CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Milk is one of nature's most complete and vital foods, consumed by humans for centuries as a
source of nourishment and sustenance. Produced by mammals to feed their young, milk is
rich in essential nutrients such as proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals, making it a dietary
cornerstone across all age groups. Globally, milk holds a unique position as both a staple food
and a base for numerous products, including butter, cheese, yogurt, and infant formula. In
many cultures, it represents purity, growth, and health, further solidifying its place in daily
life. India, the largest producer of milk, plays a significant role in meeting the world’s
growing demand for this essential commodity.

1.1 Importance of Milk

1.1.1 Nutritional Value

Milk is a highly nutritious food, packed with essential vitamins and minerals that support
overall health. Calcium and vitamin D in milk build bones and teeth, which prevents
diseases like osteoporosis. The proteins and amino acids found in milk are essential for
muscle building and overall growth,
especially during childhood. Milk also
provides an equally balanced mix of
carbohydrates, proteins, and fats,
which makes it a rich source of energy.
Regular consumption of milk can help
meet daily nutritional needs, making it
an important component of a balanced
diet.

Fig 1: Nutritional Value of Milk

1.1.2 Economic Contribution

The dairy sector is an important component of both rural economic frameworks and
international commerce. More than 88 million households in India depend on dairy farming.
Dairy supports over 1 billion people globally directly or indirectly.

1
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Fig 2: Milk Country wise export and India Scenario

The dairy sector contributes 5% of India's GDP, which translates to around $100 billion
annually, thus being one of the largest agri-business sectors. Dairy products are an annual
export commodity valued at over $55 billion, and New Zealand, Germany, and the U.S. are
among a high-growth group of market leaders.

1.1.3 Cultural Significance

Fig 3: Milk based Cultural Delicacies

In ancient texts, milk is referred to as "liquid gold," symbolizing purity and prosperity. In
countries like India, milk features in a lot of religious rituals, including offerings during
festivals like Diwali and Pongal.

1.1.4 Addressing Malnutrition

Dairy is crucial in combating malnutrition in developing nations, where 20% of children
under five suffer from undernutrition. A fortified glass of milk can deliver 20–30% of daily
micronutrient requirements, helping bridge nutritional gaps.

2
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Table 1: Per capita consumption of livestock primary products by region and subregion, 1987 and 2007

1.1.5 Industrial Applications

The global dairy processing industry is valued at over $600 billion, producing staples like
cheese, yogurt, and butter that meet diverse culinary and nutritional needs. Technologies such
as ultra-high-temperature (UHT) processing extend milk shelf life to 6–9 months, enabling
access in remote regions. The use of milk in value-added products, like protein powders,
contributes to a market estimated at $20 billion annually.

3
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

1.2 Types of Milk

Animal-based and plant-based milk are broadly categorized to cater to the diversity in
nutritional needs and preferences.

Among animal-based milk, cow milk constitutes the largest amount globally because of its
content of calcium, vitamin D, and proteins. Buffalo milk is more common in South Asia and
has a higher percentage of fat; hence, it is highly used in thick yogurts and butter or cheese.
Goat milk is often chosen due to better digestibility, and raised quantities of both potassium
and calcium. Yet other types of animal milk are camel milk, rich in vitamin C and low in fat
content, and sheep milk, which is creamy and used to make specialty cheeses.

Fig 4: Milk Types Vs. Nutrient Content

Plant-derived milk, a progressively favored substitute, serves individuals who are

lactose-intolerant or choose vegan alternatives. Almond milk is relatively low in calories and
very rich in vitamin E, while soy milk has a quite high concentration of protein, sometimes
comparable to cow milk. Oat milk contains plenty of fiber and is appreciated for its smooth
taste, while coconut milk is valued mostly for its flavor and nutrients.

4
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

1.3 Indian Dairy

India has the world's largest dairy herd with over 300 million bovines, producing over 187
million tonnes of milk. India is first among all countries in both production and consumption
of milk. Most of the milk is domestically consumed, though a small fraction is also exported.
Indian cuisine, in particular North Indian cuisine, features a number of dairy products like
paneer, while South Indian cuisine uses more yoghurts and milk. Milk and dairy products
play a part in Hindu religious practice and legend.

