222 Opening Traps after 1 e4 Karsten MüLler 2024 scribd download
222 Opening Traps after 1 e4 Karsten MüLler 2024 scribd download
https://ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/222-opening-traps-
after-1-e4-karsten-mu%cc%88ller/
https://ebookultra.com/download/opening-for-white-according-to-
anand-1-e4-volume-9-1st-edition-alexander-khalifman/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/opening-for-white-according-to-
anand-1-e4-volume-8-repertoire-books-1st-edition-alexander-khalifman/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/opening-for-white-according-to-
anand-1-e4-volume-5-repertoire-books-1st-edition-alexander-khalifman/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/how-to-play-against-1-e4-first-
edition-neil-mcdonald/
ebookultra.com
Playing 1 e4 Sicilian Main Lines 1st Edition John Shaw
https://ebookultra.com/download/playing-1-e4-sicilian-main-lines-1st-
edition-john-shaw/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/coffeehouse-
repertoire-1-e4-volume-1-gawain-jones-quality-chess-2021-tls-gawain-
jones/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/tips-traps-for-growing-and-
maintaining-the-perfect-lawn-tips-and-traps-1st-edition-rodney-johns/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/biomaterials-for-mems-1st-edition-mu-
chiao/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/starting-out-the-c3-sicilian-1st-
edition-john-emms/
ebookultra.com
222 Opening Traps after 1 e4 Karsten MüLler Digital
Instant Download
Author(s): Karsten Müller, Rainer Knaak
ISBN(s): 9783283010058, 3283010056
File Details: PDF, 9.54 MB
Year: 2008
Language: english
progressin chess
2008
EDITION OLMS
()
Karsten Muller
Rainer Knaak
2008
EDITION OLMS
G
THE AUTHORS
Karsten Miller (born 1970) gained the grandmaster title at the age of 27 and has participated in eight German
Championships, finishing third in 1996 and 1997. A Doctor of Mathematics, he has played for the Hamburger
SK team in the German Bundesliga since 1988, and he also has a good reputation as a senior trainer of the
German Chess Federation. A respected endgame expert, he writes the endgame column of the ChessBase
Magazine and the Endgame Corner of ChessCafe.com. He has written many books, including Fundamental
Chess Endings co-authored by Frank Lamprecht, which appeared in 2001 and is already considered a modern
classic,
Rainer Knaak (born 1953) became a grandmaster at the age of 22, and was one of the youngest in the
world at the time. For many years he was one of the leading players of the German Democratic Republic,
and he won the East German Championship five times. After the end of his professional career he began
working for ChessBase, where he has authored the CDs Mating Attack against 0-0 and Trompowsky Attack, At
the chessboard he has a creative attacking style. Knaak currently plays in the German Bundesliga for Werder
Bremen, edits training CDs and is editor-in-chief of the ChessBase Magazine. His first book was Konigsindisch Pro
& Kontra, published in 1992 and co-authored by his grandmaster colleague from Leipzig Lothar Vogt.
City of =
London Libraries
AA
Bibliog
CL 1182910 9
bibliotr
The De ,
Deutsc 794.1 MUL £14.99 \
availak
All rights reserved. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade
or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover
other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition
being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.
Printed in Germany
ISBN 978-3-283-01004-1
Contents
BO CCN ee it ee rete Nang ati Bic Ms. gc ealedust Haim Gains Gm AG W tabi oecigthey ls 6
BE MEAN D Were des ciesBO Sle Wi we gn aera teSiete loanc ai onan asasaGo $osouaa eats i
a Na mee ae rite Rane intac areMok cba ata PCy hin ic tse Ge ot a ido eee Ce ts 10
Bem open Games < Minor Variations iscotws . bce. oss honca aw eens Het oe oe ook 11
PMR IIE ROO ICE aioe Meter be crcicnele Ritadis MidieMe See oes Oe Ce Ee ee ee 7
EEG att DAGRISINS LISTO cath occnsy cis« anal aos watwie ta aes NE RR 22
thes 17h BSc ele - Panesar a ee oper meen see ee este Reet ie. Bee 24
ol iyo AiOdts In, Te KealO-Kalnis.ca «2 5 sad cannnenees fuse, ic Reena eee ceeee 24
ec lelosyf (pice Orerae 562101g PRA eee er SOR en SINT OOP AV NT ye: ¥, 2r
SSN'55
|2 UIC
fe (ls pale ly a ae te TNE Se A OMe OE OB bE 32
OMe aera REMICIS ALY LVEF SIGIR, a. meatetans vo 8 Wale Sans. uimun' Moe das deen eg ee ee ae 32
et eae aA ae CHI niet. cane Gta wn Rc ake ata ons oe cktorak iain ate eters 38
arr aN ISWel oe ae cake con eee enENS srrus mene kina ecoiepac eases @ a SRS ete Tak
ed aS at VICNITS: Ha TG T ONION wie ait tess. oy tua wider ge serie uae eee ek ec nae Wis
SADT pale e(yp Ristule ts 016Rlaaok ees erucdr, Gaebris oitPe ciray Pactetene a, ame MR nett AA nn ner MenAS owe 84
Cmaricanines: MiG VAlAUONS sari aet: coe san wera ee een ein cs omnes: 100
SCAN PAIT SHEN UNCS eect nie teen i encrcce comin wank ws giv cine Ge nue aaicialG once Shae ae ave 123
8.1 Typical motifs in the Giuoco Piano and the Two Knights Defence............. 123
8.2 Traps in the Giuoco Piano and Two Knights Defence ..............002se005: eure
The work on this book has been spread over to be fair to all claims on its attention and
several years. It has been a lot of fun. Dis- above all to every opening. After all, it en-
covering a new opening trap into which a compasses the total range of opening theory
dozen people have already fallen (includ- from AOO to E99 in only two volumes. Traps
ing grandmasters) is a pleasure (despite the arising after 1. e4 are covered in this book,
misfortunes of others) and something that and all other traps in the second volume.
expands one’s own chess horizons. Looking As we shall see, the theme tackled in this
into the fringes of chess theory also brought book goes somewhat farther than that which
to light many a new variation or evaluation. can be expected of the usual concept of the
This is no wonder, since lines which have a opening trap. If we had to sum up this theme
bad reputation only occur over the board by in a single sentence, we would say: ‘Some-
chance, and then only between less strong one plays a ‘normal’ looking move, which
players. But previously, opening theory was is then refuted by an unusual variation (or
compiled without the help of computers.
move).
When you consider that most of the Known We would like to thank Raymund Stolze of
opening traps go back to Znosko-Borovsky, Olms, Rainer Woisin of ChessBase and, last
it was time that there was a further collection but not least, Ulrich Dirr, who did a marvel-
of them. Not that this work will find it easy lous job again, for their good cooperation.
Karsten Muller
Rainer Knaak
SS Fe a —
Introduction
The verb ‘to fall’ hints at where we are head- because instead of falling into the trap the
ing — one falls, perhaps into a pit that some- other player has at his disposal a move which
body has dug and then hidden. That is the secures him an advantage.
difference compared with a dangerous situ- So, an opening trap is something which hap-
ation, which you have brought upon yourself, pens in the opening phase of a game. Under
such as climbing up a high tree or heading falling into a trap, we understand a situa-
into unknown territory. What you are doing tion during play in which the victim overlooks
is natural, for example going along a path something when playing an apparently ob-
and then falling into something, such as a vious but nevertheless wrong move (there
pit or a snare, etc. For the person who falls, can also be several wrong moves), which the
it is of no importance whether the situation player setting the trap had hoped for and
was created by someone else or whether it which he now exploits, usually in a tactical
arose naturally, for example an unexpected and unexpected way. This is often an unusual
hole in that place or some prickly plant — the move, but sometimes the evaluation of the
damage he may suffer is exactly the same. position is different from what it appeared to
Therefore there is someone who falls into a be at first sight. It is therefore evident that
trap, and there is also someone — sometimes opening traps, according to how they arise,
— who sets the trap. can be divided into two categories:
Let us apply what we have just said to the A) On one hand there are opening traps in
game of chess. Here we are talking about which the person setting them deliberately
the opening phase. A player makes an ob- chooses a line, in which he hopes that his
vious looking move; it appears normal — at opponent will make a mistake. The player
least at first sight. His move develops a piece setting the trap may well be taking a risk: if
or captures something, or it can be to ward his opponent should make the correct move,
off a threat. It is an apparently natural move, then he himself is caught by the trap, be-
but it turns out to be wrong. The opponent cause he then suffers a disadvantage. The
has perhaps knowingly brought about this risk being incurred can be of varying propor-
situation. Perhaps he has even taken a risk, tions, going down as far as almost no risk at
& Introduction
all. In fact, examples in which real disadvan- is a well-known mistake (cf. Hlousek— Kott,
tages are accepted are rather rare. One such Game 181 p. 125).
example is 1. e4 e5 2. Af3 Ac6 3. &c4 Ad4?!
