(Ebooks PDF) Download Advanced Linear Modeling Statistical Learning and Dependent Data 3rd Edition Christensen R Full Chapters
(Ebooks PDF) Download Advanced Linear Modeling Statistical Learning and Dependent Data 3rd Edition Christensen R Full Chapters
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/advanced-linear-
modeling-statistical-learning-and-dependent-
data-3rd-edition-christensen-r/
https://textbookfull.com/product/functional-data-structures-in-r-
advanced-statistical-programming-in-r-mailund/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/functional-data-structures-in-r-
advanced-statistical-programming-in-r-thomas-mailund/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/dressed-in-dreams-a-black-girl-s-
love-letter-to-the-power-of-fashion-first-edition-ford/
textbookfull.com
You Can’t Know It All: Leading in the Age of Deep
Expertise Wanda T. Wallace
https://textbookfull.com/product/you-cant-know-it-all-leading-in-the-
age-of-deep-expertise-wanda-t-wallace/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-uyghur-community-diaspora-
identity-and-geopolitics-1st-edition-guljanat-kurmangaliyeva-
ercilasun/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/incremental-software-architecture-a-
method-for-saving-failing-it-implementations-1st-edition-michael-bell/
textbookfull.com
Springer Texts in Statistics
Ronald Christensen
Advanced
Linear
Modeling
Statistical Learning and Dependent Data
Third Edition
Springer Texts in Statistics
Series Editors
G. Allen, Department of Statistics, Houston, TX, USA
R. De Veaux, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Williams College,
Williamstown, MA, USA
R. Nugent, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh,
PA, USA
Springer Texts in Statistics (STS) includes advanced textbooks from 3rd- to 4th-year
undergraduate courses to 1st- to 2nd-year graduate courses. Exercise sets should be
included. The series editors are currently Genevera I. Allen, Richard D. De Veaux,
and Rebecca Nugent. Stephen Fienberg, George Casella, and Ingram Olkin were
editors of the series for many years.
Third Edition
Ronald Christensen
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM, USA
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
To Pete, Russ, and Scot,
my pals from high school;
also
This is the third edition of Advanced Linear Modeling (ALM). It is roughly 50%
longer than the previous edition. It discusses the extension of linear models into
areas beyond those usually addressed in regression and analysis of variance. As in
previous editions, its primary emphasis is on models in which the data display some
form of dependence and many of the changes from the previous edition were made
to systematize this emphasis on dependent data. Nonetheless, it begins with topics
in modern regression analysis related to nonparametric regression and penalized
estimation (regularization). R code for the analyses in the book is available at http://
www.stat.unm.edu/∼fletcher/R-ALMIII.pdf.
Mathematical background is contained in Appendix A on differentiation and Kro-
necker products. Also some notation used throughout the book is set in Sect. 1.1.
This edition has been written in conjunction with the fifth edition of Christensen
(2011), often hereafter referred to as PA. Some discussions that previously appeared
in PA have been moved here. Obviously, you cannot do advanced linear modeling
without previously learning about linear modeling. I have tried to make this book
readable to people who have studied linear model theory from sources other than
PA, but I need to cite some source for basic results on linear models, so obviously I
cite PA. In cases where I need to cite results for which the new version of PA is dif-
ferent from the previous edition(s), the citations are given as PA-V. I have rearranged
the topics from the previous edition of ALM so that the material related to indepen-
dent data comes first followed by the material on dependent data. The chapter on
response surfaces has been dropped but is available in a new volume downloadable
from my website: http://www.stat.unm.edu/∼fletcher/TopicsInDesign. Some famil-
iarity with inner products is assumed, especially in Chaps. 1 and 3. The required
familiarity can be acquired from PA.
Chapter 1 expands the previous introduction to nonparametric regression. The
discussion follows what is commonly known as the basis function approach, despite
the fact that many of the techniques do not actually involve the use of basis functions
per se. In fact, when dealing with spaces of functions the very idea of a basis is
subject to competing definitions. Tim Hanson pointed out to me the obvious fact
that if a group of functions are linearly independent, they always form a basis for
vii
viii Preface to the Third Edition
the space that they span, but I think that in nonparametric regression the idea is to
approximate wider collections of functions than just these spanning sets. Chapter 1
now also includes a short introduction to models involving an entire function of
predictor variables.
Chapter 2 is an expanded version of the discussion of penalized regression from
Christensen (2011). A new Chap. 3 extends this by introducing reproducing kernel
Hilbert spaces.
Chapter 4 is new except for the last section. It gives results on an extremely gen-
eral linear model for dependent or heteroscedastic data. It owes an obvious debt to
Christensen (2011, Chapter 12). It contains several particularly useful exercises. In
a standard course on linear model theory, the theory of estimation and testing for
dependent data is typically introduced but not developed, see for example Chris-
tensen (2011, Sections 2.7 and 3.8). Section 4.1 of this book reviews, but does not
re-prove, those results. This book then applies those fundamental results to develop
theory for a wide variety of practical models.
I finally figured out how, without overwhelming the ideas in abstruse notation, to
present MINQUE as linear modeling, so I have done that in Chap. 4. In a technical
subsection, I give in to the abstruse notation so as to derive the MINQUE equations.
Previously, I just referred the reader to Rao for the derivation.
Chapter 5 on mixed models originally appeared in PA. It has been shortened in
places due of overlap with Chap. 4 but includes several new examples and exer-
cises. It contains a new emphasis on linear covariance structures that leads not only
to variance component models but the new Sect. 5.6 that examines a quite general
longitudinal data model. The details of the recovery of interblock information for a
balanced incomplete block design from PA no longer seem relevant, so they were
relegated, along with the response surface material, to the volume on my website.
Chapters 6 and 7 introduce time series: first the frequency domain which uses
models from Chap. 1 but with random effects as in Chap. 5 and then the time domain
approach which can be viewed as applications of ideas from the frequency domain.