Dairy production in the Indian subcontinent has historical roots that go back 8,000 years to
the domestication of zebu cattle. Dairy products, especially milk, were consumed on the
subcontinent at least from the Vedic period.

According to a survey conducted on Indian consumers' average daily milk consumption, 37%
of respondents consumed on average 1.5 to 2 liters of milk every day.The market is
moderately consolidated, with the top five companies commanding 41.34% of the market
share. Leading players such as Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd, Mother
Dairy, and Rajasthan Co-operative Dairy Federation Ltd are pivotal in milk procurement.

1.3.1 Current Process

The dairy industry in India is dominated by small milk producers who supply milk to over
1.90 lakh dairy cooperative societies across the country. However, about 81% of India’s dairy
and milk processing market is part of the unorganized sector. This complexity, coupled with
the perishable nature of milk and its products, makes the dairy supply chain susceptible to
adulteration.

Fig 5: Structure of Indian Dairy Industry

5
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

1.3.2 Dairy Supply Chain in India

The dairy supply chain in India

broadly passes through three
checkpoints.

● BMCs(Bulk Milk Centres) :

The collected milk from various
villages is transported to BMCs,
which serve as central collection
points and reach these centers in
4-liter tanks from villages by
cooperation. At BMCs, the milk
quality is checked by unorganized
testing, either by taste or smell.
● Chilling Plants: After the
milk undergoes quality checks at
BMCs, it is transported to chilling
centers in specialized 400-liter
tankers. These tankers are designed to
maintain the milk's freshness and
quality during transportation to the
chilling center. State Plants: After
the meticulous quality checks and
chilling process at chilling centers,
the pre-cooled milk is transported to
state processing plants in specialized
1200-liter tanks. These larger tanks
facilitate the efficient movement of
significant quantities of milk to the
next processing stage. Where there is
full proof testing and quality checks
Fig 6: Dairy Supply Chain in the milk laboratory.

6
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

1.4 Research Problem

Milk is one of most easily adulterated food globally and the potential triggers are demand
and supply discrepancies, perishability, and shortage of detection tests.

Milk adulteration refers to the intentional addition of foreign substances to milk to increase
its volume or enhance its appearance, often at the expense of quality and safety. These
adulterants range from harmless substances like water to hazardous chemicals such as urea,
detergents, and formalin. The scope of adulteration encompasses both economic motivations
and attempts to meet the high demand for milk, particularly in urban areas.

Fig 7: Adulterated Milk Incidents by Origin

1.4.1 Milk Adulteration in India

A survey by the FSSAI in 2019 found that 93% of the milk samples tested were safe for
human consumption, but nearly 41% of the samples fell short of some safety parameters.
Contamination was found to be the more serious problem than adulteration. In May 2020, a
report by the Consumer Guidance Society of India (CGSI) found that as much as 79% of the
milk in Maharashtra is adulterated.

7
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Fig 8: Adulterated Milk Incident Mentions Trend (2010 - 2024)

1.4.2 Health Risks Associated with Adulterated Milk

The health risks of consuming adulterated milk are significant and vary depending on the
type and amount of adulterant used. Common health risks include:

Fig 9: Health Side Effects

● Gastrointestinal Disorders: Contaminants such as detergents and urea can cause

severe gastrointestinal issues, including vomiting and diarrhea.
● Kidney Damage: The presence of harmful chemicals like melamine, often added to
falsely increase protein content, can lead to kidney damage and renal failure.
● Chronic Diseases: Long-term consumption of adulterated milk containing
carcinogenic substances like formaldehyde increases the risk of developing cancers.

8
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

1.5 Objective
The objective of this research is to investigate the prevalence and types of adulteration in
milk, The study aims to assess the common adulterants, such as urea, detergent, and formalin,
and evaluate their impact on consumer safety. The research seeks to explore existing
detection methods for milk adulteration, identify gaps, and propose effective strategies for
improving the milk supply chain to prevent adulteration. Ultimately, the goal is to contribute
to the development of a more reliable detection device to measure and ensure the purity and
safety of milk for consumers.