Traps of type A are very common — you want
(cf. Munster —Dieringer, Game 184 p. 128).
to set the opponent a trap. But the number of
B) But if one simply plays one’s normal lines
such traps is limited. If it is additionally con-
and the opponent is suddenly faced with a
sidered that the level of difficulty can be very
situation in which the ‘normal’ moves are
varied — from elementary to deep positional
met by a (usually) tactical counterstroke, one
traps — then traps of type A are actually ina
can only conditionally call this an opening
minority.
trap. But avoiding such typical mistakes is
just as important and will therefore play a The more general theme is moves that are
large part in this book. An example: 1. e4 e5 ‘normal’, according to the principles of the
2. Af3 Ac 3. &c4 Af6 4. Ag5 d5 5. exd5, game, but which in the given position fail for
and now the natural recapture 5...Axd5? a particular reason.
Risk or no risk?
It is perhaps a myth that there is always an el- square, instead of a recapture there follows
ement of risk in correct opening traps. It may another move, a sacrifice, etc. For example,
be, that when playing for a trap one does not the Noah’s Ark Trap.
always choose those variations which offer
After 1. e4 e5 2. Af3 Ac6 3. &b5 a6 4. 2a4
the best chance of achieving an opening ad-
d6 5. d4 b5 6. &2b3 Axd4 7. Axd4 exd4 the
vantage. But in this database there is a clear
trap is set. After the ‘natural’ 8. &xd4? White
minority of cases in which a player really
not only regains the pawn, but at first sight
gambles and voluntarily assumes the risk of
he also has possible motifs such as &xf7+
a bad position if the trap does not work. We
or YWd5. But Black simply plays 8...c5! and it
sometimes then speak of a ‘genuine trap’.
is obvious that threats against f7 can always
According to the definition given above, there
be parried by ...&e6.
are perhaps two more features which distin-
guish a typical trap: Many people want to learn traps, in order to
a) the mistake, that is to say falling into save themselves the hard work involved in
the trap, happens with a ‘normal’, appar- opening theory. We hope that there is also
ently sound move — continuing development, something here for these people. But it is
castling or capturing a piece. more important to fit a promising trap into
b) the exploitation of the error is something your Own opening repertoire, or even to con-
unexpected — a piece moves to an unusual struct a repertoire around the trap.
Introduction
Various
Xa oeWeal:
f
Alapin trap —- Neumann-Barz (Game 142
mamialalia ~
p. 100).
Canal trap -— Canal—Johner (Game 190
p. 132), Canal—Becker (Game 179 p. 124).
O'Kelly trap — Roncal—Morales Mendoza
(Game 53 p. 47).
Are traps also appropriate for strong play-
ers?
Of course! On the one hand, you only have to
look through this database to see how many
Position after 5... £f8—b4?! good players have lost quickly as a result
of a typical error or have fallen into a trap.
The surprising reply to this ‘normal’ devel-
On the other, nowadays it is more and more
oping move is 6. Yd4! (cf. Erben-Weiner,
important to surprise one’s opponent at an
Game 39 p. 37).
early stage in the game. In any case, strong
Counter-traps
players will also know what to do when their
This means accepting the offer to go into a
opponent deviates.
trap, but having an ace up your sleeve ... (cf.
Augustin —Vossenkuhl, Game 132 p. 93). Good traps
In this respect the following trap goes one What constitutes a good trap? We can dis-
step further: Nolting—Murthy (Game 109 tinguish two criteria:
Bi fo) a) if, against all expectations, the opponent
Deliberately falling into a trap finds the best move, the damage to yourself
There are some examples in which objective should not be all that great;
analysis shows a completely different picture
b) it should look a likely enough move for
from statistics. This comes about because
your opponent to make. In addition, it should
most players fall into a trap without realis-
have happened several time in practice and
ing it and fail to find the best moves over
be based on the idea that the opponent will
the board, and anyone who knows about the
fall into the trap by making ‘normal moves’.
trap avoids it. But what if you deliberately
fall into it’, but then know the best moves. For example, the O’Kelly trap 1. e4 c5 2. Af3
Let us give you an example of this, which is a6, as now the usual automatic response
well worth considering for Black, if he knows 3. d4?! is a mistake as Black gets a good
what he is doing: Kritz—Hohler (Game 171 version of the Sveshnikov Variation after
p. 118). 3...cxd4 4. Axd4 eS.
Symbols
check mate
captures new move
short castling long castling
10
Chapter 1
Game 2 [BOO]
Naiditsch (2449) - Déttling (2473)
Dortmund 2000
1. e4 Dc6 2. Af3
White wants to avoid 2. d4 d5.
2p toe
(see next diagram)
& Chapter 1 Semi-Open Games - Minor Variations
12. Wg8 he8 13. &xf4 (13. Aa3 Le6 14. Wg3
Wi6%) 13...Wxf4 14. Dad Leb 15. Wg
£xa3 16. Yxf4 exf4 17. bxa3 Axc2+ 18. &d2
§)xa1 =, Pavasovic— Gross, Bled 1995.
12...2b4+ 13. c3 2g4!
3. exf5 d5 4. Ah4!?
Black will obtain good compensation in the
spirit of the King’s Gambit, but White’s ma-
terial superiority is too great.
4. &£b5 &xf5 5. d4z.
Black’s army on the 4th rank makes a mighty
4...e5 5. Wh5+ g6 6. fxg6 Af6! 7. g7+ impression!
A) 7 Wd1? £c5 8. g7 Bg8—, Rodriguez 13...Ac2+? 14. &d1 Wxf2 15. Wg8+ #e7
Lopez-—Ferencz, Budapest 1998; 16; Wg3a
B) 7 Wg5? &c5 (7...2e7 8. Bb50, Vi- 14. Wg8+
darsson-Ulvin, Gausdal 1988) 8. d4 &xd4 14. &xf4 Ac2+ 15. d2 Wxf2+ 16. &e2
9. 2d3 e4 10. 2e2 Be6wo, Brendel—Gross, (16. &c1? Wel+ 17 &xc2 Wd1#) 16...
Bundesliga 1996. Wxe2+ 17. &cl exf4 18. cxb4 Yxg2=.
7...Axh5 8. gxh8BW Wxh4 9. Yxh7 Ad4 14...8d7 15. Wg7+ Bc6 16. g3
10. YWg6+? 16. Aa3 &xa3 17. g3 (17. cxd4 &b4+ 18. &d2
10. Ac3 Sf5 11. Wxc7 8g7 (11...8c8? &xd2+ 19. &xd2 Wxf2+ 20. &c1 He80)
12. 8b5+ Axb5 13. Wxe5++-) 12. &b5+ 17...Af3+ 18. &d1 &f8 19. Wxf8 Exf8
%f8 13. Wc5+ &g8 14. Wxd5+ &h8 20. gxh4 Ad4+ 21. Sd2 Af3+ 22. &c2 Ae1+
1550-04—, 23. &b1 Afxd30.
10...2d8 11. d3
16... Af3+ 17. &d1 Ad4+ 18. &d2
A) White could play on with 18. f3, but it does
11. g3? Wg4 12. Wxg4 &xg4 13. &d3 e4 not look convincing: 18...&xf8+ 19. &d2
14. c3 Df3+ 15. Kf1 &h3+ 16. we2 Lg2 (19. bet WhS 20. &xf4 &xht 21. g4 Whe
17. Hd1 exd3++, Jahr—Poethig, Bundesliga
22. Yxh8 Exh8 23. &g3) 19... Wh5 20. gxf4
1982.
&xh1;
11...24! B) 18. 862? &xe2+ 19. &d2 Wh3 20. cxb4
11...Axc2+? 12. &d1 Wxf2 (12...Axal? Wf5—+.
13. &8g5++-) 13. 2e2 Af4 14. &xf4 exf4 18... Df3+ 19. &d1
15. Wg5+ &e7 16. Yxd5+ &d7 17. &xc2 19. &c2 Ael+ 20. &b3? Rd14+ 21. &xb4
Wxe2+ 18. Ad2+-. 4fxd3+ 22. &a3 Wad#.
