA there is
an analytic relation between the three elastic coefficients. Because this
relationship arises from a quantum treatment that is a reasonable approx-
imation to reality, it serves as a justification for treatments like the valence
force field model (VFF) of Keating [11] that involves only two elastic
constants, bond stretching and bond bending constants.
In a nearly pure covalent material where V2 V3 or ac ffi 1,
the expressions in Eq. (17) reduce to:
2 3
2A 4 9 2
B ffi pffiffiffi 1 V1C þ V1A 2
=V22 5;
3d5 8
pffiffiffi
5:00 3
C11 C12 ¼ ;
d5 ð19Þ
pffiffiffi 2 2
3:00 3A 1 ð9=8Þ V1C þ V1A
2
=V2
C44 ¼ 8 9
< A 1 ð9=8Þ V 2
þ V 2
=V 2 =
1C 1A 2
2d5 1 þ :
: 5d2 ;
For this nearly covalent case all the elastic constants to first order vary
proportional to 1/d5. In the opposite extreme of a nearly ionic bonded
compound, where V2 V3, or ac ffi V2/V3 1, all of the elastic constants
in Eq. (17) are small but the leading term is proportional to 1/d9.
The agreement between the experimental and BOM predictions of the
elastic constant trends is good but the absolute values differ by factors of
2–4. When Coulomb interaction terms that are absent from the simple
form of the BOM are added, the agreement improves. When a full calcu-
lation based on HPT band structures and wave functions are done the
agreement is still better. Finally when an LMTO-based calculation is done
the agreement falls within 2-3% [2].
Because the bond length difference between HgTe and CdTe is small
(see Table 2), when they are alloyed into Hg(1x)CdxTe, the alloy elastic
constants are very nearly a simple concentration-weighted average of the
constituents. However, when alloys of CdTe or HgTe with ZnTe are
formed, the stiff ZnTe bonds on the low ZnTe concentration side of alloys
significantly increase the alloy elastic constants above their concentration-
weighted average. This is of particular importance to dislocation densities
in these alloys. Since most of the excess energy associated with dislocations
Zinc Blende Alloy Materials: Band Structures and Binding Properties 15
Table 2 Experimental values of the bond length and experimental and BOM results for
the bonding energy and the three independent elastic constants for three compounds
ZnTe 2.643 1.20 1.04 5.090 1.82 3.060 1.88 3,120 1.50
CdTe 2.805 1.10 0.96 4.210 1.24 1,680 1.22 2.040 0.96
HgTe 2.797 0.82 0.48 4.759 1.23 1.817 1.33 2.259 1.11
The units for the elastic constants are 1011 dynes/cm2.
is in shears, for a given stress the dislocation density tends to be lower for a
short bond length material.
While the bond length difference between HgTe and CdTe is small, it
still causes troublesome misfit and treading dislocations in epitaxial
layers of Hg(1x)CdxTe alloys grown on CdTe substrates. This is mitigated
somewhat by shortening the CdTe bonds by adding enough Zn to a
Cd(1x)ZnxTe alloy substrate material to lattice match the substrate and
the epitaxial layer. In the best of circumstances threading dislocations still
propagate from the substrate into the epitaxial layers, and also long-
ranged cross hatch patterns persist [12]. These and other point and meso-
scopic sized defects degrade the performance of devices made from these
materials, especially in the long (LWIR) and very long (VLWIR) wave
length spectral regions where small fluctuations have an important effect
on the band gap.
A typical IR detector device structure is comprised of a conducting
substrate, followed by a semi-insulating p-type base layer, a more heavily
n-doped graded composition layer forming a heterojunction, and finally
an insulating cap passivation layer. Performance of these devices is sensi-
tive to the quality of the lattice matching at each interface.
4. CONCENTRATION FLUCTUATIONS
4.1. Introduction
In Hg1xCdxTe alloys with concentration x, there is a near lattice constant
match between HgTe and CdTe bonds. Thus there is little strain energy
contribution to the mixing enthalpy [6]. Moreover, if there is a cluster
containing N cations (1 < N < many thousands) embedded in the average
medium, there is no strain penalty if the cation concentration in the cluster
is x, differing from the average alloy concentration x. The net statistical
consequence is that there must be such concentration fluctuation clusters
16 A. Sher
and for each moderately large cluster of size N, they have a probability
distribution [6] given approximately by:
!