Chapter 8 on spatial data is little changed from the previous edition. Mostly, the
references have been updated.
The former chapter on multivariate models has been split into three: Chap. 9 on
general theory with a new section relating multivariate models to spatial and time se-
ries models and a new discussion of multiple comparisons, Chap. 10 on applications
to specific models, and Chap. 11 with an expanded discussion of generalized mul-
tivariate linear models (also known as generalized multivariate analysis of variance
(GMANOVA) and growth curve models).
Chapters 12 and 14 are updated versions of the previous chapters on discriminant
analysis and principal components. Chapter 13 is a new chapter on binary regres-
sion and discrimination. Its raison d’être is that it devotes considerable attention to
support vector machines. Chapter 14 contains a new section on classical multidi-
mensional scaling.
From time to time, I mention the virtues of Bayesian approaches to problems
discussed in the book. One place to look for more information is BIDA, i.e., Chris-
tensen, Johnson, Branscum, and Hanson (2010).
Preface to the Third Edition ix
Thanks to my son Fletcher who is always the first person I ask when I have
doubts. Joe Cavanaugh and Mohammad Hattab have been particularly helpful as
have Tim Hanson, Wes Johnson, and Ed Bedrick. Finally, my thanks to Al Nosedal-
Sanchez, Curt Storlie, and Thomas Lee for letting me modify our joint paper into
Chap. 3.
As I have mentioned elsewhere, the large number of references to my other works
is as much about sloth as it is ego. In some sense, with the exception of BIDA, all of
my books are variations on a theme.
This is the second edition of Linear Models for Multivariate, Time Series and Spatial
Data. It has a new title to indicate that it contains much new material. The primary
changes are the addition of two new chapters: one on nonparametric regression and
the other on response surface maximization. As before, the presentations focus on
the linear model aspects of the subject. For example, in the nonparametric regression
chapter there is very little about kernel regression estimation but quite a bit about
series approximations, splines, and regression trees, all of which can be viewed as
linear modeling.
The new edition also includes various smaller changes. Of particular note are a
subsection in Chap. 1 on modeling longitudinal (repeated measures) data and a sec-
tion in Chap. 6 on covariance structures for spatial lattice data. I would like to thank
Dale Zimmerman for the suggestion of incorporating material on spatial lattices.
Another change is that the subject index is now entirely alphabetical.
xi
Visit https://textbookfull.com
now to explore a rich
collection of eBooks, textbook
and enjoy exciting offers!
Preface to the First Edition
volves linear models with a peculiar design matrix. Time domain analysis involves
models that are linear in the parameters but have random design matrices. Best lin-
ear predictors are used for forecasting time series; they are also fundamental to the
estimation techniques used in time domain analysis. Spatial data analysis involves
linear models in which the covariance matrix is modeled from the data; a primary
objective in analyzing spatial data is making best linear unbiased predictions of
future observables. While other approaches to these problems may yield different
insights, there is value in having a unified approach to looking at these problems.
Developing such a unified approach is the purpose of this book.
There are two well-known models with linear structure that are conspicuous by
their absence in my two volumes on linear models. One is Cox’s (1972) proportional
hazards model. The other is the generalized linear model of Nelder and Wedderburn
(1972). The proportional hazards methodology is a fundamentally nonparametric
technique for dealing with censored data having linear structure. The emphasis on
nonparametrics and censored data would make its inclusion here awkward. The in-
terested reader can see Kalbfleisch and Prentice (1980). Generalized linear models
allow the extension of linear model ideas to many situations that involve indepen-
dent non-normally distributed observations. Beyond the presentation of basic linear
model theory, these volumes focus on methods for analyzing correlated observa-
tions. While it is true that generalized linear models can be used for some types
of correlated data, such applications do not flow from the essential theory. McCul-
lagh and Nelder (1989) give a detailed exposition of generalized linear models, and
Christensen (1997) contains a short introduction.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank MINITAB1 for providing me with a copy of release 6.1.1,
BMDP with copies of their programs 4M, 1T, 2T, and 4V, and Dick Lund for pro-
viding me with a copy of MSUSTAT. Nearly all of the computations were performed
with one of these programs. Many were performed with more than one.
I would not have tackled this project but for Larry Blackwood and Bob Shumway.
Together Larry and I reconfirmed, in my mind anyway, that multivariate analysis is
just the same old stuff. Bob’s book put an end to a specter that has long haunted me:
a career full of half-hearted attempts at figuring out basic time series analysis.
At my request, Ed Bedrick, Bert Koopmans, Wes Johnson, Bob Shumway, and
Dale Zimmerman tried to turn me from the errors of my ways. I sincerely thank
them for their valuable efforts. The reader must judge how successful they were
with a recalcitrant subject. As always, I must thank my editors, Steve Fienberg and
Ingram Olkin, for their suggestions. Jackie Damrau did an exceptional job in typing
the first draft of the manuscript.
1MINITAB is a registered trademark of Minitab, Inc., 3081 Enterprise Drive, State College, PA
16801, telephone: (814) 238–3280.
