Final Excel Data
Final Excel Data
Answer a:
This data was already in consistence with a pivot table so there was no need to go through the
process of Get & Transform through Power- Query format. Also, the Transposing could not have
been done because the data was already in a transposed form. Only, the pivot- table could have been
drawn by using the variables of date, cash only, total short term investment, short term receivables
The data spans from the oldest date, September 30, 2013, to the newest date, June 30, 2019,
All variables in these cash- statements exhibited some level of fluctuation. "Total Short Term
Investments" and "Total Current Assets" demonstrated the most pronounced upward trends,
The data spans from the oldest date, September 30, 2013, to the newest date, June 30, 2019,
All variables in these cash- statements exhibited some level of fluctuation. "Total Short Term
Investments" and "Total Current Assets" demonstrated the most pronounced upward trends,
reflecting considerable financial growth. Conversely, "Cash Only" showed a relatively modest
increase with occasional declines, and "Short-Term Receivables" exhibited steady growth. These
changes indicate overall strengthening in short-term financial positions during the given timeframe.
Data
Date Sum of Cash Only Sum of Total Short Term Investments
9/30/2013 15242 41281
12/31/2013 18898 39819
3/31/2014 16639 42740
6/30/2014 19620 41584
9/30/2014 15605 46552
12/31/2014 18347 46048
3/31/2015 16976 48460
6/30/2015 18453 51327
9/30/2015 18068 54699
12/31/2015 16549 56517
3/31/2016 15111 60153
6/30/2016 13627 64833
9/30/2016 9406 73650
12/31/2016 12918 73415
3/31/2017 18132 74307
6/30/2017 15711 79002
9/30/2017 10581 89562
12/31/2017 10715 91156
3/31/2018 12658 90227
6/30/2018 14148 88106
9/30/2018 13443 92973
12/31/2018 16701 92439
3/31/2019 19148 94340
6/30/2019 16587 104469
Total Result 373283 1637659
go through the
nds:
nds:
Description b:
um of
otal Cu...
According to the table and the chart, the growth of Total Assets by quarter, as shown
in the data, reflects a steady upward trend over time. The minimum Total Assets we
recorded in Q3 2013 at 68,858, while the maximum Total Assets reached 147,437 in
Q2 2019.
Across the quarters, Q1 2014 recorded a relatively balanced Total Assets figure of
75,314, demonstrating a stable progression from earlier periods. This trend of growt
recorded in Q3 2013 at 68,858, while the maximum Total Assets reached 147,437 in
Q2 2019.
Across the quarters, Q1 2014 recorded a relatively balanced Total Assets figure of
75,314, demonstrating a stable progression from earlier periods. This trend of growt
is consistent across all quarters, with notable increases in later years, reflecting
100
80
60
40
20
4.75 4.58 4.62 4.55 4.47 4.80 5.60 4.84 4.77 4.66 5.14 5.43 6.88 6.29 7.13 6.01 5.76 5.14 4.87 4.15 4.14 3.91 3.95 3.98
0
13 13 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 19 19 u
/20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 /20 Res
3 0 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 0 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 0 al
t
9/ 12/ 3/ 6/ 9/ 12/ 3/ 6/ 9/ 12/ 3/ 6/ 9/ 12/ 3/ 6/ 9/ 12/ 3/ 6/ 9/ 12/ 3/ 6/ To
8 8 8 8 9 9 lt
2 01 201 201 201 201 esu
/ / / / / R
30 /30 /31 /31 /30 otal
9 1 2 3 6 T
Date Current Ratio
6/30/2019 3.98
3/31/2019 3.95
12/31/2018 3.91 Date Sum of Current Ratio
9/30/2018 4.14 9/30/2013 4.75
6/30/2018 4.15 12/31/2013 4.58
3/31/2018 4.87 3/31/2014 4.62
12/31/2017 5.14 6/30/2014 4.55
9/30/2017 5.76 9/30/2014 4.47
6/30/2017 6.01 12/31/2014 4.80
3/31/2017 7.13 9/30/2015 4.77
12/31/2016 6.29 3/31/2018 4.87
9/30/2016 6.88 6/30/2018 4.15
6/30/2016 5.43 9/30/2018 4.14
3/31/2016 5.14 12/31/2018 3.91
12/31/2015 4.66 3/31/2019 3.95
9/30/2015 4.77 6/30/2019 3.98
6/30/2015 4.84 Total Result 57.54
3/31/2015 5.6
12/31/2014 4.8
9/30/2014 4.47
6/30/2014 4.55 Description e:
3/31/2014 4.62
12/31/2013 4.58 The trend analysis shows that liquidity deteriorated significantly bet
periods. While the company maintained a robust liquidity position i
9/30/2013 4.75 current ratio of over 4), the downward trend in 2018–2019 highligh
financial risks that may need to be addressed (current ration touchi
dity deteriorated significantly between the two
ained a robust liquidity position in 2013–2014 (with
ward trend in 2018–2019 highlights potential
addressed (current ration touching 3 or below 4).