12. W7 19...Ad4+4 2-2
Game 4 Hagedorn—Schaub QD)
Game 3 [BOO]
Gutman (2455) - Forthoffer
Metz 1985
Inviting Black to help himself to the e4-pawn. Actually logical, since the c4-square is
taboo.
4...2xe4?
7...Abd7
4...&g4 is most often played. One possible
trap is 5. d5 Ae5 6. Axe5? &xd1 7. 2b5+ c6 7...Abc4? 8. &xc4 Axc4 9. Wa4+4+—-.
8. dxc6 dxe5 9. c7+ Wd7 10. &xd7+ &xd7 8. £4! DAg6 9. c6! 4\f6
11. &®xd1 Axe4F.
Better is 9...bxc6 10. dxc6 Ab8 11. Yxd8+
5. d5 1-0 coxd8 12. £63!? (12. AFZ Axc6 13. Ag5
And Black resigned because of 5...Ae5 %e8 14. &b5 &d7 15. Ad5 Hc8 16. &£a6
6. Wa4+4+-. Hb8 17 Axc7+ &d8 18. Ad5+) 12...e5
13. O-0-0+ £d6 14. fxe5 Axed 15. Ab5S=.
Hunting the knight 10. cxb7 &xb7 11. 2b5+ Ad7 12. Af3 e6
13. 0-0
Game 4 [BO1] 13. dxe6 fxe6 14. Wb3 with the double
16
Chapter 2
Alekhine Defence
A fresh version of 10. &xf7+ &e7 11. 895+ Ld6 12. De4+!
Legall’s mate ®xe5 13. f44+ &d4 14. Bxd1 Yxg5 15. c3+
®e3 16. 0-0!
16. fxg5+—- is simpler.
Game 8 [B02]
16...%c5 17. Bd2?
Pirozhkov —- Remizov (2155)
17. Bf2! Ad4 18. He1+ Ae2+ 19. Hfxe2+
Moscow 1995 &xd3+ 20. Axc5+ &xc5+ 21. &f1 followed
by &d1 mate.
1. e4 Df6 2. Ac3 d5 3. exd5 Axd5 4. &c4
17...0d4 18. @h2 Ye7?
Ab6 5. 2b3 AcE 6. Af3 e5 7. d3 &2g4?!
18...Wd5 is better.
This is imprudent. 19. He1+ &xf4 20. cxd4 Wh4 21. g3+
Wxg3+ 22. Axg3 1-0
8. h3! 2h5?!
A knightmare
Game 9 [BO2]
Maeser - Landenbergue (2385)
Lenk 1990
1. e4 @f6 2. Dc3 d5 3. e5 DAfd7 4. d4c5
5. @xd5?!
A weak move, but one that has often been
played. 5. f4 is better.
5,..cxd4
9...2xd1?!
9...%h4 10. Af3 We7+ 11. 2e3+ and White
is a pawn up.
17
& Chapter 2 Alekhine Defence
This occurs 15 times in Mega 2005. It is All that glitters is not gold
amazing how often even strong players do
not spot the loss of a piece at this point. [BO2]
Game 11
A) 6. e6? Ya5+ 7. c3 Yxd5 8. exd7+ &xd7F. Lima (2125) - Rodrigues
B) 6. &b5 is critical and unexplored, e.g. Lisbon 1997
6...a6 7, &xd7+ &xd7 8. Wxd4 &c6 9. c4
e6 10. 2g5 Wd7 11. 0-0-0 exd5 12. cxd5
and White has compensation. More analy- 1. e4 Afé 2. e5 Ad5 3. Df3 dé 4. 2c4 Db
sis and games are needed to separate the
wheat from the chaff.
6...Ab6! 7. £b5+ Ac6 8. c4 e6 9. Bg5 Wd7
The knight on d5 is simply lost, and White
does not get sufficient compensation for it.
10. 0-0-0 exd5 11. We3 d4 12. Yg3 a6
13. &xc6 Wxc6 14. Hxd4 &f5 15. Ae2 &2c5
0-1
A trapped bishop
Game 10 [BO2]
Bopp (1197) - Ramini (1921)
5. &xf7+?
correspondence 2000
A) 6...8e8? 7. e6+-.
7. Wf3 We8 8. e6
5. &e2! 8...g6!
A surprising motif. White now wins a piece.
In fact a self-evident defence. Now White
In none of the 19 games in Mega 2005 was
simply does not have enough attacking po-
this strong move seen.
tential to compensate for the piece.
5...Ab6 6. c5 Ac4 7. Wb3 Bad 8. Yxc4
d5 9. %c2 0-0 10. Af3 b6 11. Abd2 &a6+ 9. h4 h5 10. Af7 &xe6 11. Axh8 &xh8
12. &d1 b5 13. Ab3 1-0 12. Wxb7 &d5 13. Yxc7 &c6 0-1
Game 13 Anand -Bilawer Q)
Pawns on the attack My kingdom for a horse
AeWekl
h
6. Axf7! &xf7 7 Wh5+ wes
Rie
A AA A ~N
19
ee ee Chapiog ee Oe
20°
Game 13 Anand - Bilawer LY)
CPR COSI LEIT St 6 RPS ERE TN 8
20. d6+ &b8 21. dxe7 Wxc5 22. &f3 &xe7 22. cxb7+ &xb7 23. &f37?
23. Hxe7 Ha7 24. Wxg7 He8 25. Wg3+ a8 23. d6 Wxd6 24. 813+ &a7 25. 2xa8+-.
26. Bxe8 Axe8 27. Wf4o.
23...4d6 24. Hc6 Wb4 25. Hec1 2f5?
20...Wa5 21. c6
25...2d7 26. d6 &xc6 27. &xc6+ a7
21. d6+ &b8 22. dxe7 &xe7 23. Wxe7 28. &xa8 &xa8 29. We6 Wxd6 30. Yc8+
Wo7 -+.
a7 31. Hco7+ &b6 32. Bb7+ a5 33. Wc3+
21...east ba4=.
After 21...&b8! White’s attack simply peters 26. d6 £e4 27. 2xe4 Axe4 28. Wd5 A
out. 29. Hc7+ 1-0
at
Chapter 3
Game 14 [B06]
Fette —- Senner
Krumbach 1985
1. e4 d6 2. d4 g6
2...Ad7 3. Af3 g6 4. &c4. Often players start
to fianchetto their bishop (in this case with
g6) and continue without thinking. In this
respect, White’s bishop move sets a trap.
Ar cr e
5...Agf6?
KX 2We ADE
AAAAAAZA A) 5...c5?! (13 times in Mega 2005) 6. Ag5!
(6. &xf7+? &xf7 7. Ag5+ Les 8. Aes Wad
9. Axg7+ &f7w) 6...Ah6? (6...e6 7. &xe6!
fxe6 8. Axe6 Wad [8...We7? 9. Ad5!+—-]
9. Axg7+ &f7 10. AMS gxhd5 11. Wxhd5+
g7 12. &f4+) 7. &xf7+! Axf7 8. Ae6 Wb6
9. Axg7+ &f8 10. Ae6+ 1-0, Al Modiahki-
Tin, Yangon 1999.
B) 5...e5? (yet another way of falling into the
This position has occurred quite often trap) 6. Ag5! (6. &xf7+!?) 6...Ah6 7, &xf7+!
in practice. (4...Ab6 is better; 4...Agf6? Axf7 8. Ae6 Wh4 (8...Wf6 9. Ad5! Yxe6
5. &xf7+ &xf7 6. Ags5+ &g8 7 Ae6 10. Axc7+ ®e7 11. Axe6 &xe6+—) 9. Axg7+
We8 8. Axc7+) 5. &xf7+! &f8 (5...8xf7? ®e7 10. Ad5+ &f8 11. Ae6+ &g8 12. Wg4!
6. Ag5+ #e8 [6...2f6? 7. WI3#] 7, De6+-) 1-0, Lachex-— Santiago, USA 1990.
6. Ag5+— Adf6 7. Ac3 Wd7 8. Se6 Wes
5...Ab6 or 5...e6 is called for.
9. &xc8 Wxc8 10. e5 dxed 11. dxe5 Ag4
12. Wf3+ WF5 13. Wxf5+ gxf5 14. f4 c6 15. h3 6. e5!
BANG 16. &e3 #e8 17. 0-0-0 &f8 18. Ae6 6. &xf7+ &xf7 7 Agd5+ &g8 8. Ae6 Wes
Hc8 19. &xa7 Af7 20. 2b6 Bh6 21. Ac7+ 9. Axc7 Wd8 10. Axa8 is good, but the
Exc7 22. &xc7 &xf4+ 23. &b1 &xe5 1-0, game continuation is even better.