Preface to the First Edition xv
References
Prefaces
............................................................. vii
1 Nonparametric Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Basic Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 Linear Approximations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3 Simple Nonparametric Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.4 Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.4.1 Polynomials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.4.2 Cosines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.4.3 Haar Wavelets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.4.4 Cubic Splines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.4.5 Orthonormal Series Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.5 Variable Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.6 Heteroscedastic Simple Nonparametric Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
1.7 Approximating-Functions with Small Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
1.7.1 Polynomial Splines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1.7.2 Fitting Local Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
1.7.3 Local Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
1.8 Nonparametric Multiple Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
1.8.1 Redefining φ and the Curse of Dimensionality . . . . . . . . . 39
1.8.2 Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space Regression . . . . . . . . . 40
1.9 Testing Lack of Fit in Linear Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
1.10 Regression Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
1.11 Regression on Functional Predictors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
1.12 Density Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
1.13 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
xvii
xviii Contents
2 Penalized Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
2.1.1 Reparameterization and RKHS Regression:
It’s All About the Penalty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
2.1.2 Nonparametric Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
2.2 Ridge Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
2.2.1 Generalized Ridge Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
2.2.2 Picking k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
2.2.3 Nonparametric Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
2.3 Lasso Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
2.4 Bayesian Connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
2.5 Another Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
2.5.1 Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
2.5.2 Equivalence of Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
2.6 Two Other Penalty Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
3 Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
3.1.1 Interpolating Splines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.2 Banach and Hilbert Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
3.2.1 Banach Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
3.2.2 Hilbert Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.3 Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
3.3.1 The Projection Principle for an RKHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
3.4 Two Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
3.4.1 Testing Lack of Fit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
3.5 Penalized Regression with RKHSs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
3.5.1 Ridge and Lasso Regression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
3.5.2 Smoothing Splines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
3.5.3 Solving the General Penalized Regression Problem . . . . . 110
3.5.4 General Solution Applied to Ridge Regression . . . . . . . . . 117
3.5.5 General Solution Applied to Cubic Smoothing Splines . . . 119
3.6 Choosing the Degree of Smoothness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
4 Covariance Parameter Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
4.1 Introduction and Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
4.1.1 Estimation of β . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
4.1.2 Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
4.1.3 Prediction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
4.1.4 Quadratic Estimation of θ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
4.2 Maximum Likelihood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
4.2.1 Generalized Likelihood Ratio Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
4.3 Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
4.4 Linear Covariance Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
Contents xix
In the late 1990s, the orthogonal series approach to nonparametric regression be-
came increasingly popular; see Hart (1997), Ogden (1997), and Efromovich (1999).
In this approach, orthogonal series of functions are used to approximate the regres-
sion function. Later, the orthogonality was de-emphasized so that now a series of
more general basis functions is often used to approximate the regression function.
Basis functions, and other linear-approximation methods for which many of the se-
ries elements have small support, methods such as splines and wavelets, seem par-
ticularly useful. We discuss these approaches to nonparametric regression as fitting
linear models.
Suppose we have a dependent variable y and a vector of predictor variables
x. Regression is about estimating E(y|x). In linear regression, we assume that
E(y|x) = x β for some unknown parameter vector β . Recall that this includes fit-
ting indicator variables and polynomials as special cases. In nonlinear regression
we assume that E(y|x) = f (x; β ), where the function f is known but the vector β
is unknown; see Sect. 7.4 and Christensen (1996, Chapter 18; 2015, Chapter 23).
A special case of nonlinear regression involves linearizable models, including gen-
eralized linear models, that assume E(y|x) = f (x β ) for f known, cf. Christensen
(1997, Chapter 9). The key idea in nonlinear regression is using calculus to linearize
the model. In nonparametric regression, we assume that E(y|x) = f (x), where the
function f is unknown. Note the absence of a vector of parameters β , hence the
name nonparametric. Often, f is assumed to be continuous or to have some speci-
fied number of derivatives. In reality, nonparametric regression is exactly the oppo-
site of what its name suggests. Nonparametric regression involves fitting far more
parameters than either standard linear or nonlinear regression.
EXAMPLE 1.0.1. Table 1.1 presents data from Montgomery and Peck (1982) and
Eubank (1988) on voltage drops y over time t displayed by an electrical battery used
in a guided missile. The 41 times go from 0 to 20. The variable x results from divid-
ing t by 20, thus standardizing the times into the [0, 1] interval. The data comprise
a time series as discussed in Chaps. 6 and 7, but the idea here is that the behavior
over time is not a stationary stochastic process but rather a complicated regression
function. An unusual feature of these data is that the ti values are equally spaced
(i.e., the ti s are ordered and ti+1 − ti is a constant). This typically occurs only when
the data collection process is very well-controlled. However, when equal spacing
does occur, it considerably simplifies data analysis. 2
Case y t x Case y t x
1 8.33 0.0 0.000 22 14.92 10.5 0.525
2 8.23 0.5 0.025 23 14.37 11.0 0.550
3 7.17 1.0 0.050 24 14.63 11.5 0.575
4 7.14 1.5 0.075 25 15.18 12.0 0.600
5 7.31 2.0 0.100 26 14.51 12.5 0.625
6 7.60 2.5 0.125 27 14.34 13.0 0.650
7 7.94 3.0 0.150 28 13.81 13.5 0.675
8 8.30 3.5 0.175 29 13.79 14.0 0.700
9 8.76 4.0 0.200 30 13.05 14.5 0.725
10 8.71 4.5 0.225 31 13.04 15.0 0.750
11 9.71 5.0 0.250 32 12.06 15.5 0.775
12 10.26 5.5 0.275 33 12.05 16.0 0.800
13 10.91 6.0 0.300 34 11.15 16.5 0.825
14 11.67 6.5 0.325 35 11.15 17.0 0.850
15 11.76 7.0 0.350 36 10.14 17.5 0.875
16 12.81 7.5 0.375 37 10.08 18.0 0.900
17 13.30 8.0 0.400 38 9.78 18.5 0.925
18 13.88 8.5 0.425 39 9.80 19.0 0.950
19 14.59 9.0 0.450 40 9.95 19.5 0.975
20 14.05 9.5 0.475 41 9.51 20.0 1.000
21 14.48 10.0 0.500
Before proceeding we set some notation that is used throughout the book, unless
defined otherwise for particular purposes. A linear model has Y = X β + e where Y
is an n × 1 vector of observable random variables, X is an n × p matrix of known
values, β is a p × 1 vector of fixed but unknown coefficients, and e is an n × 1 vector
of unobservable random errors. For this to be a linear model we need E(e) = 0 so
that E(Y ) = X β . A standard linear model assumes that an individual observation
or error has variance σ 2 and that Cov(Y ) = Cov(e) = σ 2 I. The assumption that the
observations have a multivariate normal distribution can be written Y ∼ N(X β , σ 2 I).