1 ðx
xÞ 2
PN ðxÞ ¼ exp ; ð20Þ
NN 2s2N
The quantity x is defined in Eq. (21), and N defined in the second equality
in Eq. (22) are both of order unity. For small clusters the Bernoulli distri-
bution must be used in place of the Gaussian. When there is a lattice
constant mismatch between the constituents, there is an extra multiplica-
tive factor f, less than unity, which enters into x [6]. For an alloy with
a large lattice constant mismatch the extra factor can be quite small. Some
representative numbers are given in Table 3. The shapes of clusters
are undoubtedly erratic, but if they are assumed to be spherical then the
relation between their radius rN, and N is just:
4p 3
N¼ r r; ð24Þ
3 N c
where rc is the density of cation sites in the solid. The effect of the
spherical cluster shape approximation needs to be examined in a refined
Table 3 Values of the reduction factor f for two alloys at two cutoff wave lengths
lc(mm) 10 20
Alloy x f x f
calculation, along with ellipsoidal, cubic, and tetragonal shapes that could
be more appropriate in some cases.
volume bumps and dips with smaller volumes generally with larger
amplitudes, superimposed on them.
The probability in a domain of size ND of finding a cluster having size
N and concentration x is:
nðN xÞ 1
PN ðxÞ
ðN; xÞ X ð ¼ NX : ð28Þ
ND 1
dx P N 0 ðxÞ
N0
N0 N0
N0
4.3. Examples
Let us do a couple of simple examples to demonstrate the averaging
process. In this exercise we will let the integral over x vary from minus
to plus infinity rather than renormalizing PN(x).
Example (A): GðxÞ ¼ x x
Then we have:
hx
x iN ¼ 0 ð30Þ
D E
so hxiN ¼
x, and x N ¼
x.
Example (B): GðxÞ ¼ ðx x Þ2
Now the integral becomes:
D E
xð1 xÞ
ðx
xÞ 2 ¼ s2N ¼ : ð31Þ
N N
Zinc Blende Alloy Materials: Band Structures and Binding Properties 19
Replacing the sum over N by an integral, the second average over the
pixel volume is:
D E ð ND
2
xð1
xÞ xð1 xÞ 1 1
ðx
xÞ N ¼ dN 2 ¼ : ð32Þ
NF N lnðND =NF Þ lnðND =NF Þ NF ND
For a pixel whose volume is 40 40 10 mm3 and for Hg0.79Cd0.21Te
where rc ¼ 7.41 1021 cm3, we find ND ¼ 1.18 1014, and ln ND ¼ 32.4.
If we take NF ¼ 2, the smallest value for which s2N =x2 has the same answer
for both the Gaussian and Bernoulli distributions, and x ¼ 0:21 then:
D E
ðx xÞ 2 N 1 1 x
D E2 ¼ ¼ 5:93 102 : ð33Þ
2lnðND =2Þ x
x N
This says the average x variation among pixels of the above volume is
0.21 0.059. This is probably too large a variation. One problem is that
the averages for small N are large and they get emphasized in the conver-
sion from a sum to an integral in the second average over the pixel. This
example needs to be redone using a proper distribution for small N and
retaining the sum until N is large. However, even when this is done the
rms value is still too high.
As it stands, this theory only accounts for strain reductions through the f
factor. Values of f are given in Table 3 for the Hg(1x)CdxTe and Hg(1x)ZnxTe
alloys for concentrations where the cut off wave lengths are 10 and 20 mm.
For Hg(1x)CdxTe the reduction factor is near unity. But it is small enough in
Hg(1x)ZnxTe alloys to significantly suppress concentration fluctuations.
A good part of the reason this theory predicts large rms fluctuation is that
a mechanism is left out of the formalism that also reduces their amplitudes.
A cluster with a concentration x differing from the average x will have a net
cohesive energy and a mean deviation of its cohesive energy that is different
from the average. This effect still must be built into the theory.
5. CONCLUSIONS
Starting about 20 years ago and accelerating, materials science theory is
undergoing a major change. The methods have progressed from approx-
imations that often led to insights into the underlying cause of phenom-
ena, but depend on parameters fitted to experiments to produce accurate
predictions, to parameter free first principles computational methods.
