Scribd
Upload
6 views1 page

Display PDF.phfghp

Uploaded by

chiranjeevsingh22
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views1 page

Display PDF.phfghp

Uploaded by

chiranjeevsingh22
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

CS SCJ No.

82795/2016
Harpali & Anr. Vs. Anju & Ors.

28.10.2024
One of the regular stenographers is on leave.
Present : Sh. Chiranjeev Singh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiffs.
Plaintiff No. 1 stated to have expired.
Plaintiff No. 2 / husband of plaintiff no. 1 in person.
Defendants No. 1 to 4 & 6 to 9 proceeded ex-parte vide
order dated 03.08.2022.
Defendant No. 5 proceeded ex-parte vide order dated
21.03.2017.
Defendant No.10 deleted from the array of the parties on
06.04.2015.
Sh. Uday Pawar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant
No.11 / MCD.
None for defendant No. 10 / SHO & defendant
No. 13 / Gram Sabha.

1. Notice issued to LR Savita w/o Sh. Ajay Pal received


back unserved with the report that the address was not
traceable.

2. Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiffs submits that plaintiff no.


2 can assist the process server in identifying the said address. In
view thereof, fresh steps be taken to effect service of
application under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC upon LR Savita w/o
Sh. Ajay Pal on filing of PF, RC, returnable on 21.01.2025.

3. Plaintiff No. 2 is at liberty to accompany the process


server for identification of the address of the LR.

NEHA PRIYA
Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller
South District, Saket Courts,
New Delhi/28.10.2024

You might also like