STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

DESIGN PARAMETERS

DATA ADOPTED VALUES UNIT DESCRIPTION

fc' 20.700 MPa compressive strength of concrete

φ 0.900 - strength reduction factor
fy 235.000 MPa yield strength of reinforcement
Fy 275.000 MPa yield strength of structural steel
Live Load 1900.000 Pa residential load for floor, deck (NSCP Table 205-1)
Live Load 2900.000 Pa residential load for balconies (NSCP Table 205-1)
Roof Live Load 1000.000 Pa minimum roof live load (NSCP Table 205-3)
Ceiling Dead Load 720.000 Pa minimum design dead load (NSCP Table 204-2)
Roof Covering 380.000 Pa minimum design dead load (NSCP Table 204-2)
Connectors, and others 25.000 Pa assumed weight of insulation, bracing, and nail strips
Velocity 280.000 kph wind velocity of Zone 2 (NSCP Table 207-1)
Bay 2.000 m distance between adjacent roof truss/rafter
Span 9.000 m horizontal distance between supports of truss/rafter
Rise 2.000 m vertical distance from the ridge to the eaves of truss
Density of Steel 78500.000 N/cu m unit weight of steel
Density of Soil 18100.000 N/cu m relative density of soil
q 100000.000 Pa assumed soil bearing capacity

47.88
𝑃 = 0.004𝑉 Weight of Purlins:
1.609
Pwind = 5797.926 Pa w = 96.603348 Pa

𝑅
tan ∅ =
𝑆
Փ= 12.529

Using Duchemin's Formula: Weight of Connectors,Bracing and others:

2𝑠𝑖𝑛∅ w= 25.000 Pa
𝑃 =𝑃
1 + 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∅
Pnormal = 2402.438 Pa

DESIGN OF PURLINS
for Purlins try C-Purlins (100mm x 50mm x 2mm)
2
x= 0.600 Ax = 460.00 mm Iy = 18.00 cm⁴
T.A.= 1.200 D= 100.00 mm Ct = 1.39 cm
Bf = 50.00 mm Ix = 78.00 cm⁴
Tf = 2.00 mm Sx = 28000.00 cu. mm.
Tw = 2.00 mm Sy = 5000.00 cu. mm.

1
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

Dead Load Roof Live Load Load due to Wind Pressure

DL = 276.749 N/m RL = 683.331 N/m WL = 1368.05 N/m

Load Combination = 1.2 DL + 1.6WL + 0.50RL (NSCP 203-4)

Load Combination = 2862.644366 N/m
Neglecting Weight of Purlins
Mn = 128.819 N*m
use Fa equal to the half of Fy
Fa = 137.5 MPa

Req'd Sx = Mn/Fa = 936.8654287 cu. mm. OK (SAFE)!!!

Normal and Tangential Loads

a. Normal Loads Fv = 0.40 Fy
Wn = 2928.656423 N/m Fv = 110.000 MPa
b. Tangential Loads
DL = 61.500 N/m y= L/360
WL = 304.011119 N/m y= 5.556 mm.
c. Moment Normal to Purlins
Mn = 1464.328211 N*m
Vn = 2928.656423 N
d. Tangential Moment Acting on Top (treat as continuous beam)
Mdl = -7.687473099 N*m Mwl = -38.001 N*m
Rdl = 76.87473099 N Rwl = 380.014 N
Combined Actual Bending Stress
Fb = 62.97270333 MPa OK (SAFE)!!!

Check for Shear

Fv = 14.64328211 MPa OK (SAFE)!!!

Check for Deflection

y= 0.03911133 mm. OK (SAFE)!!!

Therefore, use 2" x 4" x 2 mm C-Purlins for Purlins spaced at 0.70 m on center

ANALYSIS OF TRUSS
Weight of Truss:
𝒘 = (𝟎. 𝟒 + (. 𝟎𝟒 ∗ 𝟑. 𝟐𝟖𝟏 ∗ 𝑳))*47.88

2
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

𝒘 = (𝟎 𝟒 + ( 𝟎𝟒 ∗ 𝟑 𝟐𝟖𝟏 ∗ 𝑳)
by C. E. Fowler for steel truss
w= 132.260 Pa
T.A. of roof surface per panel= 1.999 sq.m. length of top chord/rafter
T.A. of hor. surface per panel= 1.800 sq.m. 𝒍𝒕𝒄 = 0.5𝑆 + 𝑅 /panel
length tc = 0.999 m.
For Dead Panel Loads:
Panel load (t.c.)= 1268 kN/m length of bottom chord/ceiling girt
Panel load (b.c.)= 1490 kN/m 𝒍𝒃𝒄 = 0.5𝑆pan/panel
length bc = 0.900 m.
For Wind Panel Loads:
Panel load = 4805 kN/m

For Wind Panel Loads:

Panel load = 2000 kN/m

FULL TRUSS DESIGN ANALYSIS

3
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

4
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

5
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

6
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

Recommendation: Use 2-pcs 2"x2"x3mm Angle Bar Long Leg Back-to-Back for Top, Bottom
and Sides Members and 1-pc 2"x2"x3mm Angle Bar for Web Members

7
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

HALF TRUSS DESIGN ANALYSIS

8
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

9
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

10
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

Recommendation: Use 2-pcs 2"x2"x3mm Angle Bar Long Leg Back-to-Back for Top, Bottom
and Sides Members and 1-pc 2"x2"x3mm Angle Bar for Web Members