These new computational intensive methods not only help uncover the
true causes of phenomena, but are proving to be reliable engineering tools
that when used properly can speed developments. The combination of
first principles predicted parameters, and processing and performance
models are powerful device development tools.
20 A. Sher
In this chapter, three levels of theories have been referenced. The BOA
relies on a simplified fundamental-based calculation with few adjusted
parameters to lend insight into the caused of a broad range of phenomena,
but the accuracy of the predictions is often in the range of factors of two or
so. The HPT method is closer to a first principles computationally inten-
sive method, but it does require some fitting parameters. However, once
that initial fitting is done the method allows predictions of a wide variety
of phenomena for compounds and alloys with no further fitted para-
meters to accuracies of 10%. First principles theories like the self-
consistent full potential GWA method predicts the behavior of complex
materials to within a few percent with no adjusted parameters.
However, even with these powerful techniques in hand it is still
necessary to ask them the right questions. That brings us to the example
of concentration fluctuations. The presentation above is a bare start into a
study of the impact these fluctuations have on the properties of alloys.
These fluctuations are expected to be especially troublesome in alloys
where the band gap is small, that is, cases where the cutoff wave length
of devices is in the 10-20 mm range.
I have long advocated that for these VLWIR devices the active materi-
als should be Hg(1x)ZnxTe rather than Hg(1x)CdxTe because in that alloy
system not only concentration fluctuations, but also dislocation tend to be
suppressed. Some early 20 mm cutoff, LPE grown Hg(1x)ZnxTe arrays
were tested [14]. They displayed excellent bake stability and had detec-
tivities D* at 64 K within a few percent of BLIP (D∗ BLIP ¼ 1:3 10 Jones).
11
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank Professor Mark van Schilfgaarde for guidance on the
current status of first principle calculations and for a preprint of his paper.
I also wish to thank Professor An-Ban Chen for deducing Eq. (25) and
other suggestions. I am indebted to Dr. E. Patten who supplied data on
Hg(1x)ZnxTe alloy based devices.
REFERENCES
[1] W.A. Harrison, Electronic Structure and the Properties of Solids, W. H. Freeman and
Company, San Francisco, 1980.
[2] A.-B. Chen, A. Sher, Semiconductor Alloys, Plenum Press, New York, 1995.
[3] S. Krishnamurthy, A. Sher, J. Appl. Phys. 75 (1994) 7904–7909.
Zinc Blende Alloy Materials: Band Structures and Binding Properties 21
1. INTRODUCTION
The structure of the cubic face-centered unit cell of CdTe crystal is char-
acterized by the space group Td2 (F43m) and contains four formula units.
The primitive unit is one fourth as many. The vibrational representation
of optical phonons consists of 1 threefold-degenerated mode F2 which is
active in IR and Raman spectra. The dipole mode F2 is split into the
transverse (TO) and longitudinal (LO) modes in the vibrational spectra.
Institute for Spectroscopy of Russian Academy of Sciences, Fizicheskaya Str.5, 142190, Troitsk, Moscow, Russia
22
Optical Phonon Spectra in CdTe Crystals and Ternary Alloys of CdTe Compounds 23
1.0 R
0.8 4
Δ-1
x-2
0.6
0-3
0.4
0.2
Figure 1 Infrared-reflection spectra of pure CdTe with the different polish of surface:
1—chemical treatment (273 K), 2—on pitch (273 K), 3—on cloth (273 K), 4—on pitch (80 K).
where
ð
o lnRðnÞ
yðoÞ ¼ dn: ð2Þ
p n2 o 2
The value n(o) and k(o) are related with dielectric function e(o) ¼ e1(o) þ
ie2(o) as follows:
e1 ðoÞ ¼ n2 ðoÞ k2 ðoÞ; e2 ðoÞ ¼ 2nðoÞkðoÞ;
1 2nðoÞkðoÞ ð3Þ
Im ¼ 2
:
eðoÞ ½n ðoÞ þ k2 ðoÞ
2
On the other hand, using the general dispersion relation for e(o) with the g
damping, one can obtain:
ðe0 e1 Þo2TO g 1 ðe1 1
1 e0 ÞoLO g
2
oe2 ðoÞ ¼ ; oIm ¼ : ð4Þ
ðo oTO Þ2 þ g2 eðoÞ ðoLO oÞ2 þ g2
The maximum of the curve oe2(o) corresponds to the TO-mode frequency
oTO and the oIm(1/e(o)) maximum to the LO-mode frequency oLO.
