Interval Appendicectomy in Follow Up Cases-New 2024
Interval Appendicectomy in Follow Up Cases-New 2024
1
Material and Methods: • Study location: Kalaburagi's,Basaveshwara
Teaching and General Hospital, which is attached to MahadevappaRampure
Medical College. • Research period: November 1, 2022–August 31, 2023 •
Prospective research is the study design. • Data analysis: Data will be
recorded into MS Excel, tabulated, and analyzed using the proper statistical
test. • Sample size: All patients admitted to various surgical wards during
the study period, diagnosed cases of appendicular mass and abscess are
considered.
Results:Because of its low conversion rate, lower recurrence, lower
complication rate, and shorter hospital stay, interval appendicectomy is seen
to be advantageous in cases of severe appendicitis that are treated
conservatively.
2
identified as a little pouching of the these are fecal stasis and fecoliths,
cecum. As the pregnancy goes on, but other potential causes include
the cecum rotates medially and ascaris parasites, lymphoid
settles into the right lower hyperplasia, neoplasms, fruit and
quadrant of the belly, causing the vegetable debris, and barium
appendix to grow longer and more ingestion.
tubular.
Because of the columnar
epithelium, neuroendocrine cells,
and goblet cells that produce
mucin that line the tubular
structure, the appendiceal mucosa
has a colonic appearance. The
appendix is a midgut organ that
receives its blood supply from the
superior mesenteric artery. One of
the main named branches of the
superior mesenteric artery, the
ileocolic artery, is the source of the
appendiceal artery, which passes
through the mesoappendix. The Pathophysiology And
lymphatics of the appendix are also
located in the mesoappendix, and
they accompany the blood flow
from the superior mesenteric
artery to the ileocecal nodes.
Adults usually have an appendix
that is 9 cm long, though it can
vary in length from 5 to 35 cm.
Antibiotic treatment for
appendicitis-related infections
should consider both gram-
negative and gram-anemophilous
bacteria. These infections should
be considered polymicrobial.
Common isolates include
Escherichia coli, Bacteroides
fragilis, enterococci, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, and others. There are
numerous causes of luminal
obstruction. The most common of
3
Pathogenesis of The Ÿ Localized tenderness in right iliac
Appendicular Mass fossa
Following an acute episode of Ÿ Muscle guarding
MURPHYS TRIAD
Ÿ Pain Differential Diagnosis Gastro-
Ÿ Vomiting intestinal
Ÿ Temperature Cholecystitis Diverticulitis The
SIGNS OF APPENDICITIS diverticulitis of Meckel Enteritis
Ÿ Pyrexia
4
stomach ulcer Intussusception to the right; • Preperitoneal fat
intestinal lymphadenopathy widening; • Right lower quadrant
Enterocolitis with necrotizing mass indenting the caecum; •
Omentum Torsion Acute Blurring of the right psoas shape;
Pancreatitis Bowel perforation • Appendix gas
volvulus Neoplasm (carcinoid,
carcinoma, lymphoma) Ultrasound
GYNECOLOGICAL Unwanted For people experiencing
conception Endometriosis Torsion abdominal discomfort,
of the ovaries Inflammatory illness ultrasonography has a sensitivity
of the pelvis An ovarian cyst bursts of over 85% and a specificity of
ovarian tubo abscess over 90% when diagnosing acute
Systemic Cause appendicitis.
Acidosis keto in diabetics Porphyria Ultrasound Findings
Anemia with sickle cells Pleurisy
Genito-urinary prostatic and • A tubular structure that is blind and ends
pyelonephritic kidney stones at the tender point • Non-compressible
urinary tract infection infection of oedema of the caecal pole • Diameter 7
parasites mm or more •No peristalsis •Appendicolith
Abscess of Psoas Hematoma producing an acoustic shadow high
Torsion of the testicles echogenicity non-compressible
INVESTIGATIONS surrounding fat •Surrounding fluid or
abscess; •One assertion is that the
Lab Investigations sensitivity is approximately 90%. Recall
The overall count significantly that there are difficulties with diagnosing
rose, with a range of 8000 to appendicitis with ultrasonography.