A partitioned linear model is written Y = X β + Z γ + e where Z is also a matrix
of known values and γ is also a vector of fixed, unknown coefficients. If Z has s
columns, write
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
x1 z1
⎢ .. ⎥ ⎢ .. ⎥
X = [X1 , . . . , Xp ] = ⎣ . ⎦ ; Z = [Z1 , . . . , Zs ] = ⎣ . ⎦ .
xn zn
For any vector v, v2 ≡ v v is the squared (Euclidean) length of v. The Euclidean
inner product between two vectors u and v is u v. They are perpendicular (orthog-
onal), written v ⊥ u, if v u = 0. A− denotes the generalized inverse of the matrix
A, r(A) denotes its rank, and tr(A) denotes its trace. M denotes the perpendicular
projection operator (ppo) onto the column space of X. The column space of X is
denoted C(X). (With tongue slightly in cheek) the Fundamental Theorem of Least
Squares Estimation is that in a linear model, β̂ is a least squares estimate if and
only if
X β̂ = MY.
More generally, MA denotes the ppo onto C(A). C(A)⊥ denotes the orthogonal com-
plement of C(A), i.e. all the vectors that are orthogonal to C(A). If C(X) ⊂ C(A),
⊥
C(X)C(A) denotes the orthogonal complement of C(X) with respect to C(A), i.e. all
vectors in C(A) that are orthogonal to C(X). An r × c matrix of 1s is denoted Jrc with
Jn ≡ Jn1 and J ≡ Jn .
This is all common notation and, except for the use of M and J, it is pretty much
standard notation. (Some authors prefer P and 1.) It is important to understand the
theory associated with this notation. For example, I expect the reader to know (or at
⊥
least believe when I write) that the ppo onto C(X)C(A) is MA − M. Such background
can be found in many places including PA.
4 1 Nonparametric Regression
The key idea behind linear approximations is that a finite linear combination of some
known functions can approximate a wide variety of functions on a closed bounded
set, cf. the famous Stone-Weierstrass theorem. For convenience, we initially assume
that f is defined on the interval [0, 1] and is continuous. There are many ways to
approximate f including polynomials, sines and cosines, step functions, and also by
things similar to step functions called wavelets. Most often we assume that for some
predictor variable x
∞
f (x) = ∑ β j φ j (x),
j=0
where the φ j s are known functions that can be defined in many ways. Later we will
use this characterization with x being a p vector instead of a scalar. In particular,
with p = 1 and functions defined on the unit interval, we can take for j = 0, 1, 2, . . .
φ j (x) = x j , (1.2.1)
or
φ j (x) = cos(π jx), (1.2.2)
or
φ2 j (x) = cos(π jx) φ2 j+1 (x) = sin(π jx). (1.2.3)
When using (1.2.2), it should be noted that the derivative of every cos(π jx) function
is 0 at x = 0, so the derivative of f (x) should be 0 at x = 0.
In practice we approximate f with a finite number of terms which determines a
linear model in which only the β j s are unknown. We need to determine an appro-
priate finite approximation and estimate the corresponding β j s
With a single predictor, another obvious approximation uses step functions but
some care must be used. Let IA be the indicator function for the set A, namely
1 if x ∈ A
IA (x) =
0 otherwise.
Obviously, if we define
More generally, we could define the indicator functions using intervals between
knots, x̃−1,m < 0 = x̃0,m < x̃1,m < x̃2,m < · · · < x̃m,m = 1 with the property that
maxi {x̃i+1,m − x̃i,m } goes to zero as m goes to infinity.
Splines are more complicated than indicator functions. Choosing m − 1 knots in
the interior of [0, 1] is fundamental to the use of splines. Rather than indicators,
we can fit some low dimensional polynomial between the knots. In this context,
indicator functions are 0 degree polynomials. For polynomials of degree greater
than 0, traditional splines force the polynomials above and below each knot in (0,1)
to take the same value at the knot, thus forcing the splines to give a continuous
function on [0,1]. B-splines use functions φ jm that are nonzero only on small but
overlapping subintervals with locations determined by (often centered around) a
collection of knots. As with indicator functions, to get good approximations to an
arbitrary regression function, the distances between consecutive knots must all get
(asymptotically) small. As a practical matter, one tries to find one appropriate set
of knots for the problem at hand. Technically, methods based on knots are not basis
function methods because they do not provide a countable set of functions that are
linearly independent and span the space of continuous functions. (B-spline is short
for “basis spline” but that is something of a misnomer.)
As with basis function approaches based on an infinite sum, any triangular array
satisfying Eq. (1.2.4) allows us to approximate f with a finite linear model in which
only β1m , . . . , βmm are unknown. Triangular array approximations can also be used
with vector inputs.
Rather than defining a triangular array of indicator functions, we can use the
following device to define a single infinite series :
φ2 (x) = I(0,.25] (x) − I(.25,.5] (x), φ3 (x) = I(.5,.75] (x) − I(.75,1] (x),
φ4 (x) = I(0,1/8] (x) − I(1/8,2/8] (x), . . . , φ7 (x) = I(6/8,7/8] (x) − I(7/8,1] (x),
φ8 (x) = I(0,1/16] (x) − I(1/16,2/16] (x), . . . .
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
worked harder, probably, than any three other members of the
Kehillah; but in his hands the fairest projects seemed to receive a
blight, and the most promising business ventures turned to
wormwood and ashes, to apples of Sodom and grapes of bitterness.