Zemgalis — Troger, Augsburg 1946. 6...dxe5 7. dxe5 Ag4 8. &xf7+ 1-0
3. Af3 297 4. Ac3 Ad7 5. &c4 And Black resigned in view of 8...&xf7
(see next diagram) 9. Ag5+ &e8 10. Aes.
22
Game 16 Willke—Pottberg Ls)
6...Wxd1+?
At first glance obvious, but bad nevertheless
7...Ah6? — White has now constructed an ideal trap.
15 times in Mega 2005. With @f5 Black in- 6...Ag4 7 Wxd8+ &xd8 8. Af3 (8. Bd1+
tends to exert pressure on d4, but he over- £d7 9. e6 fxe6 10. Af3) 8...Axe5 9. O-0-0+
looks a lethal double attack. 7...Af6 is better. 2d7 10. Axe5 &xe5 11. &2c4 and in both
cases White has good compensation for the
8. Yc1 1-0
pawn.
7. Hxd1 Afd7
An endgame as
7...Ag4? 8. h3! (8. Ad5+— Wahls) 8...Axe5
an opening trap 9. Ad5+-.
8. Ad5 &xe5 9. Af3 2d6?
Game 16 [BO7]
Willke (2270) - Pottberg 9...e6 10. Axed exd5 11. Exd5 simply leaves
Germany 1992 White with a pleasant endgame.
10. 8xe7! &f4
1. e4 d6 2. d4 Af6 3. Ac3 g6 4. &Bg5 2g7
5. e5!? 10...8xe7 11. Axc7+ &d8 12. Axa8+-.
Trappy, but without risking much. 11. 8a3 g5 12. g3 c6 13. De7 1-0
Chapter 4
Caro-Kann Defence
Black wants to use the main advantage of the Caro-Kann compared with the French and
develop his light-square bishop outside his central pawn chain. But it can easily come under
pressure there.
Game 17 [B11]
Djurasevié - van Steenis
12th Olympiad, Moscow 1956
1. e4 c6 2. Ac3 d5 3. DAF3!?
Strictly speaking, not a trap but a venomous
sideline.
3...dxe4
3...£94 4. h3
24
4.1 Typical motifs in the Caro-Kann * Game 18 Zabala—Ferraro &)
14. 0-0-0 Wc7 15. Wf3£, Cubas Pons-Vilar This extremely slow move occurred no less
Lopez, Spain 1992. than 59 times in Mega 2005. 6...e6 or
10...Agfé 11. 2d3 6...@f6 is called for.
A) 11. c4 e5 12. 2d3 Wg4 13. &8xe5+, Movs- 7. Af4 2h7 8. 2c4 Af6 9. 0-0 e6 10. Het
esian—Dragani¢, Pula 1997.
B) 11. 8e2 Ad5 12. &d2 e6 13. c4 Ab4
14. 0-0 Wo2 15. &xb4 Wxd1 16. Bfxd1 &xb4
17. dSt, Arapovic -Mbambara, Bled 2002.
11...!Wg4 12. Wxg4
12. Wd2 @Ad5 13. &e3 Axe3 14. Wxe3
e5 15. c3+ 0-0-0? 16. &f5 Wf4 (Tate-
Belakovskaya, Parsippany 1999) 17. Wxe5+.
12...axg4 13. 0-0
13. f8 Agf6 14. O-O-O 0-0-0 15. c4 e6
16. De4+t, Konsek—Hauernherm-Thoma,
Forchheim 1993. 10...0d5?
13...e6 14. Hfe1 0-0-0 15. c3 Ab6 This occurs 20 times in Mega 2005. It is an
16. Hadi Ad5 17. &8c1 &d6 18. De4 Bh2+ unavailing attempt to stop the white threats
19. &f1 &c7 20. g3t &b8 21. &g2 b6 against e6.
22. £e2 Agf6 23. &f3 Axe4 24. &xe4 Hd7 A) 10...£e72! 11. &2xe6!? fxe6 12. Axe6 Wd7
25. Hd3 Hhd8 26. Hed1 De7 27. Hf3 f6 13. Axg7+ &d8 14. &xh6t.
28. He1 e5 29. dxe5 &xe5 30. Hfe3 g5
B) 10...2g8 is necessary.
31. hxg5 hxg5 32. &c2 Ad5 33. H3e2 Hg7
34. Hh1 &c7 35. BhS &d6 36. Hel b5 11. Axe6
37. Heh1 a5 38. a4 Db6 39. axb5 cxb5 This should win as well, but 11. &xd5! is
40. Bh7 Hdd7 41. Bh8 Ad5 42. &2f5 Hde7 simpler: 11...cxd5 12. Wh5 g6 13. We5 Hg8
43. Hce8 Dc7 44. Hd1+ &c5 45. 8e3+ &c4 14. Axd5 &g7 15. Wed Ac 16. c3+-.
46. &b6 a4 47. £8a5 He8 48. &xc7 Bxc8
11...fxe6 12. Hxe6+ De7
49. 8xe5 &b3 50. &xf6 Hgc7 51. &xc8
Hxc8 52. Hd2 g4 53. 8e7 Hc7 54. 2a3 1-0 A) 12...2e7 13. Wh5+ ®f8 14. Wf3+ Ate
(14...2f6 15. Ah5+—) 15. &d2 Lg8 16. Bxe7
Wxe7 17. DfS+-.
Even a disruptive sacrifice on e6 is possible,
if Black wastes too much time. B) 12...d7 13. Wg4 g5 14. Ae4 &c7
15. Yg3+ &b6 16. Ac5+-.
Game 18 [B18] 13. Wh5+ &d7 14. &f4 Ag6 15. Yg4 &c8
Zabala (1928) - Ferraro 15...Aaxf4 16. He7+ &xe7 17. Be1+ and
Villa Ballester 2004 mates.
Game 19 [B17] 11...05° 12. 292 °exd4 13. hd'd3 14- We3
Mecking (2630) - Miles (2565) Wo7 15. hxg6 &xe5 16. g5 Ag4 17. WYxd3
Wijk aan Zee 1978 fxg6, and now in Haba—Burmakin, Pardu-
bice 2003, White should have continued
4.e4c6 2. d4.d5 3. Ac3 dxe4 4. Axe4 DAd7 18. Yb5+ &f7 19. Bh4+-.
5. Af3 12. dxe5+- Wd5 13. Bh3 Axg4 14. Wxg4
The sequence of moves introduced by this Wxe5+ 15. He3 Wad 16. Yg5 Wb6 17. hS
is not very ambitious, but it does contain a £f5 18. He2 0-0 19. 2e3 Wd8 20. Bd2
drop of poison. 5. &c4 is the main line. Wxg5 21. &xg5 f6 22. 2e3 e5 23. 8c4+
@h8 24. h6 gxh6 25. &xh6 Hfes 1-0
5...Agté 6. Axf6+ Axf6 7. Ded !?
Game 20 [B17]
Beil - Hausner
Brno 1969
1.e4 c6 2.d4.d5 3. Ac3 dxe4 4. Axe4 Ad7
5. &c4
5. 2d3 Agf6 6. Ag5 e6 7. A1f3 and Black
should avoid 7...h6? 8. Axe6! We7 9. 0-0
fxe6 10. 896+ &d8 11. &f4 with a powerful
7...8f57! initiative.
5...Dgf6 6. as e6 7. YWe2
The fact that White’s trap is not such a
bad one is made clear when you consider
that 7...ad7! is the only move to equalise. i leaWee x:
7...2e6!? is playable, but is reckoned to be
+
As A Aik A
6
8. c3
Threatening “/b3.
8...e6
8...Ad7 9. Axf7! &xf7 10. WF3 e6 11. g4 WG
12. gxf5 Yxf5 13. Wet.
9. g4! 2g6 10. h4 2d6
10...N5 11. g5 Ad5 12. Axg6 fxg6 13. We2 Should this move, which has been played a
7 14. Bh3 Ae7 15. &c4 Af5 16. Rf3 Wd7 hundred times and more, be considered a
17. Bxf5+ gxf5 18. Wxf5+ &e7 19. Wed He8 trap?
20. &f4 &d8 21. We5 Hg8 22. 0-0-0 g6 7...Ab6
23. Hel &g7 24. Wb8+ &e7 25. Bxe6+ 1-0, A) 7...h67? 8. Axf7 &xf7 9. Wxe6+ &g6
Karpov —Hort, Bugojno 1978. 10. &d3+ Bhd 11. Wh3#.