14000/mm3. An increase in gangrenous or perforated appendicitis,
neutrophil counts (Shift to left) retrocaecal appendicitis, appendicitis of the
Increased CRP suggests appendiceal tip, and orgas loaded appendix
inflammation. Analyzing urine to are among the scenarios that can result in
rule out urinary tract infections. false-negative exams.
RADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES
5
appendectomy beneficial for both
gynecological disorders and young
girls
6
Ÿ Calculating the mass's laparoscopy has become more
dimensions After six weeks, if the common. By allowing for a quicker
patient continues to progress, hospital stay and an earlier return
orals are recommended along to work, laparoscopic operations
with an interval appendicectomy. reduce the number of lost earning
Ÿ If therapy doesn't work, surgery days. Because the majority of them
is done. are daily wage workers in India, it
is helpful there.
Operative Management
An appendicectomy is the therapy DISCUSSION
for appendicitis. Preoperative work Both complicated and
up should be done correctly. uncomplicated acute
1. IV fluid administration should start. appendicitis are the most
monitoring of blood pressure, common cause of severe
pulse, and urine production. Any abdominal pain.
irregularities in electrolytes should An appendix inflammation may
be rectified. sometimes be accompanied with
a restricted abscess or an
2. Antibiotics ought to be inflammatory phlegmon. The
administered prior to the half-hour best course of action for these
mark of anesthetic induction. patients is up for debate.
Treatment for these patients is
3. Antibiotic should cover both gram-
either conservative or surgical.
negative bacteria and anaerobes
In order to assess the
4. There should not be any delay in effectiveness of interval
surgery to minimize the chances of appendicectomy and its
perforation. necessity, this study will follow
patients who have been
Numerous researches have been diagnosed with appendicular
carried out globally; some have mass or abscess and are
endorsed and bolstered undergoing either conservative
laparoscopy, while others have not. or surgical treatment (drainage).
Laparoscopy can be used to treat The study includes all patients
acute appendicitis in the majority diagnosed with appendicular
of cases. Compared to open mass or abscess who are
appendicectomy, laparoscopic admitted to surgical wards.
appendicectomy is less risky and Without undergoing an
has less pain and morbidity after appendicectomy, patients in this
surgery. A laparoscopic group are treated conservatively
appendicectomy can shorten or with surgical drainage.
hospital stay, allow for an early About fifty individuals with
return to work, and result in fewer complex appendicitis were
problems. Due to improved training advised to have surgical
drainage or conservative therapy
in minimum access surgery,
7
in this study. These people were in the following order based on
watched for around three the duration of their stay.
months. Some of the patients 7 3
got interval appendicectomy Days
during the procedure, while 6 6
others underwent conservative Days
line of treatment. 5Days 16
Of the fifty patients that were 4 7
part of the trial, twenty-one were Days
female and 29 were male. The 3 8
majority of hospitalized patients Days
with appendicitis were between
the ages of 20 and 30 (about Of the 42 cases, six interval
54%), then between 30 and 40 appendicectomy patients had
(28%), and finally older than 40 postoperative complications like
and younger than 20. Out of the fever, wound infection, and
50 patients admitted, 28 wound gaping. Furthermore, it
patients had an appendicular was found that five patients had
mass identified either normal histology findings
radiologically or clinically; demonstrating total infection
roughly 22 people had this remission, demonstrating the
diagnosis. Every patient with efficacy of cautious antibiotic
appendicular abscesses treatment. The incidence of
underwent surgical drainage and complications was somewhat
underwent three months of higher than in cases involving
follow-up care. traditional appendicectomy.
The following is the breakdown Of the eight participants who did
of the procedures performed on not get interval appendicectomy,
the about 42 patients who had there was no record of
interval appendicectomy. A recurrence.
conservative course of treatment With all of this information,
was continued for the eight interval appendicectomy might
patients who remained. 33 not be required in a case of
patients had laparoscopy; 2 had severe appendicitis that is
open surgery; and 7 had lap treated conservatively.
conversion to open surgery.
