Protection coordination
Protection coordination
Protection Coordination
Contents
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................2
1.1. Why Protection Coordination Study? ......................................................................................2
2. Benefits........................................................................................................................................2
4. Time-current coordination........................................................................................................ 4
6. Standards ..................................................................................................................................... 7
1. Introduction
The purpose of the electrical protection coordination study is to ascertain the cir-
cuit breaker and protection relay settings.
Finding the best balance between selectivity and protection is the main objective.
Determining the fault clearance time and coordinating upstream electrical pro-
tection equipment are two key elements of the study. Proper coordination and
disruption clearing times can help reduce damage to electrical equipment and
protect operators from harm. Protection coordination analysis studies is carried
out after completing a Load flow and short circuit study.
2. Benefits
System protection coordination studies are crucial in power system networks
for several reasons:
Equipment Protection:
Selective Tripping:
Safety:
Economic Impact:
The objective of the protection coordination study is to verify that all pro-
tective equipment in the system such as relays, breakers, fuses, etc., are
properly coordinated and are sized according to the protected equipment.
4. Time-current coordination
In a properly coordinated system, protective equipment is selected and
adjusted to minimize the impact of equipment interference in a system. A
coordination study analyzes the characteristic curves of the fuse and
breaker and compares them to each other on a log-plot like the one
shown in the following figure. Any areas of miscoordination will be visible
with overlapping curves from various devices.
2. Coordination Intervals:
o Devices are coordinated by setting specific time intervals be-
tween their curves.
o The downstream device (closer to the load) should operate
faster than the upstream device (closer to the source).
o In some cases, if full coordination is not possible due to
equipment’s setting range constraints, in that case partial
coordination can be achieved.
3. Overlapping Curves:
o To achieve coordination, the curves of adjacent devices
should overlap.
o The overlap ensures that the downstream device operates
only if the fault persists beyond the upstream device’s clear-
ing time.
o The degree of overlap depends on the system’s requirements
(e.g., critical vs. non-critical loads).
4. Adjusting Settings:
o Protective relays and circuit breakers have adjustable set-
tings (e.g., pickup current, time delay).
o Power System Engineer configure these settings based on
system characteristics, load types, and fault current levels.
o Fine-tuning ensures proper coordination.
o Data collection – In addition to the data collected for short circuit stud-
ies, additional information on the settings and current ratings of all pro-
tective devices is required.
o Manufacturer data – Each protective device has unique response charac-
teristics, documented on the manufacturer’s “time-moment curve” re-
quired for the study.
o Load flow & Short circuit study
o Computer analysis – Although protection coordination studies can be
done by hand, it is much easier to use software such as ETAP, EasyPower,
SKM etc.
o Software Protection coordination module allows the Engineer to deter-
mine the optimal settings that will provide the best protection for the sys-
tem. In some cases, coordination between two devices is not possible. En-
gineering assessments are then used to determine the most appropriate
arrangement that will minimize equipment damage.
o Results tab – Settings and ratings of each protective device (circuit
breaker, fuse, motor controller, etc.) as determined by the analysis, are put
in the table for comparison with the setting and current field values.
o Final report – A detailed report describing the scope of the study, all as-
sumptions, data origins (including current-time curve), tabulated results,
and recommendations for corrective action are published at the end of the
study.
6. Standards
IEEE Guide for Practice for Protection & Coordination of Industrial & Com-
IEEE 242, 446
mercial Power Systems