11. We2 &xe5? B) 7...2e77? 8. Axf7 +-.
4.2 Traps in the Caro-Kann * Game 22 Westphal-Mitscherling GQ
8. 2d3 Wxd4? 9...2b4+
22 times in Mega 2005. This pawn capture After this intermediate check Black hopes to
should be avoided; 8...h6 is quite playable. protect his f-pawn with O-0.
9. A1f3 10. c3! &xc34+ 11. &f1! 1-0
If now the black queen moves, White can Black could play on with three pawns for a
play Hed and the f7-pawn will fall. minor piece, but he preferred to resign.
7.1. 2G4?
27
& Chapter 4 Caro-Kann Defence _ ae
Game 23 [B11]
Henris (2260) - André (2062)
Charleroi Roulx 2001
1. e4 c6 2. Ac3 d5 3. W3
6...cxb2?
A) 6...cxd2+?! 7. &£xd2 exf6 8. O-0-0 gives
White an excellent game.
B) 6...exf6 7. Y¥xc3, and here, at the least,
he has the long-term advantage of a sound
queenside pawn majority.
7. &xf7+!
A surprise!
A trap, with which White does not take much 7...2d7
of a risk.
7...&xf7 8. fxg7+ &xg7 9. &xb2+4-.
3...d4 8. &xb2 exf6 9. Ae2 Wc7 10. 0-0+ Adé
11. d4 We7 12. &2b3 He8 13. Ag3 g6 14. c4
Instead of this, Black has various solid b6 15. &c3 f5 16. c5 &xg3 17. Yxg3+ &b7
moves, of which the best is probably 18. Hfe1 Wf8 19. Hxe8 Wxe8 20. Yd6 &2d7
3...dxe4. 21. He1 Wd8 22. He7 Wc7 23. Yxc7+ &xc7
A) 3...dxe4 4. Axe4 Ad7 5. d4 Agf6 6. &c4
24. Hxh7 bxc5 25. dxc5 Daé6 26. 8e5+ Bc8
e6 7. £95 £e7 8. 0-0-0 is an interesting vari-
27. &d6 1-0
ation, which can also come about as a result
of a French. The fantasy trap
B) 3...e6 is also playable, of course.
Game 24 [B12]
4. &£c4! Afé V. Ivanov (2411) - Bataev (2227)
Chigorin Memorial Tournament
A) 4...dxc3? 5. &xf7+ &d7 6. dxc3 &c7 St. Petersburg 1999
7, £f4+ &b6 8. a4 a5 9. Bd1 Ad7 10. Re6+-.
1.e4 c6 2. d4 d53. f3 dxe4 4. fxe4 e5 5. AfT3
B) 4...e6 5. Ace2+£. exd4?!
8...Axd4?
8. &xf7+! Bxf7?
The pawn is poisoned. 8...e6 should be
8...%e7! 9. Wb3 (9. Wxd8+!?) 9...cxb2+ played.
10. Yxb4+ &xf7 11. &xb2-. 9. Db5! Wd8 10. Axd4 Wxd4 11. Wa4+!
9. Yxd8 cxb2+ 2&d8
A) 11...8d7 12. &xf7+ &xf7 13. Yxd4+-.
This move wins a great deal of material, but B) 11...!4d7 12. &8b5+-.
it does not help.
12. 8a5+ b6 13. Hd1 Wxd1+ 14. Wxd1+
10. ®e2 bxaiW 11. Ag5+ Lg6 12. Wes8+ £d7 15. 8c3 De8 16. &b5 Ad6 17. 2xd7
1-0 &xd7 18. Af3 f6 19. Ad4 e5 20. Ab5 &c6
21. Wf3+ e4 22. Ad4+ &b7 23. Wg4 Hc8
And Black resigned in view of 12...h6 24. 0-0 g6 25. We6 1-0
(12...2f6 13. Bfi+ &f5 14. Bxf5#) 13. Ae6+
Sd? 14. &xd2+ g5 15. &xg5#. Don’t miss a check!
Game 26 [B15]
Don’t touch that pawn!
Engelbrecht (2270) - Schlette
Budapest 1999
Game 25 [B13] 1. e4 g6 2. d4 c6 3. 4Af3 d5 4. Ac3 &g7
Zier (2200) - Hermann 5. &8f4 dxe4 6. Axe4 Wad5+
German Championship
Bad Neuenahr 1982
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. c4 f6
5. Ac3 Ac6 6. &g5 Wad 7. 2d2
7 &xf6 exf6 8. cxd5 £b4 9. dxc6 &xc3+
10. bxc3 Wxc3+ 11. &e2 0-0 12. f3 He8+
13. &f2 We3+ 14. &g3 Wg5+ with perpetual
check is another main line. ft
7...dxc4 8. &xc4
(see next diagram)
& Chapter 4 Caro-Kann Defence
This queen check does not make much White controls the h2-square, doesn’t he?
sense if White reacts correctly, but nor is
8...Bxh2! 9. Rxh2 Wa5+!
there much risk of Black ending up in a bad
position. 9...gxh2? 10. &2xh2=.
7. c3? 10. c3
This natural move falls into the trap. 7, YWd2
or 7. £d2 is better. 10. Wd2 gxf2+ 11. &xf2 (11. we2 Yxd2+
12. &xd2 fxgiW—+) 11...Yxd2+—-+.
7... f5!-+
5 times in Mega 2005. An unusual queen 10...4xe5+!! 11. dxe5 gxh2 0-1
move, which White had simply never consid- White resigned, since the courageous pawn
ered. can no longer be stopped.
8. AfgsS Wxf4 9. 8c4 e6 10. g3 We7 11. YF3
@h6 12. h4 Dab 13. Af6+ Ye7 14. Afe4
f6 15. Ah3 Zf5 16. 0-0 b5 17. 2b3 Hes Eyes to the left
18. Hae1 &f8 19. Ahg5d fxg5 20. Axg5 &g8
21. He2 h6 22. Hxe6 &xe6 23. 2xe6+ Hxe6
Game 28 [B15]
24. Axe6 Wd6 25. He1 He8 0-1
Kloostra - Fell
Australian Championship
Every soldier wants to Toowoomba 1986
become a general
1.e4 c6 2.d4d5 3. Ac3 dxe4 4. Axed AE
Game 27 [B15] 5. Axf6+ exf6 6. 2804 We7+
NN - Torre Repetto
Mexico (simultaneous) 1928
7. De2?
7, We2 £e6 8. 8637? (a8. 2d3) 8...%b4+ is
a variation on the same motif.
7...Wb4+ 0-1
31
Chapter 5
Sicilian Defence
32.
5.1 Typical motifs in the Sicilian ¢ Game 33 Da Silva— Cordeiro &)
A) 8. £3? Wb4! 9. &b3 (9. Axc6 bxc6 16. £e3 2d7 17 Bb7 &c8 18. Bb4 Ab6
10. 2b3 &a6 seems to be the lesser evil 19. 0-0 @d7 20. Hfb1 e5 21. c4 d4 22. 2d2
for White.) f5 23. &c2 &e7 24. c5 a5 25. 295+ Lf8
26. &h6+ &e8 27. B4b2 Axc5 28. Ld1 &d7
29. Bc2 0-1, Teie— Bellon Lopez, Groningen
1970.
C) 8. Ab3? (80 times in Mega 2005)
8...4%b4! 9. Ad2 (still the best) 9...Y%xb2.
Now there is a relatively forced line: 10. Ab5
Wed 11. f4 Wb8 12. e5 Axe5S! 13. fxe5 Wxed
14. &f2 (14. WI8? Wxal+ 15. &f2 Wed
16. 2d4 Wg5 17. &e1 0-0-4, Kupreichik-—
Veremeichik, Minsk 1973) 14...a6 15. Ad4
(Zapata—Hoffman, Santos 2001) 15...2h6!
9...Axe4! (10. fxe4!? Axd4 [10...&xd4
16. Af1 &xe3+ 17. Axe3 W4+ 18. %e2 d5
11. &xd4 Wxd4 12. Wf3 is not quite so
19. 2xd5 &g4+ 20. 2f3 Hd8 21. c3 &xf3+
clear.] 11. a8 Wd6 12. 0-0 0-0 13. BF2 Axb3
22. gxf3 e5F.
14. Yxd6 exd6 15. cxb3) 10. Axc6 &xc3+
8...W%b4?
11. bxc3 Wxc3+ 12. &e2 dxc6 13. &d4 e5
a8...0-0.
(Since this stem game [with 8. f8 Yb4] there
9. 2b3 Axe4?
have been numerous others. Mega 2005 has
34 games with 13...e5.) 14. &xc3 Axc3+ Black falls into her own trap; the move can
15. &f2 Axdi+ 16. Haxd1 0-0 17. Hhet be refuted in two ways.