1.6 Research Gap

Fig 12: VOSviewer for research gap

A comprehensive examination of 754 research papers, spanning from 2020 to 2024, was
conducted to investigate the domain of milk adulteration. The search, conducted on the LCS
Scopus database, utilized specific keywords related to milk adulteration. The color of the
notes in the analysis denotes the domain of the research, while the size of the notes reflects
the volume of research papers published in each domain. Through this systematic review, the
study aims to identify gaps and trends in existing literature, providing valuable insights for
future research endeavors and policy interventions aimed at mitigating milk adulteration and
ensuring dairy product safety and quality.

9
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Literature Review I: Key Milk Adulterants in India: A Review

Milk, often regarded as nature's ideal food, plays a crucial role in human nutrition across all
age groups due to its rich composition of proteins, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins, and
minerals. However, the practice of milk adulteration poses significant risks to public health
and the dairy industry, including economic losses and serious health hazards.

2.1.1 Common Adulterants in Milk and Their Health Implications

Adulteration in milk includes intentional additions of substances like water, urea, starch,
detergents, and harmful chemicals to increase volume or shelf life. These substances not only
degrade nutritional quality but also lead to health issues:

● Water: Dilution reduces

nutritional value and, if polluted,
can introduce pathogens or heavy
metals​.
● Urea and Detergents:
Commonly added to enhance
consistency and whiteness, but
they are toxic to the kidneys and
gastrointestinal system​.
● Starch and Glucose:
These increase the density of milk
but may cause digestive issues
when consumed in large
Fig 10: Common Adulterants in Milk and Their Health Implications ​
● Hydrogen Peroxide and Neutralizers: Added for preservation, they disturb normal
body functions, including immunity and gastrointestinal health.

2.1.2 Socioeconomic and Regulatory Context

Adulteration often arises due to the demand-supply gap, perishability of milk, and lack of
affordable detection technologies. In India, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (1954)
was introduced to safeguard public health. However, gaps in technology and enforcement
hinder effective mitigation​.

2.1.3 Insights

The adulteration of milk is a critical public health concern. The adoption of advanced
detection technologies and stricter regulatory measures is essential for ensuring milk quality.

10
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Future research should focus on cost-effective, portable detection devices to enable

widespread testing at the consumer level.

2.2 Literature Review II: Key Detection Methods for Adulteration

2.2.1 Introduction

Milk is a vital dietary component globally, renowned for its nutritional benefits. In India, it
plays a pivotal role in household consumption and the economy. However, the integrity of
milk is compromised by rampant adulteration practices. This review examines the prevalent
milk adulterants in India and evaluates various detection methods, highlighting their efficacy,
challenges, and scope for improvement.

2.2.2 Detection Techniques

The detection of milk adulterants requires a combination of chemical, physical, and

technological methods. These techniques are vital for ensuring milk safety and consumer
protection.

Milk detection
techniques must be
accurate & quick since
defrauders have become
advanced in using
chemicals and
technology and
traditional detection
techniques are not so
effective (Garcia et al.
2012). One of the
drawbacks of various
Fig 11: Detection Techniques

traditional detection methods is that they can only detect 1 or 2 adulterants at a time, whereas
mixing multiple adulterants are a fast-growing practice among synthetic milk producers.
Scientists develop new means of detecting these harmful compounds in milk, but fraudulent
milk sellers bring new strategies that are difficult to detect by existing methods (Finete et al.
2013).

11
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

2.2.3 Traditional Methods

1. Physical Observations: Examines color, texture, and smell changes.

2. Lactometer Tests: Measures milk density to identify dilution.
3. Boiling Test: Detects adulterants like synthetic substances that curdle upon heating.

2.2.4 Chemical Methods

1. Titration Techniques: Analyze the presence of neutralizers and preservatives.

2. Reagent-Based Tests: Utilize specific chemicals to react with adulterants, e.g., iodine
for starch detection.

2.2.5 Advanced Technological Approaches

1. Spectroscopy:
○ FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy): Identifies adulterants
based on molecular vibrations.
○ UV-Visible Spectroscopy: Detects chemical contaminants with unique
absorption patterns.
2. Chromatography:
○ HPLC (High-Performance Liquid Chromatography): Identifies and
quantifies adulterants.
○ GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry): Effective for volatile
and semi-volatile compounds.
3. Biosensors: Emerging as a rapid and cost-effective solution for real-time adulteration
detection.
4. Immunoassays: Leverage antigen-antibody reactions for precise adulterant
identification.