11
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOF BEAM

L.B. = 6.000 m.
Dead Loads
Truss = 132.260 Pa
Ceiling = 720 Pa
Roof Cover = 380 Pa
Nailing Strips = 25 Pa
Roof Beam = 235 Pa
D.L. = 46572 N Wu x L
Mu =
T.A. = 31.200 sq. m. 8
L.L. = 31200 N Mu = 79355.013 N.m
Wu = 1.2 D.L. + 1.6 L.L.
Wu = 105806.6836 N

BEAM DIMENSIONS
b 200.00 mm width of beam
h 400.00 mm height of beam
d 360.00 mm effective depth of tension bars
d' 40.00 mm effective depth of compression bars
Computation of β: (factor defined in section 410.3.7.3)
β = 0.85 (for fc'≤30)
β= 0.85-0.05/7(fc'-30) ≥0.65 (for fc'>30)
Design β = 0.85
Computation of ρbal: (reinforcement ratio producing balanced strain conditions)
ρbal = 0.85fc'β600/fy(600+fy) = 0.04573041
Computation of ρmax: (maximum steel ratio)
ρmax = 0.75ρbal = 0.03429781
Computation of ω: (reinforcement index)
assume ρ = 90% of ρmax = 0.03086803
ω = ρfy/fc' = 0.35043413
Computation of Mu1:
Mn1 = fc'bd2ω(1-0.59ω) = 149,148,353 N.mm
Mu1 = φMn1 = 134,233,518 N.mm

Determine if compression reinforcement is necessary: (if Mu1 < Mu)

COMPRESSION REINFORCEMENT IS NOT NEEDED !!!!!
CONSIDER AS SINGLE REINFORCED BEAM
Solve for ω:

12
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

ω = (1-√(1-2.36(Mu/φfc'bd2))1/2)/1.18 = 0.1843944
Solve for ρ:
ρ = ωfc'/fy = 0.0162424
Solve for As:
2
As = ρbd = 1169.4530 mm
Bars Selection:
try using 16
2 2
A12 = π*d /4 = 201.06193 mm
N= As/A = 4.81638192
say 5 pcs
Actual RSB 5-16mmφ deformed steel bars
Check ductility:
ρmin = 1.4/fy = 0.0059574 (minimun steel ratio)
As = 5A12 = 1005.3096 (actual steel area)
ρ = As/bd = 0.0139626 (actual ratio of tension reinforcement)
ρmin < ρ OK!
ρ < ρmax OK!

Therefore, use 200mm x 350 mm for roof beams with 4 - 16mm Top Bars and 2-16mm Bottom Bars

DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN

H.C. = 3.000 m.
Dead Loads
Truss = 132.260 Pa
Ceiling = 720 Pa
Roof Cover = 380 Pa
Nailing Strips, etc. = 100 Pa
Roof Beam = 196 Pa
Column = 706 Pa
D.L. = 139450 N
T.A. = 62.400 sq. m.
L.L. = 118560 N
Pu = 1.2 D.L. + 1.6 L.L.
Pu = 357036.3175 N
try ρ g = 0.017
A g = 25183.12 sq. mm
A req. = 90000 sq. mm

13
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

As = ρ bd
As = 1530 sq. mm
Bars Selection:
use diameter 16 mm
2 2
A16 = π*d /4 = 201.06193 mm
N = As/A16 = 7.60959572
say 8 pcs
Actual RSB 8 -16mmφ deformed steel bars

Check ductility:
ρmin = 1.4/fy = 0.0059574 (minimun steel ratio)
As = 8A16 = 1608.4954 (actual steel area)
ρ = As/bd = 0.0178722 (actual ratio of tension reinforcement)
ρmin < ρ OK!
0.01 < 0.08 > ρactual OK!
spacing of ties
S= 200 mm
Pu = Փ (0.80) (0.85 fc' (Ag - As) + (fy As))
Pu = 475728.1 N OK!

Therefore, use 300mm x 300 mm for second floor columns with 6 - 16mm RSB

DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING

T.A. = 62.400 sq. m.
D.L. = 357036 N
L.L. = 118560 N
SBC = 100000.0 Pa
assume wt of footing and overburden = 10% column load
wt = 23779.82 N
S.L. = 499376 N
A req. = 2.996257 sq. m
B= 1.731 m. use 1200 mm
A= 1.440 sq. m
Pu = 618139.6 N
σ ultimate= 429263.6 Pa
σ allow = 129971481.7 Pa OK!
using d = 200 mm

14
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PROPOSED SINGLE-STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

Owner Mr. & Mrs. Laurentino E. Morta, Jr. Date August 11, 2024
Location Brgy. Ipil, Surigao City Civil Engineer Lino G. Apostadero Jr.

vc = 1.706 MPa
vc = 0.758 MPa use lesser value of vc
ρmin = 0.005091
Vu = 214631.8 kN
Vn = 0.60121 OK!
As = ρ bd
As = 1527.273 sq. mm
Bars Selection:
use diameter 16 mm
2 2
A16 = π*d /4 = 201.06193 mm
N= As/A16 = 7.59603137
say 8 pcs
Actual RSB 8-16mmφ bothways
Required Ld= 116.7323231 mm
minimum Ld= 169.2 mm use 300mm
Ld furnished = 930 OK!
Bearing Strength = 985320 N OK!

Therefore, use 1200mm x 1200mm x 200mm for footings with 8 - 16mm RSB bothways

Prepared by:

Name : ENGR.LINO G. APOSTADERO JR

License No. : 0159182
Registration Date : 02/12/2018
Valid Until : 08/07/2027

15