But the Schlemihl, perfectly useless though he was to himself and his
family, had one very evident purpose in the scheme of life, namely, to
open the hearts of his brethren to impulses of kindness and
benevolence. They certainly acted toward him in the most
sympathetic and brotherly manner, and permitted neither him nor
his family to suffer. At the time of my arrival in Nordheim, Isaac had
just managed, through one of his usual transactions, to lose all he
had, and to have his house, which he had received as part of the
dowry of his wife, seized in satisfaction of his debts. But the
Nordheim Kehillah, assisted by some benevolent friends from other
places, paid off his debts, redeemed the house, and furnished him
with a certain amount of capital with which to begin life anew. For
safety’s sake the Kehillah retained the title in the house; for, as Uncle
Koppel said to me in confidence, “We might otherwise have to buy
the house every year.”
A peculiarly interesting character was David the horse-dealer, a
jovial, hale fellow, handsome too, and tall and strong as a lion, a very
“mighty man in Israel.” He was a stanch friend and reliable, and
could be depended upon to go through thick and thin for one who
had once gained his friendship. But David had one weakness, not
unnatural, perhaps, in those of his vocation. He knew no scruples of
conscience in regard to transactions in horseflesh; and some of his
achievements in that line had been, if report spoke truly, to say the
least, extremely venturesome. Thus he was credited with having once
sold a Prussian major who prided himself on his expert knowledge of
the equine species, a horse with only three hoofs. The manner in
which David was said to have done the trick was as follows: The deal
took place in midwinter, when the ground was covered with snow to
the depth of a foot or more. The horse was a fine animal, coal black
and of handsome form, except that the left front hoof was lacking.
David led the horse out of the stable; and as it stood in the deep snow
before the Prussian major, who was critically examining it through
his eyeglasses, the absence of the hoof was not noticeable. He then
put it through its paces, cracking his whip furiously, so that the horse
leaped and dashed in a most fiery manner, and the absence of the
hoof was again not noticeable. The major was charmed with the fire
and grace of the animal, bought and paid for it at once, and ordered
it to be sent to his quarters. It is said that the major was furious later,
not so much on account of the money loss, but because he, the
expert, had been so neatly duped, and because he had no legal
remedy against David. Had David put a false hoof in place of the
lacking member, he would have been liable to a heavy penalty for
fraud; but he had not done so, and had made no false representation.
And therefore the major not only had no case against him, but could
not even demand the cancellation of the sale. Thus the story for
whose veracity I will not guarantee. But, however weak David’s
conscience may have been in matters of horsetrading, his conduct
otherwise merited no reproach and he was well liked.
Many were the estimable and lovable characters in Nordheim’s
Kehillah, and I cannot attempt to describe or even mention them all.
Of Uncle Koppel and Aunt Caroline I have already spoken. Uncle
Koppel was a typical Jewish Baal-Ha-Bayith, or householder, a
business man of probity, whose word was as good as his bond, a
faithful worshipper at the altar of Israel’s God, and a worthy
upholder, by character, if not by learning, of the reputation of Reb
Shemayah, his father. Aunt Caroline was a true mother in Israel,
loyal, conscientious, and devout. Their able sons and charming dark-
eyed daughters were imbued with their spirit, and together they
formed an ideal household. Nor must I forget Aunt Gella, the only
other child of Reb Shemayah who had remained in the native village,
a woman of noble parts, who, had her lot been cast somewhere else
in the great world, might have played an important part in history.
Her noble brow, which emerged so modestly from the recesses of her
Scheitel and her mild and clear blue eyes, showed her the possessor
of a strong and well-developed intellect; and her wise and well-
considered conversation showed that the reality corresponded to the
indications. Her heart was as warm and good and her spirit as firm
and courageous as her mind was keen and clear; and she was, so to
speak, the combined oracle and Lady Bountiful of the village. Was
any female or, for that matter, any male villager in trouble, in want of
counsel or help, she or he would direct her or his steps to the neat
cottage in the Long Street where dwelt Aunt Gella, and there would
find counsel or comfort, or whatever help was required. A plague of
dysentery came once upon the village, and then it was that Aunt
Gella showed herself the veritable angel of help. While it continued
she hardly ate or drank or slept or changed her clothes. She worked
with tireless energy at her mission of mercy, going from house to
house among the afflicted ones, bringing the right medicine to one,
the right food to the other, and money to the third. Dear Aunt Gella:
methinks I see her sweet, mild face now, and hear the words of
blessing with which peasant and Jew mentioned her name. And
besides those whom I have mentioned, there were dozens of
householders in which piety, probity, and loving kindness were the
constantly practised rule of life.
Yes, Nordheim, I loved thee well, and I love thy memory. I loved
thee for thy simplicity, for thy natural goodness, for the true and
unpretentious way in which thou didst lay stress upon that which is
pure and noble, and didst reject that which is base and vile in human
life; for the picture which thou didst show me of the beautifying and
sanctifying effect of a simple, sincere, and honest Judaism, simply
and sincerely lived. Thou wast one of the forces which did lead me to
love and uphold the Torah, and to cleave to the faith which my and
thy ancestors received at Sinai from Sinai’s God.
Oh, that this tale of thee might work likewise upon the hearts of
others like me, children of an unbelieving and irreverent age, and stir
them to love for Israel’s God and devotion to Israel’s sacred heritage!
THE LITTLE HORSERADISH WOMAN.
THE LITTLE
HORSERADISH
WOMAN
Page 84
Page 96
But now my visitor has concluded the business which brought him
hither and rises to depart. Immediately one can notice a vast change
in the impression he makes. He does seem different now from the
ordinary so-called Ghetto type he appeared identical with a moment
ago. There is something commanding, something indefinitely
military and authoritative about him. Though feeble, he stands
perfectly erect, and his figure and bearing are thoroughly military.