2.2.6 Challenges in Detection

1. Cost Constraints: Advanced techniques like chromatography are expensive and

inaccessible to small-scale producers.
2. Time Consumption: Traditional methods are slow and labor-intensive.
3. Accuracy: Many methods lack sensitivity for low-concentration adulterants.
4. Awareness: Limited knowledge among consumers and producers exacerbates the
problem.

Conclusion

Bridging the gap between affordability and accuracy is essential to combat adulteration
effectively. Future research should focus on integrating advanced technologies into
user-friendly formats, ensuring widespread adoption across the dairy industry.

12
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY

In this chapter, we outline the qualitative methods employed to identify common

adulterants in milk through chemical tests. The primary focus is to determine the presence
of specific adulterants in milk samples using reliable and sensitive procedures. The
adulterants under consideration were selected based on their prevalence and potential health
hazards. Each test employs distinct chemical principles and reagents to qualitatively detect
adulterants such as water, starch, urea, and sucrose.

3.1 Common Adulterants in Milk

The most common adulterants found in milk are tabulated below in a graph form in fig 12.
Milk contributes the highest % followed by Starch, Sugar, Salt, Soda and Detergent.

Fig 12: Graph showing most common adulterants

3.2 Method of Testing

The table provides an overview of various types of adulterants, outlining their chemical
methods of detection and the reference methods used for testing. It serves as a guide for
identifying adulterants in different substances through both chemical analysis and established
testing procedures.

13
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Tab 2: Adulterants and Testing Methods

3.3 Chemical Testing of Common Adulterants and Results

3.3.1 Rice Flour (Starch) - Iodine Test

Principle: The development of blue colour on addition of iodine solution in starch containing
milk is due to complex formation between iodine and amylose component of starch. The
other component, amylopectin, gives a red-purple colour which is much less intense than the
amylose. The acidic condition in the reagent mixture accentuates the blue colour, whereas
alkali reduces its intensity, the blue colour disappears above a pH of about 9.5. Heating the
solution containing starch-iodine complex also destroys the colour although reversibly.

Reagents :

1. Iodine solution: Dissolve 2.5 g potassium iodide (AR) and 1 g of pure iodine crystals
(AR) in 100 ml distilled water. Prepare iodine solution at least a day before as iodine
dissolves slowly.
2. Acetic acid (10%): Dissolve 10 ml glacial acetic acid (AR) in distilled water and
make up the volume to 100 ml.
3. Citric acid solution (5%): Dissolve 5 g citric acid monohydrate (AR) in distilled water
and make up the volume to 100 ml with distilled water.

Procedure:

14
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

1. Take 3 ml milk in test tube.

2. Bring the milk to boil on a direct flame or on a boiling water bath.
3. Cool the test tube to room temperature under tap water.
4. Add a drop of 10% acetic acid in the test tube.
5. Add 0.2 ml of iodine solution.
6. Mix the content and observe colour.

Interpretation : Blue/Dark blue colour formation indicates adulteration of milk with starch.
Whereas pure milk remains yellow due to colour of iodine. Limit of detection : 0.02 g/ 100
ml milk (When test is performed in milk) 0.01 g /100 ml milk (When test is performed in
whey)

Modification: The method reported by BIS (1961) is modified. Addition of 10% acetic acid
is recommended to reduce possible interference of neutralizers and improve differentiation
between adulterated and 32 pure sample. The test was also modified using whey as medium.

Fig 13: Results of Iodine Test on Milk and Whey

3.3.2 Urea - DMAB Test (p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde Test)

Principle: A yellow coloured complex is formed between urea and p-dimethyl amino
benzaldehyde (DMAB) reagent in low acidic alcoholic solution at room temperature. The
intensity of colour can be measured at 440 nm (Lafier, 1996). The colour developed is in
proportion to urea content in the sample.