He8 18. f4 £94 19. Hd6 exf4 20. Hf6 Bxet 10. Axc6!
21. ®xe1 He8+ 22. &d2 Le6 23. Exf4 &xb3 10. Axe4!? is not bad either: 10...Axd4
24. axb3 &g7 25. Hd4 He7 26. Bd8 h5 27. c4 11. &xf7+ &xf7 12. AgS5+ &e8 (a12...&g8
c5 28. g3 b6 29. &d3 &f6 30. h3 &g5 13)>ca Yib5 14) cxd4+) 138. co’ Wxb2
31. Hd5+ &f6 32. Hd6+ wed 33. Hd8 &f6 14. &xd4 e5 15. 2xe5 &xe5 16. Hel Hf8
34. Bd6+ &g7 35. Bd8 Hel 36. Ha8 Hg1 17. Bxe5+ &d8 18. Ae6+ #e7 19. Axf8+
37. Bxa7 Hxg3+ 38. &c2 He3 39. Hd7 g5 &xf8 20. Wf3+ 1-0, Mela—Glinz, Buenos
40. Bd5 &g6 41. b4 cxb4 42. Hb5 Hc3+ 0-1, Aires 2001.
Durao-—Pustina, Leipzig 1960. 10...dxc6
10...6xc6 hardly makes any difference.
B) 8. Wd2? White would like to continue
with his usual set-up by castling long, but
11. a3 Axc3 12. WF3! Ae2+ 13. Bh1 Wh4
14. Yxf7+ &d8 15. Yxg7 Bh3 16. Yxh8+
this does not work here. 8...Axe4!. Black is
in a very comfortable position and he even
&c7 17. We5+ 1-0
has a second strong move: 8...W%/b4! (it is
The normal Dragon also contains many typi-
worth noticing that players with higher Elo
cal motifs, which we cannot deal with exten-
ratings prefer this move) 9. Axc6 (9. Axe4
sively here, for example:
Wxd2+ 10. &xd2 @xd4 Black is a pawn up -
the play White has along the two semi-open
central files should not be sufficient compen- Game 33 [B78]
sation) 9...Y¥xc3! 10. YWxc3 &xc3+ 11. bxc3 Da Silva - Cordeiro (2424)
bxc6 (Black is a pawn up; here the bishop correspondence 1998
pair is not sufficient compensation) 12. £h6 »1.e4 5 2. Df3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Axd4 Af6
Bg8 13. Hb1 d5 14. 2d3 Axc3 15. Hb3 Aa4 5. Dc3 g6 6. Be3 &g7 7. £3 Acé6 8. YWd2 0-0
33
Chapter 5 Sicilian Defence mat 2s SA ARID PLE ELLE POLE DIPPED
LSD.
9. 8c4 £d7 10. 0-0-0 Hc8 11. &2b3 Axd4 This motif would still be present if White had
12. 28xd4 b5 played a little differently, for example 13. g4
(instead of 13. h4).
18. We3 Exd4 19. Exd4 Ag3 20. Ha4 @xh1
21. We1 Wb6 22. Yxh1 Hc8 23. &b1 Hed
24. Yg1 &xb2 0-1
Game 34 [B43]
Thanks to a few games by Topalov, this plan
Velimirovié (2535) - Pavlovié (2505)
has become established theory. But there
Zonal Tournament, Panormo 1998
are a few snares for the unwary player of the
white pieces. 1.e4 c5 2. Af3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Axd4 Wb6
13. h4 5. Ab3 Wc7 6. Ac3 a6 7. 2d3 b5
13. Ad5 Axd5 14. &xg7 &xg7 15. exd5 a5 A frequently reached position, in which White
16. a3 b4 17. axb4 axb4 18. Y&xb4 is the usually continues 8. 0-0 (and then does not
critical line at the moment. play &e3).
14. h5 a4 15. &xf6 exf6 16. Wxd6 (16. &d5 10S hos Osea.
a3 17. b3 f500) 16...axb3 17. Wxd7 Wad 11. e5!?
(17...bxa2 18. Axa2 Wad 19. &b10) A trap with no risk attached. | think that
18. hxg6 hxg6 19. Wd5 f5 20. e50. the whole white set-up (after 7...05) is
14...bxa4 15. Axa4 &xa4 16. &xa4 quite good, and Black does not have many
chances to deviate from it either. 11. a3 would
be a solid move.
11...dxe5 12. fxe5
35
& Chapter 5 Sicilian Defence
9. Hct &b7 10. &g2 Abd7 11. Ad5 Wb8 (11... £f8 25. Hc8 Hb8 26. H8c7 He7 27. Hxe7
exd5 12. cxd5 Wb8 13. Ac6 Wc8 14. 0O-Of) f&xe7 28. Hc7 He8 29. Yd7 “d8 30. Wc6
12. 0-0 g6 13. Axf6+ Axf6 14. Wa4+es, £18 31. Ba7 Wc8 32. Wd5 Web 33. Wxe6
Borik— Gheorghiu, Baden-Baden 1981. Hxe6 34. £3 d5 35. Ha8 Hce6 36. exd5 He7
37. 2c3 1-0
9...2.b7
OW xc42) 10.. (acl we2bre e104
11. a3 Wad [11...%xb2 12. Aa4 Yxa3 When playing ...07-b5 to pressurise e4 with
13. &xc8++-] 12. e5+-) 11. Add exd5 _,.&b7 and b4, Black always has to watch
12. Bxc4 dxc4 13. AfS+-. out for a2-a4:
36
5.1 Typical motifs in the Sicilian e Game 39 Erben—Weiner a
Game 88 [B95] 7. Yxc3; both give him slightly more than
Denis —- Munoz compensation for the pawn, and thus his
Bogota 1958 situation compared with the position after
move 4 is clearly improved.
1. e4 c5 2. Af3 d6 3. Ac3 a6 4. d4 cxd4
5. Axd4 Af6 6. 295 e6 7. Wd2 h6 7. Yxg7 Wt6
xA2Wee mR
AA
8. £h6!!
8. &h4?
The point. 8. Yxf6? Axf6 should not cause
40 times in Mega 2005. Black any difficulties and was certainly what
a8. &e3. he was expecting.
8...Axe4! 9. Axe4 Wxh4 10. 8d3 Ac6 8...2e7 9. Yxf6 &xf6
11. De2? d5 12. D4g3 &c5 13. c3 Ded 9...Axf6 10. Abdt.
14. 0-0 &d7 15. Hadi Hd8 16. h3 Axd3 10. &f4+
17. Wxd3 0-0 18. @h2 2b5 19. Wd2 e5 The difference compared with the above
20. Af5 Wg5 0-1 variation is not so great, but here Black can
hardly extricate himself from his problems.
A surprising double attack 10...Age7 11. 0-0-0 Ag6 12. 2d6 a6
13. Da4 2d8 14. Be2 b6 15. h4 f6 16. h5
Game 39 [B21] 4\ge5 17. Axe5 Axe5 18. h6 2b7 19. 2h5+
Erben - Weiner (2255) 4\g6 20. Khe1 Hc8+ 21. &b1 2c6 22. Ac3
2nd Bundesliga 1987/88 &c7 23. &xc7 Hxc7 24. Ad5 &xd5 25. exd5
1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Axc3 e6 e5 26. f4 &d8 27. 8xg6 hxg6 28. fxe5 fxe5
29. Hxe5 Hxh6 30. Hde1 Hc5 31. Hg5 Bhs
5. Df3 &b4?!
32. Hxg6 Hhxd5 33. Hxb6 Hd2 34. Hct
92 times in Mega 2005. A normal-looking
Hg5 35. Hxa6 Hb5 36. b3 Hxg2 37. Hc2
move, which however overlooks an unusual
Hg3 38. Hd2 Hb7 39. &b2 He3 40. Hhé
motif.