Military, too, is the almost painful neatness which characterizes his
attire, from his well-brushed hat and coat down to his brightly
polished shoes, a far-off reminder, as it were, of the days when a dull
button or a frayed coat sleeve meant disgrace and the guard-house;
but most military of all is his right sleeve, for it hangs empty, with
only a short stump filling the upper part near the shoulder, a mute
reminder of bloody Sebastopol, where a British sabre cleft the arm to
which it belonged in twain, and its owner hovered for many a day
’twixt life and death.
This is the General. Perhaps, strictly speaking, he does not deserve
the title, for he long since was stricken from the Russian army list,
and might even meet with condign punishment were he to return to
his native land; but once he bore it with full right and authority, and
no military shortcoming, no lack of loyalty or courage upon the
battlefield was responsible for its forfeiture. It is, therefore, only
natural that his friends and neighbors who know his history give him
the title. So “the General” he is, and “the General” he will remain,
until death calls him to his last long bivouac. What a tremendous
change in state and fortune! Once a distinguished military
commander, whose slightest behest thousands hastened to obey
because of his heroism; beloved by his countrymen and honored by
his emperor; the husband of a renowned general’s daughter, and
with every prospect promising rapid advancement and eventually
loftiest rank; now the humble denizen of an obscure street in the
Jewish quarter of New York, his life in nowise different from that of
the other long-bearded habitués of the synagogue and the Beth
Hammidrash.
How came this Jew, son of a proscribed and pariah race, to attain
to such distinguished rank in the service of the persecutors of his
people? How came he to lose it, and to sink back again into the
lowliness from which he sprang? It is a strange tale, showing what
sombre romances, what heartrending tragedies Jewish life is still
capable of producing in the empire of the Czars. I shall tell it you.
Some seventy years ago there lived in one of the western provinces
of Russia a young couple. Israel Rabbinowitz was the husband’s
name, and Malka Feige that of the spouse. They were a pious and
worthy pair. The husband was a respected merchant, whose
scrupulous honesty and commercial rectitude were no less esteemed
than his unswerving religious fidelity, and the accuracy and extent of
the Hebrew scholarship which he displayed in the Talmudic debates
of the circle of “learners” in the Beth Hammidrash. Malka Feige was
a worthy mate of such a husband. Kindhearted, unwearyingly
industrious, and devout, she was a typical Jewish housewife.
They had but one child, a blue-eyed, fair-haired boy of eight,
whom they loved with the passionate devotion of which parental
hearts are capable when they have but one object upon which to
concentrate their affection. He was literally the apple of their eyes.
His father cared for his intellectual welfare, and provided the best
and most highly esteemed Melammedim to introduce him into the
intricacies of the Jewish education of that time; and the lad, who had
a bright and acute intellect, responded well to these efforts, and at
eight was quite a little prodigy of Biblical and Talmudical learning.
His mother, on the other hand, looked after his physical well-being,
fed him on delicate food, clothed him in a jubitza of extra fine
material, brushed and combed his little peoth until they shone, and
set her pride upon making him finer and brighter in appearance than
his comrades. Like Hannah of old, she had determined to dedicate
her offspring to the Lord. Already in imagination she saw him seated
upon the rabbi’s seat, greeted by the plaudits of admiring thousands;
and so strong was her faith in that future for her son that she rarely
called him by his given name, which was Saul Isaac, but always
referred to him as “my little rabbi.” Thus the love, the hopes, the
ambition of these parents were all wrapped up in this, their only son.
Troublous times were just beginning then for the descendants of
Jacob living on Muscovite soil. Nicholas the First sat on the throne of
the Czars; and, like so many of the Russian potentates before and
after him, could find no more pressing task to perform than to
convert his Hebrew subjects to Christianity. He had no respect for
the conscientious scruples which kept the Jews faithful to their
ancestral religion; he could not appreciate the heroism with which
they endured every conceivable suffering and martyrdom rather than
grow recreant to the allegiance plighted to their God. In his eyes they
were only a mass of obdurate, stubborn, and pestiferous heretics,
who refused to see the beauties and accept the salvation of
Christianity. He thought and thought and cudgelled his brains to
devise some scheme by which to overcome the endless resistance of
Judaism to its own dissolution, and finally evolved a plan which for
sheer deviltry and refinement of heartless brutality would have done
credit to the blackest fiend in the legions of Satan; and this, too, in
the name of the religion which claims love and tenderness as its own
special prerogative, and calmly assumes all the progress of humanity
and civilization as its doing.
His plan, in brief, was to separate the parents and the children.
With the old Jews, he knew nothing could be done. They would go to
the stake or the dungeon, and would not recant; but if, he reasoned,
the young Jews could be removed from parental influence, could be
caught, so to speak, before their characters were formed, and be
placed in charge of priests or other Christian officials, they would be
unable to resist, but would succumb to the powerful pressure
brought to bear upon them and would become genuine Christians.
This fiendish plan he proceeded, with icy deliberation, to put into
execution. What cared he for the cruelty or violent dissolution of
natural relations, for the tears of terrified children, for the
immeasurable woes and heart-breakings of bereaved parents. His
tyrant’s view of statecraft approved the plan and other
considerations had no weight. Then were legions of brutal emissaries
sent into the provinces reserved for the habitation of the children of
Jacob. Their conduct resembled that of brigands rather than of
officers of the law. In numbers so great as to defy resistance, they
would fall upon some unsuspecting Hebrew settlement, generally at
dead of night; would burst into the houses, and with utter disregard
of all considerations of justice or frenzied appeals for mercy, would
tear the weeping and terror-stricken children from the arms of their
screaming and frantically resisting parents, would throw them into
the ready standing wagons and would carry them off, never more to
return.