15
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Reagents: p-Dimethylaminobenzaldehyde reagent (DMAB): The reagent is prepared by

dissolving 1.6 g of p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (AR) in methanol (AR) subsequently
adding 10 ml of concentrated HCl (AR) and making volume to 100 ml with methanol.
Procedure:

1. Take 5 ml milk in a test tube.

2. Add 5 ml DMAB reagent.
3. Mix the content and observe the colour.

Interpretation : Formation of distinct yellow colour indicates the presence of added urea in
milk sample. Pure milk shows light yellow colour due to natural urea. Limit of detection : 0.2
g/ 100 ml milk

Modification: The method reported by FSSAI (2016) is modified. Ethanol was replaced with
methanol. Instead of 1 ml each of milk sample and DMAB reagent, 5 ml of each is taken.)

Fig 14: Results of DMAB Test on Milk

16
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

3.3.3 Sucrose (Cane Sugar) - Seliwanoff’s Test

Principle: Sucrose is a disaccharide containing glucose and fructose (a ketose sugar).

Seliwanoff test is used for detection of ketoses. The dilute hydrochloric acid used in
Seliwanoff reagent along with heat leads to hydrolysis of sucrose and subsequent dehydration
of fructose. Further keto group more actively attacks resorcinol in comparison to aldehyde
group. The dehydration product 5-hydroxymethylfurfural condenses with resorcinol forming
cherry red colour. Ketoses react rapidly in comparison to aldoses because dehydration of
aldoses to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural proceeds in a much slower way than the reaction of
ketoses.

Reagents:

Resorcinol solution (0.05%): The reagent is prepared by dissolving 0.05 g of resorcinol (AR)
in 100 ml hydrochloric acid (The acid is prepared by taking 30 ml conc. HCl and diluting to
100 ml with distilled water.).

Procedure:

Add resorcinol solution to the milk or whey and stir. If sucrose is present, a red color will
develop, indicating the reaction between resorcinol and fructose. The test requires only a
single stirring action to observe the color change.

Interpretation : Development of red colour indicates adulteration of sucrose in milk. The

intensity of red colour increases with increase in the sucrose content in the milk. Pure milk
remains light in colour.

Limit of detection : 0.1g/ 100 ml milk (When test is performed in milk)

Modification: The method reported by Srivastava (2010) is modified. Different

concentration of hydrochloric acid (30 ml conc. hydrochloric acid diluted to 100 ml) was
used instead of reported concentration (1 part HCl: 2 parts distilled water).

17
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Fig 15: Results of Seliwanoff Test on Milk and Whey

3.3.4 Detergent - Methylene Blue Test

Principle: Methylene blue is cationic dye which forms complex with anionic detergents. It is
normally water soluble compound; however it shows affinity for anionic detergents, if they
are present. In this method, detergent is first extracted in chloroform and then methylene blue
solution is added. In presence of detergent blue colour is developed in chloroform layer of the
sample, whereas blue colour is observed in milk layer in control (pure milk). Chloroform is
heavier (density 1.49 g/ml) than milk (density ∼1.030 g/ml), hence settles at the bottom. This
implies that observation of blue colour in the bottom layer indicates presence of detergents.

Reagents:

1. Methanol (AR)
2. Methylene blue solution: 12.5 mg methylene blue (AR) is dissolved in 100 ml of
distilled water. Protect the solution from direct sunlight.
3. Chloroform (AR): Precaution: Inflammable and toxic on inhalation. Mouth pipetting
is not recommended

Procedure:

18
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

1. Take 2.5 ml of suspected milk sample in a test tube and add 7.5 ml methanol.
2. Filter the content through Whatman No. 1 filter paper.
3. Take 2 ml filtrate in a test tube.
4. Add 2 ml of methylene blue solution and shake well.
5. Subsequently add 4 ml chloroform and shake well again.
6. Allow the chloroform layer to separate.
7. Compare the colour extracted in the chloroform layer in suspected milk with that for
pure milk.

Interpretation : If the methylene blue colour extracted from a suspected sample into the
chloroform layer is darker than that extracted from pure milk sample, it indicates the presence
of detergent in milk.

Limit of detection : 0.02 g/ 100 ml milk

Modification: The method reported by Paradkar et al. (2000b) is modified. Methanol was
used in place of ethanol. Methylene blue concentration was reduced from 25 mg/100 ml to
12.5 mg/100 ml.