Hg3 41. Bh7 Hf3 42. Rg7 Bh3 43. Bg6 Be3
6. Wd4! 44. Bgd6 &e7 45. H6d4 Hg3 46. He2+ &d8
Black must give up either his extra pawn or 47. Bed2 He3 48. H4d3 He6 49. a3 Beb6
his bishop pair (ignoring the fact that 6...2f8 50. b4 Bh6 51. Hdd Bh1 52. b5 Hg1 53. a4
is theoretically possible). Hg4 54. &b3 Hg1 55. a5 Hg3+ 56. &b4
6...Ac6?! Hg4+ 57. H5d4 Hg1 58. b6 Hb1+ 59. @c5
After 6...&xc3+ White has a choice between ¢c8 60. Hc4 d5 61. &xd5+ &d8 62. &c6+
the aggressive 7. bxc3 and the more solid ¢c8 63. Hd8+ &xd8 64. &xb7 1-0
37
Chapter 5 Sicilian Defence
38
5.2 Traps in the Sicilian ¢ Game 43 Schuck -Gottschlich
SED EES OOE: OSES ES ARE SOO PSE ND AOE EPR SESRI TOONS
a
IAT IT LIT NOTE
6. &c4
With 7. &£e2 White could avoid the forced The evaluation of this variation is not an easy
variation which follows. A possible line is task, and even computers are not of much
7...e6 8. Ac3 Wad 9. 0-0 Af6 10. h3 &h5 help — their evaluation of the pawn formation
11. 863 Re7 12. Wb3 Wb4 13. g4 296 f2, £3 and h3 is much too negative. But from
14. De5 0-0 15. g5 Wxb3 16. axb3 Add White’s point of view these pawns are sim-
17. Axd5 exd5 18. Bfc1 £. ply onlookers, because he wants to become
active on the queenside. The knights on a1
7...2xf3 8. gxf3
and a8 are either both lost or both saved.
8. Axd5?! &xd1 9. Ac7+ is difficult to as-
13...g6
sess, as the fate of the knight at a8 is unclear.
In practice White scores badly, but things are
not so simple, e.g. 9...&d7 10. Axa8 £h5
11. d5 Ad4 12. Lf4 Ac2+ 13. &d2 Axal
14. &8b5+ &d8 15. Exal Af6 16. Ac7 a6
17. &8d3 e6=. More analysis is needed to
shed light on this variation.
8...W4xd4 9. Wxd4 Axd4
14. 2e3
Everybody plays this.
14. 2b5+!? was pointed out by Sveshnikov
in B22, Informator editions 1998. The king is
immediately forced to clarify its intentions,
i.e. head for c8: 14...&c8 (14...2d6? 15. b3!
&g7 16. 8a3+ &e6 17. Ac7+ &F5 18. &c1!
10. Ab5 Ac2+ 4Mf6 19. £d3+ Ved 20. &b2++—-) 15. Re3
&b8 16. &e2 a Bd1. Sveshnikov ends his
10...e5 is also playable, but after 11. Ac7+ analysis with the evaluation +, which is per-
&d7 12. Axa8 &b4+ 13. &d1 Ae7 14. f4
haps a little too optimistic. 16...8g7 17. Ab6
White stands better.
axb6 18. Hxal. As has already been said,
11. &d1 Axat the kingside hardly plays any role at all, but
on the opposite wing White’s superiority is
Burgess suggests 11...&c8 12. Axa7 Bcd
obvious.
13. £63 (13. Hb1 !?; 13. &b5+!?) 13...Axe3+
14. fxe3. We cannot quite share his evalua- 14...2h6 15. 2b5+ &d6
tion of “equal”. White has a slight lead in de- Now the king goes forward.
velopment and he will soon start to become
active, e.g. 14...Af6 15. b4 Hd5+ 16. &c2 16. &8xa7 Af6 17. Ab6 Hd8 18. Se2 Ac2
e5 17. &c4 Bd8 18. Had1! &d6 (18...&xb4? 19. Rd1+ &c7 20. Rxd8
19. Bxd8+ &xd8 20. Hb1) 19. &b3+t. 20. a3 e5 21. Rxd8 &xd8 22. Ac4 Af4=.
40
5.2 Traps in the Sicilian ¢ Game 45 Kvikstad —Kiselev GQ)
20...&xd8= 21. Ac4 &f4 22. h3 Also played by Csom, Osnos and Guliev.
22, a3 &bB!=. 8...WYxd4 9. &xd4+t.
11. Axc6?
11...Y%xc3! 0-1
4
le Chapter 5 Sicilian Defence aan
7A
This sets another venom
(8...Aa5 9. Yb5+ Wd7 10. Axf3 Axc4
11. Yxc4 cxd4 12. Axd4 e5 13. Af3 e4
14. Agd Hc8 15. We2 Wc6 16. f3 &cd
17. Axe4 Axe4 18. Yxe4+ Wxed+ 19. fxe4
White sets a trap which brings him an ad-
0-0 20. &d1 Hfe8 21. He1 &d6 22. g3 Ec4=,
vantage if Black does not know how to refute
Glavina Rossi- Campos Moreno, Pamplona
it.
2002) 9. &xd5 &xd5 10. Yxb7 Axd4 11. Wab
iedxCoeyCo=i(Ganeo lc) &c2+ 12. ®e2 4xal 13. Bd1 and White’s
7...2xf3! 8. Ya4? lead in development has reached dangerous
proportions.
This is the trap; however, the alternatives are
D) 8. &xd5? &xd1 9. &xc6+ bxc6 10. &xd1
not very promising. cxd4 11. cxd4 4d8F. Wahls: “... and White
A) 8. gxf3? Wf5! Wahls: “De Firmian’s new will face a joyless task in the endgame.”
move is the final nail in the coffin of 6. Abd2 8...W%g5?
and, moreover, one of national importance! Black falls into the trap.
Because it did not become deeply embed- A) 8...£d1!!
ded in the collective chess consciousness at
the Olympiad in Yerevan, it earned the Ger-
man team two whole points. The alternatives
8...W/d7 and 8...W%d6 may be all right, but
once you have driven a Ferrari you tend to
turn your nose up at a Porsche ...” 9. Wb3
(9. Ab3 0-0-0 10. Axc5 e5t) Wahis: “This
double attack seems to justify White’s play,
but after 9...0-O-—-0! he is faced with the dif-
ficult decision of whether to decline the sac-
rifice or part with his king’s bishop.” is the refutation:
42
5.2 Traps in the Sicilian * Game 47 Heimrath—Petersammer DY
ATROPINE aC ER
9. Wxd1 (9. &xd1 Wxg2 10. Hel e6 An open Sicilian through the
11. 2e2 Wd5 12. Ac4 0-0-0-+) 9...Yxg2
back door
10. W3 (10. Bl cxd4 11. cxd4 Axd4
12. Wa4+ Dc6 13. Yb3 “and the safest
continuations are now 13...e6 14. Wb7 Bb8 Game 47 [B23]
or simply 13...0-0-0. (Wahls)) 10...Wxf3 Heimrath (2254) -
11. Axf8 cxd4 12. Axd4 Axd4 13. cxd4 Petersammer (1804)
Hc8 14. &8b5+ &d8 15. &d2 e6 16. 8a5+ b6 Nuremberg 2001
17, Bd2 Ad5 18. Bgl g6 19. Hg3 2d6 20. Hf3
®e7 21. h3 Bb4 22. Hb3 &xd2+ 23. &xd2
1. e4 c5 2. Ac3 Ac6 3. d3
Ehd8 24. £a6 Hc7 25. a4 Af4 26. &e3 Ag2+ The prelude to a subtle trap!
27. e4 Hc2 28. Hf Hd2 29. Bb4 An4 0-1,
3...g6
Degraeve —-Palac, Montpellier 1997.
To avoid the trap, 3...d6 should be played.
B) 8...Wd7? 9. Axf3 cxd4 10. 0-0 (10. cxd4 4. 863 d6 5. d4
e6 11. O-O Se7?! 12. 2b5 &d6 13. Aed5+,
N. Kosintseva—Kosteniuk, Rimavska Sob-
ota 1996) 10...e6 11. 2b5 &d6 12. Axd4+,
Grimal- Gonzalez, Cuba 2000.
11. d5
11...8c8?
Game 49 [B23]
Lam King Wai - Lokanata
Macao 1996
44
5.2 Traps in the Sicilian © Game 51 Palacios —Montecatine Rios 4)
10. De2?
This position has occurred very frequently, White has various ways of falling into the
almost 200 times in Mega 2005. White’s plus trap: 10. &2d2 Aec6 11. Ad1? c4 12. &a4
score is phenomenal. Does
10...0a5
10...dxe4 11. dxe4 c4 12. 8d2 Dec6
10..Ae5 11. &g5 He8 12. Axed dxed
13. 8a4 b5! 0-1
13. Ad5+-.
11. 295 He8 12. Ad5 Dac6 13. Af6+ &xf6
14. &2xf6 h5 15. YWg5 1-0
March of the f-pawn
Taming the Grand Prix Attack
Game 51 B25)
Game 50 [B23] Palacios - Montecatine Rios (2300)
Benasque 1990
Zvara (2355) - Mochalov (2465)
Pardubice 1996
IV
Deb dawdled along the street, painfully carrying a suit-case. La
llorraine had insisted on keeping her to supper, but the Countess
was occupying the only vacant room in the house ... anyway, you
could always rely on a bed at Zoe’s whenever you turned up—time
enough to-morrow to think things over....