It would take the pen of a Dante and the brush of their own
Verestchagin fitly to depict the awful scenes which occurred on the
occasions of these visitations, the demoniacal brutality of the
despot’s henchmen, the helpless terror of the childish victims, and
the unutterable, paralyzed agony of the wretched fathers and
mothers who saw their beloved ones dragged away to that which for
them was worse than death, and could do nothing to save them from
their fate.
The same fate befell our Saul Isaac. It was a cold midwinter night.
The Rabbinowitz family were sleeping peacefully, all unsuspecting of
evil. Suddenly the sound of powerful blows upon the door caused
them to awake in terror. Too well they knew what those sounds
meant, although there had been no report that the “chappers,” as
they were called, were coming to their province. Hastily the agonized
parents sought to find some place of concealment for their son. A
second later the door fell beneath the shower of blows rained upon it,
and several ruffianly looking men, dressed in uniform, burst into the
room. Without showing any warrant or offering a word of
explanation, they seized the shrinking lad. Roughly they thrust aside
Israel, who would have protested, and flung off Malka Feige, who
clung to them in a half-insane effort to rescue her boy. The lad
himself they tossed into the wagon, into the midst of twenty or more
other lads, who already cowered there, and drove off.
Let us draw a veil over the unutterable sorrows of that parent pair,
thus foully deprived of the beloved of their souls. Heaven alone has
power to right wrongs such as these, and to the mercy and justice of
heaven we must commend them.
Let us follow Saul Isaac on the course which he was obliged to
pursue. His experience was not at first different from that of
thousands of others. He was taken to the convent of St. Sophia in the
neighborhood of Moscow. There a thorough Russian and Christian
education was given him, and every effort was made, by means of
mingled kindness and severity, to induce him voluntarily to accept
baptism, for even the perverted and tyrannical minds of his captors
perceived that a compulsory administration of the rite could have no
binding obligation upon the conscience. To be sure, their notions of
voluntary action were rather remarkably casuistical. Severe beatings,
periodical starvation, and longer or shorter terms of imprisonment
were all considered legitimate forms of missionary effort with which
to persuade the cantonists, as the abducted Hebrew children were
called, of the superiority of Christianity to Judaism, and to induce
them voluntarily to accept it.
It is a glorious tribute to the power of Jewish teachings that most
of these helpless victims, despite their tender years and pitiful
condition, were by no means quick to yield to the maltreatment or
blandishments of their masters. Most of them resisted for years;
some never yielded.
Four years were required to bring our Saul Isaac into the frame of
mind requisite for the acceptance of Christianity. At first he wept and
wailed constantly and would touch no food except dry bread and
water; and, young as he was, he refused to listen to the instruction of
the Russian monks. But as the weeks rolled into months and the
months into years, without seeing other than Gentile faces and
without any word from his parents or any other Jews, gradually his
recollections grew dimmer and his resolution weaker. Finally he no
longer objected to the Christian instructions, and in his twelfth year
he was baptized with great pomp and parade in the chapel of the
monastery, receiving the name of Sergei Pavlowitz. From this time
on his advancement was rapid. After three years of general education
he decided to enter upon the military career, and in his fifteenth year
he entered the Imperial Cadet School at St. Petersburg.
The memory of his parents had quite faded from his mind; or if the
thought of them ever came to him, they seemed like ghostly figures
of an unreal world, entirely devoid of actuality or connection with his
present existence.
Sergei Pavlowitz was one of the most popular students at the Cadet
School. His quick intellect, which had enabled him to comprehend
the abstruse debates of the Talmud, stood him in good stead in
mastering the details of military science, while his handsome figure
in the neat Russian uniform and his polite and obliging ways were
universally pleasing. In due course of time he graduated as a
lieutenant of artillery.
His career in the army justified the expectations of his student
years. He combined the two most requisite military qualities, high
capacity and rigid fidelity to duty. He became in rapid succession a
captain and then a colonel of artillery.
While holding the latter office he attracted the attention and then
aroused the love of Olga, the beautiful daughter of General Wladimir
de Mitkiewicz. Shortly afterward the General sent for him, and in due
form and in the most flattering terms offered to make him his son-
in-law. Such a distinguished honor could not be refused. To be sure,
a momentary pang went through the heart of the young colonel; and
the shadowy faces of his father and mother seemed to rise from the
gloomy recesses of the past and gaze at him reproachfully, but these
sensations were too dim and faint to have any effect. He accepted the
offer of the venerable General, which was, indeed, a most
complimentary one, and because of which he became the object of
many congratulations and no little envy.
In the magnificent cathedral of Kurski-Kazan the nuptials of the
dashing Colonel Pavlowitz and the beautiful and accomplished Olga
de Mitkiewicz were consummated with all the gorgeous ceremonial
of the Greek Church, and amidst an unprecedented display of wealth
and luxury. The vast edifice was crowded with representatives of the
noblest and finest families of the province, while the streets
surrounding the cathedral were thronged with a vast multitude of the
baser sort; and the personal interest and gratification which all
displayed were quite extraordinary.
It cannot be denied that the striking attentions and adulations of
which Colonel Pavlowitz became the recipient did almost turn his
head. In no other country are honors so much appreciated as in
Russia; and those he had received were quite exceptional, both in
extent and in cordiality.
He was happy, very happy; happy in the possession of the radiant,
beauteous creature he could now call his own, and from whose
sparkling eyes love and devotion, ardent and sincere, shone forth; he
was happy in the evident sympathy and admiration of all his
associates, and he was happy in the consciousness that his future was
secure and that he was destined to a brilliant and distinguished
career. Very faint and dim, indeed, were now the images of the
ghostly past, and they did not affect his actions in the slightest; but
somehow or other they would not forsake him, and he often found
himself wondering with a peevish sort of dissatisfaction and
impatience, why they did not leave him to enjoy undisturbed the
pleasures and honors of his present station.