Fig 16: Results of Methylene Blue Test on Milk and Whey

3.3.5 Salt (Sodium Chloride) - Silver Nitrate Test

Principle: The chloride ion (Cl−) from sodium chloride reacts with silver ion (Ag+) of silver
nitrate forming white precipitates of silver chloride. Simultaneously water soluble sodium
nitrate is also formed. After the Ag+ from silver nitrate has complexed with all the available

19
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

chloride in the sample, the Ag+ reacts with chromate from silver chromate added in the
reaction mixture; forming an orange coloured precipitates of silver chromate.

Reagents:

1. Silver nitrate solution (0.1N): The reagent is prepared by dissolving 16.987 g silver
nitrate (AR) in 1000 ml distilled water.

2. Potassium chromate solution (5%): The reagent is prepared by dissolving 5 g

potassium chromate (AR) in 100 ml distilled water.

Procedure :

a. Take 5 ml milk in test tube.

b. Add 0.5 ml of 5% potassium chromate solution.
c. Add 2 ml 0.1 N silver nitrate and mix the contents.
d. Observe for colour change.

Interpretation : Yellow colour indicates adulteration of milk with common salt (sodium
chloride). Unadulterated milk gives chocolate or reddish brown colour.

Limit of detection : 0.04g /100 ml of milk Benefits of modified method over reported
method- Better differentiation between adulterated and pure sample.

Modification: The method reported by FSSAI (2016) is modified. 5% potassium chromate is

used instead of 10 %.

Fig 17: Results of Chromate Test on Milk

20
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

CHAPTER IV
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

4.1 Our Solution

Our solution aims at detecting adulterants in

milk, integrating chemical analysis with
modern technologies to offer fast, accurate, and
reliable results. By combining a physical
testing chamber with a photo detection system,
temperature control, and cloud-based
functionality, we ensure precision and
transparency throughout the entire testing
process.

Fig 18: CAD Prototype

4.1.1 Operating Principle

The system operates on the principle of detecting specific chemical reactions between milk
samples and reagents used for identifying adulterants such as starch, urea, sucrose, detergent,
and salt. These reactions cause observable changes in the milk’s color or other physical
properties, which are then measured using light-based sensors and photo detectors. The
core principles involve:

● Chemical Reactions: Each adulterant interacts with a specific reagent to cause a

color change or other detectable physical reaction.
● Light Detection: After the reagent is added and the reaction occurs, the system uses a
light source and a photo detector to monitor the color change. These sensors capture
changes in light intensity due to the chemical reaction, which are used to determine
whether adulteration has occurred.
● Temperature Control: Some adulterant tests require precise temperature control to
ensure accurate results. For example, certain reactions, like the iodine test for starch,
may need specific heating or cooling conditions to proceed properly. The Peltier
effect is used to regulate the temperature, ensuring optimal reaction conditions for
each test.

21
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

4.2 CAD Modelling and Dimensions

4.2.1 Base Model

Dimensions

Container Dimensions = (H = 8 cm)x(D = 4

cm)x(L = 10 cm)

No. of Tube Holes = 16 = 8 Each Side

Tube Diameter = 1 cm

Glass Dimensions = (H = 6 cm)x(L = 9.4

cm)x(D = 0.2 cm)

Note: H = Height, D = Depth, L = Length

4.2.2 Feature Additions for Enhanced Functionality

Light Source Integration:

A carefully calibrated light source ensures
uniform illumination of the samples,
improving the accuracy of photo detection
and enhancing the reliability of results.

ESP32 for Photo Detection:

Equipped with an ESP32 microcontroller, the
system can efficiently detect changes in light
patterns for precise photo analysis. This
addition brings real-time processing
capabilities for enhanced performance.

Fig 19 and 20: CAD Prototypes

Microcontroller for Cloud Functionality:

A robust microcontroller enables seamless integration with cloud services. This feature
allows for remote data storage, monitoring, and analysis, making the system accessible and
scalable.