Somebody was already on the doorstep pealing at the bell: “The
door usually stands open, but it must have got jammed.... Do you
want tailor Moses, tailor Jacob, or tailor Isaac?”
“I don’t want a tailor at all, thanks. Not to-night, anyhow. I want
Zoe Dene-Cresswell? I wonder if she’s in.”
Again Gillian tugged at the bell. “You look as if you ought to be
Deb Marcus.”
“I am.”
“I’m Gillian Sherwood. Put down your suit-case and shake hands.
I’ll carry it up for you, if ever they admit us.”
Gillian at last! Deb was first conscious of triumph—followed by a
quick pang of guilt. She had not sought out this meeting; it was
purely accidental—but what would Antonia say?
Antonia opened the door to them.
PART III
CHAPTER I
I
II
III
IV
“I’ve waited long enough,” said Deb.
It suddenly frightened her that again she was hesitating too long;
that decision was wearing thin and threadbare with the days....
Perhaps Blair had not realized ... it must be puzzling for a man
nowadays to differentiate between the merely good; the frankly bad;
the good trying to be bad; and the bad resolved to be good.
“I suppose he needs what Aunt Trudchen used to call ‘a little
encouragement,’” Deb reflected.
Then by what sign could she convey to him that her intentions
were dishonourable? They had, of course, dispassionately talked of
sex, which is the weather-subject of to-day’s men and girls.... Deb
was afraid, standing on tiptoe to the clubman and the cosmopolitan,
that she might have given an excessive impression of sophistication;
and that he was inwardly astonished, now, that she delayed to pass
him some customary code-word or countersign necessary to his
advancement. She had not the faintest idea what was expected of
her, so she essayed a semi-confidence in La llorraine.
That royal veteran of a more clear-headed period, when
courtesans were expected to know their alphabet, could not fail to
be good-humouredly contemptuous at the spectacle of these
children playing their variations of an old game with such quaint and
ponderous seriousness; and getting so very little out of it in the way
of genuine passion, genuine fun, and ermine cloaks.
Out of the question, certainly, that Manon should join these
games. But Deb was six years older and had “made a muff from her
chances,” as Manon would never be permitted to do. Moreover, Deb
was not La llorraine’s own daughter.... So La llorraine shrugged her
shoulders, and gave her the necessary tip.
“It’s now....”
Queer—never before had she realized the present so vividly; “it
has been a minute ago,” “it will be the day after to-morrow” ... but
“It’s now,” as Blair, with a smile and a subtle look, threw away his
half-smoked cigar, took the half-finished cup of coffee from her
hands.
“Now—now——”
She was one pulse that beat for initiation. Her cheap artist fancy
had always decorated the temple of initiation so heavily with incense
and tiger-skins and divans and rose-leaves, all the crude stock and
properties of rapture, that the reality of this ordinary room, big
leather arm-chairs and a few prints on the plain dark walls, and a
bookcase, and several ash-trays scattered about, this so essentially a
man-room, left her disappointed. Had she relied too much upon the
trappings? ... but—Blair had taken her in his arms, now....
And still no response from that—that most damnably sluggish
temperament.
Very precisely and dispassionately she noticed for the first time
that one of his lids lay over the eye with a heavier slouch than the
other. She was pleased with the behaviour of his face under stress of
emotion ... it did not grow hot nor red nor damp; the veins did not
bulge; his breath was under control. She had been right in her
selection of Blair Stevenson—but—but——
The ungrateful temperament, which she had provided with the
best advantages, was failing her utterly....
She kissed his exacting lips with as much of faked ecstasy as she
could coax to her aid, and then wondered, supposing she laughed,—
the word ecstasy always made her want to laugh—if that indecorum
could be passed off as further ecstasy?
And all this time she did Stevenson the injustice of believing him
imperceptive.
“Deb ... my dear....”
He had from the beginning philosophically summed her up as
incapable of extremes. But it was not as though he were
dependent.... He did not love Deb; he was a little bit in love with
her; and she was elfish, delicate, captivating, freshly surprising at
each encounter, like in June the first strawberry whose
unremembered flavour one has taken for granted through the winter
months. Yes, she was charming. And he was wrong in his estimate
of her. After all, she had come to him——
One tiny gesture of his—and Deb’s histrionics lay shattered like a
wave into foam....
“No ... no ... no—not now.... Oh, please!”
A moment later, and Blair said, from the other end of the room:
“There was no need for that ‘please,’ dear. The first ‘no’ would have
been enough.”
She lay angrily sobbing, hair not even disordered, her drapings of
pale ninon shamefully untumbled. The desperate encounter had
yielded her one scrap of self-knowledge—nothing else: That she was
not in the least passionate by nature, and that only love could raise
her nature to passion; that she had been misled all her life by a
mere illusion deduced by herself and others from her face and her
way of moving, and her recklessness of speech and her Jewish
pliability.... To her mother who was a Gentile, was due this slight
chilliness, blown like a hoar-frost over what might otherwise have
been an exotic blossoming.
And the man by the window murmured: “‘To play at half a love
with half a lover,’ ... is that what you wanted, child, and couldn’t
express? I didn’t understand. Well——”
He crossed again to the couch and stood looking down upon her,
hands clasped behind his back, mouth bent to a whimsical smile
—“Well—It’s not too late, is it?”
For that explanation both solved the enigma of her visit, and
coincided with his former conception of her. The surprise had been
her acquiescence, not her rebuff.
She looked up at him pitifully, and shook her head.... His mouth
grew hard: if not mistress, nor demi-maid, then what did she expect
he would make of her? Surely she could not be hoping.... Blair
Stevenson’s wife, if ever materialized from wraithdom, would not be
the sort of girl who came to his rooms alone at 10.15 p.m. Nor
would his mistress—she not at all a wraith—plead to leave them
again after a futile half-hour of compromise. No, Deb (and he still
thought her charming) was qualified not for chastity nor for fierce
desire.... What did she want of him?
Her intuition leapt to what was passing in his mind; and in stinging
agony that he should behold in her a huntress for a likely husband,
she said quickly—“I did—I did want to play—only to play. But—you
frightened me....”
“Forget that. I’m getting old and dense. And all men try ... once,
you know. But it’s all right, Deb....”
It was all right—now; at the demi-price of her demi-virtue, she
had saved at least that tattered beggar-maid she still called her
pride. “I believe you thought I had come with a matrimonial lasso
coiled up in my hand,” she taunted him.
And Blair was deceived, for all his penetration. How was he to
know, indeed, that daringly as she had repudiated his suspicion, in a
little backwater of thought trembled still an eddy from old times and
old traditions: “It—would—have—been—rather nice ... to marry
him....” But you have just proved you are not in love with him. “Oh—
that kind of thing—wouldn’t matter. I believe it would grow of itself
... if he were looking after me.” Her set smile curved into real
merriment as it struck her how Samson would approve of these
sentiments. Perhaps she and Samson were kindred souls, after all!
But Samson would most certainly not have approved of her
present abandonment to a demi-lover. She lay with an apathetic
hand straying over his hair and eyebrows, wondering a little at the
hard cheek pressed close to hers, wondering a little ... how soon she
could say it was time to go, whether there were any letters waiting
for her at home, if that pale young lance-corporal who had fainted
as she put the coffee-cup into his hands, had recovered yet;
wondering a little, as Blair shifted their positions, and drew her head
down to where his shirt opened on to his heart—Did Blair really
enjoy this? ought she not to say she was uncomfortable and had a
crick in her neck? Whether she were now what is called a sinner?—
pêcheresse in French ... or was it pécheuse? one of them meant the
“fisherman’s wife”—she remembered that from school—yes,
pêcheuse, surely—they were taught to tell the difference by the
resemblance of the circumflex to the roof of the fisherman’s hut. The
other has an accent aigü—but Deb had never been quite able to
disentangle a vague notion that a fisherman’s wife was also a sinner.
Pêcheuse—pécheresse....
She wondered anew if that monstrosity on the wall opposite were
a Hogarth? if her watch would be mended by to-morrow, as the man
at the shop had faithfully promised?...
“Are you happy, you small white Deb?”
She sighed “Yes....”
“You must come to me often now we understand each other....”
And again: “Yes ... often....”
CHAPTER II
I