The bandwidths of these curves determine the g damping of phonons.
24 B.N. Mavrin and E.A. Vinogradov
Three methods were used to find the oscillator strengths (STO ¼ e0 e1) of
TO modes:
pffiffiffiffiffiffi !2 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffi !2
R0 þ 1 R1 þ 1
e0 ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffi and e1 ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ;
R0 1 R1 1
ð ð5Þ
gTO 2 1 e2 ðoÞ
e0 e1 ¼ e2 ðoTO Þ; e0 e1 ¼ do;
oTO p 0 o
8 n, k
k
n
4
0
100 200 cm–1
ε1, ε2 Im (–ε–1)
100 1.0
50 0.5
0
100 200 cm–1
–50
Figure 2 Optical functions of CdTe: n(o) and k(o), e1(o), e2(o)-left axis,
and Im(e1 (o))-right axis, reconstructed from reflection spectra 1 of Fig. 1.
Optical Phonon Spectra in CdTe Crystals and Ternary Alloys of CdTe Compounds 25
(<1.5 eV), TO mode is dominant [12, 13]. But in the case of resonant
Raman scattering, especially at resonance with the E0 þ D0 gap
(2.54 eV), LO mode and its overtones become intense [14, 15]. Besides,
the bands near 120 and 140 cm1 corresponding to phonons of Te on the
CdTe surface can be seen in the resonant Raman spectra.
The phonons of the CdTe crystal were studied in the whole Brillouin
zone by inelastic neutron scattering [16] and ab initio calculations [17]. As
it follows from calculations of the density of phonon states in CdTe crystal
[18], there is a gap from 123 to 128 cm1 between acoustical and optical
density of states and the high-frequency edge of the optical density is near
173 cm1.
2.2. Films
The direct measurements of both TO and LO phonons by infrared tech-
nique may be performed from films. Earlier it was shown [19], that one
can observe an absorption by TO and LO modes at the oblique incidence
of light on a film. As it is expected [19], only TO modes may be seen in the
s-polarized light as well as both TO and LO modes in p-polarized light.
The experimental spectra of the infrared absorption in the CdTe films on
the metallic mirror [10] correspond to these predictions (Fig. 3). Moreover,
the optical constants of CdTe measured from the reflection for bulk
crystals (Table 1) and by the absorption in the films are similar [10]. For
more detail explanation of IR optical properties of thin semiconductor
(A2B6) films see for example [20].
The Raman spectra from CdTe films were also studied (for example,
in [21]) and they had the same features as those from the bulk crystal
(Table 2).
2.3. Nanostructures
The phonon spectra of nanostructures (quantum dots, quantum wells and
heterostructures) can be different from those of bulk crystals and depend
on the nanocrystal shape and size. The interface phonons, the folded
26 B.N. Mavrin and E.A. Vinogradov
R R
1 1 1 1
1 2 1 2
1 3 1 3
1 4 1
4
0.9
0.8 0.8
0.7
0.6 0.6
cm–1 cm–1
acoustical phonons and the confined optical phonons may appear in the
nanostructure spectra [22].
For example, the Raman spectra of the CdTe quantum well show a
main peak near 173 cm1 and smaller oscillationlike features towards
lower phonon energies, which are assigned to even-order confined pho-
nons (m ¼ 2, 4, . . ., 12) in quantum well [23]. The appearance of the
oscillations is due to the quantization of the phonon momentum along
the epitaxial growth normal to the layer:
qm ¼ mp=ðd þ a0 =2Þ; ð6Þ
where d is the layer thickness and a0 is the lattice constant of the bulk
crystal. Using the observed dispersion om (qm) of the oscillations, it is
possible not only to find the phonon dispersion at q > 0, but also to derive
and estimate the compositional profile of the quantum well [23].