22
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

4.3 Workflow Diagram

Fig 21: Operational Workflow

4.4 Key Benefits and Impact

● Improved Consumer Confidence: Consumers are increasingly concerned about the
quality and safety of the products they consume. Implementing a reliable milk
adulteration detection device can help ensure the authenticity and purity of the milk,
leading to increased consumer confidence in the product.
● Public Health Benefits: Milk adulteration can pose serious health risks, especially if
harmful substances are added. Detecting adulteration early in the supply chain can
prevent contaminated milk from reaching consumers, thereby reducing the potential
for health issues and ensuring public safety.
● Regulatory: Compliance Adherence to food safety regulations is crucial for dairy
producers. Implementing effective adulteration detection measures can help
companies comply with regulatory standards, avoiding legal issues and potential
penalties.
● Reduction in Economic Losses: Adulteration not only poses health risks but also
leads to economic losses for both consumers and producers. By preventing adulterated
milk from entering the market, economic losses associated with recalls, medical
expenses, and damage to brand value can be minimized

23
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

4.4 Future Product Scope:

4.4.1 Automated Reagent Dispensing

Each adulterant detection test (for example, starch, urea, sucrose, detergent, or salt) requires
different reagents in varying amounts. Our system automates the dispensing of these reagents
with high precision using a smart, microfluidic-based reagent control mechanism. Once the
user selects the test they want to run via the intuitive app or onboard display, the system
automatically dispenses the exact amount of each required reagent.

4.4.2 Magnetic Stirrer

A magnetic stirrer is ideal for consistent, controlled stirring. It ensures gentle, precise mixing
with low noise. The system requires a magnetic stir bar inside the sample container, activated
by an external rotating magnet. Models like IKA C-MAG or Fisherbrand™ offer adjustable
speeds. Integration can be achieved via a microcontroller for speed and timing control, with
optional heating elements for temperature regulation.

4.4.3 Real-Time Data Analytics and AI Integration

The system could integrate Artificial Intelligence (AI) to analyze data in real-time,
identifying adulterants not only based on chemical reactions but also patterns across multiple
test parameters. By leveraging machine learning algorithms, the system could learn to detect
emerging, unknown adulterants from complex milk samples, improving the system’s ability
to adapt to new adulteration techniques. The AI model could continuously update the
database of adulterant signatures, ensuring the system remains effective as new threats
emerge in the market.

4.4.4 Mobile App for Consumer-Level Testing

A mobile app could be developed to empower consumers to test milk quality at home. The
app would connect via Bluetooth to the detection system, allowing users to place a small
sample of milk into a portable test chamber and get instant results on their smartphones. The
app could also offer a digital report on adulteration levels, provide alerts about unsafe milk,
and educate consumers on the health risks of specific adulterants. This feature would
democratize milk testing and offer immediate quality assurance directly to consumers.

24
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

CHAPTER V
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

5.1 Summary

Milk is one of the most adulterated food items globally, with the growing demand,
perishability, and lack of adequate detection methods contributing to its vulnerability. Milk
adulteration refers to the addition of foreign substances like water, urea, detergent, and
formalin to increase its volume, improve appearance, or meet high market demand. These
adulterants can range from harmless to hazardous, posing serious health risks to consumers.
In India, a country with one of the largest dairy sectors, milk adulteration is particularly
prevalent, with nearly 79% of milk in Maharashtra found to be adulterated, according to
reports. Despite improvements in quality control, contamination remains a more widespread
issue, affecting the safety and nutritional value of milk. The primary adulterants found in
milk often lead to severe gastrointestinal issues, kidney damage, and long-term chronic
diseases due to toxic chemicals like melamine and formaldehyde.

The literature review on milk adulteration in India highlights the various common adulterants
found in milk, their health implications, and the challenges of detecting them. Adulterants
such as water, urea, starch, detergents, and harmful chemicals are commonly added to milk to
increase volume or improve its appearance. These substances can have serious health
impacts, including gastrointestinal issues, kidney damage, and interference with normal
bodily functions.

The socioeconomic context for milk adulteration is driven by factors like the demand-supply
gap, the perishability of milk, and the lack of affordable detection technologies. In response,
regulatory measures like the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (1954) have been
introduced, but gaps in technology and enforcement hinder their effectiveness.

The review also evaluates a range of detection methods, from traditional techniques like
physical observations and lactometer tests to more advanced chemical and technological
methods such as spectroscopy and chromatography. While traditional methods can only
detect a limited number of adulterants, newer approaches like biosensors and immunoassays
offer promising, rapid, and cost-effective solutions. However, challenges such as cost, time
consumption, accuracy, and awareness persist, hindering widespread implementation of these
advanced techniques.