The conversion rate from
laparoscopic appendicectomy to CONCLUSION
open method was slightly In our study, conservative care
greater than in individuals with with interval appendectomy for the
acute appendicitis. management of appendiceal
The hospital stays varied in mass/abcess shown a lower
duration from three to seven incidence of recurrence and
days. The patients are arranged negligible consequences.
8
Considering all of these data, resolution of an appendiceal mass questioned.
Dig Surg. 2002;19:216–220].
interval appendicectomy is thought 13. Wright GP. Is there truly an oncologic indication
for interval appendectomy? Am J Surg.
to be advantageous due to its low 2015;209:442–6].
conversion rate, low complication 14. Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and
laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg.
rate, and shorter hospital stay 2004 Jan. 91(1):28-37.
while treating complex appendicitis 15. Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordström P,
Aarnio M, Rantanen T, et al. Antibiotic Therapy vs
conservatively. Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated
Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized
Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Jun 16. 313 (23):2340-8.
[Medline].
16. Cariati A, Brignole E, Tonelli E, Filippi M, Guasone
F, De Negri A. [Laparoscopic or open
REFERENCES
appendectomy. Critical review of the literature
1. Margaret Farquharson (Author), Brendan Moran
and personal experience]. G Chir. 2001 Oct.
(Author).Operations on appendix. In
17. Esposito C, Borzi P, Valla JS, Mekki M, Nouri A,
Farquharson's Textbook of Operative General
Becmeur F. Laparoscopic versus open
Surgery, 9th EditionA Hodder Arnold Publication.
appendectomy in children: a retrospective
2. Muhammad Shoib Hanif, Tufail Hussain Tahir,
comparative study of 2,332 cases. World J Surg.
Irfan Ali sheikh, Muhammad Zaman Ranjha. Acute
2007 Apr. 31(4):750- 5. [Medline].
appendicitis: gaining time in mass casualty
18. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA.
scenario. Pak Armed Forces J Med 2010; 3 23-25.
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected
3. Chan L, Shin LK, Pai RK, Jeffery RB. Pathologic
appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004
continuum of acute appendicitis:Sonographic
Oct 18. CD001546. [Medline].
findings and clinical management implications.
19. McBurney C. II. The Indications for Early
Ultrasound Q 2011;27(2):71-9.
Laparotomy in Appendicitis. Ann Surg. 1891 Apr.
4. Tannoury J, Abboud B. Treatment options of
13(4):233-54. [Medline].
inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults.
20. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(25):3942–3950.
1983 Mar. 15(2):59-64. [Medline]
5. Cueto J, D'Allemagne B, VázquezFrias JA,
Gomez S, Delgado F, Trullenque L, et al.
Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated
appendicitis: an international study. Surgical
Endoscopy 2006;20(5):71720.
6. Norman S.William, Christopher J.K.Bulstrode, P
Ronan O' Connel in Vermiform appendix in Short
practice Of surgery, 25th ed, 2008, Edward
Arnold publisher Ltd 1205-1217.
7. Deelder JD, Richir MC, Schoorl T, Schreurs WH.
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
2014;18(4):6415.
8. Kirkwood KS, Maa J. The appendix. In: Sabiston
DC, Townsend CM, editors. Sabiston textbook of
surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical
practice. 18th ed. Philadelphia:
Saunders/Elsevier; 2008. pp. 1333–1347.
9. Cheng Y, Xiong X, Lu J, Wu S, Zhou R, Lin Y, et al.
Early versus delayed appendicectomy for
appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 4.
[DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011670].
10. Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T,
Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute
appendicitis in the United States: study period
1993–2008. Journal of Surgical Research
2012;175(2):18590.
11. Anderson JE, Bickler SW, Chang DC, Talamini
MA. Examining a common disease with unknown
etiology: trends in epidemiology and surgical
management of appendicitis in California,
19952009. World Journal of Surgery
2012;36(12):278794.
12. Willemsen PJ, Hoorntje LE, Eddes EH, Ploeg RJ.
The need for interval appendectomy after