Optical Phonon Spectra in CdTe Crystals and Ternary Alloys of CdTe Compounds 27
localized modes of the impurity with frequencies above the optic band of
the host lattice. Impurities of heavier masses may have localized mode
frequencies in the gap between the acoustical and optical bands (gap
modes). Localized modes falling inside the optical band are known as
resonance modes. The frequencies of impurity modes may be found from
equation [33]:
eo 2 X X jsj ðq; MÞj2
0
1þ ¼ 0; ð8Þ
N q j o2j ðqÞ o0 2
0.8 R
0.6
2
0.4
0.2
1
0.9 R
1
2
0.7
0.5 3
0.3
0.1
cm–1
Im (ε) Im (−ε–1)
1.5
2
100 1 1.25
80 1.0
60 0.75
40 0.5
4
20 0.25
0 0
3
–20 –0.25
150 170 190 210 230 cm–1
Figure 5 Reflectivity spectra of gap mode in ZnTe:Cd (A) crystals with compositions:
1—ZnTe, 2—Zn0.95Cd0.05Te, 3—Zn0.80Cd0.20Te and their dielectric functions (B).
One the most successful models which has been used to describe the
optical behavior in mixed crystals is the random element isodisplacement
(REI) model [44, 45, 47]. The REI model is based on the assumption that in
the long-wavelength limit the anion and cation of like species vibrate with
the same phase and amplitude and that interatomic forces are determined
by a statistical average of the interaction with its neighbors. A modified
REI model [47] is completely defined by the macroscopic parameters of
the pure end members. As distinct from REI models [44, 45], in incorpo-
rates second-neighbor force constant f(B-C) and a linear dependence of all
force constants on the lattice parameter without resorting to microscopic
fitting parameters.
At present there are no clear formal criteria for one- or two-mode
behavior. The conditions given earlier [44] are not valid for ternary alloys
of the CdTe compounds [8, 9]. For example, the two-mode behavior
occurs in the CdTe1xSex crystal [34] while the conditions [44] predict
an one-mode behavior, since the Se atom mass is greater than the reduced
mass of elements of CdTe (mSe > mCdTe). The CdTe1xSex reflection spectra
show two Reststrahlen bands [34]. The intensity of the low-frequency
band decreases continuously from a value of pure CdTe (x ¼ 0) to zero
at x ! 1 whereas the intensity of the high-frequency band increases with
the Se concentration. The dependence of optical-mode frequencies on
CdTe1xSex composition is shown in Fig. 6 and the oscillator strengths
of TO and LO modes in Fig. 7. By analogy with the TO oscillator strength
(Eq. (5)) the oscillator strength of LO modes was found as
1 1 gLO 1
SLO ¼ ¼ Im : ð9Þ
e1 e0 oLO eðoLO Þ
TO1
170 170
LO2
TO2
130 130
0.4 0.8 x
CdTe CdSe
"I wouldn't tell her neither," she said earnestly. "I'm not
so bad as that. She ain't like us; and I wouldn't be the one
to make her like my sort. I'd sooner learn to be like her—if I
could."
CHAPTER XX.
TROUBLE.
The class ended, Annie put away her Bible, set the
chairs straight, and went out into the garden, singing softly.
She believed her father to be at the school, where he
usually went every Sunday afternoon. A favourite Homer
rose bush near the garden-gate drew Annie's attention. She
thought she would gather a few buds, and put them on
father's study table, to refresh his eyes when he returned.
He had not seemed at all well that morning; and Annie had
almost made up her mind to ask Mr. Rawdon privately some
day soon whether Mr. Wilmot ought not to take a tonic.
CHAPTER XXI.
THE GREAT DREAD!
"I will see some one, and arrange for the service this
evening." Mr. Rawdon spoke deliberately. "I have already
warned your father that he must consent to do less work.
"The fact is, Miss Wilmot—the fact is, your father has
had lately a severe return of certain troublesome heart
symptoms, from which he suffered a good deal about two
years ago. You will probably remember."
She lifted her face, and said in a voice quiet as his own:
"But how can I help—?" sobbed the poor girl, for the
moment entirely overcome.
Yet her words had been true, and she knew it. But she
could not feel or see their truth now. She could only bow
her head beneath the blow.
After all, was there any need—as yet? The blow had
only just fallen: and He who sent it knew its weight, knew
her weakness. Annie had only just entered the School of
Sorrow, and He who called her into it could pity her faltering
steps with all a mother's tenderness.
"I have been looking for you," her father said. "Come
here, my child."
"That is the right attitude for both of us, isn't it?" said
Mr. Wilmot softly.
Annie looked up, but she could not face his smile. Her
head sank anew.