The review suggests that bridging the gap between cost-effective detection and accuracy is
crucial for effectively addressing milk adulteration. Future research should focus on
developing portable, user-friendly detection technologies that can be employed across the
dairy industry and at the consumer level.

The proposed solution integrates chemical analysis with modern technologies to detect
adulterants in milk, providing a fast, accurate, and reliable detection process. The system

25
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

works by identifying specific chemical reactions between milk samples and reagents for
adulterants like starch, urea, sucrose, detergents, and salt, which cause observable physical
changes in the milk (e.g., color changes). These changes are monitored using light sensors
and photo detectors, with temperature control provided by the Peltier effect to ensure accurate
reactions.

The system is built using a CAD prototype with dimensions designed for efficient testing. It
incorporates a calibrated light source for consistent illumination, an ESP32 microcontroller
for precise photo detection, and cloud functionality for remote data storage and analysis. The
system’s workflow is streamlined for ease of operation and scalability.

Key benefits include improved consumer confidence, public health protection, regulatory
compliance, and reduced economic losses by preventing adulterated milk from entering the
market.

5.2 Current Limitations

While our solution offers significant improvements in detecting milk adulteration, there are
some current limitations to consider. Firstly, the system requires a controlled environment to
ensure accurate temperature regulation, which may limit its usability in certain field settings
or rural areas with inconsistent electricity supply. Additionally, while the chemical reactions
and light-based sensors offer reliable results, the system’s effectiveness may decrease when
dealing with complex mixtures of multiple adulterants, which could pose challenges in
real-world scenarios where adulteration is often not limited to a single substance. The
reliance on cloud functionality for data storage and analysis could also raise concerns
regarding data privacy and accessibility, particularly for users without stable internet
connections. Furthermore, while the automated reagent dispensing mechanism improves
efficiency, it may still require calibration and periodic maintenance to ensure precision.

5.3 Final Thoughts

The milk adulteration detection device represents more than a technological solution—it is a
critical step towards ensuring food safety, protecting public health, and supporting the
integrity of India's dairy industry. By democratizing milk quality testing, this innovation has
the potential to transform how we approach food safety at both local and national levels.

While challenges remain, the project demonstrates the power of interdisciplinary research in
addressing complex societal issues. It underscores the importance of continuous innovation in
food technology and the critical role of academic research in solving real-world problems.

26
 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

REFERENCES

1. Kamthania, M., Saxena, J., & Bhargava, A. (2014). Milk adulteration: Methods of
detection and implications. International Journal of Food Science and Technology,
49(6), 1418-1428. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12462
2. Garcia, E. S., Rodriguez-Saona, L. E., & Allendorf, M. E. (2012). Advances in milk
adulteration detection: A review of emerging technologies. Comprehensive Reviews
in Food Science and Food Safety, 11(4), 354-369.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00200.x
3. Finete, V. A. M., Oliveira, M. A., & Silva, J. (2013). Innovative approaches for milk
authenticity and adulteration detection. Food Analytical Methods, 6(3), 707-718.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-012-9474-x
4. Paradkar, P. N., Yadav, A. K., & Tiwari, A. K. (2020). Emerging technologies for milk
quality assessment: A comprehensive review. Food Chemistry, 310, 125921.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125921
5. Srivastava, R. K. (2010). Analytical techniques for milk adulteration detection:
Principles and applications. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47(5), 504-512.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0063-x
6. FSSAI. (2016). Manual of methods of analysis of foods: Milk and milk products.
Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, New Delhi.
7. World Health Organization. (2019). Milk safety and quality in developing countries.
WHO Technical Report Series, 1024, 45-62.
8. Nollet, L. M. L., & Toldrá, F. (2021). Innovative technologies for detecting food
adulteration. Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry, 94, 215-240.
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.coac.2021.03.001
9. Zhang, W., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2018). Advanced spectroscopic techniques for milk
adulteration detection. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular
Spectroscopy, 192, 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2017.11.014
10. International Dairy Federation. (2020). Milk authenticity and adulteration: Global
perspectives and mitigation strategies. IDF Special Issue Report, 2020(1), 1-25.

27