Untitled Document 1
Untitled Document 1
ENGLISH
Submitted by:
Lindsay Marie C. Estenzo
Submitted to:
Mary Jane L. Flores
“SHOULD SOCIAL MEDIA BE
RESTRICTED TO CHILDREN BELOW
18 YEARS OLD”
In a world where technology is rapidly improving, the information everyone can
access is vast. Moreover, social media has always been the face of technology; it is a broad
network where individuals create online communities for sharing information, ideas, content,
and their personal lives. Given the worldwide availability of social media, its accessibility
correlates to everyone. But is it appropriate for minors or children below 18 to have the same
access, considering the often mature content and diverse nature of many online communities?
There is no limit to the information adults can acquire. In contrast, children lack maturity and
are vulnerable to the risks of this complex digital world. Unrestricted access affects
children's education, mental health, and physical health; Therefore, social media should
be restricted for children below 18.
In contrast, social media has become a daily part of our lives; it is an advantageous
network helping in various ways: connecting and enabling communication with our friends,
broadening our perspectives, exploring our curiosity, having friends across the globe, gaining
more knowledge, and also helping businesses with marketing and customer service on a
wider scale. Furthermore, social media serves as a powerful tool for accessing information
quickly, raising awareness about important issues, and facilitating online advocacy. Due to
the great benefits of social media in our lives, we overlook its effects on children. Based on a
study by Philippineseducation.info, the cons of social media use for children are far more
numerous and impactful than the benefits, affecting children's education, psychological
(mental) health, and physical health.
Specifically, education is a powerful tool for children's growth and future. However,
in today's generation, children are influenced by technology and are focused on their gadgets.
These gadgets offer numerous benefits because of social media, enabling students to acquire
necessary information and fostering learning; yet, this convenience is often abused. In
addition, a blog post on Filipino youth analyzing the relationship between social media and
education shows addiction, procrastination, and the spread of misinformation. It also
mentions the risks of cyberbullying and the abusive use of social media for criminal
activities. Furthermore, reliance on technology and the use of social media undermines the
development of independence, self-reliance, and social skills. As stated, social media tends to
be misused by children, resulting in detrimental effects on their education.
In conclusion, the evidence extremely supports the must have for restrictions on
social media access for children under 18. While social media can foster connection and
provide various information, the negative effects of unrestricted access such as detrimental
effects on education, mental health, and physical well-being are too crucial to ignore.
Children and adolescents are particularly vulnerable to issues like addiction, cyber bullying,
and exposure to harmful content, which can lead to psychological and emotional harm.
Moreover, to protect the well-being of our youth, it is necessary to enforce age-appropriate
guidelines that restrict access to social media for minors. By doing so, we can create a safer
online environment that prioritizes their self development and mental health. A balanced way
to technology use is crucial, ensuring that children can still benefit from the advantages of
social media, while they are protected from its potential dangers. Thus, implementing
restrictions on social media access for minors is not just a necessity but an urgent priority in
today’s digital age.