Shortly after his marriage the Crimean war broke out. Russia was
engaged in a titanic struggle with the Western Powers, and Colonel
Pavlowitz was among those summoned to defend the fatherland. The
parting from his young wife was marked by tears and sobs; but still
he heard the summons to war with stern joy, for, like a true soldier,
he longed to display in actual combat the qualities he had gained in
theoretic instruction; and then he longed for action—intense, stirring
action—to drive away the shadowy, reproachful faces which tortured
him by their constant recurrence.
He was one of the commanders in charge of the defence of
Sebastopol. He was personally engaged, and displayed the greatest
gallantry in many of the desperate conflicts of that bloody campaign.
At Balaklava he was in command of a part of the artillery, which
received the world-renowned charge of the Light Brigade; and it was
while fiercely beating off that attack that an unexpected blow of a
British sabre took off his right arm near the shoulder.
For three months our hero lay in the hospital, the object of
universal sympathy and interest, for the good-will which had been
previously entertained toward him had been greatly heightened by
the splendid bravery and skill he had displayed in the war and the
cruel wound he had received.
The Emperor himself had sent several times to inquire concerning
his condition, and the visits and inquiries of lesser personages were
innumerable.
As soon as he was able to resume his active duties, the Emperor
ordered a review of the entire army. It was a glittering spectacle, a
sea of brilliant uniforms, shining bayonets, swords and cannons,
interspersed with magnificent bands of music, an ocean of deeply
interested onlookers. Our hero rode at the head of his regiment on a
splendid black charger, his empty sleeve hanging useless at his right
side. As he passed the grand stand where stood the Emperor and his
brilliant retinue of officers and aides, His Majesty ordered the parade
to halt. Then in the presence of the army and the serried throngs of
spectators, the Emperor addressed him as follows:
“Gen. Sergei Pavlowitz, my good and faithful servitor. I have
noticed the courage and devotion with which you have served in my
army. It is always my wish fitly to reward virtue and fidelity, and I
therefore appoint you to the command of the —th division of my
regular army.”
Hardly had these words, which His Majesty pronounced in a loud
and clear voice, been spoken, than the entire army, breaking for a
moment through the restraints of discipline, and the vast throng of
spectators, burst into enthusiastic hurrahs and cheered again and
again the name of Sergei Pavlowitz. It was a glorious and inspiring
moment.
Our hero flushed with pride and gratification; but, obedient to the
rules of military etiquette, said no word, but merely saluted with
profound reverence, and a second later the stern command rang
forth and the host marched on.
Words cannot describe the exultation which now filled the soul of
General Pavlowitz. He was fairly intoxicated with joy. Every ambition
of his life seemed gratified, and with rapture he thought of the
delight with which the news of his great advancement would fill the
heart of his beloved Olga, who had visited him during his stay in the
hospital, and had now returned to their home in Kursky Kazan.
AS THE CAVALCADE
PASSED A CORNER
THE GENERAL HEARD
A CRY
Page 111
Moses Levinsky awoke with a start upon his humble couch in the
little hall bedroom in the sixth story of the immense and crowded
tenement-house in Eldridge Street, New York City, in which he
dwelt. He very much feared that he had overslept himself and would
be late at the early morning service of the Congregation Sons of
Peace. The light which shown through the narrow window of his
room was much brighter than the pale illumination which usually
greeted his early waking eyes and seemed to show that the day was
further advanced. A glance at the cheap silver watch which lay upon
his trousers on the chair next to his bed showed him that his
apprehensions were only too well founded.
The Congregation Sons of Peace invariably began its devotions at 6
A.M. Moses Levinsky was in the habit of rising at half-past five; his
toilet and the walk to the little meeting-room in the next block
required twenty-five minutes, and he was regularly in his place five
minutes before the voice of the Chazan or precentor, chanting in
classic Hebrew, “Exalted be the living God and praised,” betokened
that the service of adoration and supplication, with which modern
Israel supplies the place of the ancient sacrificial worship, had
begun. But to-day the watch which usually indicated about a quarter
past five when he first glanced at it in the early mornings, stood at
half-past six. The congregation had already been engaged in prayer
for a full half-hour, and he could hardly hope to be with them before
the services, which usually lasted somewhat less than an hour, were
concluded. Watches and clocks are obstinate creatures. They persist
in their opinions, which can be plainly read in their faces. They care
not at all how disagreeable or unpleasant their statements may be to
those who consult them, and they can neither be reasoned with nor
stared out of countenance. And so Moses Levinsky’s watch did not
recede at all for all the hard stares which that rather confused
individual directed at it; but, on the contrary, advanced a minute or
so, while he, who had now risen upon his side and rested upon his
left arm, gazed at it with puzzled and rueful countenance.
The truth was that Moses was in doubt as to the right course to
pursue. His watch told him that he might as well make an exception
to-day from his regular practice and stay at home, for he could never
hope to be on time at the services, or even present during any
considerable portion of them. On the other hand, his conscience
smote him greatly at having overslept himself; and thus incurred the
danger of breaking his life rule, of always beginning the day in the
house of God, and in the words which the ship captain once
addressed to the prophet Jonah when he had gone to sleep in the
midst of all the turmoil of the storm, it called to him, “What aileth
thee, O sleeper? Arise, cry out unto thy God.” After a minute’s
hesitation conscience won the battle over comfort. Moses hastily
sprang from his couch, made his simple toilet as speedily as possible,
and in something less than twenty minutes was on his way to the
little synagogue (“place of prayer” was the unassuming name which
the worshippers themselves gave it) of the Congregation of the Sons
of Peace. While he is on his way thither, we will take occasion to
describe him to our readers; for many of them, no doubt, are at a loss
to understand what kind of a person he is, and particularly fail to
comprehend why he should be so dreadfully put out at the mere
possibility of being absent from prayers one morning, a thing which,
I am sure, would never disturb the majority of my worthy readers in
their mental tranquillity.